[Armstrong, David Malet. 1973. Belief, Truth and Knowledge. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511570827]Search in Google Scholar
[Ashfield, Michael D. 2013. Against the Minimalistic Reading of Epistemic Contextualism: A Reply to Wolfgang Freitag. Acta Analytica 28 (1): 111–125.10.1007/s12136-012-0153-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bark, Antonia. 2004. Epistemic Contextualism. Erkenntnis 61 (2–3): 353–373.10.1007/s10670-004-9273-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumann, Peter. 2008. Contextualism and the Factivity Problem. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76: 580–602.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2008.00158.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumann, Peter. 2010. Factivity and Contextualism. Analysis 70 (1): 82–89.10.1093/analys/anp125]Search in Google Scholar
[Baumann, Peter. 2016. Epistemic Contextualism. A Defence. Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198754312.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Blome-Tillmann, Michael. 2009. Knowledge and Presupposition. Mind 118 (470): 241–91.10.1093/mind/fzp032]Search in Google Scholar
[Brady, Michael and Pritchard, Duncan. 2005. Epistemological Contextualism: Problems and Prospects. The Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219): 161–171.10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00393.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Brendel, Elke. 2005. Why Contextualists Cannot Know They Are Right: Self-Refuting Implications of Contextualism. Acta Analytica 20 (2): 38–55.10.1007/s12136-005-1021-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Brendel, Elke. 2009. Contextualism, Relativism and Factivity: Analysing ‘Knowledge’ After the New Linguistic Turn in Epistemology. Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society, 11: 404–416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brendel, Elke. 2013. Contextualism, Relativism, and the Semantics of Knowledge Ascriptions. Philosophical Studies 168 (1): 101–117.10.1007/s11098-013-0204-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Brueckner, Anthony and Buford, Christopher T. 2009. Contextualism, SSI and the Factivity Problem. Analysis 69 (3): 431–438.10.1093/analys/anp064]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckwalter, Wesley. 2010. Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3): 395–406.10.1007/s13164-010-0030-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckwalter, Wesley. 2014. The Mystery of Stakes and Error in Ascriber Intuitions. In James Beebe (ed.), Advances in Experimental Epistemology: 145–174. London, Bloomsbury Academic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckwalter, Wesley. 2017. Epistemic Contextualism and Linguistic Behavior. In Jonathan J. Ichikawa (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Contextualism: 45–56. New York, Routledge.10.4324/9781315745275-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Buckwalter, Wesley and Schaffer, Jonathan. 2015. Knowledge, Stakes, and Mistakes. Noûs 49 (2): 201–234.10.1111/nous.12017]Search in Google Scholar
[Buford, Christopher. 2009. Contextualism, Closure, and the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Journal of Philosophical Research 34: 111–121.10.5840/jpr_2009_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 1986. Knowledge and Context. The Journal of Philosophy 83 (10):574–58310.2307/2026434]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 1987. Knowledge, Context, and Social Standards. Synthese 73 (1):3–26.10.1007/BF00485440]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 1998. Contextualist Solutions to Epistemological Problems: Scepticism, Gettier, and the Lottery. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2): 289–306.10.1080/00048409812348411]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 1999. Contextualism, Skepticism, and the Structure of Reasons. Philosophical Perspectives 13 (s13):57–89.10.1111/0029-4624.33.s13.3]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 2000. Contextualism and Skepticism. Noûs 34 (1):94–107.10.1111/0029-4624.34.s1.12]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 2001. Contextualism Defended: Comments on Richard Feldman’s ‘Skeptical Problems, Contextualist Solutions’. Philosophical Studies 103 (1): 87–98.10.1023/A:1010345123470]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 2004. Knowledge, Assertion, and Practical Reasoning. Philosophical Issues 14 (1): 482–491.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2004.00040.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cohen, Stewart. 2005. Knowledge, Speaker and Subject. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (219):199–212.10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00395.x]Search in Google Scholar
[DeRose, Keith. 1992. Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (4):913–929.10.2307/2107917]Search in Google Scholar
[DeRose, Keith. 1995. Solving the Skeptical Problem. The Philosophical Review 104 (1): 1–52.10.2307/2186011]Search in Google Scholar
[DeRose, Keith. 2009. The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context, Vol. 1. Oxford, Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dinges, Alexander. 2014. Epistemic contextualism can be stated properly. Synthese 191 (15): 3541–56.10.1007/s11229-014-0459-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Feldman, Richard. 2003. Epistemology. Upper Saddle River, Pearson Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feltz, Adam and Zarpentine, Chris. 2010. Do You Know More When It Matters Less? Philosophical Psychology 23 (5): 683–706.10.1080/09515089.2010.514572]Search in Google Scholar
[Freitag, Wolfgang. 2011. Epistemic Contextualism and the Knowability Problem. Acta Analytica 26 (3): 273–84.10.1007/s12136-010-0112-y]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, Nat and Chemla, Emmanuel. 2013. Experimenting on Contextualism. Mind and Language 28 (3): 286–321.10.1111/mila.12019]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawthorne, John. 2004. Knowledge and Lotteries. Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199269556.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins. 2017. Contextualising Knowledge, New York, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780199682706.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins and Steup, Matthias. 2017. The Analysis of Knowledge. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/knowledge-analysis/>.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kallestrup, Jesper. 2005. Contextualism between Scepticism and Common-Sense. Grazer Philosophische Studien 69 (1):247–253.10.1163/18756735-069001013]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, David. 1989. Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry, Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan: 481–563. Oxford, Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kompa, Nikola. 2014. Knowledge in Context. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia 5 (1): 58–71.]Search in Google Scholar
[Leardi, Stefano and Vassallo, Nicla. 2017. When Do the Truth-Conditions of S Knows that p Change? In Patrick Brézillon, Roy Turner, Carlo Penco (eds.), Modeling and Using Context: 56–68. Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-57837-8_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, David. 1996. Elusive Knowledge. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549–567.10.1080/00048409612347521]Search in Google Scholar
[Montminy, Martin and Skolits, Wes. 2014. Defending the Coherence of Contextualism. Episteme 11 (3): 319–33.10.1017/epi.2014.13]Search in Google Scholar
[Pinillos, Ángel. 2012. Knowledge, Experiments, and Practical Interests. In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions: 192–219. Oxford, Oxford University Press10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199693702.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Steup, Matthias. 2005. Contextualism and Conceptual Disambiguation. Acta Analytica 20–1 (34): 3–15.10.1007/s12136-005-1000-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Turri, John. 2017. Epistemic Contextualism: An Idle Hypothesis. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 95 (1): 141–156.10.1080/00048402.2016.1153684]Search in Google Scholar
[Unger, Peter. 1984. Philosophical Relativity. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Williamson, Timothy. 2001. Comments on Michael Williams’ contextualism, externalism and epistemic standards’. Philosophical Studies 103 (1): 25–33.10.1023/A:1010368318927]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright, Crispin. 2005. Contextualism and Scepticism: Even-Handedness, Factivity and Surreptitiously Raising Standards. Philosophical Quarterly 55:236–262.10.1111/j.0031-8094.2005.00397.x]Search in Google Scholar