This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ali, A. and Nazim, M. (2023). Does funded research have a greater scholarly impact? A study of funded and non-funded research published in high-impact library and information science journals. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2023-0102AliA.NazimM. (2023). Does funded research have a greater scholarly impact? A study of funded and non-funded research published in high-impact library and information science journals. , Vol. ahead-of-print No. ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-03-2023-0102Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ardito L., Coccia M., Messeni Petruzzelli A. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. R&D Management, 51(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455ArditoL.CocciaM.Messeni PetruzzelliA. (2021). Technological exaptation and crisis management: Evidence from COVID-19 outbreaks. ,51(4), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12455Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bjørk R. (2019). The age at which Nobel Prize research is conducted. Scientometrics, 119, 931-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03065-4BjørkR. (2019). The age at which Nobel Prize research is conducted. ,119, 931-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03065-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bjørk R. (2020). The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research. Scientometrics, 122, 817-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03312-8BjørkR. (2020). The journals in physics that publish Nobel Prize research. , 122, 817-823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03312-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyack K.W. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 101: 5192-5199.BoyackK.W. (2004). Mapping knowledge domains: Characterizing PNAS. ,101: 5192-5199.Search in Google Scholar
Boyack K.W., Klavans R., Börner K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374.BoyackK.W.KlavansR.BörnerK. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. ,64(3), 351-374.Search in Google Scholar
Clements J. C. (2017). Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals. Facets, 2(1), 1-14.ClementsJ. C. (2017). Open access articles receive more citations in hybrid marine ecology journals. ,2(1), 1-14.Search in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2005). A Scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. Scientometrics, 65(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1CocciaM. (2005). A Scientometric model for the assessment of scientific research performance within public institutes. ,65(3), 307-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0276-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2008). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.001CocciaM. (2008). Measuring scientific performance of public research units for strategic change.,2(3), 183-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2008.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2008a). Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9032-4CocciaM. (2008a). Spatial mobility of knowledge transfer and absorptive capacity: analysis and measurement of the impact within the geoeconomic space. ,33(1), 105-122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9032-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2009). Bureaucratization in public research institutions, Minerva, A Review of Science, Learning and Policy, 47(1), 31-50. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41821483CocciaM. (2009). Bureaucratization in public research institutions, Minerva, A Review of Science, , 47(1), 31-50. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41821483Search in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2014). Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: the effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26(7), 733-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882501CocciaM. (2014). Converging scientific fields and new technological paradigms as main drivers of the division of scientific labour in drug discovery process: the effects on strategic management of the R&D corporate change. ,26(7), 733-749. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2014.882501Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2018). General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology. Scientometrics, 117(2), 1265-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8CocciaM. (2018). General properties of the evolution of research fields: a scientometric study of human microbiome, evolutionary robotics and astrobiology. ,117(2), 1265-1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2902-8Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2018a). Motivation and theory of self-determination: Some management implications in organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 5(4), 223-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i4.1792CocciaM. (2018a). Motivation and theory of self-determination: Some management implications in organizations. ,5(4), 223-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i4.1792Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2018b). Classification of innovation considering technological interaction. Journal of Economics Bibliography-J. Econ. Bib., 5(2), 76-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i2.1650CocciaM. (2018b). Classification of innovation considering technological interaction. .,5(2), 76-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v5i2.1650Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology? Technology in Society, 59, November, n. 101124, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007CocciaM. (2019). Why do nations produce science advances and new technology?,59, November, n. 101124, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.03.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019a). The Role of Superpowers in Conflict Development and Resolutions. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3709-1CocciaM. (2019a). The Role of Superpowers in Conflict Development and Resolutions. FarazmandA (ed.), . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3709-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019b). Comparative Institutional Changes. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1277-1CocciaM. (2019b). Comparative Institutional Changes. FarazmandA. (ed.), , Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1277-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019c). Destructive technologies as driving forces of new technological cycles for industrial and corporate change. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 6(4), 252-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v6i4.1973CocciaM. (2019c). Destructive technologies as driving forces of new technological cycles for industrial and corporate change. ,6(4), 252-277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v6i4.1973Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019d). Metabolism of public research organizations: how do laboratories consume state subsidies? Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 19(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0421-yCocciaM. (2019d). Metabolism of public research organizations: how do laboratories consume state subsidies?,19(4), 473-491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0421-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019e). Intrinsic and extrinsic incentives to support motivation and performance of public organizations. Journal of Economics Bibliography, 6(1), 20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v6i1.1795CocciaM. (2019e). Intrinsic and extrinsic incentives to support motivation and performance of public organizations. ,6(1), 20-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jeb.v6i1.1795Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2020). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. Scientometrics, 124, 451-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-yCocciaM. (2020). The evolution of scientific disciplines in applied sciences: dynamics and empirical properties of experimental physics. , 124, 451-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03464-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2020a). Fishbone diagram for technological analysis and foresight. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, Vol. 14, Nos. 2/3/4, 225-247. DOI: 10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111221CocciaM. (2020a). Fishbone diagram for technological analysis and foresight. ,14, Nos. 2/3/4, 225-247. DOI: 10.1504/IJFIP.2020.111221Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2020b). Destructive Technologies for Industrial and Corporate Change. In: Farazmand A. (eds), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1CocciaM. (2020b). Destructive Technologies for Industrial and Corporate Change. In: FarazmandA. (eds), . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3972-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2021). Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research. Scientometrics, 126(12), 9405-9429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04172-xCocciaM. (2021). Evolution and structure of research fields driven by crises and environmental threats: the COVID-19 research. ,126(12), 9405-9429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04172-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2022). Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change. Technology in Society, vol. 68, February, n. 101874, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874CocciaM. (2022). Probability of discoveries between research fields to explain scientific and technological change. , 68, February, n. 101874, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101874Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Bozeman B. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. Scientometrics, 108(3), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2027-xCocciaM.BozemanB. (2016). Allometric models to measure and analyze the evolution of international research collaboration. ,108(3), 1065-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2027-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Falavigna G., Manello A. (2015). The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1427-zCocciaM.FalavignaG.ManelloA. (2015). The impact of hybrid public and market-oriented financing mechanisms on scientific portfolio and performances of public research labs: a scientometric analysis. ,102(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1427-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Ghazinoori S., Roshani S. (2023). Evolutionary Pathways of Ecosystem Literature in Organization and Management Studies. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2499460/v1CocciaM.GhazinooriS.RoshaniS. (2023). Evolutionary Pathways of Ecosystem Literature in Organization and Management Studies. . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2499460/v1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Rolfo S. (2008). Strategic change of public research units in their scientific activity. Technovation, 28(8), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.005CocciaM.RolfoS. (2008). Strategic change of public research units in their scientific activity. ,28(8), 485-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Wang L. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(8), 2057-2061. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510820113CocciaM.WangL. (2016). Evolution and convergence of the patterns of international scientific collaboration. ,113(8), 2057-2061. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1510820113Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Roshani S. (2024). General laws of funding for scientific citations: how citations change in funded and unfunded research between basic and applied sciences. Journal of Data and Information Science, 9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0001CocciaM.RoshaniS. (2024). General laws of funding for scientific citations: how citations change in funded and unfunded research between basic and applied sciences. ,9(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2024-0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M., Mosleh M., Roshani S., (2024a). Evolution of Quantum Computing: Theoretical and Innovation Management Implications for Emerging Quantum Industry. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 2270-2280, DOI (identifier) 10.1109/TEM.2022.3175633CocciaM.MoslehM.RoshaniS., (2024a). Evolution of Quantum Computing: Theoretical and Innovation Management Implications for Emerging Quantum Industry. ,71, 2270-2280, DOI (identifier) 10.1109/TEM.2022.3175633Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2008b). New organizational behaviour of public research institutions: Lessons learned from Italian case study. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 2(4), 402-419. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBCocciaM. (2008b). New organizational behaviour of public research institutions: Lessons learned from Italian case study. , 2(4), 402-419. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2010). Spatial patterns of technology transfer and measurement of its friction in the geo-economic space. International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 9(3), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2010.030214CocciaM. (2010). Spatial patterns of technology transfer and measurement of its friction in the geo-economic space. , 9(3), 255-267. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTTC.2010.030214Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2018c). Competition between basic and applied research in the organizational behaviour of public research labs. Journal of Economics Library, 5(2), 118-133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v5i2.1652CocciaM. (2018c). Competition between basic and applied research in the organizational behaviour of public research labs. ,5(2), 118-133, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jel.v5i2.1652Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2019f). Theories of Self-determination. A. Farazmand (ed.), Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3710-1CocciaM. (2019f). Theories of Self-determination. FarazmandA. (ed.), , Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3710-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Coccia M. (2020c). How does science advance? Theories of the evolution of science. Journal of Economic and Social Thought, 7(3), 153-180, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v7i3.2111IR.2008.018589CocciaM. (2020c). How does science advance? Theories of the evolution of science. ,7(3), 153-180, http://dx.doi.org/10.1453/jest.v7i3.2111IR.2008.018589Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cole S., Cole J. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32, 377-390.ColeS.ColeJ. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. ,32, 377-390.Search in Google Scholar
Dewett T., Denisi A.S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: It’s more than just productivity. Scientometrics, 60, 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61DewettT.DenisiA.S. (2004). Exploring scholarly reputation: It’s more than just productivity. ,60, 249-272. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000027796.55585.61Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fanelli D., Glänzel W. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. PLoS One, 8(6), e66938.FanelliD.GlänzelW. (2013). Bibliometric evidence for a hierarchy of the sciences. ,8(6), e66938.Search in Google Scholar
Fortunato S., Bergstrom C. T., Börner K., Evans J. A., Helbing D., Milojević, S., Petersen A. M., Radicchi F., Sinatra R., Uzzi B., Vespignani A., Waltman L., Wang D., Barabási A.-L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6378). DOI: 10.1126/science.aao0185FortunatoS.BergstromC. T.BörnerK.EvansJ. A.HelbingD.MilojevićS.PetersenA. M.RadicchiF.SinatraR.UzziB.VespignaniA.WaltmanL.WangD.BarabásiA.-L. (2018). Science of science. ,359(6378). DOI: 10.1126/science.aao0185Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Frame J.D., Carpenter M.P. (1979). International research collaboration. Soc Stud Sci, 9(4), 481-497.FrameJ.D.CarpenterM.P. (1979). International research collaboration. ,9(4), 481-497.Search in Google Scholar
Heinze T., Fuchs J.E. (2022). National and organizational patterns of Nobel laureate careers in physiology/medicine, physics, and chemistry. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04250-0HeinzeT.FuchsJ.E. (2022). National and organizational patterns of Nobel laureate careers in physiology/medicine, physics, and chemistry. . https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04250-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Heyard, R., Hottenrott H. (2021). The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF research Grants. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00891-xHeyardR.HottenrottH. (2021). The value of research funding for knowledge creation and dissemination: A study of SNSF research Grants. ,8(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-021-00891-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hollingsworth J.R., (2006). A path-dependent perspective on institutional and organizational factors shaping major scientific discoveries. In: Hage, J., Meeus, M. (Eds.), Innovation, Science, and Institutional Change. Oxford University Press, UK.HollingsworthJ.R., (2006). A path-dependent perspective on institutional and organizational factors shaping major scientific discoveries. In: HageJ.MeeusM. (Eds.), . Oxford University Press, UK.Search in Google Scholar
Hu X. J, Rousseau R. (2016). Nobel Prize winners: Igniting or sparking foundational publications? Scientometrics, 110, 1053-1063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2205-xHuX. JRousseauR. (2016). Nobel Prize winners: Igniting or sparking foundational publications?,110, 1053-1063 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2205-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huang, Y. R., Tian, C. L., Ma, Y. F. (2023). Practical operation and theoretical basis of difference-in-difference regression in science of science: The comparative trial on the scientific performance of Nobel laureates versus their coauthors. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(1), 29-46HuangY R.TianC. L.MaYF. (2023). Practical operation and theoretical basis of differencein-difference regression in science of science: The comparative trial on the scientific performance of Nobel laureates versus their coauthors. , 8(1), 29-46Search in Google Scholar
Kademani B., Kalyane V., Kumar V. et al. (2005). Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. Scientometrics, 62, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0019-3KademaniB.KalyaneVKumarV (2005). Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status. ,62, 261-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0019-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Katz J. S. (2016). What is a complex innovation system? PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0156150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150.KatzJ. S. (2016). What is a complex innovation system?,11(6), e0156150. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0156150.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kitcher P. (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy, Oxford Univ Press, New York.KitcherP (2001). , Oxford Univ Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar
Klavans R., Boyack K.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 60, 455-476.KlavansR.BoyackK.W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. ,60, 455-476.Search in Google Scholar
Kosmulski M. (2020). Nobel laureates are not hot. Scientometrics, 123, 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03378-9KosmulskiM. (2020). Nobel laureates are not hot. ,123, 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03378-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leguendre P., Leguendre L. (2012). Numerical ecology. London: Elsevier B. V. 3rd ed., vol. 24.LeguendrePLeguendreL. (2012). . London: Elsevier B. V3rd ed., 24.Search in Google Scholar
Lewison, G., Dawson, G. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. Scientometrics, 41, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963LewisonG.DawsonG. (1998). The effect of funding on the outputs of biomedical research. ,41, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457963Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Li E.Y., Liao C.H., Yen H.R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. Research Policy, 42(9), 1515-1530.LiE.YLiaoC.H.YenH.R. (2013). Co-authorship networks and research impact: A social capital perspective. , 42(9), 1515-1530.Search in Google Scholar
Li X., Rousseau R., Liang, L. M. et al. (2022). Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research? Scientometrics, 127, 2105-2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04290-0LiX.RousseauR.LiangL. M. (2022). Is low interdisciplinarity of references an unexpected characteristic of Nobel Prize winning research?,127, 2105-2122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04290-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ma C. F., Su C., Yuan, J. P. et al. (2012). Papers written by Nobel Prize winners in physics before they won the prize: an analysis of their language and journal of publication. Scientometrics, 93, 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0748-zMaC. F.SuC.YuanJ. P (2012). Papers written by Nobel Prize winners in physics before they won the prize: an analysis of their language and journal of publication. , 93, 1151-1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0748-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ma, L. (2021). The steering effects of citations and metrics. Journal of Documentation, 77(2), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0093MaL. (2021). The steering effects of citations and metrics. , 77(2), 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2020-0093Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mabe M. A, Amin M. (2002). Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: Author- reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. Aslib Proceedings, 54(3), 149-157.MabeM. AAminM. (2002). Dr Jekyll and Dr Hyde: Author-reader asymmetries in scholarly publishing. , 54(3), 149-157.Search in Google Scholar
MacLean M., Davies C., Lewison G., Anderson J.(1998). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. Research Evaluation, 7(1), 7-16.MacLeanM.DaviesC.LewisonG.AndersonJ.(1998). Evaluating the research activity and impact of funding agencies. , 7(1), 7-16.Search in Google Scholar
Makino J. (1998). Productivity of research groups-relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities. Scientometrics, 43, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458398MakinoJ. (1998). Productivity of research groups-relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities. ,43, 87-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458398Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mannion, R., Marini, G., Street, A. (2008). Implementing payment by results in the English NHS: Changing incentives and the role of information. Journal of Health, Organisation and Management, 22(1), 79-88.MannionR.MariniG.StreetA. (2008). Implementing payment by results in the English NHS: Changing incentives and the role of information. , 22(1), 79-88.Search in Google Scholar
Merton R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79(4), 606-623.MertonR. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. , 79(4), 606-623.Search in Google Scholar
Morillo F. (2020). Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact. Scientometrics, 125, 689-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03652-wMorilloF. (2020). Is open access publication useful for all research fields? Presence of funding, collaboration and impact. ,125, 689-716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03652-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mosleh M., Roshani S., Coccia M. (2022). Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science. Scientometrics, 127, 1931-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1MoslehM.RoshaniS.CocciaM. (2022). Scientific laws of research funding to support citations and diffusion of knowledge in life science. ,127, 1931-1951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04300-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pagliaro M., Coccia M. (2021). How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications. Heliyon, 7(1), e05998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05998PagliaroM.CocciaM. (2021). How self-determination of scholars outclasses shrinking public research lab budgets, supporting scientific production: a case study and R&D management implications. ,7(1), e05998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05998Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pao M.L. (1991). On the relationship of funding and research publications. Scientometrics, 20, 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018158PaoM.L. (1991). On the relationship of funding and research publications. , 20, 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018158Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Petersen A.M., Fortunato S., Pan R.K., Kaski K., Penner O., Rungi A., Riccaboni M., Stanley H.E., Pammolli F. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 111(43), 15316-153PetersenA.M.FortunatoS.PanR.K.KaskiK.PennerO.RungiA.RiccaboniM.StanleyH.E.PammolliF. (2014). Reputation and impact in academic careers. , 111(43), 15316-153Search in Google Scholar
Quinlan K. M., Kane M., Trochim W. M. K. (2008). Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. In C. L. S. Coryn & M. Scriven (Eds.), Reforming the evaluation of research. New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 61-72.QuinlanK. M.KaneM.TrochimW. M. K. (2008). Evaluation of large research initiatives: Outcomes, challenges, and methodological considerations. In CorynC. L. S.ScrivenM. (Eds.), . New Directions for Evaluation, 118, 61-72.Search in Google Scholar
Rodríguez-Navarro, A. (2011). Measuring research excellence: Number of Nobel Prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 582-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145007Rodríguez-NavarroA. (2011). Measuring research excellence: Number of Nobel Prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. , 67(4), 582-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220411111145007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ronda-Pupo G. A., Katz J. S. (2016). The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale-independent approach. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(10), 2565-2572. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23575.Ronda-PupoG. A.KatzJ. S. (2016). The power-law relationship between citation-based performance and collaboration in articles in management journals: A scale-independent approach. , 67(10), 2565-2572. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23575.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ronda-Pupo G. A., Katz J. S. (2017). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1257-1265. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23759Ronda-PupoG. A.KatzJ. S. (2017). The scaling relationship between citation-based performance and coauthorship patterns in natural sciences. ,68(5), 1257-1265. doi.org/10.1002/asi.23759Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roshani S., Bagherylooieh M. R., Mosleh M., Coccia M. (2021). What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines. Scientometrics, 126(9), 7859-7874. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9RoshaniS.BagherylooiehM. R.MoslehM.CocciaM. (2021). What is the relationship between research funding and citation-based performance? A comparative analysis between critical disciplines. ,126(9), 7859-7874. doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04077-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saam N.J., Reiter L. (1999). Lotka’s law reconsidered: The evolution of publication and citation distributions in scientific fields. Scientometrics, 44, 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457376SaamN.J.ReiterL. (1999). Lotka’s law reconsidered: The evolution of publication and citation distributions in scientific fields. ,44, 135-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457376Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sen, B.K., Pandalai, T.A. and Karanjai, A. (1998). Ranking of scientists – a new approach. Journal of Documentation, 54(5), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007184SenB.K.PandalaiT.A.KaranjaiA. (1998). Ranking of scientists-a new approach. ,54(5), 622-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007184Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Simonton D.K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. Rev Gen Psychol, 8(1), 59-67.SimontonD.K. (2004). Psychology’s status as a scientific discipline: Its empirical placement within an implicit hierarchy of the sciences. , 8(1), 59-67.Search in Google Scholar
Small H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol, 50(3), 799-813.SmallH. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. ,50(3), 799-813.Search in Google Scholar
Small H., Tseng H., Patek M. (2017). Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation contexts. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 46-62. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.001SmallH.TsengH.PatekM. (2017). Discovering discoveries: Identifying biomedical discoveries using citation contexts. ,11(1), 46-62. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2016.11.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Smith L.D., Best L.A., Stubbs D.A., Johnston J., Bastiani A.A. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. Soc Stud Sci, 30(1), 73-94.SmithL.D.BestL.A.StubbsD.A.JohnstonJ.BastianiA.A. (2000). Scientific graphs and the hierarchy of the sciences: A Latourian survey of inscription practices. , 30(1), 73-94.Search in Google Scholar
Stephan P. E. (1996). The Economics of Science. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), 1199-1235, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729500StephanP. E. (1996). The Economics of Science. ,34(3), 1199-1235, Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2729500Search in Google Scholar
Storer N.W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. Bull Med Libr Assoc, 55(1), 75-84.StorerN.W. (1967). The hard sciences and the soft: Some sociological observations. ,55(1), 75-84.Search in Google Scholar
Turki H., Hadj Taieb, M.A., Ben Aouicha M. (2020). Facts to consider when analyzing the references of Nobel Prize scientific background. Scientometrics, 124, 787-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03456-yTurkiH.Hadj TaiebM.A.Ben AouichaM. (2020). Facts to consider when analyzing the references of Nobel Prize scientific background. , 124, 787-790. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03456-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Urde, M. and Greyser, S.A. (2015). The Nobel Prize: the identity of a corporate heritage brand. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(4), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2014-0749UrdeM.GreyserS.A. (2015). The Nobel Prize: the identity of a corporate heritage brand. ,24(4), 318-332. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-11-2014-0749Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wang J., Shapira P. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 87(3), 563-586.WangJ.ShapiraP. (2011). Funding acknowledgement analysis: an enhanced tool to investigate research sponsorship impacts: the case of nanotechnology. ,87(3), 563-586.Search in Google Scholar
Wang J., Shapira P. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. PloS one, 10(2), doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.WangJ.ShapiraP. (2015). Is there a relationship between research sponsorship and publication impact? An analysis of funding acknowledgments in nanotechnology papers. ,10(2), doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117727.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Web of Science. (2022). Web of Science, Search in: Web of Science Core Collection, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&SID=E5lSYgaLwJn6kp2iz2G&search_mode=GeneralSearch (Accessed 24 February 2022)Web of Science. (2022). in: Web of Science Core Collection, http://apps.webofknowledge.com/WOS_GeneralSearch_input.do?product=WOS&SID=E5lSYgaLwJn6kp2iz2G&search_mode=GeneralSearch (Accessed 24 February 2022)Search in Google Scholar
Wen, F. F. (2019). Study on the research evolution of Nobel laureates 2018 based on self-citation network. Journal of Documentation, 75(6), 1416-1431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0027WenF F. (2019). Study on the research evolution of Nobel laureates 2018 based on self-citation network. ,75(6), 1416-1431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-02-2019-0027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yan E., Wu C. J., Song M. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. Scientometrics, 115(1), 369-384.YanE.WuC. J.SongM. (2018). The funding factor: A cross-disciplinary examination of the association between research funding and citation impact. ,115(1), 369-384.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, T. Y., Tan, F., Yu, C., Wu, J. X. & Xu, J. (2023). Understanding relationship between topic selection and academic performance of scientific teams based on entity popularity trend. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 75(3), 561-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2022-0135ZhangT. Y.TanF.YuC.WuJ. X.XuJ. (2023). Understanding relationship between topic selection and academic performance of scientific teams based on entity popularity trend. ,75(3), 561-588. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2022-0135Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zhao S. X., Lou W., Tan A. M., Yu S. (2018). Do funded papers attract more usage? Scientometrics, 115(1), 153-168. ZhaoS. X.LouW.TanA. M.YuS. (2018). Do funded papers attract more usage?,115(1), 153-168.Search in Google Scholar