This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Boyack, K., Glänzel, W., Gläser, J., Havemann, F., Scharnhorst, A., Thijs, B., van Eck, N. J., Velden, T., & Waltmann, L. (2017). Topic identification challenge. Scientometrics, 111, 1223– 1224.BoyackK.GlänzelW.GläserJ.HavemannF.ScharnhorstA.ThijsB.van EckN. J.VeldenT.WaltmannL.2017Topic identification challengeScientometrics1111223– 122410.1007/s11192-017-2307-0Search in Google Scholar
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2014). Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make? Journal of Informetrics, 8, 569–580. 10.1016/j. joi.2014.04.001BoyackK. W.KlavansR.2014Including cited non-source items in a large-scale map of science: What difference does it make?Journal of Informetrics856958010.1016/j.joi.2014.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Colavizza, G., Boyack, K. W., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2018). The closer the better: Similarity of publication pairs at different cocitation levels. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69, 600–609. 10.1002/asi.23981ColavizzaG.BoyackK. W.van EckN. J.WaltmanL.2018The closer the better: Similarity of publication pairs at different cocitation levelsJournal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6960060910.1002/asi.23981Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2003). A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposes. Scientometrics, 56, 357–367.GlänzelW.SchubertA.2003A new classification scheme of science fields and subfields designed for scientometric evaluation purposesScientometrics5635736710.1023/A:1022378804087Search in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Thijs, B. (2011). Using core documents for the representation of clusters and topics. Scientometrics, 88, 297–309.GlänzelW.ThijsB.2011Using core documents for the representation of clusters and topicsScientometrics8829730910.1007/s11192-011-0347-4Search in Google Scholar
Grover, A., & Leskovec, J. (2016). node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining (pp. 855–864). ACM.GroverA.LeskovecJ.2016node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networksProceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining85586410.1145/2939672.2939754510865427853626Search in Google Scholar
Haunschild, R., Schier, H., Marx, W., & Bornman, L. (2018). Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splitting. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 436–447. 10.1016/j.joi.2018.03.004HaunschildR.SchierH.MarxW.BornmanL.2018Algorithmically generated subject categories based on citation relations: An empirical micro study using papers on overall water splittingJournal of Informetrics1243644710.1016/j.joi.2018.03.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Janssens, F., Glänzel, W., & De Moor, B. (2008). A hybrid mapping of information science. Scientometrics, 75, 607–631.JanssensF.GlänzelW.De MoorB.2008A hybrid mapping of information scienceScientometrics7560763110.1007/s11192-007-2002-7Search in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60, 455–476.KlavansR.BoyackK. W.2009Toward a consensus map of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology6045547610.1002/asi.20991Search in Google Scholar
Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2017). Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68, 984–998.KlavansR.BoyackK. W.2017Which type of citation analysis generates the most accurate taxonomy of scientific and technical knowledge? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology6898499810.1002/asi.23734Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L. (2006). Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the journal citation reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 601–613.LeydesdorffL.2006Can scientific journals be classified in terms of aggregated journal-journal citation relations using the journal citation reports? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology5760161310.1002/asi.20322Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2017). Generating clustered journal maps: An automated system for hierarchical classification. Scientometrics, 110, 1601–1614.LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.WagnerC. S.2017Generating clustered journal maps: An automated system for hierarchical classificationScientometrics1101601161410.1007/s11192-016-2226-5531108228255188Search in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., & Wagner, C. S. (2017). Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classification. Scientometrics, 110, 1601–1614. 10.1007/s11192-016-2226-5LeydesdorffL.BornmannL.WagnerC. S.2017Generating clustered journal maps: an automated system for hierarchical classificationScientometrics1101601161410.1007/s11192-016-2226-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Leydesdorff, L., Wagner, C. S., & Bornmann, L. (2018). Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—a tribute to eugene garfield. Scientometrics, 114, 567–592.LeydesdorffL.WagnerC. S.BornmannL.2018Betweenness and diversity in journal citation networks as measures of interdisciplinarity—a tribute to eugene garfieldScientometrics11456759210.1007/s11192-017-2528-2580750029449751Search in Google Scholar
Maaten, L. v. d., & Hinton, G. (2008). Visualizing data using t-sne. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 2579–2605.MaatenL. v. d.HintonG.2008Visualizing data using t-sneJournal of Machine Learning Research925792605Search in Google Scholar
Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G. S., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 3111–3119).MikolovT.SutskeverI.ChenK.CorradoG. S.DeanJ.2013Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionalityadvances in neural information processing systems31113119Search in Google Scholar
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, E. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830.PedregosaF.VaroquauxG.GramfortA.MichelV.ThirionB.GriselO.BlondelM.PrettenhoferP.WeissR.DubourgV.VanderplasJ.PassosA.CournapeauD.BrucherM.PerrotM.DuchesnayE.2011Scikit-learn: Machine learning in PythonJournal of Machine Learning Research1228252830Search in Google Scholar
Rao, C. R. (1982). Diversity: its measurement, decomposition apportionment and analysis. Sankhy : The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A, 44, 1–22.RaoC. R.1982Diversity: its measurement, decomposition apportionment and analysisSankhy : The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A44122Search in Google Scholar
Schakel, A. M., & Wilson, B. J. (2015). Measuring word significance using distributed representations of words. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02297.SchakelA. M.WilsonB. J.2015Measuring word significance using distributed representations of wordsarXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02297Search in Google Scholar
Shen, Z., Yang, L., Pei, J., Li, M., Wu, C., Bao, J., Wei, T., Di, Z., Rousseau, R., & Wu, J. (2016). Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input—output analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.002ShenZ.YangL.PeiJ.LiM.WuC.BaoJ.WeiT.DiZ.RousseauR.WuJ.2016Interrelations among scientific fields and their relative influences revealed by an input—output analysisJournal of Informetrics108297https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.11.00210.1016/j.joi.2015.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Sjogarde, P., & Ahlgren, P. (2018). Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topics. Journal of Informetrics, 12, 133–152. 10.1016/j.joi.2017.12.006SjogardeP.AhlgrenP.2018Granularity of algorithmically constructed publication-level classifications of research publications: Identification of topicsJournal of Informetrics1213315210.1016/j.joi.2017.12.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4, 707–719.StirlingA.2007A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and societyJournal of the Royal Society Interface470771910.1098/rsif.2007.0213237338917327202Search in Google Scholar
Vinh, N. X., Epps, J., & Bailey, J. (2010). Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: Variants, properties, normalization and correction for chance. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2837–2854.VinhN. X.EppsJ.BaileyJ.2010Information theoretic measures for clusterings comparison: Variants, properties, normalization and correction for chanceJournal of Machine Learning Research112837285410.1145/1553374.1553511Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10, 365 – 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007WaltmanL.2016A review of the literature on citation impact indicatorsJournal of Informetrics10365391https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.00710.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007Search in Google Scholar
Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 2378–2392.WaltmanL.Van EckN. J.2012A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of scienceJournal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology632378239210.1002/asi.22748Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glanzel, W. (2016). Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into account. Journal of The Association for Information Science and Technology, 67, 1257–1265. 10.1002/asi.23487ZhangL.RousseauR.GlanzelW.2016Diversity of references as an indicator of the interdisciplinarity of journals: Taking similarity between subject fields into accountJournal of The Association for Information Science and Technology671257126510.1002/asi.23487Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
