This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Aksnes, D.W., Sivertsen, G, van Leeuwen, T.N., & Wendt, K.K. (2017). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. Science and Public Policy, 44(2), 246–258. https://doi:10.1093/scipol/scw058AksnesD.W.SivertsenGvan LeeuwenT.N.WendtK.K. (2017). Measuring the productivity of national R&D systems: Challenges in cross-national comparisons of R&D input and publication output indicators. , 44(2), 246–258. https://doi:10.1093/scipol/scw058Search in Google Scholar
Allen, R.M. (2017). A comparison of China’s “Ivy League” to other peer groupings through global university rankings. Journal of Studies in International Education, 21(11), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/102831531769753AllenR.M. (2017). A comparison of China’s “Ivy League” to other peer groupings through global university rankings. , 21(11), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/102831531769753Search in Google Scholar
Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance –An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003AuranenO.NieminenM. (2010). University research funding and publication performance –An international comparison. , 39(6), 822–834. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bastedo, M.N., & Bowman, N.A. (2010). U.S. News & World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. American Journal of Education, 116(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1086/649437BastedoM.N.BowmanN.A. (2010). U.S. News & World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. , 116(2), 163–183. https://doi.org/10.1086/649437Search in Google Scholar
Beveridge, M.E.L., & Bak, T.H. (2011). The languages of aphasia research: Bias and diversity. Aphasiology, 25(12), 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.624165BeveridgeM.E.L.BakT.H. (2011). The languages of aphasia research: Bias and diversity. , 25(12), 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.624165Search in Google Scholar
Bowman N.A., & Bastedo, M.N. (2011). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores. Higher Education, 61(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9339-1BowmanN.A.BastedoM.N. (2011). Anchoring effects in world university rankings: exploring biases in reputation scores. , 61(4), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9339-1Search in Google Scholar
Bozeman, B., & Corely, E. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10:1016/j.respol.2004.01.008BozemanB.CorelyE. (2004). Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. , 33(4), 599–616. https://doi.org/10:1016/j.respol.2004.01.008Search in Google Scholar
Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C.P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the state-of-the-art. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8BozemanB.FayD.SladeC.P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: the state-of-the-art. , 38(1), 1–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9281-8Search in Google Scholar
Bozeman, B., Goughan, M., Youtie, J., Slade, C.P., & Rimes, H. (2016). Research experiences, good and bad: Dispatches from the front lines. Science and Public Policy, 43(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv035BozemanB.GoughanM.YoutieJ.SladeC.P.RimesH. (2016). Research experiences, good and bad: Dispatches from the front lines. , 43(2), 226–244. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scv035Search in Google Scholar
Buela-Casal, G., Gutierrez-Martinez, O., Bermudez-Sanchez, M.P., & Vadillo-Munoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8Buela-CasalG.Gutierrez-MartinezO.Bermudez-SanchezM.P.Vadillo-MunozO. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. , 71(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8Search in Google Scholar
Cakur, M.P., Acarturk, C., Alasehir, O., & Cilingir, C. (2015). A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems. Scientometrics, 103(3), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1586-6CakurM.P.AcarturkC.AlasehirO.CilingirC. (2015). A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems. , 103(3), 813–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1586-6Search in Google Scholar
Chen, K.-H., & Liao, P.-Y. (2012). A comparative study on world university rankings: a bibliometric survey. Scientometrics, 92(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0724-7ChenK.-H.LiaoP.-Y. (2012). A comparative study on world university rankings: a bibliometric survey. , 92(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0724-7Search in Google Scholar
Coccia, M. (2008). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change. Journal of Infometrics, 2(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.001CocciaM. (2008). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change. , 2(3), 183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Coccia, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2017-xCocciaM.BozemanB. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. , 108(3), 1065–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2017-xSearch in Google Scholar
Daskivich, T.J., & Gewertz, B.L. (2023). Campaign reform for US News and World Report rankings. JAMA Surgery, 158(2), 114–115. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4511DaskivichT.J.GewertzB.L. (2023). Campaign reform for US News and World Report rankings. , 158(2), 114–115. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4511Search in Google Scholar
Fairclough R., & Thelwall, M. (2015). More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons. Journal of Informetrics, 9(4), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.005FaircloughR.ThelwallM. (2015). More precise methods for national research citation impact comparisons. , 9(4), 895–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.09.005Search in Google Scholar
Faghri, A. & Bergman T.L. (2024). Highly ranked scholars and the influence of countries/regions in research fields, disciplines, and specialties. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(2), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00291FaghriA.BergmanT.L. (2024). Highly ranked scholars and the influence of countries/regions in research fields, disciplines, and specialties. , 5(2), 464–483. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00291Search in Google Scholar
Guba, K., & Tsivinskaya, A. (2023). Expert judgements versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation? Journal of Documentation, 79(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2022-0039GubaK.TsivinskayaA. (2023). Expert judgements versus publication-based metrics: Do the two methods produce identical results in measuring academic reputation?, 79(1), 127–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2022-0039Search in Google Scholar
Jasco, P. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. Online Information Review, 33(4), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910985756JascoP. (2009). The h-index for countries in Web of Science and Scopus. , 33(4), 831–837. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910985756Search in Google Scholar
Koltun, V., & Hafner, D. (2021). The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0253397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397KoltunV.HafnerD. (2021). The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. , 16(6), e0253397. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253397Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2009.05.005LeydesdorffL.WagnerC. (2009). Macro-level indicators of the relations between research funding and research output. , 3(4), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2009.05.005Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C.S., & Zhang, L. (2021). Are university rankings statistically significant? A comparison among Chinese universities and with the USA. Journal of Data and Information Science, 6(2), 67–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0014LeydesdorffL.WagnerC.S.ZhangL. (2021). Are university rankings statistically significant? A comparison among Chinese universities and with the USA. , 6(2), 67–95. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0014Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., & Zhou, P. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science? Scientometrics, 63(3), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1LeydesdorffL.ZhouP. (2005). Are the contributions of China and Korea upsetting the world system of science?, 63(3), 617–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0231-1Search in Google Scholar
Massucci, F.A., & Docampo, D. (2019). Measuring the academic reputation through citation networds via PageRank. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2018.12.001MassucciF.A.DocampoD. (2019). Measuring the academic reputation through citation networds via PageRank. , 13(1), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. joi.2018.12.001Search in Google Scholar
Moskovkin, V.M., Zhang, H., Sadovski, M.V., & Serkina, O.V. (2022). Comprehensive quantitative analysis of the TOP-100s of ARWU, QS and THE World University Rankings for 2014 – 2018. Education for Information, 38(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-211539MoskovkinV.M.ZhangH.SadovskiM.V.SerkinaO.V. (2022). Comprehensive quantitative analysis of the TOP-100s of ARWU, QS and THE World University Rankings for 2014 – 2018. , 38(2), 133–169. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-211539Search in Google Scholar
Pikos, A.M. (2022). Restoring trust in an organization after a business school rankings scandal. Polish Sociological Review, issue 217, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr217.06PikosA.M. (2022). Restoring trust in an organization after a business school rankings scandal. , issue 217, 93–113. https://doi.org/10.26412/psr217.06Search in Google Scholar
Ramírez-Castañeda, V. (2020). Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Columbian researchers in biological sciences. PLOS ONE, 15(9), e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372Ramírez-CastañedaV. (2020). Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Columbian researchers in biological sciences. , 15(9), e0238372. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238372Search in Google Scholar
Rauhvargers, A. (2014). Where are the global rankings leading us? An analysis of recent methodological changes and new developments. European Journal of Education, 49(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12066RauhvargersA. (2014). Where are the global rankings leading us? An analysis of recent methodological changes and new developments. , 49(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12066Search in Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2016). Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the United States and Europe in terms of highly cited papers and Nobel Prizes. Journal for the Association of Information Science and Technology, 67(3), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23412Rodriguez-NavarroA. (2016). Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the United States and Europe in terms of highly cited papers and Nobel Prizes. , 67(3), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23412Search in Google Scholar
Shehatta, I., & Mahmood, K. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: policy implications, Scientometrics, 109(2), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/:10.1007/s11192-016-2065-4ShehattaI.MahmoodK. (2016). Correlation among top 100 universities in the major six global rankings: policy implications, , 109(2), 1231–1254. https://doi.org/:10.1007/s11192-016-2065-4Search in Google Scholar
Sinson, G., Kolinski, J., Alme, C., & Siddhartha S. (2023). Is it time to follow the lawyers: Should hospitals extract themselves from US News & World Report rankings? American Journal of Medical Quality, 38(3), 160–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000116SinsonG.KolinskiJ.AlmeC.SiddharthaS. (2023). Is it time to follow the lawyers: Should hospitals extract themselves from US News & World Report rankings?, 38(3), 160–161. https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000116Search in Google Scholar
Van Hooydonk, G. (1997). Fractional counting of multi-authored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48(10), 944–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10%3C944::AID-ASI8%3E3.0.CO;2-1Van HooydonkG. (1997). Fractional counting of multi-authored publications: Consequences for the impact of authors. , 48(10), 944–945. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199710)48:10%3C944::AID-ASI8%3E3.0.CO;2-1Search in Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T.N., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S., & van Raan, A.J.F. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484Van LeeuwenT.N.MoedH.F.TijssenR.J.W.VisserM.S.van RaanA.J.F. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequences for international comparisons of research performance. , 51(1), 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010549719484Search in Google Scholar
Van Raan, A.F.J., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Visser, M.S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: Particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. Scientometrics, 88(2), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0382-1Van RaanA.F.J.van LeeuwenT.N.VisserM.S. (2011). Severe language effect in university rankings: Particularly Germany and France are wronged in citation-based rankings. , 88(2), 495–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0382-1Search in Google Scholar
Viiu, G.-A. (2016). A theoretical evaluation of Hirsch-type bibliometric indicators confronted with extreme self-citation. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.010ViiuG.-A. (2016). A theoretical evaluation of Hirsch-type bibliometric indicators confronted with extreme self-citation. , 10(2), 552–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.04.010Search in Google Scholar