[
Agresti, A. 2007. An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis (second edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken: New Jersey.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Babu, G.J., and C.R. Rao. 2004. “Goodness-of-Fit Tests when Parameters are Estimated.” Sankhyā. Series A 66(1): 63–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25053332.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Banca d’Italia. 2012. Supplement to the Statistical Bulletin, Sample Surveys, Household income and wealth in 2010: 12(6). Available at: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/indagine-famiglie/bil-fam2010.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beaumont, J.F. 2000. “An Estimation Method for Nonignorable Nonresponse.” Survey Methodology 26(2): 131–136. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2000002/article/5532-eng.pdf?st=WJWdN_3l.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belzile, L., J.L. Wadsworth, P.J. Northrop, S.D. Grimshaw, J. Zhang, M.A. Stephens, A.B. Owen, and R. Huser. 2022. mev: Modelling Extreme Values. R package version 1.14 Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mev (accessed June 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beresewicz, M., R. Lehtonen, F. Reis, L. Di Consiglio and M. Karlberg. 2018. An overview of methods for treating selectivity in big data sources. Statistical Working Papers, Eurostat. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-statistical-working-papers/-/ks-tc-18-004 (accessed July 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, T., and P.S. Kott. 2008. “Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonresponse under a Plausible Model.” Biometrika 95(3): 555–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/-biomet/asn022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chaudhuri S., M.S. Handcock, and M.S. Rendall. 2010. A conditional empirical likelihood approach to combine sampling design and population level information. Technical report No. 3/2010, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Available at: https://cpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/blog.nus.edu.sg/dist/0/14452/files/2020/10/tr032010.pdf (accessed July 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, C., M. Wang, R. Wu, and R. Li. 2022. “A Robust Consistent Information Criterion for Model Selection Based on Empirical Likelihood.” Statistica Sinica 32: 1205–1223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5705/ss.202020.0254.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conti P.L., D. Marella, and M. Scanu. 2008. “Evaluation of matching noise for imputation techniques based on nonparametric local linear regression estimators.” Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 53(2): 354–365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2008.07.041.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiSogra, C., C. Cobb, E. Chan, and J. M. Dennis. 2011. “Calibrating non-probability internet samples with probability samples using early adopter characteristics.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, Joint Statistical Meetings. Miami Beach, Florida, July 30-August 4, 2011: 4501–4515. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2011/Files/30270468925.pdf (accessed June 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elliott, M., and R. Valliant. 2017. “Inference for non-probability samples.” Statistical Science 32(2): 249–264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/16-STS598.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Feder, M., and D. Pfeffermann. 2019. Statistical Inference Under Non-ignorable Sampling and Non-response. An Empirical Likelihood Approach. Working paper. University of Southampton. Available at: https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/378245/ (accessed July 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galimard J.E., S. Chevret, E. Curis, and M. Resche-Rigon. 2018. “Heckman imputation models for binary or continuous MNAR outcomes and MAR predictors.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 18(90). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0547-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hájek, J. 1964. “Asymptotic theory of rejective sampling with varying probabilities from a finite population.” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35(4): 1491–1523. DOI: 10.1214/aoms/1177700375.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Heckman, J.J. 1979. “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error.” Econometrica 47(1): 153–161. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1912352.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J.K., and Z. Wang. 2019. “Sampling techniques for big data analysis in finite population inference.” International Statistical Review 87(S1): S177–S191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12290.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kott, P.S. 2006. “Using calibration weighting to adjust for nonresponse and coverage errors.” Survey Methodology 32(2): 133–142. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2006002/article/9547-eng.pdf?st=B2aZNvo0.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kott, P.S., and T. Chang. 2010. “Using Calibration Weighting to Adjust for Nonignorable Unit Nonresponse.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 105(491): 1265–1275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J., and J.O. Berger. 2001. “Semiparametric Bayesian analysis of selection models.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 96(456): 1397–1409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214501753382318.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marella D., M. Scanu, and P.L. Conti. 2008. “On the matching noise of some nonparametric imputation procedures.” Statistics & Probability Letters 78(12): 1593–1600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2008.01.020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marella, D., and D. Pfeffermann. 2019 “Matching Information from two independent informative samples.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 203: 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2019.03.001.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marella, D., and D. Pfeffermann. 2021 “Accounting for nonignorable sampling and nonresponse in statistical matching.” International Statistical Review. Accepted for pubblication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12524.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meng, X-L., 2018. “Statistical paradises and paradoxes in big data (I): law of large populations, big data paradox and the 2016 US presidential election.” The Annals of Applied Statistics 12(2): 685–726. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/18-AOAS1161SF.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owen, A.B. 2001. Empirical Likelihood. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Owen, A.B. 2013. “Self-concordance for empirical likelihood.” Canadian Journal ofStatistics 41(3): 387–397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.11183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D., A.M. Krieger, and Y. Rinott. 1998. “Parametric distribution of complex survey data under informative probability sampling.” Statistica Sinica 8(4): 1087–1114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D., and M. Sverchkov. 2009. “Inference under Informative Sampling.” In Handbook of Statistics 29B: Sample Surveys: Inference and Analysis, edited by D. Pfeffermann and C.R. Rao.: 455–487. North Holland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D. 2011. “Modelling of complex survey data: Why model? Why is it a problem? How can we approach it?” Survey Methodology 37(2): 115–136. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2011002/article/11602-eng.pdf?st=_vXrCcPb.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D., and V. Landsman. 2011. “Are private schools really better than public schools? Assessment by methods for observational studies.” Annals of Applied Statistics 5(3): 1726–1751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1214/11-AOAS456.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D., and A. Sikov. 2011. “Imputation and Estimation under Nonignorable Non-response in Household Surveys with Missing Covariate Information.” Journal of Official Statistics 27(2): 181–209. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/ff271eeeca694f47ae99b942de61df83/imputation-and-estimation-under-nonignorable-nonresponse-in-household-surveys-with-missing-covariate-information.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeffermann, D. 2015. “Methodological issues and challenges in the production of official statistics: 24th Annual Morris Hansen Lecture.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3(4): 425–483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv035.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
R Core Team 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riddles, M.K., J. K. Kim, and J. Im. 2016. “A propensity-score-adjustment method for non-ignorable nonresponse.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology” 4(2): 215–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv047.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivers, D. 2007. “Sampling for web surveys.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, Joint Statistical Meetings. Salt Lake City, Utah, July 29-August 2, 2007: 4127–4134. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Available at: http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/1368187629Rivers2007Samplingforwebsurveys.pdf (accessed June 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenbaum, P.R., and D.B. Rubin. 1983. “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.” Biometrika 70(1): 41–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rubin, D.B. 1976. “Inference and missing data.” Biometrika 63(3): 581–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/63.3.581.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheather, S.J., and M.C. Jones. 1991. “A reliable data-based bandwidth selection method for Kernel density estimation.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B-Statistical Methodology 53(3): 683–690. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2345597.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Variyath, A. M., J. Chen, and B. Abraham. 2010. “Empirical likelihood based variable selection.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 140(4): 971–981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, S., J.K. Kim, and Y. Hwang. 2021a. “Integration of data from probability surveys and big found data for finite population inference using mass imputation.” Survey Methodology 47(1): 29–58. Available at: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/12-001-x/2021001/article/00004-eng.pdf?st=-WLDQdr7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yang, S., J.K. Kim, and R. Song. 2021b. “Doubly Robust Inference when Combining Probability and Nonprobability Samples with High-dimensional Data.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B-Statistical Methodology 82(2): 445–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssb.12354.
]Search in Google Scholar
