[
Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly 24 (4): 665-694.10.2307/3250951
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. 1998. A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research 9 (2): 101-215.10.1287/isre.9.2.204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T. M. 1983. The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology 45 (2): 357-376.10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J. and Herron, M. 1996. Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal 39 (5): 1154-1184.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bates, D. 2013. Are ‘digital natives’ equipped to conquer the legal landscape? Legal Information Management 13 (3): 172-178.10.1017/S1472669613000418
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Becker, S.A., Pasquini, L.A. and Zentner, A. 2017. 2017 Digital literacy impact study: An NMC horizon project strategic brief. Austin, Texas: The New Media Consortium. (Volume 3.5, November 2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, S. and Maton, K. 2010. Beyond the ‘digital natives’ debate: Towards a more nuanced understanding of students’ technology experiences. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26 (5): 321-331.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00360.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bennett, S., Maton, K. and Kervin, L. 2008. The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British journal of educational technology 39 (5): 775-786.10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boonaert, T. and Vettenburg, N. 2011. Young people’s internet use: Divided or diversified? Childhood 18 (1): 54-66.10.1177/0907568210367524
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borhans, L. and Weel, B.T. 2002. Do older workers have more trouble using a computer than younger workers? In A. De Grip, J. Van Loo and K. Mayhev (Eds), The economics of skills obsolescence (Research in Labor Economics 21: 139-173). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.10.1016/S0147-9121(02)21009-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brislin, R. W. 1986. The wording and translation of research instruments. In W.J. Lonner and J.W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research 137-164. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, Y. G. 2015. The use of computer games as foreign language learning tasks for digital natives. System 54: 91-102.10.1016/j.system.2014.10.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carlsen, A., Clegg, S. and Gjersvik, R. 2012. Idea work. Oslo: Aschehoug.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chi, M. T. H., Glaser, R. and Farr, M. J. (Eds.). 1988. The nature of expertise. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cimperman, M., Makovec Brenčič, M. and Trkman, P. 2016. Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an extended UTAUT model. International Journal of Medical Informatics 90: 22-31.10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Černe, M., Hernaus, T., Dysvik, A. and Škerlavaj, M. 2017. The role of multilevel synergistic interplay among team mastery climate, knowledge hiding, and job characteristics in stimulating innovative work behavior. Human Resource Management Journal 27 (2): 281-299.10.1111/1748-8583.12132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davison, R. M. and Ou, C. X. J. 2017. Digital work in a digitally challenged organization. Information and Management 54 (1): 129-137.10.1016/j.im.2016.05.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Haan, J., Huysmans, F. and Steyaert, J. 2002. At home in a digital world: Acquiring digital skills between home and school. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Agency.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
De Jong, J. and Den Hartog, D. 2010. Measuring innovative work behavior. Creativity and Innovation Management 19 (1): 23-36.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Derks, D., Bakker, A. B., Peters, P. and van Wingerden, P. 2016. Work-related smartphone use, work–family conflict and family role performance: The role of segmentation preference. Human Relations 69 (5): 1045-1068.10.1177/0018726715601890
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dewett, T. and Jones, G.R. 2001. The role of information technology in the organization: A review, model, and assessment. Journal of Management 27 (3): 313-346.10.1177/014920630102700306
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DiMaggio, P. and Hargittai, E. 2001. From the “digital divide” to “digital inequality”: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies. Working Paper No. 15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Durndell, A. and Haag, Z. 2002. Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in human behavior 18 (5): 521-535.10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eastin, M. S. and LaRose, R. 2000. Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the digital divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1).10.1111/j.1083-6101.2000.tb00110.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ericsson, K. A. 2003. The search for general abilities and basic capacities: Theoretical implications from the modifiability and complexity of mechanisms mediating expert performance. In R. J. Sternberg and E. L. Grigorenko (Eds.), Perspectives on the psychology of abilities, competencies, and expertise (93–125). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615801.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ericsson, K. A. and Smith, J. 1991. Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. A. Ericsson and J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eshet-Alkali, Y. and Amichai-Hamburger, Y. 2004. Experiments in digital literacy. CyberPsychology and Behavior 7 (4): 421–429.10.1089/cpb.2004.7.421
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrari, A. 2012. Digital competence in practice: An analysis of frameworks. European Commission, Journal Research Centre (JRC) Technical Reports, Luxembourg Publications Office of the European Union.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fieseler, C., Meckel, M. and Ranzini, G. 2014. Professional personae – How organizational identification shapes online identity in the workplace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 20: 153-170.10.1111/jcc4.12103
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fieseler, C. and Ranzini, G. 2015. The networked communications manager: A typology of managerial social media impression management tactics. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 20 (4): 500-517.10.1108/CCIJ-02-2015-0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fichman, R.G., Dos Santos, B.L. and Zheng, Z. 2014. Digital innovation as a fundamental and powerful concept in the information systems curriculum. MIS Quarterly 38 (2): 329-353.10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Friedberg, L. 2003. The impact of technological change on older workers: Evidence from data on computer use. ILR Review 56 (3): 511-529.10.1177/001979390305600309
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilster, P. 1997. Digital literacy (1st ed.), New York: John Wiley and Sons.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gough, H. G. 1979. A creative personality scale for the adjective check list. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (8): 1398-1405.10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1398
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gu, X., Zhu, Y. and Guo, X. 2013. Meeting the “digital natives”: Understanding the acceptance of technology in classrooms. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 16 (1): 392-402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gui, M. and Argentin, G. 2011. Digital skills of internet natives: Different forms of digital literacy in a random sample of northern Italian high school students. New Media and Society 13 (6): 963-980.10.1177/1461444810389751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hammond, M. M., Neff, N. L., Farr, J. L., Schwall, A. R. and Zhao, X. 2011. Predictors of individual-level innovation at work: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 5 (1): 90-105.10.1037/a0018556
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hargittai, E. 2001. Second-level digital divide: Mapping differences in people’s online skills. First Monday 7 (4).10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hargittai, E. 2005. Survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social science computer review 23 (3): 371-379.10.1177/0894439305275911
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hargittai, E. 2009. An update on survey measures of web-oriented digital literacy. Social Science Computer Review 27 (1): 130-137.10.1177/0894439308318213
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harman, H. H. 1976. Modern factor analysis (3rd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Helsper, E. J. and Eynon, R. 2010. Digital natives: Where is the evidence?. British educational research journal 36 (3): 503-520.10.1080/01411920902989227
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ilomäki, L., Kantosalo, A. and Lakkala, M. 2011. What is digital competence? In Linked Portal. Brussels: European Schoolnet.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jackson, J.D., Yi, M.Y. and Park, J.S. 2013. An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Information and Management 50 (4): 154-161.10.1016/j.im.2013.02.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N. and Kiron, D. 2015. Is your business ready for a digital future?. MIT Sloan management review 56 (4): 37-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kang, M. H., Lee, J. E., Kim, M. J. and Yun, N. R. 2011. Identifying the predictors of learning outcomes in using mathematics digital textbooks. The Journal of Educational Methodology studies 23 (1): 127-150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kang, M. H., Song, Y. H., Lee, J. E. and Ku, J. A. 2010. Outcomes in using English digital textbook. The Journal of Educational Information and Media 16 (2): 197-221.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirschner, P. A. and De Bruyckere, P. 2017. The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education 67: 135-142.10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kirton, M. J. and De Ciantis, S. M. 1986. Cognitive style and personality: The Kirton adaption- innovation and Cattell’s sixteen personality factor inventories. Personality and Individual Differences 7 (2): 141-146.10.1016/0191-8869(86)90048-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kong, S. C. 2014. Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers and Education 78: 160-17310.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koning, J. A. and Gelderblom, A. 2006. ICT and older workers: No unwrinkled relationship. International Journal of Manpower 27 (5): 467-490.10.1108/01437720610683967
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LaBay, D. G. and Kinnear, T. C. 1981. Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems. Journal of Consumer Research 8 (3): 271-278.10.1086/208865
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LeBreton, J. M., Tonidandel, S. and Krasikova, D. V. 2013. Residualized relative importance analysis: A technique for the comprehensive decomposition of variance in higher order regression models. Organizational Research Methods 16 (3): 449-473.10.1177/1094428113481065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, J., Moon, J. and Cho, B. 2015. The mediating role of self-regulation between digital literacy and learning outcomes in the digital textbook for middle school English. Educational Technology International 16 (1): 58-83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levitt, T. 2002. Creativity is not enough. Harvard Business Review 80 (8): 137-144.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lewis, W., Agarwal, R. and Sambamurthy, V. 2003. Sources of influence on beliefs about Information Technology use: An empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS Quarterly 27 (4): 657-678.10.2307/30036552
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindell, M. K. and Whitney, D. J. 2001. Accounting for common method variance in cross- sectional research designs. Journal of applied psychology 86 (1): 114-121.10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lu, J., Yao, J.E. and Yu, C.S. 2005. Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14: 245-268.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A. and Vojt, G. 2011. Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers and education 56 (2): 429-440.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martin, A. 2005. DigEuLit–a European framework for digital literacy: A progress report. Journal of eLiteracy 2 (2): 130-136.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mohammadyari, S. and Singh, H. 2015. Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy. Computers and Education 82: 11-25.10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nambisan, S., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A. and Song, M. 2017. Digital innovation management: Reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. Mis Quarterly 41 (1).10.25300/MISQ/2017/41:1.03
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nelissen, S. and Van den Bulck, J. 2018. When digital natives instruct digital immigrants: Active guidance of parental media use by children and conflict in the family. Information, Communication and Society 21 (3): 375-387.10.1080/1369118X.2017.1281993
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M. and Organ, D. W. 1986. Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management 12 (4): 531-544.10.1177/014920638601200408
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. and Podsakoff, N. P. 2012. Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology 63: 539-569.10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Preacher, K.J. and Hayes, A.F. 2004. SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers 36 (4): 717-731.10.3758/BF03206553
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Punie, Y. and Cabrera, M. (Eds.). 2006. The future of ICT and learning in the knowledge society. Luxembourg: European Commission.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rammstedt, B. and John, O.P. 2007. Measuring personality in one minute or less: A 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. Journal of Research in Personality 41 (1): 203-212.10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ramos, J., Anderson, N., Peiro, J. M. and Zijlstra, F. 2016. Studying innovation in organizations: A dialectic perspectiveintroduction to the special issue. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 25 (4): 477-480.10.1080/1359432X.2016.1192364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rogers, E. 1995. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, 866 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y. Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, F.F. (1971). Communication of innovations – A cross-cultural approach. The Free Press, 866 Third Avenue, New York, N.Y.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rui, H., Cuervo-Cazurra, A. and Un, C. A. 2016. Learning-by-doing in emerging market multinationals: Integration, trial and error, repetition, and extension. Journal of World Business 51 (5): 686-699.10.1016/j.jwb.2016.07.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sandstrom, C. and Bjork, J. 2010. Idea management systems for a changing innovation landscape. International Journal of Product Development 11(3-4): 310-324.10.1504/IJPD.2010.033964
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schleife, K. 2006. Computer use and employment status of older workers – An analysis based on individual data. Labour Journal 20 (2): 325-348.10.1111/j.1467-9914.2006.00341.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schulmeister, R. 2013. On the myth of the Digital Natives and the Net Generation. BWP (Special Edition) 31-35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singh, A. and Hess, T. 2017. How Chief Digital Officers Promote the Digital Transformation of their Companies. MIS Quarterly Executive 16 (1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spitzer, M. 2012. Digitale demenz. München: Droemer Knaur.10.1055/s-0038-1628243
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Škerlavaj, M., Černe, M. and Dysvik, A. 2014. I get by with a little help from my supervisor: Creative-idea generation, idea implementation, and perceived supervisor support. The Leadership Quarterly 25 (5): 987-1000.10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson, I. and Cupples, J. 2008. Seen and not heard? Text messaging and digital sociality. Social and Cultural Geography 9 (1): 95-108.10.1080/14649360701789634
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomat, L., & Trkman, P. 2019. Digital Transformation-The Hype and Real Changes. Economic & Business Review, In press.10.15458/ebr.90
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tonidandel, S. and LeBreton, J. M. 2011. Relative importance analysis: A useful supplement to regression analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology 26 (1): 1-9.10.1007/s10869-010-9204-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trantopoulos, K., von Krogh, G., Wallin, M. W., & Woerter, M. 2017. External knowledge and information technology: Implications for process innovation performance. MIS quarterly 41 (1): 287-300.10.25300/MISQ/2017/41.1.15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Trkman, M. and Trkman, P. 2009. A wiki as intranet – a critical analysis using the DeLone and McLean Model. Online Information Review 33 (6): 1087-1102.10.1108/14684520911011025
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turan, A., Tunc, A.O., Zehir, C. 2015. A Theoretical model proposal: Personal innovativeness and user involvement as antecedents of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 210: 43-51.10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Deursen, A.J.A.M., Van Dijk, J.A.G.M. and Peters, O. 2011. Rethinking Internet skills: The contribution of gender, age, education, Internet experience, and hours online to medium- and content-related Internet skills. Poetics 39 (2): 125-144.10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Van Dijk, J. 2005. The deepening divide: Inequality in the information society. Sage: London.10.4135/9781452229812
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J., van Dijk, J. A. and de Haan, J. 2017. The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior 72: 577-588.10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
von Briel, F., Davidsson, P. and Recker, J. 2018. Digital technologies as external enablers of new venture creation in the IT hardware sector. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 42 (1): 47-69.10.1177/1042258717732779
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallace, J. C., Butts, M. M., Johnson, P. D., Stevens, F. G. and Smith, M. B. 2016. A multilevel model of employee innovation: Understanding the effects of regulatory focus, thriving, and employee involvement climate. Journal of Management 42 (4): 982-1004.10.1177/0149206313506462
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, Q., Myers, M. D. and Sundaram, D. 2013. Digital Natives and Digital Immigrants. Business and Information Systems Engineering 5 (6): 409-419.10.1007/s12599-013-0296-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warschauer, M. 2009. Digital literacy studies: Progress and prospects. In The future of literacy studies (123-140). Palgrave Macmillan: London.10.1057/9780230245693_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Warschauer, M. and Matuchniak, T. 2010. New technology and digital worlds: Analyzing evidence of equity in access, use, and outcomes. Review of research in education 34 (1): 179-225.10.3102/0091732X09349791
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Westerman, G. and Bonnet, D. 2015. Revamping your business through digital transformation. MIT Sloan management review 56 (3): 10-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yi, M.Y., Fiedler, K.D. and Park, J.S. 2006. Understanding the Role of Individual Innovativeness in the Acceptance of IT-Based Innovations: Comparative Analyses of Models and Measures. Decision Sciences 37 (3): 393-426.10.1111/j.1540-5414.2006.00132.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zevenbergen, R. 2007. Digital natives come to preschool: Implications for early childhood practice. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 8 (1): 19-29.10.2304/ciec.2007.8.1.19
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, J. and George, J.M. 2001. When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging the expression of voice. Academy of Management Journal 44 (4): 682-696.
]Search in Google Scholar
, 