This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bastani, K., Namavari, H., & Shaffer, J. (2019). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) for topic modeling of the CFPB consumer complaints. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 256–271.BastaniK.NamavariH.ShafferJ. (2019). Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) for topic modeling of the CFPB consumer complaints. Expert Systems with Applications, 127, 256–271.Search in Google Scholar
Buchanan, B., & Corken, R. (2010). A toolkit for the systematic analysis of patent data to assess a potentially disruptive technology. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/312333/informatic-techtoolkit.pdf.BuchananB.CorkenR. (2010). A toolkit for the systematic analysis of patent data to assess a potentially disruptive technology. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/312333/informatic-techtoolkit.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Cerulli, G. (2015). Econometric evaluation of socio-economic programs Theory and applications. Springer.CerulliG. (2015). Econometric evaluation of socio-economic programs Theory and applications. Springer.Search in Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M. (2013) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press.ChristensenC. M. (2013) The innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlin, K. B., & Behrens, D. M. (2005). When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research policy, 34(5), 717–737.DahlinK. B.BehrensD. M. (2005). When is an invention really radical?: Defining and measuring technological radicalness. Research policy, 34(5), 717–737.Search in Google Scholar
Du, H., Guo, Y., Lin, Z., Qiu, Y., & Xiao, X. (2021). Effects of the joint prevention and control of atmospheric pollution policy on air pollutants-A quantitative analysis of Chinese policy texts. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113721.DuH.GuoY.LinZ.QiuY.XiaoX. (2021). Effects of the joint prevention and control of atmospheric pollution policy on air pollutants-A quantitative analysis of Chinese policy texts. Journal of Environmental Management, 300, 113721.Search in Google Scholar
Feng, J., Wang, Y. J., & Ding, Y. Y. (2018). Microblog topic evolution computing based on LDA algorithm. Open Physics, 16(1), 509–516.FengJ.WangY. J.DingY. Y. (2018). Microblog topic evolution computing based on LDA algorithm. Open Physics, 16(1), 509–516.Search in Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.FischerF. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Publishers.Search in Google Scholar
Freeman, L. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science, 1(687), 159–167. Empirical Press.FreemanL. (2004). The development of social network analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science, 1(687), 159–167. Empirical Press.Search in Google Scholar
Gan, J. X., & Qi, Y. (2021). Selection of the optimal number of topics for LDA topic model—taking patent policy analysis as an example. Entropy, 23(10), 1301.GanJ. X.QiY. (2021). Selection of the optimal number of topics for LDA topic model—taking patent policy analysis as an example. Entropy, 23(10), 1301.Search in Google Scholar
Goldenberg, E. N. (1983) The three faces of evaluation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(4), 515–525.GoldenbergE. N. (1983) The three faces of evaluation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2(4), 515–525.Search in Google Scholar
House, E. R. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Educational Researcher, 7(3), 4–12.HouseE. R. (1978). Assumptions underlying evaluation models. Educational Researcher, 7(3), 4–12.Search in Google Scholar
Howlett, M. (2017). Policy tools and their role in policy formulation: Dealing with procedural and substantive instruments. In Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 96–111). Edward Elgar Publishing.HowlettM. (2017). Policy tools and their role in policy formulation: Dealing with procedural and substantive instruments. In Handbook of policy formulation (pp. 96–111). Edward Elgar Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Hughes, S. F. (2017). A new model for identifying emerging technologies. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 7(1).HughesS. F. (2017). A new model for identifying emerging technologies. Journal of Intelligence Studies in Business, 7(1).Search in Google Scholar
Isoaho, K., Gritsenko, D., & Mäkelä, E. (2021). Topic modeling and text analysis for qualitative policy research. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 300–324.IsoahoK.GritsenkoD.MäkeläE. (2021). Topic modeling and text analysis for qualitative policy research. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 300–324.Search in Google Scholar
Kenagy, J. W., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). Disruptive innovation: a new diagnosis for health care’s “financial flu”. Healthcare Financial Management, 56(5), 62–67.KenagyJ. W.ChristensenC. M. (2002). Disruptive innovation: a new diagnosis for health care’s “financial flu”. Healthcare Financial Management, 56(5), 62–67.Search in Google Scholar
Lambin, E. F., Meyfroidt, P., Rueda, X., Blackman, A., Börner, J., Cerutti, P. O., … & Wunder, S. (2014). Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change, 28, 129–140.LambinE. F.MeyfroidtP.RuedaX.BlackmanA.BörnerJ.CeruttiP. O.WunderS. (2014). Effectiveness and synergies of policy instruments for land use governance in tropical regions. Global Environmental Change, 28, 129–140.Search in Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (2017). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. Routledge.LasswellH. D. (2017). Power and society: A framework for political inquiry. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy sciences, 1(1), 3–14.LasswellH. D. (1970). The emerging conception of the policy sciences. Policy sciences, 1(1), 3–14.Search in Google Scholar
Mohr, L. B. (1995). Impact analysis for program evaluation. Sage.MohrL. B. (1995). Impact analysis for program evaluation. Sage.Search in Google Scholar
Momeni, A., & Rost, K. (2016). Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 16–29.MomeniA.RostK. (2016). Identification and monitoring of possible disruptive technologies by patent-development paths and topic modeling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 16–29.Search in Google Scholar
Nagy, D., Schuessler, J., & Dubinsky, A. (2016). Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Industrial marketing management, 57, 119–126.NagyD.SchuesslerJ.DubinskyA. (2016). Defining and identifying disruptive innovations. Industrial marketing management, 57, 119–126.Search in Google Scholar
Paap, J., & Katz, R. (2004). Anticipating disruptive innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(5), 13–22.PaapJ.KatzR. (2004). Anticipating disruptive innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(5), 13–22.Search in Google Scholar
Păvăloaia, V. D., & Necula, S. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a disruptive technology—a systematic literature review. Electronics, 12(5), 1102.PăvăloaiaV. D.NeculaS. C. (2023). Artificial intelligence as a disruptive technology—a systematic literature review. Electronics, 12(5), 1102.Search in Google Scholar
People’s Daily Online. (2022, October 12). Xi Jinping’s Series of Important Speeches Database. People’s Daily Online. http:/jhsjk.people.cn/.People’s Daily Online. (2022, October12). Xi Jinping’s Series of Important Speeches Database. People’s Daily Online. http:/jhsjk.people.cn/.Search in Google Scholar
Prior, L., Hughes, D., & Peckham, S. (2012). The discursive turn in policy analysis and the validation of policy stories. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 271–289.PriorL.HughesD.PeckhamS. (2012). The discursive turn in policy analysis and the validation of policy stories. Journal of Social Policy, 41(2), 271–289.Search in Google Scholar
Rothwell, R. (1985). Reindustrialization and technology: Towards a national policy framework. Science and Public Policy, 12(3), 113–130.RothwellR. (1985). Reindustrialization and technology: Towards a national policy framework. Science and Public Policy, 12(3), 113–130.Search in Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A., Swedberg, R. (2021). The theory of economic development. Routledge.SchumpeterJ. A.SwedbergR. (2021). The theory of economic development. Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Sommarberg, M., & Mäkinen, S. J. (2019). A method for anticipating the disruptive nature of digitalization in the machine-building industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 808–819.SommarbergM.MäkinenS. J. (2019). A method for anticipating the disruptive nature of digitalization in the machine-building industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 808–819.Search in Google Scholar
Song, C., Guo, J., Gholizadeh, F., & Zhuang, J. (2022). Quantitative Analysis of Food Safety Policy—Based on Text Mining Methods. Foods, 11(21), 3421.SongC.GuoJ.GholizadehF.ZhuangJ. (2022). Quantitative Analysis of Food Safety Policy—Based on Text Mining Methods. Foods, 11(21), 3421.Search in Google Scholar
Stufflebeam, D. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(89), 7–98.StufflebeamD. (2001). Evaluation models. New Directions for Evaluation, 2001(89), 7–98.Search in Google Scholar
Thomond, P., & Lettice, F. (2002, July). Disruptive innovation explored. In Cranfield University, Cranfield, England. Presented at: 9th IPSE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CE2002) (pp. 17–28).ThomondP.LetticeF. (2002, July). Disruptive innovation explored. In Cranfield University, Cranfield, England. Presented at: 9th IPSE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications (CE2002) (pp. 17–28).Search in Google Scholar
van den Bergh, J. C. J. M., Castro, J., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., … & Savin, I. (2021). Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy, 21(6), 745–764.van den BerghJ. C. J. M.CastroJ.DrewsS.ExadaktylosF.ForamittiJ.KleinF.SavinI. (2021). Designing an effective climate-policy mix: accounting for instrument synergy. Climate Policy, 21(6), 745–764.Search in Google Scholar
Vojak, B. A., & Chambers, F. A. (2004) Roadmapping disruptive technical threats and opportunities in complex, technology-based subsystems: The SAILS methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 121–139.VojakB. A.ChambersF. A. (2004) Roadmapping disruptive technical threats and opportunities in complex, technology-based subsystems: The SAILS methodology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 71(1-2), 121–139.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, X., Huang, L., Daim, T., Li, X., & Li, Z. (2021). Evaluation of China’s new energy vehicle policy texts with quantitative and qualitative analysis. Technology in Society, 67, 101770.WangX.HuangL.DaimT.LiX.LiZ. (2021). Evaluation of China’s new energy vehicle policy texts with quantitative and qualitative analysis. Technology in Society, 67, 101770.Search in Google Scholar