Forensic Science Integration in Legal Education: A Paradigm Shift for Strengthening Legal Expertise in Pakistan

1 Ali, MI., (2022). Teaching legal reasoning to law students in Pakistan: Need for reforms in LLB curriculum. Journal of Legal Studies, 30 (44), pp.13–26. Search in Google Scholar

2 Canela, C., Buadze, A., Dube, A., Jackowski, C., Pude, I., Nellen, R., Signorini, P., Liebrenz, M., (2019). How do legal experts cope with medical reports and forensic evidence? The experiences, perceptions, and narratives of Swiss judges and other legal experts. Front Psychiatry, 10 (18). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6381858/pdf/fpsyt-10-00018.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

3 Claude, R., Sheila, W., Céline, W., (2021). Shifting forensic science focus from means to purpose: A path forward for the discipline? Science & Justice, 61(6), pp. 678–686. Search in Google Scholar

4 Delia, M., (2022). Achieving judgment by means of forensic science during the criminal proceedings in Romania. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, Porto Alegre, 8 (2), pp. 929–963. Search in Google Scholar

5 Dirkmaat, D.C., Cabo, LL., (2016). Forensic archaeology and forensic taphonomy: Basic considerations on how to properly process and interpret the outdoor forensic scene. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6 (3), pp. 439–454. Search in Google Scholar

6 Elénore, R., Hannes, S., Eoghan, C., (2020). Structured decision making in investigations involving digital and multimedia evidence. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 34. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666281720300512. Search in Google Scholar

7 HEC Report on Curriculum of Law for 5 Years LLB Program, (2010). http://hec.gov.pk/english/services/universities/RevisedCurricula/Documents/2010-2011/Law-2010.pdf#search=llb. Search in Google Scholar

8 HEC Report on Curriculum of LLB 5 Years. http://hec.gov.pk/english/services/universities/RevisedCurricula/Documents/201415/Final%20Curriculum%20%20LLB.pdf#search=llb Search in Google Scholar

9 Higher Education Commission Ordinance, (2002). Search in Google Scholar

10 Legal Education Rules, (2015). Search in Google Scholar

11 Losif, K., (2022). Technologies of justice: Forensics and the evolution of transitional justice. European Journal of International Relations, 29 (1), pp. 29–52. Search in Google Scholar

12 Lucina, H., (2021). Communication, Forensic Science and the Law. WIREs Forensic Science. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1396. Search in Google Scholar

13 Martin, E., (2016). Evidence on Trial. Science Magazine, 351, pp. 1129–1132. Search in Google Scholar

14 National Research Council, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009). https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/22809. Search in Google Scholar

15 O’Brien, E., Nic Daeid, N., Black, S., (2015). Science in the court: pitfalls, challenges and solutions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 370 (1674). http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0062. Search in Google Scholar

16 Pakistan Bar Council Legal Education Rules, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

17 Resnik, D.B., Elliott, K.C., (2016). The Ethical challenges of socially responsible science. Accountability in Research, 23 (1), pp. 31–46. Search in Google Scholar

18 Roberts, P., (2015). Paradigms of forensic science and legal process: A critical diagnosis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 370 (1674). https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/epdf/10.1098/rstb.2014.0256. Search in Google Scholar

19 Robert Sanger, M., (2019). Forensics: Educating the Lawyers. The Journal of the Legal Profession, 43 (2), pp. 221–250. Search in Google Scholar

20 Rowan, D., (2023). Examining the relationship between legal systems and forensic science: Current issues and proposed solutions. Themis: Research Journal of Justice Studies and Forensic Science, 11. https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/themis/vol11/iss1/2. Search in Google Scholar

21 Shipra, G., Indu, B.J., (2023). Crime scene investigation and forensic evidence: Forensic analysis and tools. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results, 14 (2), pp. 3661–3667. Search in Google Scholar

22 Swofford, H., Champod, C., (2022). Probabilistic reporting and algorithms in forensic science: Stakeholder perspectives of the American criminal justice system. Forensic Science International: Synergy, 4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589871X22000055?via%3Dihub. Search in Google Scholar

23 Stone, E.M., (2014). Guiding students to develop an understanding of scientific inquiry: A science skills approach to instruction and assessment. CBE Life Science Education, 13 (1), pp. 90–101. Search in Google Scholar

24 The Constitution (Eighteenth Amendment) Act, (2010). Search in Google Scholar

25 The Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, (1973). Search in Google Scholar

26 The Punjab Higher Education Commission Act, (2015). Search in Google Scholar

27 The Sindh Higher Education Commission Act, (2013). Search in Google Scholar

28 Yadav, P.K., (2017). Ethical issues across different fields of forensic science. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Science, 7 (1). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5514178/pdf/41935_2017_Article_10.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

29 Young, M., (2022). Law vs Science: Genomic evidence, wrongful convictions and the requirement for a statutory framework. Canberra Law Review, 19 (1), pp. 1–35. Search in Google Scholar