[
Andridge, R.R., B.T. West, R.J.A. Little, P.S. Boonstra, and F. Alvarado-Leiton. 2019. “Indices of non-ignorable selection bias for proportions estimated from non-probability samples.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 68(5): 1465–1483. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssc.12371 (accessed September 2022).772461133304001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, R., J.M. Brick, N.A. Bates, M.P. Battaglia, M.P. Couper, J.A. Dever, K. Gile, and R. Tourangeau. 2013. Report of the AAPOR task force on non-probability sampling. The American Association for Public Opinion Research, Deerfield, IL. Available at: https://www.aapor.org/aapor_main/media/mainsitefiles/nps_tf_report_final_7_revised_fnl_6_22_13.pdf (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brick, J.M., and D. Williams. 2013. “Explaining rising nonresponse rates in cross-sectional surveys.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645(1): 36–59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212456834.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Caliendo, M, and S. Kopeinig. 2008. “Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching.” Journal of Economic Surveys 2(1): 31–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017. Weighting the BRFSS Data. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/annual_data/2017/pdf/weighting-2017-508.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Center for Disease Control and Prevention. 2023. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/BRFSS.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, Y., P. Li, and C. Wu. 2020. “Doubly robust inference with non-probability survey samples.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 115: 2011–2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2019.1677241.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cochran, W.G. 1953. “Matching in analytical studies.” American Journal of Public Health 43: 684–691. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.43.6_Pt_1.684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dehejia, R. and S. Wahba. 2002. “Propensity-score matching methods for nonexperi-mental causal studies.” The Review of Economic and Statistics 84(1): 151–161. Available at: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/003465302317331982 (accessed September 2022).10.1162/003465302317331982
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deville, J.C., and C. Sa¨rndal. 1992. “Calibration estimators in survey sampling.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 87(418): 376–382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2290268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elliott, M.R. and R. Valliant. 2017. “Inference for nonprobability samples.” Statistical Science 32: 249–264. Available at: https://projecteuclid.org/journals/statistical-science/volume-32/issue-2/Inference-for-Nonprobability-Samples/10.1214/16-STS598.full. (accessed September 2022).10.1214/16-STS598
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gessendorfer, J., Beste, J., J. Drechsler, and J. Sakshaug. 2018. “Statistical Matching as a Supplement to Record Linkage: A Valuable Method to Tackle Nonconsent Bias?. Journal of Official Statistics 34(4): 909–933. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jos-2018-0045.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, M.H., W.G. Madow, and B.J. Tepping. 1983. “An evaluation of model-dependent and probability sampling inferences in sample surveys.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 78: 776–793.10.1080/01621459.1983.10477018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kennedy, C., A. Mercer, S. Keeter, N. Hatley, K. McGeeney, and A. Gimenez. 2016. Evaluating online nonprobability surveys, vendor choice matters: widespread errors found for estimates based on blacks and hispanics. Technical report, Pew Research. Available at: https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2016/05/02/evaluating-online-nonprobability-surveys/ (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kim, J.-K., S. Park, Y. Chen, and C. Wu. 2021. “Combining non-probability and probability survey samples through mass imputation.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A: Statistics in Society 184: 941–963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rssa.12696.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, S. 2006. “Propensity Score Adjustment as a Weighting Scheme for Volunteer Panel Web Surveys.” Journal of Official Statistics 22(2): 329–349. Available at: http://www.scb.se/contentassets/ca21efb41fee47d293bbee5bf7be7fb3/propensity-score-adjustment-as-a-weighting-scheme-for-volunteer-panel-web-surveys.pdf (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Little, R.J.A., B. West, P.S. Boonstra, and J. Hu. 2019. “Measures of the degree of departure from ignorable sample selection.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8(5): 932–964. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz023.775089033381610
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lumley, T. 2020. “Survey: analysis of complex survey samples.” R package version 4.1-1. Available at: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survey/index.html (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacKinnon, J.G., and H. White. 1985. “Some heteroskedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimators with improved finite sample properties.” Journal of Econometrics 29(3): 305–325. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90158-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rao, J., W. Yung, and M Hidiroglou. 2002. “Estimating equations for the analysis of survey data using poststratification information.” Sankhyâ Series A 64: 364–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivers, D. 2007. “Sample matching for web surveys: Theory and application.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, July, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. Available at: http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/1368187629Rivers_2007_Sampling_for_web_surveys.pdf (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivers, D., and D. Bailey. 2009. “Inference from matched samples in the 2008 U.S. national elections.” In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association, Section on Survey Research Methods: 627–639. August, Washington D.C., USA. Available at: http://www.asasrms.org/Proceedings/y2009f.html (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosenbaum, P.R., and D.B. Rubin. 1983. “The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects.” Biometrika 70(1): 41–55. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rothman, K.J., S. Greenland, and T.L. Lash. 2008. Modern Epidemiology. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, 3rd edition.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rubin, D. 1973. “Matching to remove bias in observational studies.” Biometrics 29(1): 159–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Särndal, C.E., B. Swensson, and J.H. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. Springer Series in Statistics. Springer-Verlag, New York.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schonlau, M., Soest, A.V., A. Kapteyn, and M. Couper. 2009. “Selection bias in web surveys and the use of propensity scores. Sociological Methods a Research 37(3): 291–318. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124108327128.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sekhon, J.S. 2011. “Multivariate and propensity score matching software with automated balance optimization: The Matching package for R.” Journal of Statistical Software 42(7): 1–52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i07.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, J., and P. Todd. 2005. “Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of non-experimental estimators?” Journal of Econometrics 125(1): 305–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Terhanian, G., and J. Bremer. 2012. “A smarter way to select respondents for surveys?” International Journal of Market Research 54(6): 751–780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-6-751-780.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Toluna. 2023. Toluna delivers real-time consumer insights at the speed of the on-demand economy. Available at: https://www.greenbook.org/company/Toluna.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
U.S. Census Bureau. 2023. American Community Survey. Available at: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valliant, R. 2020. “Comparing alternatives for estimation from nonprobability samples.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8: 231–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smz003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valliant, R. and J.A. Dever. 2011. “Estimating propensity adjustments for volunteer web surveys.” Sociological Methods and Research 40: 105–137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124110392533.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valliant, R., J.A. Dever, and F. Kreuter. 2018. Practical Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. Springer, New York, 2nd edition.10.1007/978-3-319-93632-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valliant, R., J.A. Dever, and F. Kreuter. 2020. PracTools: Tools for Designing and Weighting Survey Samples. R package version 1.2.8. Available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PracTools (accessedSeptember 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vavreck, L., and D. Rivers. 2008. “The 2006 cooperative congressional election study.” Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18(4): 35–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280802305177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L. 2020. Improving External Validity of Epidemiologic Analyses by Incorporating Data from Population-Based Surveys. PhD thesis, University of Maryland. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1903/26125, doi:10.13016/pogq-glbs (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L., Graubard, B.I., H. Katki, and Y. Li. 2020. “Improving external validity of epidemiologic cohort analyses: a kernel weighting approach.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Statistics in Society, Series A 183(3):1293–1311. Available at: https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/rssa.12564 (accessed September 2022).10.1111/rssa.12564756658633071484
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L., R. Valliant, and Y. Li. 2021. “Adjusted logistic propensity weighting methods for population inference using nonprobability volunteer-based epidemiologic cohorts.” Statistics in Medicine: 1–14. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.9122 (accessed September 2022).
]Search in Google Scholar
