[Anderson, L.A. and R.F. Dedrick. 1990. “Development of the Trust in Physician Scale: A Measure to Assess Interpersonal Trust in Patient-physician Relationships.” Psychological Reports 67: 1091–1100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091.10.2466/pr0.1990.67.3f.1091]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Audacity Developer Team. 2008. Audacity (Version 1.2.6) [Computer Software]: Available at: http://www.audacityteam.org/download/ (accessed April 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bassili, J.N. and B.S. Scott. 1996. “Response Latency as a Signal to Question Problems in Survey Research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 60: 390–399. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/297760.10.1086/297760]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Braunstein, J.B., N.S. Sherber, S.P. Schulman, E.L. Ding, and N.R. Powe. 2008. “Race, Medical Researcher Distrust, Perceived Harm, and Willingness to Participate in Cardiovascular Prevention Trials.” Medicine 87: 1–9. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Carpenter, P.A. and M.A. Just. 1975. “Sentence Comprehension: A Psycholinguistic Processing Model of Verification.” Psychological Review 82: 45–73. Available at: http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0076248 (accessed April 2019).10.1037/h0076248(2019)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Corbie-Smith, G., S.B. Thomas, and D.M.M. St. George. 2002. “Distrust, Race, and Research.” Archives of Internal Medicine 162: 2458–2463. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.21.2458.10.1001/archinte.162.21.2458]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Davidov, E., B. Meuleman, J. Cieciuch, P. Schmidt, and J. Billiet. 2014. “Measurement Equivalence in Cross-National Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 40: 55–75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137.10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043137]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[De Leeuw, E. and N. Berzelak. 2016. “Survey Mode or Survey Modes?” In The SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology, edited by C. Wolf, J. Dominique, T.W. Smith, and F. Yang-chih, 142–156. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Ltd. Available at: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=g8OMDAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA142&dq=survey+mode+or+modes+berzelak&ots=DyqMiBT1oS&sig=hGg7pa80-bI535N5GgSUwvLmLfY#v=onepage&q=survey%20mode%20or%20modes%20berzelak&f=false (accessed April 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Dijkstra, W. and Y. Ongena. 2006. “Question-Answer Sequences in Survey-Interviews.” Quality & Quantity 40: 983–1011. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-005-5076-4.10.1007/s11135-005-5076-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dillman, D.A., J.D. Smyth, and L.M. Christian. 2014. Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed-Mode Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (4th edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Draisma, S. and W. Dijkstra. 2004. “Response Latency and (Para)linguistic Expression as Indicators of Response Error.” In Methods for Testing and Evaluating Survey Questionnaires, edited by S. Presser, J.M. Rothgeb, M.P. Couper, J.T. Lessler, E. Martin, J. Martin, and E. Singer, 131–148. New York: Springer-Verlag. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0471654728.ch7.10.1002/0471654728.ch7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dykema, J., J.M. Lepkowski, and S. Blixt. 1997. “The Effect of Interviewer and Respondent Behavior on Data Quality: Analysis of Interaction Coding in a Validation Study.” In Survey Measurement and Process Quality, edited by L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. de Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, and D. Trewin, 287–310. N.Y: Wiley-Interscience. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9781118490013.ch12 (accessed April 2019).10.1002/9781118490013.ch12(accessed2019)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dykema, J., N.C. Schaeffer, and D. Garbarski. 2012. “Effects of Agree-Disagree Versus Construct-Specific Items on Reliability, Validity, and Interviewer-Respondent Interaction.” Presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research, May 17–20. 2012. Orlando, Florida, U.S.A.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dykema, J., N.C. Schaeffer, and D. Garbarski. 2019. “Towards a Reconsideration of the Use of Agree-Disagree Questions in Measuring Subjective Evaluations.” Unpublished manuscript, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison-WI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Edwards, D.F. 2015. “Voices Heard.” Presented at the Health Equity Leadership Institute, Madison, WI.]Search in Google Scholar
[Egede, L.E. and C. Ellis. 2008. “Development and Testing of the Multidimensional Trust in Health Care Systems Scale.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 23: 808–815. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0613-1.10.1007/s11606-008-0613-1251787218415653]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fleiss, J.L. 1981. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd edition. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fortune-Greeley, A.K., K.E. Flynn, D.D. Jeffery, M.S. Williams, F.J. Keefe, R.B. Reeve, G.B. Willis, and K.P. Weinfurt. 2009. “Using Cognitive Interviews to Evaluate Items for Measuring Sexual Functioning Across Cancer Populations: Improvements and Remaining Challenges.” Quality of Life Research 18: 1085–1093. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9523-x.10.1007/s11136-009-9523-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fowler, F.J. and C. Cosenza. 2009. “Design and Evaluation of Survey Questions.” In The Sage Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, edited by L. Bickman and D.J. Rog, 375–412. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.4135/9781483348858.n12]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, M.A., F. Camacho, E. Dugan, and R. Balkrishnan. 2002a. “Trust in the Medical Profession: Conceptual and Measurement Issues.” Health Services Research 37: 1419–1439. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.01070.10.1111/1475-6773.01070]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hall, M.A., F. Camacho, J.S. Lawlor, V. DePuy, J. Sugarman, and K. Weinfurt. 2006. “Measuring Trust in Medical Researchers.” Medical Care 44: 1048–1053. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41219560 (accessed April 2019).10.1097/01.mlr.0000228023.37087.cb]Search in Google Scholar
[Hall, M.A., E. Dugan, B. Zheng, and A.K. Mishra. 2001. “Trust in Physicians and Medical Institutions: What is It, Can It be Measured, and Does It Matter?” Milbank Quarterly 79: 613–639. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00223.10.1111/1468-0009.00223]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hall, M.A., B. Zheng, E. Dugan, F. Camacho, K.E. Kidd, A. Mishra, and R. Balkrishnan. 2002b. “Measuring Patients’ Trust in their Primary Care Providers.” Medical Care Research and Review 59: 293–318.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558702059003004.10.1177/1077558702059003004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hanson, T. 2015. “Comparing Agreement and Item-Specific Response Scales: Results from an Experiment.” Social Research Practice 1: 17–25. Available at: http://the-sra.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/social-research-practice-journal-issue-01-winter-2015.pdf (accessed April 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayman, R.M., B.J. Taylor, N.S. Peart, B.C. Galland, and R.M. Sayers. 2001. “Participation in Research: Informed Consent, Motivation and Influence.” Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 37: 51–54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00612.x (accessed April 2019).10.1046/j.1440-1754.2001.00612.x(accessed2019)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Henderson, G., J. Garrett, J. Bussey-Jones, M.E. Moloney, C. Blumenthal, and G. Corbie-Smith. 2008. “Great Expectations: Views of Genetic Research Participants Regarding Current and Future Genetic Studies.” Genetics in Medicine 10: 193–200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e318164e4f5.10.1097/GIM.0b013e318164e4f518344709]Search in Google Scholar
[Höhne, J.K. and D. Krebs. 2018. “Scale Direction Effects in Agree/Disagree and Item-Specific Questions: A Comparison of Question Formats.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 21: 91–103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2017.1325566.10.1080/13645579.2017.1325566]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Höhne, J.K. and T. Lenzner. 2018. “New Insights on the Cognitive Processing of Agree/Disagree and Item-Specific Questions.” Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 6: 401–417. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx028.10.1093/jssam/smx028]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Höhne, J.K., S. Schlosser, and D. Krebs. 2017. “Investigating Cognitive Effort and Response Quality of Question Formats in Web Surveys Using Paradata.” Field Methods 29: 365–382. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x17710640.10.1177/1525822x17710640]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Holbrook, A.L. 2008. “Recency Effect.” In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methodology, edited by P.J. Lavrakas, 695–696. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, R.B. and A.J. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. “Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come.” Educational Researcher 33: 14–26. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033007014.10.3102/0013189X033007014]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Krosnick, J.A. and S. Presser. 2010. “Question and Questionnaire Design.” In Handbook of Survey Research, Second Edition, edited by P.V. Marsden and J.D. Wright, 263–313. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuru, O. and J. Pasek. 2016. “Improving Social Media Measurement in Surveys: Avoiding Acquiescence Bias in Facebook Research.” Computers in Human Behavior 57: 82–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008 (accessed April 2019).10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.008(accessed2019)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Landis, J.R. and G.G. Koch. 1977. “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data.” Biometrics 33: 159–174. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310.10.2307/2529310]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lelkes, Y. and R. Weiss. 2015. “Much Ado about Acquiescence: The Relative Validity and Reliability of Construct-Specific and Agree-Disagree Questions.” Research and Politics 2: 1–8. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015604173.10.1177/2053168015604173]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Liu, M., S. Lee, and F.G. Conrad. 2015. “Comparing Extreme Response Styles between Agree-Disagree and Item-Specific Scales.” Public Opinion Quarterly 79: 952–975. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfv034.10.1093/poq/nfv034]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mainous, A.G., D.W. Smith, M.E. Geesey, and B.C. Tilley. 2006. “Development of a Measure to Assess Patient Trust in Medical Researchers.” Annals of Family Medicine 4: 247–252. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.541.10.1370/afm.541147944516735527]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Revilla, M. and C. Ochoa. 2015. “Quality of Different Scales in an Online Survey in Mexico and Columbia.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 7: 157–177. Available at: https://journals.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jpla/article/view/903/910 (accessed April 2019).10.1177/1866802X1500700305]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogers, W. 1994. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.” Stata Technical Bulletin 13. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/tsj/stbull/y1994v3i13sg17.html (accessed April 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ryan, G.W. and H.R. Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15: 85–109. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x02239569.10.1177/1525822x02239569]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Saris, W.E., M. Revilla, J.A. Krosnick, and E.M. Shaeffer. 2010. “Comparing Questions with Agree/Disagree Response Options to Questions with Item-Specific Response Options.” Survey Research Methods 4: 61–79. Doi: https://ojs.ub.uni-konstanz.de/srm/article/view/2682/3971.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schaeffer, N.C. and J. Dykema. 2011. “Response 1 to Fowler’s Chapter: Coding the Behavior of Interviewers and Respondents to Evaluate Survey Questions.” In Question Evaluation Methods: Contributing to the Science of Data Quality, edited by J. Madans, K. Miller, A. Maitland, and G. Willis, 23–39. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118037003.ch3.10.1002/9781118037003.ch3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Scharff, D.P., K.J. Mathews, P. Jackson, J. Hoffsuemmer, E. Martin, and D. Edwards. 2010. “More than Tuskegee: Understanding Mistrust about Research Participation.” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved 21: 879–897. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323.10.1353/hpu.0.0323435480620693733]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schuman, H. and S. Presser. 1996. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, T.W., P.V. Marsden, and M. Hout. 2013. General Social Survey, 1972–2010 [Cumulative File]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-02-07. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1.10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Streiner, D.L., G.R. Norman, and J. Cairney. 2015. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/med/9780199685219.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Sturgis, P., C. Roberts, and P. Smith. 2014. “Middle Alternatives Revisited: How the neither/nor Response Acts as a Way of Saying “I Don’t Know”?” Sociological Methods & Research 43: 15–38. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124112452527.10.1177/0049124112452527]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thompson, H.S., H.B. Valdimarsdottir, G. Winkel, L. Jandorf, and W.W. Redd. 2004. “The Group-Based Medical Mistrust Scale: Psychometric Properties and Association with Breast Cancer Screening.” Preventive Medicine 38: 209–218. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.041.10.1016/j.ypmed.2003.09.04114715214]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., M.C. Couper, and F. Conrad. 2004. “Spacing, Position, and Order: Interpretive Heuristics for Visual Features of Survey Questions.” Public Opinion Quarterly 68: 368–393. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfh035.10.1093/poq/nfh035]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Tourangeau, R., L.J. Rips, and K. Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, M.M., D.P. Scharff, K.J. Mathews, J.S. Hoffsuemmer, P. Jackson, J.C. Morris, and D.F. Edwards. 2010. “Barriers and Facilitators of African American Participation in Alzheimer Disease Biomarker Research.” Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders 24: S24–S29. Available at: https://journals.lww.com/alzheimerjournal/Fulltext/2010/07001/Barriers_and_Facilitators_of_African_American.6.aspx (accessed April 2019).10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181f14a14293913820711059]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, G.B. 2005. Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.10.1037/e538062007-001]Search in Google Scholar
[Willis, G.B. and K. Miller. 2011. “Cross-Cultural Cognitive Interviewing: Seeking Comparability and Enhancing Understanding.” Field Methods 23: 331–341. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x11416092.10.1177/1525822x11416092]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Willits, F.K., G.L. Theodori, and A.E. Luloff. 2016. “Another Look at Likert Scales.” Journal of Rural Social Sciences 31: 126–139. Available at: http://journalofruralsocialsciences.org/pages/Articles/JRSS%202016%2031/3/JRSS%202016%2031%203%20126-139.pdf (accessed April 2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, T. and R. Tourangeau. 2008. “Fast Times and Easy Questions: The Effects of Age, Experience and Question Complexity on Web Survey Response Times.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 22: 51–68. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acp.1331 (accessed April 2019).10.1002/acp.1331(accessed2019)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zheng, B., M.A. Hall, E. Dugan, K.E. Kidd, and D. Levine. 2002. “Development of a Scale to Measure Patients’ Trust in Health Insurers.” Health Services Research 37: 185–200. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.00145.10.1111/1475-6773.00145]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar