Accesso libero

Government Data Openness and Coverage. How do They Affect Trust in European Countries?

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Alesina, A., & Ferrara, E.L. (2000). The determinants of trust (No. w7621). National Bureau of Economic Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w7621AlesinaA.FerraraE.L.2000The determinants of trust (No. w7621)National Bureau of Economic ResearchDOI: https://doi.org/10.3386/w762110.3386/w7621Search in Google Scholar

Altayar, M.S. (2018). Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 633–643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006AltayarM.S.2018Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspectiveGovernment Information Quarterly354633643DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.00610.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238BentlerP.M.1990Comparative fit indexes in structural modelsPsychological Bulletin1072238DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.23810.1037/0033-2909.107.2.2382320703Search in Google Scholar

Bentler, P.M., & Bonett, D.G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588. DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588BentlerP.M.BonettD.G.1980Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structuresPsychological Bulletin883588DOI: https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.58810.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588Search in Google Scholar

Berelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 313–330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/266397BerelsonB.1952Democratic theory and public opinionPublic Opinion Quarterly313330DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/26639710.1086/266397Search in Google Scholar

Bollen, K.A., & Paxton, P. (2000). Subjective measures of liberal democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 33(1), 58–86.BollenK.A.PaxtonP.2000Subjective measures of liberal democracyComparative Political Studies331588610.1177/0010414000033001003Search in Google Scholar

Bozeman, B., & Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review, 109–118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/976358BozemanB.KingsleyG.1998Risk culture in public and private organizationsPublic Administration Review109118DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/97635810.2307/976358Search in Google Scholar

Cangur, S., & Ercan, I. (2015). Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normality. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 14(1), 14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1430453580CangurS.ErcanI.2015Comparison of model fit indices used in structural equation modeling under multivariate normalityJournal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods14114DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/143045358010.22237/jmasm/1430453580Search in Google Scholar

Chun, S., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., & Hovy, E. (2010). Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and government. Information Polity, 15(1–2), 1–9.ChunS.ShulmanS.SandovalR.HovyE.2010Government 2.0: Making connections between citizens, data and governmentInformation Polity151–21910.3233/IP-2010-0205Search in Google Scholar

Drakos, K., Kallandranis, C., & Karidis, S. (2019). Determinants of trust in institutions in times of crisis: Survey-based evidence from the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(6), 1228–1246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12884DrakosK.KallandranisC.KaridisS.2019Determinants of trust in institutions in times of crisis: Survey-based evidence from the European UnionJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies57612281246DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.1288410.1111/jcms.12884Search in Google Scholar

Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee (2020) Available from: https://cepr.org/content/euro-area-business-cycle-dating-committee-announcements.Euro Area Business Cycle Dating Committee2020Available from: https://cepr.org/content/euro-area-business-cycle-dating-committee-announcements.Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council of the EU (2003). Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/98/ojEuropean Parliament and Council of the EU2003Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector informationAvailable from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2003/98/ojSearch in Google Scholar

European Parliament and Council of the EU (2019). Directive (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector information. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1024/ojEuropean Parliament and Council of the EU2019Directive (EU) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the re-use of public sector informationAvailable from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/1024/ojSearch in Google Scholar

Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., & Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-government. International Journal of Public Sector Management. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550410539794GilbertD.BalestriniP.LittleboyD.2004Barriers and benefits in the adoption of e-governmentInternational Journal of Public Sector ManagementDOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/0951355041053979410.1108/09513550410539794Search in Google Scholar

Gonzálvez-Gallego, N., Nieto-Torrejón, L., & Pérez-Cárceles, M.C. (2020). Is open data an enabler for trust? Exploring the link and the mediating role of citizen satisfaction. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(14), 1218–1227. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1668412Gonzálvez-GallegoN.Nieto-TorrejónL.Pérez-CárcelesM.C.2020Is open data an enabler for trust? Exploring the link and the mediating role of citizen satisfactionInternational Journal of Public Administration431412181227DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.166841210.1080/01900692.2019.1668412Search in Google Scholar

Grimmelikhuijsen, S.G. (2012). Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in government. Dissertation, Utrecht Univ.GrimmelikhuijsenS.G.2012Transparency and trust. An experimental study of online disclosure and trust in governmentDissertation,Utrecht UnivSearch in Google Scholar

Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2016). Monnet's error? Economic Policy, 31(86), 247–297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiw003GuisoL.SapienzaP.ZingalesL.2016Monnet's error?Economic Policy3186247297DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eiw00310.3386/w21121Search in Google Scholar

Harrison, T.M., Guerrero, S., Burke, G.B., Cook, M., Cresswell, A., Helbig, N., & Pardo, T. (2012). Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspective. Information Polity, 17(2), 83–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-0269HarrisonT.M.GuerreroS.BurkeG.B.CookM.CresswellA.HelbigN.PardoT.2012Open government and e-government: Democratic challenges from a public value perspectiveInformation Polity1728397DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2012-026910.1145/2037556.2037597Search in Google Scholar

Hix, S. (2013). What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix it. John Wiley & Sons.HixS.2013What's Wrong with the Europe Union and How to Fix itJohn Wiley & SonsSearch in Google Scholar

Hood, C. (2006). Transparency in historical perspective. In Transparency: The key to better governance?, Ed. Christopher Hood and David Heald, 3–23. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press.HoodC.2006Transparency in historical perspectiveInTransparency: The key to better governance?Ed.HoodChristopherHealdDavid323OxfordOxford Univ. Press10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.003.0001Search in Google Scholar

Hooghe, M., & Marien, S. (2013). A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies, 15(1), 131–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.692807HoogheM.MarienS.2013A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in EuropeEuropean Societies151131152DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2012.69280710.1080/14616696.2012.692807Search in Google Scholar

Hossain, M.A., Dwivedi, Y.K., & Rana, N.P. (2016). State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda. Journal of organizational computing and electronic commerce, 26(1–2), 14–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124007HossainM.A.DwivediY.K.RanaN.P.2016State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agendaJournal of organizational computing and electronic commerce261–21440DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.112400710.1080/10919392.2015.1124007Search in Google Scholar

Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118HuL.T.BentlerP.M.1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal61155DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551990954011810.1080/10705519909540118Search in Google Scholar

Jackson, M.C. (2016). Systems thinking: Creative holism for managers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc..JacksonM.C.2016Systems thinking: Creative holism for managersJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, M., & Kuk, G. (2016). Big and open linked data (BOLD) in research, policy, and practice. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 26(1–2), 3–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.1124005JanssenM.KukG.2016Big and open linked data (BOLD) in research, policy, and practiceJournal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce261–2313DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10919392.2015.112400510.1080/10919392.2015.1124005Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740JanssenM.CharalabidisY.ZuiderwijkA.2012Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open governmentInformation Systems Management294258268DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.71674010.1080/10580530.2012.716740Search in Google Scholar

Jöreskog, K.G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International.JöreskogK.G.SörbomD.1993LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command languageScientific Software InternationalSearch in Google Scholar

MacCallum, R.C., & Hong, S. (1997). Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFI. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32(2), 193–210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5MacCallumR.C.HongS.1997Power analysis in covariance structure modeling using GFI and AGFIMultivariate Behavioral Research322193210DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_510.1207/s15327906mbr3202_526788758Search in Google Scholar

Martin, C. (2014). Barriers to the open government data agenda: Taking a multi-level perspective. Policy & Internet, 6(3), 217–240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI367MartinC.2014Barriers to the open government data agenda: Taking a multi-level perspectivePolicy & Internet63217240DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1944-2866.POI36710.1002/1944-2866.POI367Search in Google Scholar

McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002McDermottP.2010Building open governmentGovernment Information Quarterly274401413DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.00210.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Meijer A. (2009). Understanding computer-mediated transparency. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(2), 255–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0020852309104175MeijerA.2009Understanding computer-mediated transparencyInternational Review of Administrative Sciences75225569DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002085230910417510.1177/0020852309104175Search in Google Scholar

Meijer, A. (2014). Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the Netherlands. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(3), 189–199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.934837MeijerA.2014Government transparency in historical perspective: From the ancient regime to open data in the NetherlandsInternational Journal of Public Administration383189199DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.93483710.1080/01900692.2014.934837Search in Google Scholar

Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2005). What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 38(9), 1050–1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414005278419MishlerW.RoseR.2005What are the political consequences of trust? A test of cultural and institutional theories in RussiaComparative Political Studies38910501078DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400527841910.1177/0010414005278419Search in Google Scholar

Moss, G., & Coleman, S. (2014). Deliberative manoeuvres in the digital darkness: E-democracy policy in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 16(3), 410–427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-856X.12004MossG.ColemanS.2014Deliberative manoeuvres in the digital darkness: E-democracy policy in the UKThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations163410427DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111%2F1467-856X.1200410.1111/1467-856X.12004Search in Google Scholar

Muller, E.N., & Jukam, T.O. (1983). Discontent and aggressive political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 13(2), 159–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003203MullerE.N.JukamT.O.1983Discontent and aggressive political participationBritish Journal of Political Science132159179DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340000320310.1017/S0007123400003203Search in Google Scholar

Muñoz, J., Torcal, M., & Bonet, E. (2011). Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?. European Union Politics, 12(4), 551–574. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511419250MuñozJ.TorcalM.BonetE.2011Institutional trust and multilevel government in the European Union: Congruence or compensation?European Union Politics124551574DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/146511651141925010.1177/1465116511419250Search in Google Scholar

O’Hara, K. (2012, June). Transparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphere. In Proceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference, 223–232.O’HaraK.2012JuneTransparency, open data and trust in government: Shaping the infosphereInProceedings of the 4th annual ACM web science conference22323210.1145/2380718.2380747Search in Google Scholar

Open Data Watch (2019). Open data inventory 2018/2019. Methodology report. Available from: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ubPL1l_3im9bjlCVZ6W2ICAy6UAiXl1hGeA1aXImkxI/editOpen Data Watch2019Open data inventory 2018/2019. Methodology reportAvailable from: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ubPL1l_3im9bjlCVZ6W2ICAy6UAiXl1hGeA1aXImkxI/editSearch in Google Scholar

Parycek, P., Hochtl, J., & Ginner, M. (2014). Open government data implementation evaluation. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Eelectronic Commerce Research, 9(2), 80–99. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762014000200007ParycekP.HochtlJ.GinnerM.2014Open government data implementation evaluationJournal of Theoretical and Applied Eelectronic Commerce Research928099DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-1876201400020000710.4067/S0718-18762014000200007Search in Google Scholar

Pereira, G.V., Macadar, M.A., Luciano, E.M., & Testa, M.G. (2017). Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City context. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(2), 213–229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-7PereiraG.V.MacadarM.A.LucianoE.M.TestaM.G.2017Delivering public value through open government data initiatives in a Smart City contextInformation Systems Frontiers192213229DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9673-710.1007/s10796-016-9673-7Search in Google Scholar

Porumbescu, G.A., & Park, Y. (2014). Examining the distinctiveness of antecedents to trust in government: Evidence from South Korea. African and Asian Studies, 13(3), 315–337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-12341301PorumbescuG.A.ParkY.2014Examining the distinctiveness of antecedents to trust in government: Evidence from South KoreaAfrican and Asian Studies133315337DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15692108-1234130110.1163/15692108-12341301Search in Google Scholar

Rigdon, E.E. (1996). CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 3(4), 369–379. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519609540052RigdonE.E.1996CFI versus RMSEA: A comparison of two fit indexes for structural equation modelingStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal34369379DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1070551960954005210.1080/10705519609540052Search in Google Scholar

Safarov, I., Meijer, A., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2017). Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and users. Information Polity, 22(1), 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-160012SafarovI.MeijerA.GrimmelikhuijsenS.2017Utilization of open government data: A systematic literature review of types, conditions, effects and usersInformation Polity221124DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-16001210.3233/IP-160012Search in Google Scholar

Savoldelli, A., Codagnone, C., & Misuraca, G. (2014). Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 63–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008SavoldelliA.CodagnoneC.MisuracaG.2014Understanding the e-government paradox: Learning from literature and practice on barriers to adoptionGovernment Information Quarterly316371DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.00810.1016/j.giq.2014.01.008Search in Google Scholar

Schafheitle, S., Weibel, A., Meidert, N., & Leuffen, D. (2020). The Road to Trust. A Vignette Study on the Determinants of Citizens’ Trust in the European Commission. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(2), 256–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12901SchafheitleS.WeibelA.MeidertN.LeuffenD.2020The Road to Trust. A Vignette Study on the Determinants of Citizens’ Trust in the European CommissionJCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies582256275DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.1290110.1111/jcms.12901Search in Google Scholar

Schedler, K., Guenduez, A.A., & Frischknecht, R. (2019). How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart government. Information Polity, 24(1), 3–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180095SchedlerK.GuenduezA.A.FrischknechtR.2019How smart can government be? Exploring barriers to the adoption of smart governmentInformation Polity241320DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-18009510.3233/IP-180095Search in Google Scholar

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH.2003Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measuresMethods of Psychological Research Online822374Search in Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.SchumpeterJ.A.1950Capitalism, socialism, and democracyNew YorkHarper & RowSearch in Google Scholar

Smith, A., Voß, J.P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023SmithA.VoßJ.P.GrinJ.2010Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challengesResearch Policy394435448DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.02310.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023Search in Google Scholar

Thorhildur, J., Avital, M., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2013). The generative mechanisms of open government data. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Utrecht, 6–7, June.ThorhildurJ.AvitalM.Bjorn-AndersenN.2013The generative mechanisms of open government dataInProceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS)Utrecht6–7, JuneSearch in Google Scholar

Ullman, J.B., & Bentler, P.M. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Handbook of Psychology, 607–634.UllmanJ.B.BentlerP.M.2012Structural equation modelingHandbook of Psychology60763410.1002/9781118133880.hop202023Search in Google Scholar

Van der Meer, T.W. (2018). Economic performance and political trust. The Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust, 599–616.Van der MeerT.W.2018Economic performance and political trustThe Oxford Handbook of Social and Political Trust599616Search in Google Scholar

Williams, L.J., Edwards, J.R., & Vandenberg, R.J. (2003). Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research. Journal of Management, 29(6), 903–936. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0149-2063_03_00084-9WilliamsL.J.EdwardsJ.R.VandenbergR.J.2003Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management researchJournal of Management296903936DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016%2FS0149-2063_03_00084-910.1016/S0149-2063(03)00084-9Search in Google Scholar

Wirtz, B.W., & Birkmeyer, S. (2015). Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectives. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(5), 381–396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.942735WirtzB.W.BirkmeyerS.2015Open government: Origin, development, and conceptual perspectivesInternational Journal of Public Administration385381396DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.94273510.1080/01900692.2014.942735Search in Google Scholar

Wright, S. (1921). Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research, 20, 557–585.WrightS.1921Correlation and causationJournal of Agricultural Research20557585Search in Google Scholar

Yu, H., & Robinson, D.G. (2011). The new ambiguity of open government. UCLA L. Rev. Discourse, 59, 178.YuH.RobinsonD.G.2011The new ambiguity of open governmentUCLA L. Rev. Discourse5917810.2139/ssrn.2012489Search in Google Scholar

Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003ZuiderwijkA.JanssenM.2014Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparisonGovernment Information Quarterly3111729DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.00310.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2543-683X
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Computer Sciences, Information Technology, Project Management, Databases and Data Mining