[
Atlan, H., 1999. La fin du «tout génétique»? Vers de nouveaux paradigmes en biologie. Paris: INRA.10.3917/quae.atlan.1999.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bateson, G., 1972. Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. New York: Ballantine Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bateson, G., 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: E.P. Dutton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Budisa, N. et al., 2020. Xenobiology: A Journey towards Parallel Lifeforms. ChemBioChem, 21, 2228–2231.10.1002/cbic.202000141
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boudry, M., Pigliucci, M., 2013. The Mismeasurement of the Machine: Synthetic Biology and the Trouble with Engineering Metaphors. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 660–668.10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cameron, D.E. et al., 2014. A Brief History of Synthetic Biology. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 12, 381–390.10.1038/nrmicro3239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Catts, O., Zurr, I., 2014. Countering the Engineering Mindset: The Conflict of Art and Synthetic Biology. In Ginsberg, A.D. et al. (Eds.), Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology’s Design on Nature. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press, pp. 27–37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cavalazzi, B., Westall, F., 2019. Biosignatures for Astrobiology. Cham: Springer International.10.1007/978-3-319-96175-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaput, J.C., Herdewijn, P., 2019. What is XNA? Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 58(34), 11570–11572.10.1002/anie.201905999
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiurazzi, G., 2021. Seconda natura. Da Lascaux al digitale. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.10.4000/books.res.8735
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Csibra, E. et al., 2020. Towards XNA Molecular Biology: Bacterial Cell Display as a Robust and Versatile Platform for the Engineering of Low Affinity Ligands and Enzymes. ChemBioChem, 21(19), 2844–2853.10.1002/cbic.202000203
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dick, S.J., 2020. Space, Time, and Aliens. Collected Works on Cosmos and Culture. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-41614-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dupont, J.-C., 2022. Qu’est-ce que la biologie spéculative? ISTE OpenScience, 6(Special issue), available at: < DOI: 10.21494/ISTE.OP.2022.0790 >.10.21494/ISTE.OP.2022.0790
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U., 2000. Kant and the Platypus. Essays of Language and Cognition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eco, U., 2014. From the Tree to the Labyrinth. Historical Studies on the Sign and Interpretation. Cambridge, Mass./London: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674728165
]Search in Google Scholar
[
El-Hani, C.N. et al., 2008. Genes, Information, and Semiosis. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Endy, D., 2005. Foundations for Engineering Biology. Nature, 438, 449–453.10.1038/nature04342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrari, M., 2021. Come costruire un alieno. Ipotesi di biologia extraterrestre. Torino: Codice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greimas, J.A., 1970. Du sens. In Id., Du Sens. Paris: Seuil, pp. 7–17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Heinlein, R., Wooster, H., 1961. Xenobiology. Science, 134(3473), 223–225.10.1126/science.134.3473.223
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herdewijn, P., Marliere, P., 2009. Toward Safe Genetically Modified Organisms Through the Chemical Diversification of Nucleic Acids. Chem Biodivers, 6(6), 791–808.10.1002/cbdv.200900083
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoesl, M.G. et al., 2015. Chemical Evolution of a Bacterial Proteome. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 54(34), 10030–10034.10.1002/anie.201502868
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holm, S., 2015. Is Synthetic Biology Mechanical Biology? History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, 37(4), 413–429.10.1007/s40656-015-0081-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kubyshkin, V., Budisa, N., 2017. Synthetic alienation of microbial organisms by using genetic code engineering: Why and how? Biotechnology Journal, 12(8), 1600097.10.1002/biot.201600097
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marcos, A., 2011. Bioinformation as a Triadic Relation. In Terzis, G., Arp, R. (Eds.), Information and Living Systems: Philosophical and Scientifical Perspectives. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 55–90.10.7551/mitpress/9780262201742.003.0004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marliere, P. et al., 2011. Chemical Evolution of a Bacterium’s Genome. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 50(31), 7109–7114.10.1002/anie.201100535
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montanari, F., 2015. Immanence/Imminence: Thinking about Immanence and Individuation. In Sarti, A. et al. (Eds.), Morphogenesis and Individuation. Cham: Springer International, pp. 203–222.10.1007/978-3-319-05101-7_10
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicholson, D., 2012. The Concept of Mechanism in Biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 153–163.10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.05.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicholson, D., 2013. Organisms ≠ Machines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44, 669–678.10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.014
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicholson, D., 2014. The Machine Conception of the Organism in Development and Evolution: A Critical Analysis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 48, 162–174.10.1016/j.shpsc.2014.08.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nieto-Dominguez, M., Nikel, P.I., 2020. Intersecting Xenobiology and Neometabolism to Bring Novel Chemistries to Life. ChemBioChem, 21(18), 2551–2571.10.1002/cbic.202000091
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C.S., 1931–35. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. (Eds.), Vols. 1–6. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press [abbr. as CP].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peirce, C.S., 1977. Semiotics and Significs: The Correspondence Between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. In Hardwick, C.S. (Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press [abbr. as SS].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Prodi, G., 2021 [1977]. The Material Bases of Meaning. Tartu: Tartu University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Queiroz, J. et al., 2011. The Biosemiotic Approach in Biology: Theoretical Bases and Applied Models. In Terzis, G., Arp, R. (Eds.), Information and Living Systems: Philosophical and Scientifical Perspectives. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 91–130.10.7551/mitpress/9780262201742.003.0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sagan, C., 1973. Cosmic Connection: An Extraterrestrial Perspective. New York: Dell Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmidt, M. et al., 2018. Xenobiology: State-of-the-Art, Ethics, and Philosophy of New-to-Nature Organisms. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol, 162, 301–315.10.1007/10_2016_14
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulze-Makuch, D., Irwin, L.N., 2018. Life in the Universe: Expectations and Constraints. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-97658-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shank, G., 2021. The Path to Xenopaedagogy. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 17(4), 613–631.10.1515/css-2021-2037
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simondon, G., 2017 [1958]. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Washington/Minneapolis: Univocal.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Simondon, G., 2020 [2005]. Individuation in Light of the Notions of Form and Information. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Waldenfels, B., 2011 [2006]. Phenomenology of the Alien: Basic Concepts. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.10.2307/j.ctv47wfh3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wicaksono, A., Cristy, G.P., 2021. Xenobiology: An Expanded Semantical Review. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 13(2), 10929.10.15835/nsb13210929
]Search in Google Scholar
