[
Cherbonnier, F., Ivaldi, M., Muller-Vibes, C., and Van Der Straeten, K. 2017. Competition for versus in the market of long-distance passenger rail services. Review of Network Economics 16 (2): 203-238.10.1515/rne-2018-0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cookson, J. A. 2018. Anticipated entry and entry deterrence: Evidence from the American casino industry. Management Science 64 (5): 2325-2344.10.1287/mnsc.2017.2730
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornes, R., Itaya, J. 2016. Alternative objectives in an oligopoly model: An aggregative game approach. CESifo working paper no. 6191.10.2139/ssrn.2887957
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cournot, A. 1838. Researches into the Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth. New York: The Macmillan Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crozet. Y., and Chassagne, F. 2013. Rail access charges in France: Beyond the opposition between competition and financing. Research in Transportation Economics 39 (1): 247-254.10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.021
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dixit, A. 1979. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 20-32.10.2307/3003317
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dixit, A. 1980. The role of investment in entry-deterrence. The Economic Journal 90 (357): 95-106.10.2307/2231658
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dixit, A. 1982. Recent developments in oligopoly theory. American Economic Review 72 (2): 12-17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilbert, R., Vives, X. 1986. Entry deterrence and the free rider problem. The Review of Economic Studies 53 (1): 71-83.10.2307/2297592
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goolsbee, A., Syverson, C. 2008. How do incumbents respond to the threat of entry? Evidence from the major airlines. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (4): 1611-1633.10.1162/qjec.2008.123.4.1611
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huisman, K. J., Kort, P. M. 2015. Strategic capacity investment under uncertainty. The RAND Journal of Economics 46 (2): 376-408.10.1111/1756-2171.12089
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreps, D. M., Scheinkman, J. A. 1983. Quantity precommitment and Bertrand competition yield Cournot outcomes. The Bell Journal of Economics 14 (2): 326-337.10.2307/3003636
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maskin, E. S. 1999. Uncertainty and entry deterrence. Economic Theory 14 (2): 429-437.10.1007/s001990050302
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Masson, R. T., Shaanan, J. 1982. Stochastic-dynamic limiting pricing: An empirical test. The Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (3): 413-422.10.2307/1925939
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milgrom, P., Roberts, J. 1982. Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: An equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50 (2): 443-459.10.2307/1912637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Morrison, S. A. 2001. Actual, adjacent, and potential competition estimating the full effect of Southwest Airlines. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy 35 (2): 239-256.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schmalensee, R. 1981. Output and welfare implications of monopolistic third-degree price discrimination. American Economic Review 71 (1): 242-247.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Snider, C. 2009. Predatory incentives and predation policy: the American Airlines case (manuscript). Department of Economics. UCLA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spence, M. 1977: Entry, capacity, investment and oligopolistic pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics 8 (2): 534-544.10.2307/3003302
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sweeting, A., Roberts, J. W., Gedge, C. 2020. A model of dynamic limit pricing with an application to the airline industry. Journal of Political Economy 128 (3): 1148-1193.10.1086/704760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tirole, J. 1988. The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, J. W. 2008. Capacity investments, exclusionary behavior, and welfare: A dynamic model of competition in the airline industry. Empirical Studies of Firms & Markets.10.2139/ssrn.1375450
]Search in Google Scholar
, 