This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abalkina, A. (2023). Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill. Learned Publishing, 36(4), 689–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1574AbalkinaA.(2023).Publication and collaboration anomalies in academic papers originating from a paper mill: evidence from a Russia-based paper mill.,36(4),689–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1574Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abalkina, A., & Bishop, D. (2023). Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology. Meta-Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422AbalkinaA. & BishopD.(2023).Paper mills: a novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology.,7. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ali, M. J. (2021). No room for ambiguity: the concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 69(1), 36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2221_20AliM. J.(2021).No room for ambiguity: the concepts of appropriate and inappropriate authorship in scientific publications.,69(1),36–41. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2221_20Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Allen, L., O’Connell, A., & Kiermer, V. (2019). How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 71–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1210AllenL.O’ConnellA. & KiermerV.(2019).How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorship.,32(1),71–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1210Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Baumgartner, H. A., Alessandroni, N., Byers-Heinlein, K., Frank, M. C., Hamlin, J. K., Soderstrom, M., Voelkel, J. G., Willer, R., Yuen, F., & Coles, N. A. (2023). How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations. Royal Society Open Science, 10(6), 230235. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230235BaumgartnerH. A.AlessandroniN.Byers-HeinleinK.FrankM. C.HamlinJ. K.SoderstromM.VoelkelJ. G.WillerR.YuenF. & ColesN. A.(2023).How to build up big team science: a practical guide for large-scale collaborations.,10(6),230235. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230235Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bernardi, K., Lyons, N. B., Huang, L., Holihan, J. L., Olavarria, O. A., Martin, A. C., Milton, A. N., Loor, M. M., Zheng, F., Tyson, J. E., Ko, T. C., & Liang, M. K. (2020). Gender disparity in authorship of peer-reviewed medical publications. The American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 360(5), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2019.11.005BernardiK.LyonsN. B.HuangL.HolihanJ. L.OlavarriaO. A.MartinA. C.MiltonA. N.LoorM. M.ZhengF.TysonJ. E.KoT. C. & LiangM. K.(2020).Gender disparity in authorship of peer-reviewed medical publications.,360(5),511–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2019.11.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brand, A., Allen, L., Altman, M., Hlava, M., & Scott, J. (2015). Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing, 28(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211BrandA.AllenL.AltmanM.HlavaM. & ScottJ.(2015).Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit.,28(2),151–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/20150211Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brand, R. A. (2012). Further thoughts on authorship: gift authorship. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 470(10), 2926–2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2504-3BrandR. A.(2012).Further thoughts on authorship: gift authorship.,470(10),2926–2929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2504-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dusdal, J., & Powell, J. J. W. (2021) Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010DusdalJ. & PowellJ. J. W.(2021)Benefits, motivations, and challenges of international collaborative research: a sociology of science case study.,48(2),235–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hoekman, J., & Rake, B. (2024). Geography of authorship: how geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science. Research Policy, 53(2), 104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104927HoekmanJ. & RakeB.(2024).Geography of authorship: how geography shapes authorship attribution in big team science.,53(2),104927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104927Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Holcombe, A. O., Kovacs, M., Aust, F., & Aczel, B. (2020). Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0244611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244611HolcombeA. O.KovacsM.AustF. & AczelB.(2020).Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing.,15(12), e0244611. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244611Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kerr, R. L., de Vreese, C., Logan, R. A., Steiner, L., Pearson, G. S., & Pierson, C. A. (2018). Authorship transparency in an era of accountability. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(4), 871–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018802805KerrR. L.de VreeseC.LoganR. A.SteinerL.PearsonG. S. & PiersonC. A.(2018).Authorship transparency in an era of accountability.,95(4),871–885. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018802805Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Khalifa, A. A. (2022). Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 20, 100735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100735KhalifaA. A.(2022).Losing young researchers in the authorship battle, under-reported casualties.,20,100735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100735Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kwiek, M. (2020). Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system. Scientometrics, 124(1), 57–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2KwiekM.(2020).Internationalists and locals: international research collaboration in a resource-poor system.,124(1),57–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03460-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2015). Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship and authorship attribution in academic science. Evaluation Review, 39(1), 19–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13517234LissoniF. & MontobbioF.(2015).Guest authors or ghost inventors? Inventorship and authorship attribution in academic science.,39(1),19–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X13517234Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and inequality in global science: problems of the center-periphery model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/722760MarginsonS. & XuX.(2023).Hegemony and inequality in global science: problems of the center-periphery model.,67(1),31–52. https://doi.org/10.1086/722760Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
McNutt, M. K., Bradford, M., Drazen, J. M., Hanson, B., Howard, B., Jamieson, K. H., Kiermer, V., Marcus, E., Pope, B. K., Schekman, R., Swaminathan, S., Stang, P. J., & Verma, I. M. (2018). Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 115(11), 2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115McNuttM. K.BradfordM.DrazenJ. M.HansonB.HowardB.JamiesonK. H.KiermerV.MarcusE.PopeB. K.SchekmanR.SwaminathanS.StangP. J. & VermaI. M.(2018).Transparency in authors’ contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication.,115(11),2557–2560. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56MertonR. K.(1968).The Matthew effect in science.,159(3810),56–63. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.159.3810.56Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., & Agarwal, V. (2018). Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: challenges and opportunities for improvement. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 33(46), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287MisraD. P.RavindranV. & AgarwalV.(2018).Integrity of authorship and peer review practices: challenges and opportunities for improvement.,33(46), e287. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2018.33.e287Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Morton, B., Vercueil, A., Masekela, R., Heinz, E., Reimer, L., Saleh, S., Kalinga, C., Seekles, M., Biccard, B., Chakaya, J., Abimbola, S., Obasi, A., & Oriyo, N. (2022), Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships. Anaesthesia, 77(3), 264–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15597MortonB.VercueilA.MasekelaR.HeinzE.ReimerL.SalehS.KalingaC.SeeklesM.BiccardB.ChakayaJ.AbimbolaS.ObasiA. & OriyoN.(2022),Consensus statement on measures to promote equitable authorship in the publication of research from international partnerships.,77(3),264–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15597Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ni, C., Smith, E., Yuan, H., Larivière, V., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2021). The gendered nature of authorship. Science Advances, 7(36), eabe4639. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639NiC.SmithE.YuanH.LarivièreV. & SugimotoC. R.(2021).The gendered nature of authorship.,7(36), eabe4639. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abe4639Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nichols, T. E., Das, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Evans, A. C., Glatard, T., Hanke, M., Kriegeskorte, N., Milham, M. P., Poldrack, R. A., Poline, J.-B., Proal, E., Thirion, B., Van Essen, D. C., White, T., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2017). Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI. Nature Neuroscience, 20(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500NicholsT. E.DasS.EickhoffS. B.EvansA. C.GlatardT.HankeM.KriegeskorteN.MilhamM. P.PoldrackR. A.PolineJ.-B.ProalE.ThirionB.Van EssenD. C.WhiteT. & YeoB. T. T.(2017).Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MRI.,20(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4500Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Patience, G. S., Galli, F., Patience, P. A., & Boffito, D. C. (2019). Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories. PLOS ONE, 14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117PatienceG. S.GalliF.PatienceP. A. & BoffitoD. C.(2019).Intellectual contributions meriting authorship: survey results from the top cited authors across all science categories.,14(1), e0198117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198117Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rossiter, M. W. (1993). The Matthew Matilda effect in science. Social Studies of Science, 23(2), 325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004RossiterM. W.(1993).The Matthew Matilda effect in science.,23(2),325–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631293023002004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sandler, J. C., & Russell, B. L. (2005). Faculty-student collaborations: ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit. Ethics & Behavior, 15(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5SandlerJ. C. & RussellB. L.(2005).Faculty-student collaborations: ethics and satisfaction in authorship credit.,15(1),65–80. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb1501_5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Savchenko, E., & Rosenfeld, A. (2024). Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey. Scientometrics (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-xSavchenkoE. & RosenfeldA.(2024).Authorship conflicts in academia: an international cross-discipline survey.(in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04972-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Seeman, J. I., & House, M. C. (2015). Authorship issues and conflict in the U.S. academic chemical community. Accountability in Research, 22(6), 346–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707SeemanJ. I. & HouseM. C.(2015).Authorship issues and conflict in the U.S. academic chemical community.,22(6),346–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2015.1047707Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sismondo, S. (2020). Ghost-Managing and Gaming Pharmaceutical Knowledge. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0012SismondoS.(2020).. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, E., & Williams-Jones, B. (2012). Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 18(2), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5SmithE. & Williams-JonesB.(2012).Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: a review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies.,18(2),199–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9263-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith, E., Williams-Jones, B., Master, Z., Larivière, V., Sugimoto, C. R., Paul-Hus, A., Shi, M., & Resnik, D. B. (2020). Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 1967–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4SmithE.Williams-JonesB.MasterZ.LarivièreV.SugimotoC. R.Paul-HusA.ShiM. & ResnikD. B.(2020).Misconduct and misbehavior related to authorship disagreements in collaborative science.,26(4),1967–1993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2021). Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1116–1130. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0219Teixeira da SilvaJ. A.(2021).Multiple co-first authors, co-corresponding authors and co-supervisors: a synthesis of shared authorship credit.,45(6),1116–1130. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-06-2020-0219Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2023). How are authors’ contributions verified in the ICMJE model? Plant Cell Reports, 42(9), 1529–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-023-03022-9Teixeira da SilvaJ. A.(2023).How are authors’ contributions verified in the ICMJE model?,42(9),1529–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-023-03022-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2024). The conceptual ‘APC ring’: Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship, and is a change in the culture of the APC needed? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, (in press, DOI not yet assigned).Teixeira da SilvaJ. A.(2024).The conceptual ‘APC ring’: Is there a risk of APC-driven guest authorship, and is a change in the culture of the APC needed?, (in press, DOI not yet assigned).Search in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Dobránszki, J. (2016). Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3Teixeira da SilvaJ. A. & DobránszkiJ.(2016).Multiple authorship in scientific manuscripts: ethical challenges, ghost and guest/gift authorship, and the cultural/disciplinary perspective.,22(5),1457–1472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9716-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Rivera, H. (2021). Spousal and kinship co-authorship should be declared to avoid conflicts of interest. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 18(3), 379–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10123-1Teixeira da SilvaJ. A. & RiveraH.(2021).Spousal and kinship co-authorship should be declared to avoid conflicts of interest.,18(3),379–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-021-10123-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., Tsigaris, P., & Vuong, Q.-H. (2023). Acknowledgments in scientific papers. Publishing Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09955-zTeixeira da SilvaJ. A.TsigarisP. & VuongQ.-H.(2023).Acknowledgments in scientific papers.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09955-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Whetstone, D., & Moulaison-Sandy, H. (2020). Quantifying authorship: a comparison of authorship rubrics from five disciplines. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1), e277. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.277WhetstoneD. & Moulaison-SandyH.(2020).Quantifying authorship: a comparison of authorship rubrics from five disciplines.,57(1), e277. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.277Open DOISearch in Google Scholar