[Adamowski, K., 2000. Regional analysis of annual maximum and partial duration flood data by nonparametric and L-moment methods. J. Hydrol., 229, 219–231.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00156-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Ajmal, M., Wassem, M., Ahn, J.-H., Kim, T.-W., 2015. Improved runoff estimation using event-based rainfall-runoff models. Water Resour. Manag., 29, 6, 1995–2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0924-z.10.1007/s11269-015-0924-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Arnold, J.G., Williams, J.R., Srinivasan, R., King, K.W., 1995. SWAT: Soil Water Assessment Tool. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station: Blackland Research Center, Texas A&M University, Temple, TX, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baltas, E.A., Dervos, N.A., Mimikou, M.A., 2007. Research on the initial abstraction – storage ratio and its effect on hydrograph simulation at a watershed in Greece. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 4, 2169–2204. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-4-2169-2007.10.5194/hessd-4-2169-2007]Search in Google Scholar
[Banasik, K., Ignar, S., 1983. Estimation of effective rainfall using the SCS method on the base of measured rainfall and runoff. Rev. Geophys., XXVII (3–4), 401–408. (In Polish.)]Search in Google Scholar
[Banasik, K., Madeyski, M., Więzik, B., Woodward, D.E. 1997. Applicability of curve number technique for runoff estimation from small Carpathian catchments. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Developments of Hydrology of Mountainous Areas. Slovak Committee of Hydrology, Stara Lesna, Sept. 14–16, 1994, pp. 240–242. IHP-Projects, H-5-5/H-5-6, Unesco, Paris. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109610.]Search in Google Scholar
[Banasik, K., Woodward, D., 2010. Empirical determination of runoff curve number for a small agricultural watershed in Poland. In: Proc. 2nd Joint Federal Interagency Conference, Las Vegas: NV, USA, June 27–July 1, 2010, pp. 1–11. http://acwi.gov/sos/pubs/2ndJFIC/Contents/10E_Banasik_28_02_10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Banasik, K., Woodward, D.E., Hawkins, R., 2014. Curve numbers for two agro-forested watersheds. In: Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress “Water Without Borders”, ASCE, Portland: Oregon, USA, June 1–5, 2014, pp. 2235–2246. Abstract available at: https://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/9780784413548.223.10.1061/9780784413548.223]Search in Google Scholar
[Banasik, K., Rutkowska, A., Kohnová, S., 2014. Retention and curve number variability in a small agricultural catchment: the probabilistic approach. Water, 6, 5, 1118–1133.10.3390/w6051118]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartlett, M.S., Parolari, A.J., McDonnell, J.J., Porporato, A., 2016. Beyond the SCS-CN method: A theoretical framework for spatially lumped rainfall-runoff response. Water Resour. Res., 52, 4608–4627. DOI: 10.1002/2015WR018439.10.1002/2015WR018439]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartlett, M.S., Parolari, A.J., McDonnell, J.J., Porporato, A., 2017. Reply to comment by Fred L. Ogden et al. on “Beyond the SCS-CN method: A theoretical framework for spatially lumped rainfall-runoff response.” Water Resour. Res., 53, 6351–6354. DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020456.10.1002/2017WR020456]Search in Google Scholar
[Bingner, R.L., Theurer, F.D., 2005. AnnAGNPS Technical Processes: Documentation Version 3.2. USDA-ARS, National Sedimentation Laboratory, Oxford, Miss., USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bondelid, T., McCuen, R., Jackson, T., 1982. Sensitivity of SCS Models to curve number variation. J. Am. Water Resour. As., 18, 1, 111–116.10.1111/j.1752-1688.1982.tb04536.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Burn, D.H., Goel, N.K., 2000. The formation of groups for regional flood frequency analysis. Hydrolog. Sci. J., 45, 97–112. DOI: 10.1080/02626660009492308.10.1080/02626660009492308]Search in Google Scholar
[Castellarin, A., Burn, D.H., Brath, A., 2001. Assessing the effectiveness of hydrological similarity measures for flood frequency analysis. J. Hydrol., 241, 270–285.10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00383-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Cazier, D.J., Hawkins, R.H., 1984. Regional application of the curve number method. In: Proceedings of Specialty Conference, Irrigation and Drainage Division, American Society of Civil Engineers, Flagstaff, AZ, abstract, p. 710.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dalrymple, T., 1960. Flood Frequency Analyses, Manual of Hydrology. Water Supply Paper 1543-A, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Durán-Barroso, P., González, J., Valdés, J.B., 2017. Sources of uncertainty in the NRCS CN model: recognition and solutions. Hydrol. Process., 31, 22, 3898–3906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1130510.1002/hyp.11305]Search in Google Scholar
[Elhakeem, M., Papanicolaou, A.N., 2009. Estimation of the runoff curve number via direct rainfall simulator measurements in the state of Iowa, USA. Water Resour. Manag., 23, 12, 2455–2473. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9390-1.10.1007/s11269-008-9390-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaál, L., Kohnová, S., Szolgay, J., 2013. Regional flood frequency analysis in Slovakia: Which pooling approach suits better? In: Klijn, Schweckendiek (Eds): Comprehensive Flood Risk Management: Research for policy and practice. pp. 27–30.10.1201/b13715-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaswirth, J.L., Gel, Y.R., Miao, W., 2009. The impact of Levene’s test of equality of variances on statistical theory and practice. Stat. Sci., 24, 3, 343–360. DOI: 10.1214/09-STS301.10.1214/09-STS301]Search in Google Scholar
[Geetha, K., Mishra, S., Eldho, T., Rastogi, A., Pandey, R., 2007. Modifications to SCS-CN method for long-term hydrologic simulation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 133, 5, 475–486.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2007)133:5(475)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R., 1973. Improved prediction of storm runoff in mountain watersheds. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 99, 4, 519–523.10.1061/JRCEA4.0000957]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R., 1979. Runoff Curve Numbers from Partial Area Watersheds. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 105, 4, 375–389.10.1061/JRCEA4.0001275]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R., 1993. Asymptotic determination of curve numbers from data. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 119, 334–345.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1993)119:2(334)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R.H., Khojeini, A.V., 2000. Initial abstraction and loss in the curve number method. Proc. of Arizona Hydrological Society, Tucson, Arizona.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R.H., Hjelmfelt, Jr. A.T., Zevenbergen, A.W., 1985. Runoff probability, storm depth, and Curve Numbers. J. Irrig. Drain. Div., 111, 4, 330–340.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:4(330)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hawkins, R.H., Ward, T.J., Woodward, D.E., van Mullem, J.A. (Eds.), 2009. Curve Number Hydrology: State of the Practice. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA.10.1061/9780784410042]Search in Google Scholar
[Hitchcock, D.R., Jayakaran, A.D., Loflin, D.R., Williams, T.M., Amatya, D.M., 2013. Curve number derivation for watersheds draining two headwater streams in Lower Coastal Plain of South Carolina, USA. J. Am. Water. Resor. As., 49, 1284–1295.10.1111/jawr.12084]Search in Google Scholar
[Hjelmfelt, A., 1991. Investigation of curve number procedure. J. Hydraul. Eng., 117, 6, 725–737.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1991)117:6(725)]Search in Google Scholar
[Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., Kramer, L.A., Burwell, R.E., 1983. Curve numbers as random variables. In: Proceedings of the Specialty Conference on Advances in Irrigation and Drainage: Surviving External Pressures. Jackson, Wy, USA, pp. 365–370.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1990. L-moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J. R. Stat. Soc. B., 52, 1, 105–124.10.1111/j.2517-6161.1990.tb01775.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosking, J.R.M., Wallis, J.R., 1997. Regional Frequency Analysis. An Approach Based on L-Moments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 244 p.10.1017/CBO9780511529443]Search in Google Scholar
[Hosking, J.R.M., 2019. Regional frequency analysis using Lmoments. R package, version 3.2. URL: https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/lmomRFA/lmomRFA.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Jiang, R., 2001. Investigation of runoff curve number initial abstraction ratio. MS thesis. Watershed Management, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 120 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeon, J.-H., Lim, K. J., Engel, B.A., 2014. Regional calibration of CSC-CN L-THIA model: application for ungauged basins. Water, 6, 1339–1359. DOI: 10.3390/w6051339.10.3390/w6051339]Search in Google Scholar
[Karabová, B., Marková, R., 2013. Testing of regionalization of SCS-CN parameters in the Upper Hron River region, Slovakia. Adolf Patera Seminar 2013, Prague, Czech Republic.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kochanek, K., Strupczewski, W.G., Bogdanowicz, E., 2012. On seasonal approach to flood frequency modelling. Part II: flood frequency analysis of Polish rivers. Hydrol. Process., 26, 71–73. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.8178.10.1002/hyp.8178]Search in Google Scholar
[Kohnová, S., Szolgay, J., Solin, L., Hlavčova, K., 2006. Regional Methods for Prediction in Ungauged Basins. Case Studies. KEY Publishing s.r.o. in cooperation with the Slovak Committee for Hydrology, Bratislava.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kruskal, W.H., Wallis, W.A., 1952. Use of ranks in onecriterion variance analysis. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 47, 260, 583–621.10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441]Search in Google Scholar
[Leonard, R.A., Knisel, W.G., Still, D.A., 1987. GLEAMS: Groundwater loading effects of agricultural management systems. Trans. ASAE, 30, 5, 1403–1418.10.13031/2013.30578]Search in Google Scholar
[Levene, H., 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin, I., Hotteling, H. et al. (Eds.): Contributions to Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford University Press, pp. 278–292.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merz, R., Blöschl, G., 2005. Flood frequency regionalization - spatial proximity vs. catchment attributes. J. Hydrol., 302, 1–4, 283–306.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.07.018]Search in Google Scholar
[McCuen, R., 2002. Approach to confidence interval estimation for curve numbers. J. Hydraul. Eng., 7, 1, 43–48.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2002)7:1(43)]Search in Google Scholar
[Mishra, S.K., Tyagi, J.V., Singh, V.P., Singh, R., 2006. SCS-CNbased modeling of sediment yield. J. Hydrol., 324, 301–322.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Mishra, B.K., Takara, K., Tachikawa, Y., 2009. Integrating the NRCS runoff curve number in delineation of hydrologic homogeneous regions. J. Hydrol. Eng., 14, 10, 1091–1097.10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000101]Search in Google Scholar
[Mockus, V., 1972. Chapter 21: Design hydrographs. In: McKeever, V., Owen, W., Rallison, R. (Eds.): National Engineering Handbook, Section 4, Hydrology. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[R Core Team, 2018. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutkowska, A., Kohnová, S., Banasik, K., Szolgay, J., Karabová, B., 2015. Probabilistic properties of a curve number: a case study for small Polish and Slovak Carpathian Basins. J. Mt. Sci., 12, 3, 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3123-010.1007/s11629-014-3123-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Rutkowska, A., Żelazny, M., Kohnová, S., Łyp, M., Banasik, K., 2010. Regional L-moment-based flood frequency analysis in the Upper Vistula River basin, Poland. Pure Appl. Geophys., 174, 2, 701–721. DOI: 10.1007/s00024-016-1298-810.1007/s00024-016-1298-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Sahu, R.K., Mishra, S.K., Eldho, T.I., 2010. An improved AMC-coupled runoff curve number model. Hydrol. Process., 24, 20, 2834–2839.10.1002/hyp.7695]Search in Google Scholar
[Scheffé, H., 1959. The Analysis of Variance. Wiley, New York. 477 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Shi, Z.H., Chen, L.-D., Fang, N.-F., Qin, D.-F., CAI, C.-F., 2009. Research on the SCS-CN initial abstraction ratio using rainfallrunoff event analysis in the Three Gorges Area, China. Catena, 77, 1, 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006.10.1016/j.catena.2008.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Shapiro, S.S, Wilk, M.B., 1965. An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality, Biometrica, 52, 3–4, 591–611.10.1093/biomet/52.3-4.591]Search in Google Scholar
[Soulis, K.X., Valiantzas, J.D., 2012. SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds - the two-CN system approach. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 16, 1001–1015. DOI: 10.5194/hessd-8-8963-2011.10.5194/hessd-8-8963-2011]Search in Google Scholar
[Tedela, N.M., McCutcheon, S.C., Rasmussen, T.C., Tollner, E.W., 2008. Evaluation and Improvements of the Curve Number Method of Hydrological Analysis on Selected Forested Watersheds of Georgia. The University of Georgia, report submitted to Georgia Water Resources Institute. USA. Available at: http://water.usgs.gov/wrri/07grants/progress/2007GA143B.pdf (accessed on 6th February 2014).]Search in Google Scholar
[Ulrych, T.J., Velis, D.R., Woodbury, A.D., Sacchi, M.D., 2000. L-moments and C-moments. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A., 14, 50–68.10.1007/s004770050004]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, 2004. Estimation of direct runoff from storm rainfall. In: National Engineering Handbook, Chapter 10, part 630. Dept of Agriculture NRCS, Washington, DC, pp. 1–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[Verma, S., Verma, R.K., Mishra, S.K., Singh, A., Jayaraj, G.K., 2017. A revisit of NRCS-CN inspired models coupled with RS and GIS for runoff estimation. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 62, 12, 1891–1930. DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2017.133416610.1080/02626667.2017.1334166]Search in Google Scholar
[Viglione, A., 2018. nsRFA: Non-supervised Regional Frequency Analysis. R package version 0.7-14. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/nsRFA/nsRFA.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Wang, Q.J., 1996. Direct sample estimators of L moments. Water Resour. Res., 32, 3617–3619.10.1029/96WR02675]Search in Google Scholar
[Wałęga, A., Cupak, A., Amatya, D.M., Drożdżal, E., 2017. Comparison of direct outflow calculated by modified SCSCN methods for mountainous and highland catchments in upper Vistula Basin, Poland and lowland catchment in South Carolina, U.S.A. Acta Scientiarum Polonorum Formatio Circumiectus, 16, 1, 187–207.10.15576/ASP.FC/2017.16.1.187]Search in Google Scholar
[Węglarczyk, S., 2010. Statystyka w inżynierii środowiska (Statistics in Environmental Engineering). Politechnika Krakowska, Cracow, Poland, 376 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woodward, D.E., Hawkins, R.H., Jiang, R., Hjelmfelt Jr., A.T., Van Mullem, J.A., Quang, D.Q., 2003. Runoff curve number method: examination of the initial abstraction ratio. In: Bizier, P., DeBarry, P. (Eds.): Proceedings of the World Water & Environmental Resources Congress 2003 and Related Symposia, EWRI, ASCE, 23–26 June, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, p. 10. DOI: 101061/40685(2003)308.10.1061/40685(2003)308]Search in Google Scholar
[Yang, T., Xu, C.-Y., Shao, Q.-X., Chen, X., 2010. Regional flood frequency and spatial patterns analysis in the Pearl River Delta region using L-moments approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24, 165–182. DOI: 10.1007/s00477-009-0308-0.10.1007/s00477-009-0308-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Yuan, Y., Nie, W., McCutcheon, S.C., Taguas, E.V., 2014. Initial abstraction and curve number for semiarid watersheds in Southeastern Arizona. Hydrol. Process., 28, 3, 774–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hyp.959210.1002/hyp.9592]Search in Google Scholar