This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Adnan M., Latif M.A., Abaid-ur-Rehman, Nazir M. 2017. Estimating evapotranspiration using machine learning techniques. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 8(9): 108–113. DOI: 10.14569/ijacsa.2017.080915.AdnanM.LatifM.A.Abaid-ur-RehmanNazirM.2017Estimating evapotranspiration using machine learning techniques8910811310.14569/ijacsa.2017.080915Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aghajanloo M.-B., Sabziparvar A.-A., Hosseinzadeh Talaee P. 2013. Artificial neural network–genetic algorithm for estimation of crop evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran. Neural Computing and Applications 23: 1387–1393. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-012-1087-y.AghajanlooM.-B.SabziparvarA.-A.Hosseinzadeh TalaeeP.2013Artificial neural network–genetic algorithm for estimation of crop evapotranspiration in a semi-arid region of Iran231387139310.1007/s00521-012-1087-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Allen R.G. 1993. New approaches to estimating crop evapotranspiration. Acta Horticulturae 335: 287–294. DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1993.335.35.AllenR.G.1993New approaches to estimating crop evapotranspiration33528729410.17660/actahortic.1993.335.35Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Allen R.G., Pereira L.S., Raes D., Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, 300 p. https://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm [accessed 24 March 2023]AllenR.G.PereiraL.S.RaesD.SmithM.1998FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, 300 p. https://www.fao.org/3/x0490e/x0490e00.htm [accessed 24 March 2023]Search in Google Scholar
Antonopoulos V.Z., Antonopoulos A.V. 2017. Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 132: 86–96. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2016.11.011.AntonopoulosV.Z.AntonopoulosA.V.2017Daily reference evapotranspiration estimates by artificial neural networks technique and empirical equations using limited input climate132869610.1016/j.compag.2016.11.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Aryalekshmi B.N., Biradar R.C., Chandrasekar K., Ahamed J.M. 2021. Analysis of various surface energy balance models for evapotranspiration estimation using satellite data. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences 24(3; 2): 1119–1126. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.11.007.AryalekshmiB.N.BiradarR.C.ChandrasekarK.AhamedJ.M.2021Analysis of various surface energy balance models for evapotranspiration estimation using satellite data243; 21119112610.1016/j.ejrs.2021.11.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Olshen R.A., Stone C.J. 1984. Classification and regression trees. Chapman and Hall, USA, 368 p. DOI: 10.1201/9781315139470.BreimanL.FriedmanJ.H.OlshenR.A.StoneC.J.1984Chapman and HallUSA36810.1201/9781315139470Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chartzoulakis K., Bertaki M. 2015. Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia 4: 88–98. DOI: 10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.03.011.ChartzoulakisK.BertakiM.2015Sustainable water management in agriculture under climate change4889810.1016/j.aaspro.2015.03.011Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cobaner M. 2011. Evapotranspiration estimation by two different neuro-fuzzy inference systems. Journal of Hydrology 398(3–4): 292–302. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.030.CobanerM.2011Evapotranspiration estimation by two different neuro-fuzzy inference systems3983–429230210.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.030Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cutler D.R., Edwards T.C. Jr., Beard K.H., Cutler A., Hess K.T., Gibson J., Lawler J.J. 2007. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88(11): 2783–2792. DOI: 10.1890/07-0539.1.CutlerD.R.EdwardsT.C.Jr.BeardK.H.CutlerA.HessK.T.GibsonJ.LawlerJ.J.2007Random forests for classification in ecology88112783279210.1890/07-0539.1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Doorenbos J., Pruitt W.O. 1977. Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, 144 p. https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/6bae3071-5d7b-5206-af5c-c9bfa1d9d1fe [accessed March 24, 2023]DoorenbosJ.PruittW.O.1977FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 24, 144 p. https://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/6bae3071-5d7b-5206-af5c-c9bfa1d9d1fe [accessed March 24, 2023]Search in Google Scholar
El-Magd A.A., Baraka S.M., Eid S.F.M. 2023. Using artificial neural networks to predict the reference evapotranspiration. Journal of Water and Land Development 57(4–6): 1–8. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2023.143768.El-MagdA.A.BarakaS.M.EidS.F.M.2023Using artificial neural networks to predict the reference evapotranspiration574–61810.24425/jwld.2023.143768Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fernández J.E., Cuevas M.V. 2010. Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: A review. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 150(2): 135–151. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.006.FernándezJ.E.CuevasM.V.2010Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: A review150213515110.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gabr M.E. 2022. Management of irrigation requirements using FAO-CROPWAT 8.0 model: A case study of Egypt. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment 8(3): 3127–3142. DOI: 10.1007/s40808-021-01268-4.GabrM.E.2022Management of irrigation requirements using FAO-CROPWAT 8.0 model: A case study of Egypt833127314210.1007/s40808-021-01268-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gocic M., Trajkovic S. 2010. Software for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 71(2): 158–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2010.01.003.GocicM.TrajkovicS.2010Software for estimating reference evapotranspiration using limited weather data71215816210.1016/j.compag.2010.01.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gu Z., Qi Z., Burghate R., Yuan S., Jiao X., Xu J. 2020. Irrigation scheduling approaches and applications: A review. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 146(6); 04020007; 15 p. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001464.GuZ.QiZ.BurghateR.YuanS.JiaoX.XuJ.2020Irrigation scheduling approaches and applications: A review146604020007;1510.1061/(asce)ir.1943-4774.0001464Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hargreaves G.H., Samani Z.A. 1985. Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1(2): 96–99. DOI: 10.13031/2013.26773.HargreavesG.H.SamaniZ.A.1985Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature12969910.13031/2013.26773Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Howell T.A., Dusek D.A. 1995. Comparison of vapor-pressure-deficit calculation methods – Southern High Plains. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 121(2): 191–198. DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1995)121:2(191).HowellT.A.DusekD.A.1995Comparison of vapor-pressure-deficit calculation methods – Southern High Plains121219119810.1061/(asce)0733-9437(1995)121:2(191)Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jones H.G. 2004. Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. Journal of Experimental Botany 55(407): 2427–2436. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erh213.JonesH.G.2004Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods554072427243610.1093/jxb/erh213Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kim S.E., Sim S.Y., Kim Y.S. 2010. Comparison on irrigation management methods by integrated solar radiation and drainage level sensor in rockwool and coir bag culture for tomato. Journal of Bio-Environment Control 19(1): 12–18. [in Korean with English abstract]KimS.E.SimS.Y.KimY.S.2010Comparison on irrigation management methods by integrated solar radiation and drainage level sensor in rockwool and coir bag culture for tomato1911218[in Korean with English abstract]Search in Google Scholar
Klamkowski K., Treder W. 2002. Influence of a rootstock on transpiration rate and changes in diameter of an apple tree leader growing under different soil water regimes. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research 10: 31–39.KlamkowskiK.TrederW.2002Influence of a rootstock on transpiration rate and changes in diameter of an apple tree leader growing under different soil water regimes103139Search in Google Scholar
Klamkowski K., Treder W., Wójcik K. 2015. Effects of long-term water stress on leaf gas exchange, growth and yield of three strawberry cultivars. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum, Hortorum Cultus 14(6): 55–65.KlamkowskiK.TrederW.WójcikK.2015Effects of long-term water stress on leaf gas exchange, growth and yield of three strawberry cultivars1465565Search in Google Scholar
Kumar M., Raghuwanshi N.S., Singh R. 2011. Artificial neural networks approach in evapotranspiration modelling: a review. Irrigation Science 29(1): 11–25. DOI: 10.1007/s00271-010-0230-8.KumarM.RaghuwanshiN.S.SinghR.2011Artificial neural networks approach in evapotranspiration modelling: a review291112510.1007/s00271-010-0230-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ley T.W., Hill R.W., Jensen D.T. 1994. Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa reference evapotranspiration estimates: I. Model sensitivity analyses. Transactions of the ASAE 37(6): 1853–1861. DOI: 10.13031/2013.28276.LeyT.W.HillR.W.JensenD.T.1994Errors in Penman-Wright alfalfa reference evapotranspiration estimates: I. Model sensitivity analyses3761853186110.13031/2013.28276Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lykhovyd P. 2022. Comparing reference evapotranspiration Calculated in ETo calculator (Ukraine) mobile app with the estimated by standard FAO-based approach. AgriEngineering 4(3): 747–757. DOI: 10.3390/agriengineering4030048.LykhovydP.2022Comparing reference evapotranspiration calculated in ETo Calculator (Ukraine) mobile app with the estimated by standard FAO-based approach4374775710.3390/agriengineering4030048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mehdizadeh S. 2018. Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) using artificial intelligence methods: Offering a new approach for lagged ETo data-based modeling. Journal of Hydrology 559: 794–812. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.060.MehdizadehS.2018Estimation of daily reference evapotranspiration (ETo) using artificial intelligence methods: Offering a new approach for lagged ETo data-based modeling55979481210.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.060Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pereira L.S., Allen R.G., Smith M., Raes D. 2015. Crop evapotranspiration estimation with FAO56: Past and future. Agricultural Water Management 147: 4–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.031.PereiraL.S.AllenR.G.SmithM.RaesD.2015Crop evapotranspiration estimation with FAO56: Past and future14742010.1016/j.agwat.2014.07.031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Polade S.D., Gershunov A., Cayan D.R., Dettinger M.D., Pierce D.W. 2017. Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro-climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions. Scientific Reports 7; 10783; 10 p. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-11285-y.PoladeS.D.GershunovA.CayanD.R.DettingerM.D.PierceD.W.2017Precipitation in a warming world: Assessing projected hydro-climate changes in California and other Mediterranean climate regions71078310 p.10.1038/s41598-017-11285-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schneider T., O’Gorman P.A., Levine X.J. 2010. Water vapor and the dynamics of climate changes. Reviews of Geophysics 48(3); RG3001; 22 p. DOI: 10.1029/2009rg000302.SchneiderT.O’GormanP.A.LevineX.J.2010Water vapor and the dynamics of climate changes483RG300122 p.10.1029/2009rg000302Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sentelhas P.C., Gillespie T.J., Santos E.A. 2010. Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada. Agricultural Water Management 97(5): 635–644. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001.SentelhasP.C.GillespieT.J.SantosE.A.2010Evaluation of FAO Penman–Monteith and alternative methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration with missing data in Southern Ontario, Canada97563564410.1016/j.agwat.2009.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sutton C.D. 2005. Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting. Handbook of Statistics 24: 303–329. DOI: 10.1016/s0169-7161(04)24011-1.SuttonC.D.2005Classification and regression trees, bagging, and boosting2430332910.1016/s0169-7161(04)24011-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tang D., Feng Y., Gong D., Hao W., Cui N. 2018. Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for actual crop evapotranspiration modeling in mulched and non-mulched maize croplands. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 152: 375–384. DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.029.TangD.FengY.GongD.HaoW.CuiN.2018Evaluation of artificial intelligence models for actual crop evapotranspiration modeling in mulched and non-mulched maize croplands15237538410.1016/j.compag.2018.07.029Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tanner C.B., Sinclair T.R. 1983. Efficient Water Use in Crop Production: Research or Re-Search? In: Taylor H.M., Jordan W.R., Sinclair T.R. (Eds.), Limitations to Efficient Water Use in Crop Production. American Society of Agronomy, USA, pp. 1–27. DOI: 10.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c1.TannerC.B.SinclairT.R.1983Efficient Water Use in Crop Production: Research or Re-Search?In:TaylorH.M.JordanW.R.SinclairT.R.(Eds.),American Society of AgronomyUSA12710.2134/1983.limitationstoefficientwateruse.c1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Treder W., Klamkowski K., Tryngiel-Gać A., Sas D., Pych T. 2013. Irrigation service – an internet decision support system for irrigation of fruit crops. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas 1(2): 19–30. [in Polish with English abstract]TrederW.KlamkowskiK.Tryngiel-GaćA.SasD.PychT.2013Irrigation service – an internet decision support system for irrigation of fruit crops121930[in Polish with English abstract]Search in Google Scholar
Treder W., Klamkowski K., Tryngiel-Gać A., Wójcik K. 2022. Assessment of rainfall efficiency in an apple orchard. Journal of Water and Land Development 53(4–6): 51–57. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2022.140779.TrederW.KlamkowskiK.Tryngiel-GaćA.WójcikK.2022Assessment of rainfall efficiency in an apple orchard534–6515710.24425/jwld.2022.140779Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Treder W., Klamkowski K., Wójcik K., Tryngiel-Gać A. 2023. Machine learning for supporting irrigation decisions based on climatic water balance. Journal of Water and Land Development 58(7–9): 25–30. DOI: 10.24425/jwld.2023.145358.TrederW.KlamkowskiK.WójcikK.Tryngiel-GaćA.2023Machine learning for supporting irrigation decisions based on climatic water balance587–9253010.24425/jwld.2023.145358Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thornthwaite C.W. 1948. An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review 38(1): 55–94. DOI: 10.2307/210739.ThornthwaiteC.W.1948An approach toward a rational classification of climate381559410.2307/210739Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Vereecken H., Huisman J.A., Bogena H., Vanderborght J., Vrugt J.A., Hopmans J.W. 2008. On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review. Water Resources Research 44(4); W00D06; 21 p. DOI: 10.1029/2008wr006829.VereeckenH.HuismanJ.A.BogenaH.VanderborghtJ.VrugtJ.A.HopmansJ.W.2008On the value of soil moisture measurements in vadose zone hydrology: A review444W00D0621 p.10.1029/2008wr006829Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wanniarachchi S., Sarukkalige R. 2022. A review on evapotranspiration estimation in agricultural water management: past, present, and future. Hydrology 9(7); 123; 12 p. DOI: 10.3390/hydrology9070123.WanniarachchiS.SarukkaligeR.2022A review on evapotranspiration estimation in agricultural water management: past, present, and future9712312 p.10.3390/hydrology9070123Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Xu T., Guo Z., Liu S., He X., Meng Y., Xu Z. et al. 2018. Evaluating different machine learning methods for upscaling evapotranspiration from flux towers to the regional scale. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 123(16): 8674–8690. DOI: 10.1029/2018jd028447.XuT.GuoZ.LiuS.HeX.MengY.XuZ.2018Evaluating different machine learning methods for upscaling evapotranspiration from flux towers to the regional scale123168674869010.1029/2018jd028447Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yamaç S.S., Todorovic M. 2020. Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data. Agricultural Water Management 228; 105875; 12 p. DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105875.YamaçS.S.TodorovicM.2020Estimation of daily potato crop evapotranspiration using three different machine learning algorithms and four scenarios of available meteorological data22810587512 p.10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105875Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yang F.J. 2019. An extended idea about decision trees. 2019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence, pp. 349–354. DOI: 10.1109/csci49370.2019.00068.YangF.J.20192019 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence34935410.1109/csci49370.2019.00068Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yu L., Gao W., Shamshiri R.R., Tao S., Ren Y., Zhang Y., Su G. 2021. Review of research progress on soil moisture sensor technology. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 14(4): 32–42. DOI: 10.25165/j.ijabe.20211404.6404.YuL.GaoW.ShamshiriR.R.TaoS.RenY.ZhangY.SuG.2021Review of research progress on soil moisture sensor technology144324210.25165/j.ijabe.20211404.6404Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yuan B.-Z., Nishiyama S., Kang Y. 2003. Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato. Agricultural Water Management 63(3): 153–167. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3774(03)00174-4.YuanB.-Z.NishiyamaS.KangY.2003Effects of different irrigation regimes on the growth and yield of drip-irrigated potato63315316710.1016/s0378-3774(03)00174-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar