[Abramovitz, M. 1986. Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. Journal of Economic History 46 (2), The Tasks of Economic History (June): 385-406.10.1017/S0022050700046209]Search in Google Scholar
[Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F. A., Robinson, J. A. 2014. Institutions, human capital, and development. Annual Reviews of Economica 6 (1): 875-912.10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041119]Search in Google Scholar
[Aghion, P., Howitt, P. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60 (2): 323-351.10.2307/2951599]Search in Google Scholar
[Archibugi, D., Denni, M., Filippetti, A. 2009. The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76 (7): 917-931.10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Atieno, R. 2001. Formal and informal institutions› lending policies and access to credit by small-scale enterprises in Kenya: An empirical assessment. AERC Research Paper 111 African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi November, https://www.africaportal.org/documents/5926/RP111.pdf (accessed 2 March 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[Baltagi, B. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bartlett, W., Čučković, N., Krešimir, J., Nojkovič, A. 2013. Institutional quality and growth in EU neighbourhood countries. WP05/11 Search working paper. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-5.11.pdf (accessed 2 March 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[Baum, C. F. 2006. An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beck, T., Laeven, L. 2006. Institution building and growth in transition economies. Journal of Economic Growth 11 (2): 157-186.10.1007/s10887-006-9000-0]Search in Google Scholar
[BvD - Bureau van Dijk 2017. Orbis, brochure. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/ourproducts/data/international/orbis?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI_dW0hNTD1wIVC7gbCh-3ScgWhEAAYASAAEgKcHvD_BwE (accessed September 15, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Commander, S., Svejnar, J., 2011. Business environment, exports, ownership and firm performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (1): 309-337.10.1162/REST_a_00135]Search in Google Scholar
[Crafts, N. 2001. Historical perspectives on development. In Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective, edited by G. Meier, J. Stiglitz, 301-340. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dang, V. 2009. Institutional determinants of investment in transition economies. Economics and Finance Working Paper Series No. 09-33. Brunel University West London. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e03e/96fa9c61cc160b765afcac49f9036f4ddca3.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Dias, J., Tebaldi, E. 2012. Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23 (3): 300-312.10.1016/j.strueco.2012.04.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Dollar, D., Kraay, A. 2003. Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of monetary economics 50 (1): 133-162.10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4]Search in Google Scholar
[EIS 2017. - European Innovation Scoreboard 2017, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/24829 (accessed October 22, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Edler, J., Fagerberg, J. 2017. Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 2-23.10.1093/oxrep/grx001]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A., Pugh, J. 2015. Institutional effects on economic performance in post socialist transition: A dynamic panel analysis. Acta Oeconomica 65 (4): 503-523.10.1556/032.65.2015.4.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Efendic, A., Mickiewicz, T., Rebmann, A. 2015. Growth aspirations and social capital: Young firms in post conflict environment. International Small Business Journal 33 (5): 537-561.10.1177/0266242613516987]Search in Google Scholar
[Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., Mickiewicz, T. 2013. Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing 28 (4): 564-580.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. 2011. Entrepreneurship in transition economies: The role of institutions and generational changes. In: The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data, edited by M. Minniti, 181-208. Oxford, Publisher?10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580866.003.0009]Search in Google Scholar
[Fagerberg, J. 1987. A technology growth approach, to why growth rates differ. Research policy 16 (2-4): 87-99. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2017): WorldReport 2016/17. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812 (accessed November 10, 2017)10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. 2017. http://www.gemconsortium.org/data/sets#bnes (accessed November 15, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Goedhuys, M., Srholec, M. 2015. Technological capabilities, institutions and firm productivity: A multilevel study. European Journal of Development Research 27 (1): 122-139.10.1057/ejdr.2014.32]Search in Google Scholar
[Hsiao, C. 2003. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754203]Search in Google Scholar
[Hu, A. G., Jefferson, G. H., Jinchang, Q. 2005. R&D and technology transfer: Firm-level evidence from Chinese industry. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(4): 780-786.10.1162/003465305775098143]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, M. Mastruzzi. 2010. Worldwide Governance Indicators methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. World Bank, September. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMACRO/Resources/WPS5430.pdf (accessed October 10, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Klevmarken, N. A. 1989. Panel studies: What can we learn from them? Introduction. European Economic Review 33: 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90131-1 (accessed 22 October 2017)10.1016/0014-2921(89)90131-1(accessed22October2017]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lanjouw, J. O., Levy, P. I. 2002. Untitled: A study of formal and informal property rights in urban Ecuador. The Economic Journal 112 (482): 986-1019.10.1111/1468-0297.00067]Search in Google Scholar
[Mair, M. Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing 24: 419-435.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyer, K. E., Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies 47 (1): 3-22.10.1057/jibs.2015.34]Search in Google Scholar
[Miščević, T., Mrak, M., 2017. The EU Accession process: Western Balkans vs EU-10. Croatian Political Science Review 54 (4): 185-204.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mitra, P., Muravyev, A., Schaffer, M. E. 2008. Convergence in institutions and market outcomes: Cross-Country and time-series evidence from the BEEPS surveys in transition economies. IZA DP No. 3863. http://ftp.iza.org/dp3863.pdf (accessed October 11, 2017)10.2139/ssrn.1429258]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohnen, P., Mairesse, J., Dagenais, M. 2006. Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4-5): 391-413.10.1080/10438590500512950]Search in Google Scholar
[Monteiro, J. C., Assunçao, J. J. 2012. Coming out of the shadows? Estimating the impact of bureaucracy simplification and tax cut on formality in Brazilian microenterprises. Journal of Development Economics 99 (1): 105-115.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.10.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Nakabashi, L., Gonçalves Pereira, E. A., Sachsida, A. 2013. Institutions and growth: a developing country case study. Journal of Economic Studies, 40 (5): 614-634.10.1108/JES-09-2011-0111]Search in Google Scholar
[Ngo, V., D., Jansen, F., Leonidou, L., C., Christodoulides, P. 2016. Domestic institutional attributes as drivers of export performance in an emerging and transition economy. Journal of Business Research 69: 2911-2922.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.060]Search in Google Scholar
[Nguyen, T. V., Le, N .T. B. , Bryant, S. E. 2013. Sub-national institutions, firm strategies, and firm performance: A multilevel study of private manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Journal of World Business 48 (1): 68-76.10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678]Search in Google Scholar
[Olbrecht, V. 2016. Multilevel modeling in exploring institutional effects on performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64(6): 2087-2094.10.11118/actaun201664062087]Search in Google Scholar
[Raiser, M. 1999. Trust in transition. Postcommunist transformation and the social sciences: cross disciplinary approaches. Conference proceedings, Berlin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Redek, T., Sušjan, A. 2005. The impacts of institutions on economic growth: The case of transition economies. Journal of Economic Issues 39(4): 995-1027.10.1080/00213624.2005.11506864]Search in Google Scholar
[Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9(2): 131-165.10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85]Search in Google Scholar
[Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002-1037.10.1086/261420]Search in Google Scholar
[Talbott, J., Roll, R. 2001. Why many developing countries just aren’t. Anderson School UCLA, Finance Working Paper No. 19-01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=292140 (accessed 22 October 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Temple, J., Johnson, P. A. 1998. Social capability and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 965-990.10.1162/003355398555711]Search in Google Scholar
[Verspagen, B. 1991. A new empirical research to catching up or falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamic 2 (2): 359-380.10.1016/S0954-349X(05)80008-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Vijayaraghavan M., Ward, W. A. 2001. Institutions and economic growth: Empirical evidence from a cross-national analysis. Center for International Trade, Working Paper 001302. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/112952/2/citpaper11.pdf (accessed 25 October 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[WB - World Bank, 2017. Worldwide Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. (accessed November 15, 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, C., C., Franic, J. 2016. Explaining participation in the informal economy in post-socialist societies: A study of the asymmetry between formal and informal institutions in Croatia. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 24 (1): 51-65.10.1080/0965156X.2015.1118817]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, C. C. Shahid, M. S. 2016. Informal entrepreneurship and institutional theory: Explaining the varying degrees of (in)formalization of entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28 (1-2): 1-25.10.1080/08985626.2014.963889]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, N., Vorley, T. 2015. Institutional asymmetry: How formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal, 33 (8): 840-861.10.1177/0266242614534280]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, N., Vorley, T. 2017. Fostering productive entrepreneurship in post-conflict economies: The importance of institutional alignment. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29 (5-6): 444-466. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2017.1297853 (accessed 22 October 2017).10.1080/08985626.2017.1297853(accessed22October2017)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Zamberi Ahmad, S, Xavier, S.R. 2012. Entrepreneurial environments and growth: Evidence from Malaysia GEM data. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship 4 (1): 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561391211200939 (accessed October 22, 2017).10.1108/17561391211200939(222017)]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar