Accesso libero

Students’ Participation in Search for Sustainability: A Case Study from Lithuania

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Alvesson, M. (2011). Interpreting interviews. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.10.4135/9781446268353Search in Google Scholar

Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.Search in Google Scholar

Convention on the Rights of the Child. (1989). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspxSearch in Google Scholar

Durmuşoğlu Saltali., N., & Arslan, E. (2013). The rules pre-school teachers establish for their classes and their application. Elementary Education Online, 12(4), 1032–1040. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/ilkonline/article/view/5000037741/5000036599Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Fedosejeva, J., Boče, A., Romanova, M., Iliško, D., & Ivanova O. (2018). Education for sustainable development: The choice of pedagogical approaches and methods for the implementation of pedagogical tasks in the anthropocene age. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(1), 157–179.10.2478/jtes-2018-0010Search in Google Scholar

Fitzgerald, R., Graham, A., Smith, A., & Taylor, N. (2010). Children’s participation as a struggle over recognition: Exploring the promise of dialogue. In Percy-Smith, B. & Thomas, N. (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J., & Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academic Management Review, 39, 463–487.10.5465/amr.2012.0341Search in Google Scholar

Hargreaves, L. G. (2008). The whole-school approach to education for sustainable development: From pilot Projects to systemic change. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 6, 69–73.Search in Google Scholar

Hart, C. S., & Brando, N. (2018). A capability approach to children’s well-being, agency and participatory rights in education. European Journal of Education, 53(3), 293–309.10.1111/ejed.12284Search in Google Scholar

Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2011). Qualitative research methods. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Hopkins, D., Ainscow, M., & West, M. (1998). Kaita ir mokyklos tobulinimas [Change and school improvement]. Vilnius: Tyto alba.Search in Google Scholar

Jenlink, P. M., Reigeluth, C. M., Carr, A. A., & Nelson, L. M. (1998). Guidelines for facilitating systemic change in school districts. Retrieved from http://www.indiana.edu/~syschang/decatur/new_members/pdf_documents/gste_systems-research.pdf10.1002/(SICI)1099-1743(199805/06)15:3<217::AID-SRES223>3.0.CO;2-NSearch in Google Scholar

Kairienė, B. (2017). Mokinio pareigos: ·gyvendinimo problema [The duties of a pupil: The implementation problem]. Pedagogika [Pedagogy], 126(2), 130–142.10.15823/p.2017.24Search in Google Scholar

Kılıç, A., & Öztürk, A. (2018). An analysis of children’s right to participation at primary schools in Turkey: A case study. Qualitative Research in Education, 7(3), 265–303.10.17583/qre.2018.3528Search in Google Scholar

King, N., & Horrocks, Ch. (2010). Interviews in qualitative research. London: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Kosher, H., Ben-Arieh, A., & Hendelsman, Y. (2016). The history of children’s rights. New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Lansdown, G., Jimerson, S. R., & Shahroozi, R. (2014). Children’s rights and school psychology: Children’s right to participation. Journal of School Psychology, 52(1), 3–12.10.1016/j.jsp.2013.12.006Search in Google Scholar

Lietuvos Respublikos Esimo 2013 m. gruodžio 23 d. nutarimas Nr. XII-745 “Dėl valstybinės švietimo 2013–2022 metų strategijos patvirtinimo” [Approval of the National Education Strategy 2013–2022]. Valstybės žinios, 2013-12-30, Nr. 140-7095.Search in Google Scholar

Mason, M. (2016). Is thorough implementation of policy change in education actually possible? What complexity theory tells us about initiating and sustaining change. European Journal of Education, 51(4). doi: doi.org/10.1111/ejed.1219310.1111/ejed.12193Search in Google Scholar

Morin, E. (1999). Seven complex lessons in education for the future. Paris: UNESCO.Search in Google Scholar

Nevin, E. (2008). Education and sustainable development. Policy & Practice: A Development Education Review, 6, 49–62.Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2008). Educational action research for sustainability: Constructing a vision for the futurein teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 10, 5–16.10.2478/v10099-009-0021-6Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I. (2002). Teachers’ views on the aim of education. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 1, 68–80.Search in Google Scholar

Salīte, I., Drelinga, E., Iliško, D., Oļehnoviča, E., & Zariņa, S. (2016). Sustainability from the transdisciplinary perspective: An action research strategy for continuing education program development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(2), 135–152.10.1515/jtes-2016-0020Search in Google Scholar

Sargeant, J. (2018). Towards voice-inclusive practice: Finding the sustainability of participation in realising the child’s rights in education. Children & Society, 32(4), 314–324.10.1111/chso.12247Search in Google Scholar

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research – a guide for researchers in education. 4th ed. New York and London: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Seitz, S. (2015). Pixilated partnership, overcoming obstacles in qualitative interviews via skype: A research note. Qualitative Research, 1–7.Search in Google Scholar

Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015). United Nations. Retrieved from www.un.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Tulin, D. (2018). The relationship of organisational value frames with the configuration of alliance portfolios: Cases from electricity utilities in Great Britain. Sustainability, 10, 2–29.Search in Google Scholar

Vaikų teisės – kaip jas suvokia vaikai [Children have the rights to how they are perceived by children]. (2011). Liuksemburgas: Europos Sajungos leidiniu biuras. Retrieved from www.moodlevda.lt/.../Vaiku%20teises%20-%20kaip%20jas%20suvokia%20vaikai.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Wissink, I. B., Dekovi„, M., Stams, G., Asscher, J. J., Rutten, E., & Zijlstra, B. H. (2014). Moral orientation and relationships in school and adolescent pro- and antisocial behaviors: A multilevel study. Journal of School Nursing (Sage Publications Inc.), 30(3), 216–225.10.1177/1059840513497402Search in Google Scholar

Yan, X., Lin, H., & Clarke, A. (2018). Cross-sector social partnerships for social change: The roles of non-governmental organizations. Sustainability, 10(2), 558.10.3390/su10020558Search in Google Scholar

Želvys, R. (2003). Švietimo organizacijų vadyba [Management of educational organizations]. Vilnius: VU leidykla.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1691-5534
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
2 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Social Sciences, Education, other