[
Addison T. and Heshmati A. 2003. The New Global Determinants of FDI Flows to Developing Countries. United Nations University. WIDER, Discussion Papers No. 2003/45.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ali, F., Fiess, N. and MacDonald, R. 2010. Do Institutions Matter for Foreign Direct Investment? Open Economies Review. Springer 21 (2): 201-219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Altomone, C. 1998. FDI in the CEECs and the theory of real options: an empirical assessment. LICOS Centre for Transition Economics Discussion Paper 76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asiedu E. 2002. On the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries: Is Africa Different?. World Development 30 (1): 107-118.10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00100-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Asiedu, E. 2005. Foreign Direct Investment in Africa: The Role of Natural Resources, Market Size, Government Policy, Institutions and Political Instability. UN-WIDER Research Paper, No. 2005/24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey, N. 2018. Exploring the relationship between Institutional Factors and FDI Attractiveness: A Meta-analytic Review. International Business Review 27 (1): 139-148.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.05.012
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bekes, G. 2005. Location of manufacturing FDI in Hungary: how important are inter-company relationships?. Magyar Nemzeti Bank Working Paper No. 2005/7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benassy-Quere, A. and Lahreche-Revil, A. 2005. Corporate taxation and FDI within the EU 25. Paper presented at the 2nd Euroframe Conference on Economic Policy Issues in the European Union, Vienna.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bevan, A. and Estrin, S. 2000. The determinants of foreign direct investment in transition economies. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 2638. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bevan, A., Estrin, S. and Meyer, K. 2004. Foreign investment location and institutional development in transition economies. International Business Review 13: 43-64.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2003.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boudier-Bensebaa, F. 2005. Agglomeration economies and location choice: foreign direct investment in Hungary. Economics of Transition 13: 605-628.10.1111/j.0967-0750.2005.00234.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brenton, P., Di Mauro, F. and Lucke, M. 1999. Economic integration and FDI: An empirical analysis of foreign investment in the EU and in Central and Eastern Europe. Empirica 26: 95-121.10.2139/ssrn.139908
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Buchanan, J. M. 1991. Economics in the Post-Socialist Century. The Economic Journal 101 (1): 15-21.10.2307/2233831
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Busse, M. 2004. Transnational Corporation and Repression of Political Rights and Civil Liberties: An Empirical Analysis. Kyklos 54: 45-65.10.1111/j.0023-5962.2004.00242.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Campos, N. and Kinoshita, Y. 2003. Why Does FDI Go Where It Goes? New Evidence from the Transition Economies. IMF Working papers 03/228.10.5089/9781451875461.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christie, E. 2003. Foreign Direct Investment in Southeast Europe. Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, Working Paper No. 24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clausing, K.A. and Dorobantu, C.L. 2005. Re-entering Europe: does European Union candidacy boost foreign direct investment?. Economics of Transition 13: 77-103.10.1111/j.1468-0351.2005.00208.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Contractor, F.J., Dangol, R., Nuruzzaman, N. and Raghunath, S. 2020. How do country regulations and business environment impact foreign direct investment (FDI) inflows?. International Business Review 29 (2020) 101640: 1-13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornia, G. A. and Popov, V., ed. 2001. Transition and institutions – the experience of gradual and late reformers. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199242184.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Damijan, J. P., Rojec, M., Majcen, B. and Knell, M. 2008. Impact of firm heterogeneity on direct and spillover effects of FDI: micro evidence from ten transition countries. LICOS Discussion Paper 21808, LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, K. U. Leuven.10.2139/ssrn.1361535
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunning, J. H. 1998. Location and the multinational enterprise: A neglected factor. Journal of International Business Studies 29 (1): 45-66.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490024
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Contractor, F.J., Nuruzzaman, N., Dangol, R. and Raghunath, S. 2021. How FDI inflows to emerging markets are influenced by country regulatory factors: An exploratory study. Journal of International Management 27 (1): 100834.10.1016/j.intman.2021.100834
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galego, Al, Vieira, C. and Vieira, I. 2004. The CEEC and FDI attractors, a menace to the EU periphery?. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 40 (5): 4-91.10.1080/1540496X.2004.11052585
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ginevičius, R. and Šimelytė, A. 2011. Government incentives directed towards foreign direct investment: a case of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of Business Economics and Management 12 (3): 435-450.10.3846/16111699.2011.599415
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Globerman, S. and Shapiro, D. 2002. Global foreign direct investment flows: the role of governance infrastructure. World Development 30 (11): 1898-1919.10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00110-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grabher, G. 1993. The Weakness of Strong Ties. The Lock-in of Regional Development in the Ruhr Area. In: The Embedded Firm, ed. G. Grabher. London: Routledge, pp. 255-277.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grossman, G. M. and Helpman, E. 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harms, P. and H. Ursprung 2002. Do Civil and Political Repression Really Boost Foreign Direct Investment?. Economic Inquiry 40 (4): 651-663.10.1093/ei/40.4.651
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hossain, MT, Hassan, Z., Shafiq, S. and Basit, A. 2018. Ease of Doing Business and Its Impact on Inward FDI. Indonesian Journal of Management and Business Economics 1 (1): 52-65.10.32455/ijmbe.v1i1.52
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Havrylyshyn, O. and Van Rooden, R. 2003. Institutions matter in transition, but so do policies. Comparative Economic Studies 45 (1): 2-24.10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Henisz, W.J. 2000. The Institutional Environment for Multinational Investment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 16: 334-364.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, A. 2006. FDI inflows to the transition economies in Eastern Europe: magnitude and determinants. The Royal Institute of Technology. CESIS (Centre for Excellence for Studies in Science in Innovation), Paper No. 59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jovanovic, B. and Jovanovic, B. 2018. Ease of doing business and FDI in the ex-socialist countries. International economics and economic policy 15 (3): 587-627.10.1007/s10368-017-0377-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kunčič, A. and Jaklič, A. 2014. FDI and institutions: Formal and informal institutions. In Multinational enterprises, markets and institutional diversity. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1108/S1745-886220140000009007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurul, Z. 2017. Nonlinear relationship between institutional factors and FDI flows: Dynamic panel threshold analysis. International Review of Economics and Finance 48: 148-160.10.1016/j.iref.2016.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lall, S. 2003. Reinventing industrial strategy: The role of government policy in building industrial competitiveness. Report for the Intergovernmental Group on Monetary Affairs and Development (G-24).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lall, S. 2004. Introduction and overview, in Sanjaya Lall and Shujiro Urata Eds., Competitiveness FDI and Technological Activity in East Asia, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.10.4337/9781781950562
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lankes, H. P. and Venables, A. J. 1996. FDI in economic transition: the changing pattern of investments. Economics of Transition 4 (2): 331-347.10.1111/j.1468-0351.1996.tb00176.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Li, C. 2020. Enhancing or inhibiting: The impact of investment in political ties on the link between firm innovation and productivity. International Business Review 29 (2): 101636.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Limao, N. and Venables, A. J. 2001. Infrastructure, Geographical Disadvantage, Transport Costs, and Trade. The World Bank Economic Review 15 (3): 451.10.1093/wber/15.3.451
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meyer, K.E. 2001. Institutions, Transaction Costs and Entry Mode Choice. Journal of International Business Studies 32 (2): 357-367.10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milgrom, P. R., North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R. 1990. The role of institutions in the revival of trade: The law merchant, private judges, and the Champagne fairs. Economics and Politics 2 (1): 1–23.10.1111/j.1468-0343.1990.tb00020.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mudambi, R. and Navarra, P. 2002. Institutions and international business: a theoretical overview. International Business Review 11 (6): 635-646.10.1016/S0969-5931(02)00042-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Murgasova, Z. 2005. Post-transition investment behavior in Poland: a sectoral panel analysis. International Monetary Fund: 184, Washington.10.5089/9781451862034.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Narula, R. and Dunning, J. 2000. Industrial Development, Globalisation and Multinational Enterprises: New Realities for Developing Countries. Oxford Development Studies 28: 141-167.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Neuhaus, M. 2006. The Impact of FDI on Economic Growth, An Analysis for the Transition Countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Physica-Verlag, A Springer Company
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Noorbakhsh, F., Paloni A. and Youssef A. 2001. Human Capital and FDI Inflows to Developing Countries: New Empirical Evidence. World Development 26 (7): 1593-1610.10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00054-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North, D. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University. Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2018. Competitiveness in South East Europe: A Policy Outlook 2018, Competitiveness and Private Sector Development, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264298576-en. (accessed October 3, 2020)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2006. Investment reform index 2006, Progress in Policy Reforms to improve the Investment Climate in South East Europe. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/41/0/37686316.pdf (accessed October 3, 2020).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD. 2010. Investment Reform Index 2010 Monitoring policies and institutions for direct investment in South-East Europe.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Resmini, L. 2000. The determinants of foreign direct investment in the CEECs: New evidence from sectoral patterns. Economics of Transition 8 (3): 665-689.10.1111/1468-0351.00060
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sen, K. and Sinha, C. 2017. The location choice of US foreign direct investments: how do institutions matter? Journal of Institutional Eonomics 13 (2), 401-420.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sethi, D., Judge, W. Q. and Sun, Q. 2009. FDI distribution within China: an integrative conceptual framework for analyzing intra-country FDI variations. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, online, DOI 10.1007/s10490-009-9144-5.
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Smarzynska, B.K. 2002. Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Pullovers through Backward Linkages. Working Paper.10.1596/1813-9450-2923
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spar, D. 1999. Foreign Investment and Human Rights. Challenge 42 (1): 55–80.10.1080/05775132.1999.11472078
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stiglitz, J. 1999. Whither Reform? Ten Years of the Transition. Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, April 28 to 30, World Bank, Washington, DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, J. 1993. An analysis of the factors determining the geographical distribution of Japanese manufacturing investment in theU K, 1984-91. Urban Studies 30 (7): 1209-24.10.1080/00420989320081131
]Search in Google Scholar
[
UNCTAD. 2006. FDI from Developing and Transition Economies: Implications for Development. Geneva, United Nations.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vanberg, V. 1992. Innovation, Cultural Evolution and Economic Growth», in: Ulrich Witt (ed.): Explaining Process and Change. Approaches to Evolutionary Economics, pp. 105-121, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walkenhorst, P. 2004. Economic transition and the sectoral patterns of foreign direct investment. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 40 (2): 5-2610.1080/1540496X.2004.11052564
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Z.Q. and Swain, N.J. 1995. The determinants of foreign direct investment in transforming economies: empirical evidence from Hungary and China. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 131: 359-382.10.1007/BF02707440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wheeler, D. and Mody, A. 1992. Institutional investment location decisions, the case of US firms. Journal of International Economics 33: 57–76.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, O. E. 2000. The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economics Literature 38 (3): 57-76.10.1257/jel.38.3.595
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williamson, O. E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, Free Press World Bank, Washington DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yeager, T. J. 1999. Institutions, Transition Economies, and Economic Development, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Young, H. P. 1998. Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.10.1515/9780691214252
]Search in Google Scholar