Login
Registrati
Reimposta password
Pubblica & Distribuisci
Soluzioni Editoriali
Soluzioni di Distribuzione
Temi
Architettura e design
Arti
Business e Economia
Chimica
Chimica industriale
Farmacia
Filosofia
Fisica
Geoscienze
Ingegneria
Interesse generale
Legge
Letteratura
Linguistica e semiotica
Matematica
Medicina
Musica
Scienze bibliotecarie e dell'informazione, studi library
Scienze dei materiali
Scienze della vita
Scienze informatiche
Scienze sociali
Sport e tempo libero
Storia
Studi classici e del Vicino Oriente antico
Studi culturali
Studi ebraici
Teologia e religione
Pubblicazioni
Riviste
Libri
Atti
Editori
Blog
Contatti
Cerca
EUR
USD
GBP
Italiano
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrello
Home
Riviste
Journal of Nematology
Volume 54 (2022): Numero 1 (February 2022)
Accesso libero
Toxicity of Tioxazafen to
Meloidogyne incognita
and
Rotylenchulus reniformis
Travis R. Faske
Travis R. Faske
,
Katherine Brown
Katherine Brown
e
Jesse Kelly
Jesse Kelly
| 17 apr 2022
Journal of Nematology
Volume 54 (2022): Numero 1 (February 2022)
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Articolo precedente
Articolo Successivo
Sommario
Articolo
Immagini e tabelle
Bibliografia
Autori
Articoli in questo Numero
Anteprima
PDF
Cita
CONDIVIDI
Article Category:
Research Paper
Pubblicato online:
17 apr 2022
Pagine:
-
Ricevuto:
09 dic 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2022-0007
Parole chiave
behavior
,
EC
,
hatch
,
nematicides
,
recovery
,
reniform nematode
,
southern root-knot nematode
,
toxicity
© 2022 Travis R. Faske et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
Relationship between the paralyses of M. incognita and R. reniformis treated for 24 hr and 48 hr with water solutions of tioxazafen. Equations were derived by nonlinear regression of probit analysis. For each equation, the R2 value was 0.99 (P = 0.0001).
Figure 2
Effect of tioxazafen on hatch of M. incognita and R. reniformis. Different letters over bars per sample day indicate a significant difference at α = 0.05 according to Fisher’s LSD procedure. LSD, least significant difference.
Figure 3
Recovery of M. incognita and R. reniformis treated with tioxazafen. Each species was treated with water solutions corresponding to its 48-hr EC50 value of tioxazafen for 24 hr, and then rinsed and transferred to distilled water. Different letters over bars indicate a significant difference at α = 0.05 according to Fisher’s LSD procedure. LSD, least significant difference.
Figure 4
Effect of low concentrations of tioxazafen on infectivity of M. incognita and R. reniformis on tomato roots. Different letters over bars indicate a significant difference at α = 0.05 according to Fisher’s LSD procedure. LSD, least significant difference.