Identification of contractions from Electrohysterography for prediction of prolonged labor

1S. Sobhy et al., “Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet. 2019; 393(10184): 1973–1982. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32386-9. Sobhy S. et al “Maternal and perinatal mortality and complications associated with caesarean section in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis” The Lancet 2019 393 10184 1973–1982 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32386-930929893Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2G. Molina et al., “Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality,” JAMA. 2015; 314(21): 2263–2270. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.15553. Molina G. et al “Relationship Between Cesarean Delivery Rate and Maternal and Neonatal Mortality ” JAMA 2015 314 21 2263 2270 10.1001/jama.2015.1555326624825Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3“FOGSI - Cesarean Rates (JDT),” The Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India. https://www.fogsi.org/fogsicesarean-rates-jdt/ (accessed Mar. 11, 2020). “FOGSI - Cesarean Rates (JDT),” The Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India https://www.fogsi.org/fogsicesarean-rates-jdt/ (accessed Mar. 11, 2020)Search in Google Scholar

4G. Desai et al., “Rates, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries: A comparison of tribal and non-tribal women in Gujarat, India,” PLOS ONE. 2017; 12(12): e0189260. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189260. Desai G. et al “Rates, indications, and outcomes of caesarean section deliveries: A comparison of tribal and non-tribal women in Gujarat India,” PLOS ONE 2017 12 12 e0189260 10.1371/journal.pone.0189260574493429281645Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5K. B. Kozhimannil, M. M. Casey, P. Hung, X. Han, S. Prasad, and I. S. Moscovice, “The Rural Obstetric Workforce in US Hospitals: Challenges and Opportunities,” J. Rural Health. 2015; 31(4): 365–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/jrh.12112. Kozhimannil K. B. Casey M. M. Hung P. Han X. Prasad S. and Moscovice I. S. “The Rural Obstetric Workforce in US Hospitals: Challenges and Opportunities,” J Rural Health 2015 31 4 365 372 10.1111/jrh.12112458049025808202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6K. R. Simpson, “Predicting Nurse Staffing Needs for a Labor and Birth Unit in a Large-Volume Perinatal Service,” J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2015; 44(2): 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1552-6909.12549. Simpson K. R. “Predicting Nurse Staffing Needs for a Labor and Birth Unit in a Large-Volume Perinatal Service,” J. Obstet Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs 2015 44 2 329 338 10.1111/1552-6909.1254925652215Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7J. Zocco, M. J. Williams, D. B. Longobucco, and B. Bernstein, “A Systems Analysis of Obstetric Triage,” J. Perinat. Neonatal Nurs. 2007; 21(4): 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JPN.0000299789.47161.8a. Zocco J. Williams M. J. Longobucco D. B. and Bernstein B. “A Systems Analysis of Obstetric Triage,” J Perinat. Neonatal Nurs 2007 21 4 315 322 10.1097/01.JPN.0000299789.47161.8a18004169Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8T. Y. Euliano et al., “Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of three methods,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 208(1): 66.e1–66.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.873. Euliano T. Y. et al., “Monitoring uterine activity during labor: a comparison of three methods,” Am. J Obstet. Gynecol 2013 208 1 66e1–66.e6 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.873352984423122926Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9R. K. Riemer and M. A. Heymann, “Regulation of Uterine Smooth Muscle Function during Gestation,” Pediatr. Res. 1998; 44(5): 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1203/00006450-199811000-00001. Riemer R. K. and Heymann M. A. “Regulation of Uterine Smooth Muscle Function during Gestation,” Pediatr Res 1998 44 5 615 627 10.1203/00006450-199811000-000019803440Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10T. Y. Euliano, D. Marossero, M. T. Nguyen, N. R. Euliano, J. Principe, and R. K. Edwards, “Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009; 200(1): 54.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.008. Euliano T. Y. Marossero D. Nguyen M. T. Euliano N. R. Principe J. and Edwards R. K. “Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor,” Am J. Obstet. Gynecol 2009 200 1 54e1–7 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.09.00819121657Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

11B. Vasak et al., “Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2013; 209(3): 232.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.056. Vasak B. et al “Uterine electromyography for identification of first-stage labor arrest in term nulliparous women with spontaneous onset of labor,” Am. J Obstet. Gynecol 2013 209 3 232e1–8 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.05.05623727524Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12R. K. Edwards et al., “Evaluating Fundal Dominant Contractions on Spatiotemporal Electrohysterography as a Marker for Effective Labor Contractions,” Am. J. Perinatol. 2019; 36(9): 924–929. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1675621. Edwards R. K. et al “Evaluating Fundal Dominant Contractions on Spatiotemporal Electrohysterography as a Marker for Effective Labor Contractions,” Am. J Perinatol 2019 36 9 924 929 10.1055/s-0038-167562130414600Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

13B. Vasak et al., “Identification of first-stage labor arrest by electromyography in term nulliparous women after induction of labor,” Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2017; 96(7): 868–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13127. Vasak B. et al “Identification of first-stage labor arrest by electromyography in term nulliparous women after induction of labor,” Acta Obstet Gynecol. Scand 2017 96 7 868 876 10.1111/aogs.1312728295156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14S. Vasist, P. Bhat, S. Ulman, and H. Hebbar, “Quantified comparison of uterine electrical activity during active labor at various locations NN abdominal surface: A preliminary study,” Int. J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng. 2019; 8(4): 1472–1475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/66842019. Vasist S. Bhat P. Ulman S. and Hebbar H. “Quantified comparison of uterine electrical activity during active labor at various locations NN abdominal surface: A preliminary study,” Int J. Adv. Trends Comput. Sci. Eng 2019 8 4 1472 1475 https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2019/66842019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15B. C. Jacod, E. M. Graatsma, E. Van Hagen, and G. H. A. Visser, “A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour,” J. Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010; 23(1): 17–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767050903156668. Jacod B. C. Graatsma E. M. Van Hagen E. and Visser G. H. A. “A validation of electrohysterography for uterine activity monitoring during labour,” J Matern.-Fetal Neonatal Med 2010 23 1 17 22 10.3109/1476705090315666819672790Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16K. Horoba, J. Jezewski, J. Wrobel, and S. Graczyk, “Algorithm for detection of uterine contractions from electrohysterogram,” in 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. 2001; 3: 2161–2164. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1017198. Horoba K. Jezewski J. Wrobel J. and Graczyk S. “Algorithm for detection of uterine contractions from electrohysterogram,” in 2001 Conference Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2001 3 2161 2164 10.1109/IEMBS.2001.1017198Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17X. Li and A. Aruin, “Muscle activity onset time detection using teager-kaiser energy operator,” Conf. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Annu. Conf. 2005; 2005: 7549–7552. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616259. Li X. and Aruin A. “Muscle activity onset time detection using teager-kaiser energy operator,” Conf. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. IEEE Eng Med. Biol. Soc. Annu. Conf 2005 2005 7549 7552 10.1109/IEMBS.2005.161625917282028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18“Teager–Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945630/(accessed Mar. 11, 2020). “Teager–Kaiser energy operator signal conditioning improves EMG onset detection.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2945630/(accessed Mar. 11, 2020)Search in Google Scholar

19M. Tabie and E. A. Kirchner, “EMG Onset Detection - Comparison of Different Methods for a Movement Prediction Task based on EMG,” BIOSIGNALS. 2013: 242-247. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004250102420247. Tabie M. and Kirchner E. A. “EMG Onset Detection - Comparison of Different Methods for a Movement Prediction Task based on EMG,” BIOSIGNALS 2013 242 247 10.5220/0004250102420247Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20J. F. Kaiser, “On a simple algorithm to calculate the ‘energy’ of a signal,” in International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 1990; 1: 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1990.115702. Kaiser J. F. “On a simple algorithm to calculate the ‘energy’ of a signal,” in International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 1990 1 381 384 10.1109/ICASSP.1990.115702Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

21J. F. Kaiser, “Some useful properties of Teager’s energy operators,” in 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. 1993; 3: 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319457. Kaiser J. F. “Some useful properties of Teager’s energy operators,” in 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech, and Signal Processing 1993 3 149 152 10.1109/ICASSP.1993.319457Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

22S. D. Larks and K. Dasgupta, “Wave forms of the electrohysterogram in pregnancy and labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1958; 75(5): 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(58)90828-7. Larks S. D. and Dasgupta K. “Wave forms of the electrohysterogram in pregnancy and labor,” Am. J Obstet. Gynecol 1958 75 5 1069 1078 10.1016/0002-9378(58)90828-713520832Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23R. A. Sher and E. M. Southern, “An evaluation of contractile activity in the lower uterine segment in labor by external tokodynamometry,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1957; 73(4): 822–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(57)90393-9. Sher R. A. and Southern E. M. “An evaluation of contractile activity in the lower uterine segment in labor by external tokodynamometry,” Am. J Obstet. Gynecol 1957 73 4 822 836 10.1016/0002-9378(57)90393-913411048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

24L. Spätling, C. Behrens, A. Hasenburg, and F. Fallenstein, “External four channel tocography in preterm labor. First results,” J. Perinat. Med. - Off. J. WAPM. 2009; 25(1): 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/jpme.1997.25.1.43. Spätling L. Behrens C. Hasenburg A. and Fallenstein F. “External four channel tocography in preterm labor. First results,” J Perinat. Med. - Off. J. WAPM 2009 25 1 43 48 10.1515/jpme.1997.25.1.439085202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

25L. M. Hellman, “Characteristics of the gradients of uterine contractility during the first stage of true labor,” Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1951; 61(6): 1398. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(51)90938-6. Hellman L. M. “Characteristics of the gradients of uterine contractility during the first stage of true labor,” Am J. Obstet. Gynecol 1951 61 6 1398 10.1016/0002-9378(51)90938-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar