[
AAPOR (The American Association for Public Opinion Research). 2016. Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, (9th edition). Illinois: AAPOR. Available at: http://www.aapor.org/AAPOR_Main/media/publications/Standard-Definitions20169theditionfinal.pdf (accessed November 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beatty, P., and D. Herrmann. 2002. “To Answer or not to Answer: Decision Processes Related to Survey Item Non-response.” In Survey Nonresponse, edited by R. Groves, D. Dillman, J. Eltinge, and J. Little. (pp. 71–85). New York: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bowling, A. 2005. “Mode of Questionnaire Administration can have Serious Effects on Data Quality.” Journal of Public Health 27: 281–291. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/-pubmed/fdi031.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Browne, W.J. 2019. “MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, v3.03.” Centre for Multilevel Modelling, University of Bristol. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/media/software/mlwin/downloads/manuals/3-03/mcmc-web.pdf (accessed November 2, 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chang, L., and J.A. Krosnick. 2010. “Comparing Oral Interviewing with Self-Administered Computerized Questionnaires. An Experiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 74(1): 154–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp090.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christian, L.M., D.A. Dillman, and J.D. Smyth. 2007. “The Effects of Mode and Format on Answers to Scalar Questions in Telephone and Web Surveys.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, edited by J.M. Lepkowski, C. Tucker, M. Brick, E.D. de Leeuw, L. Japec, P.J. Lavrakas, M.W. Link, and R.L. Sangster: 250–275. Hoboken, Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Leeuw, E.D. 2005. “To Mix or not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 21(2): 233–255. Available at: https://www.scb.se/contentassets/-ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/to-mix-or-not-to-mix-data-collection-modes-in-surveys.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Leeuw, E.D., and J. Hox. 2018. “Internet Surveys as Part of a Mixed-Mode Design.” In Social and behavioral research and the Internet: Advances in applied methods and research strategies, edited by M. Das, P. Ester, and L. Kaczmirek. 45–76. New York: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Leeuw, E.D., J. Hox, and A. Boeve. 2016. “Handling do-not-know Answers: Exploring new Approaches in Online and Mixed-mode Surveys.” Social Science Computer Review 34(1): 116–132. DOI: 10.1177/0894439315573744.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Fielding, A., and H. Goldstein. 2006. “Cross-classified and Multiple Membership Structures in Multilevel Models: An Introduction and Review,” University of Birmingham. Available at: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/cmm/team/hg/full-publications/2006/cross-classified-models-review-for-dfes.pdf (accessed November 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fricker, S., M. Galesic, R. Tourangeau, and T. Yan. 2005. “An Experimental Comparison of Web and Telephone Surveys.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69(3): 370–392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gooch, A., and L. Vavreck. 2019. “How Face-to-Face Interviews and Cognitive Skill Affect Item Non-response: A Randomized Experiment Assigning Mode of Interview.” Political Science Research and Methods 7(1): 143–162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2016.20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greene, J., H. Speizer, and W. Wiitala. 2008. “Telephone and Web: Mixed-Mode Challenge.” Health services research 43(1): 230–248. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2007.00747.x.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Groves, R.M., F.J. Fowler, M.P. Couper, J.M. Lepkowski, E. Singer, and R. Tourangeau. 2011. Survey Methodology. Hoboken: Wiley.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guzy, N., and H. Leitgöb. 2015. “Assessing Mode Effects in Online and Telephone Victimization Surveys.” International Review of Victimology 21(1): 101–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0269758014547995.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Juster, F.T., and J.P. Smith. 1997. “Improving the Quality of Economic Data: Lessons from the HRS and AHEAD.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 92(440): 1268–1278. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1997.10473648.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Holbrook, A., Y.I. Cho, and T. Johnson. 2006. “The Impact of Question and Respondent Characteristics on Comprehension and Mapping Difficulties.” Public Opinion Quarterly 70(4): 565–595. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfl027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keusch, F. 2020. “Gamification in Web Surveys.” In SAGE Research Methods Foundations, edited by P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J.W. Sakshaug, and R.A. Williams. 1–8. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kleiner, B., O. Lipps, and E. Ferrez. 2015. “Language Ability and Motivation Among Foreigners in Survey Responding.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 3(3): 339–360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smv015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krosnick, J.A. 1991. “Response Strategies for Coping with the Cognitive Demands of Attitude Measures in Surveys.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 5: 231–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krumpal, I. 2013. “Determinants of Social Desirability Bias in Sensitive Surveys: a Literature Review.” Quality & Quantity 47(4): 2025–2047. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9640-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leckie, G., and C. Charlton. 2013. “runmlwin – A Program to Run the MLwiN Multilevel Modelling Software from Within Stata.” Journal of Statistical Software 52: 1–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v052.i11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lipps, O., and G.-A. Monsch. 2022. “Effects of Question Characteristics on Item Non-Response in Telephone and Web Survey Modes.” Field Methods. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X221115838.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, C., and C. Vandenplas. 2017. “Estimating Components of Mean Squared Error to Evaluate the Benefits of Mixing Data Collection Modes.” Journal of Official Statistics 33(2): 303–334. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/JOS-2017-0016.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shoemaker, P.J., M. Eichholz, and E.A. Skewes. 2002. “Item Nonresponse: Distinguishing Between Don’t know and Refuse.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14(2): 193–201. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.2.193.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silber, H., J. Roßmann, T. Gummer, S. Zins, and K.W. Weyandt. 2021. “The Effects of Question, Respondent and Interviewer Characteristics on Two Types of Item Nonresponse.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12703.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sun, H., R. Tourangeau, and S. Presser. 2019. “Panel Effects: Do the Reports of Panel Respondents Get Better or Worse over Time?” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 7(4): 572–588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy021.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sturgis, P., C. Roberts, and P. Smith. 2014. “Middle Alternatives Revisited: How the Neither/nor Response Acts as a Way of Saying “I don’t know.” Sociological Methods & Research 43(1): 15–38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452527.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tillmann, R., M. Voorpostel, E. Antal, N. Dasoki, H. Klaas, U. Kuhn, F. Lebert, G.-A. Monsch, and V.-A. Ryser. 2021. “The Swiss Household Panel (SHP).” Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik . DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2021-0039.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tourangeau, R., and K.A. Rasinski. 1988. “Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement.” Psychological bulletin 103(3): 299–314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.299.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vannieuwenhuyze, J.T., and G. Loosveldt. 2013. “Evaluating Relative Mode Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys: Three Methods to Disentangle Selection and Measurement Effects.” Sociological Methods & Research 42(1): 82–104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112464868.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorpostel, M., U. Kuhn, R. Tillmann, G.-A. Monsch, E. Antal, V.-A. Ryser, F. Lebert, H.S. Klaas, and N. Dasoki. 2020. Introducing Web in a Refreshment Sample of the Swiss Household Panel: Main Findings From a Pilot Study. FORS Working Paper Series, paper 2020-2. Lausanne: FORS. Available at: https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_7C300C68F2D1.P001/REF (accessed November 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorpostel, M., O. Lipps, and C. Roberts. 2021. “Mixing Modes in Household Panel Surveys: Recent Developments and new Findings.” In Advances in longitudinal survey methodology, edited by P. Lynn. 204–226. Hoboken: Wiley. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119376965.ch9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, R. 2012. Don’t Know Responses in Survey Research. Unpublished dissertation. Department of Sociology: Pennsylvania State University. Available at: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/files/final_submissions/7219 (accessed November 2022)
]Search in Google Scholar
