This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E. et al. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82, 391–400.AlonsoS.CabrerizoF.J.Herrera-ViedmaE.2010hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indicesScientometrics8239140010.1007/s11192-009-0047-5Search in Google Scholar
Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Bordons M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. JASIST, 61, 1564–1581.CostasR.van LeeuwenT.N.BordonsM.2010A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impactJASIST611564158110.1002/asi.21348Search in Google Scholar
Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 625–636.HayatiZ.EbrahimyS.2009Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006Scientometrics8062563610.1007/s11192-009-2094-3Search in Google Scholar
Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431.HicksD.WoutersP.WaltmanL.2015Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metricsNature52042943110.1038/520429a25903611Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.HirschJ.E.2005An index to quantify an individual's scientific research outputProceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America102165691657210.1073/pnas.0507655102128383216275915Search in Google Scholar
Hirsch, J.E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 19193–19198.HirschJ.E.2007Does the h index have predictive power?Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America104191931919810.1073/pnas.0707962104214826618040045Search in Google Scholar
Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., et al. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52, 855–863.JinB.LiangL.RousseauR.2007The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-indexChinese Science Bulletin5285586310.1007/s11434-007-0145-9Search in Google Scholar
Kosten, J. (2016). A classification of the use of research indicators. Scientometrics, 108, 457–464.KostenJ.2016A classification of the use of research indicatorsScientometrics10845746410.1007/s11192-016-1904-7490978727390388Search in Google Scholar
Kutlača, D., Babić D., Živković L., et al. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. Scientometrics, 102, 247–265.KutlačaD.BabićD.ŽivkovićL.2015Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific outputScientometrics10224726510.1007/s11192-014-1290-ySearch in Google Scholar
Okubo, Y. (1997). “Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/1, OECD Publishing.OkuboY.1997“Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples,”OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/1OECD PublishingSearch in Google Scholar
Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.PorterM.E.1998Clusters and the new economics of competitionHarvard Business Review767790Search in Google Scholar
Prathap, G. (2011). Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—Toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics, 88, 555–562.PrathapG.2011Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—Toward a theory of performanceScientometrics8855556210.1007/s11192-011-0401-2Search in Google Scholar
Russell, J., & Rousseau, R. (2009). “Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation,” Science and Technology Policy - Volume II, UNESCO, 42–64.RussellJ.RousseauR.2009“Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation,”Science and Technology Policy - Volume II, UNESCO4264Search in Google Scholar
Sahel, J. (2011). Quality versus quantity: Assessing individual research performance. Scienve and. Translational Medicine, 3, 84cm13.SahelJ.2011Quality versus quantity: Assessing individual research performanceScienve and. Translational Medicine384cm1310.1126/scitranslmed.3002249333840921613620Search in Google Scholar
Shirabe, M. (2019). Measurement of research capacity using disciplinary agglomeration indicators: National university “rankings” in Japan. In Proceedings of the 17th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference, 316–321.ShirabeM.2019Measurement of research capacity using disciplinary agglomeration indicators: National university “rankings” in JapanInProceedings of the 17th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference316321Search in Google Scholar
Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13, 239–259.VinklerP.1988An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposesScientometrics1323925910.1007/BF02019961Search in Google Scholar
Wilsdon, J. (2015) The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, Sage Publications.WilsdonJ.2015The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and ManagementSage Publications10.4135/9781473978782Search in Google Scholar
Yokogawa, T., Nishino, J., & Mizuno, Y. (1995). Macroscopic understanding of the situations in GO. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 31–32.YokogawaT.NishinoJ.MizunoY.1995Macroscopic understanding of the situations in GOProceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems313210.1109/FUZZY.1995.410028Search in Google Scholar
Ye, F.Y., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Probing the h-core: An investigation of the tail—core ratio for rank distributions. Scientometrics, 84, 431–439.YeF.Y.RousseauR.2010Probing the h-core: An investigation of the tail—core ratio for rank distributionsScientometrics8443143910.1007/s11192-009-0099-6Search in Google Scholar