This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Kaller R, Mureșan AV, Popa DG, Arbănași EM, Russu E. Fatal Aortoduodenal Fistula Caused by a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm – a Case Report. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2021;7:129–132. doi: 10.2478/jce-2021-0015.Search in Google Scholar
Arbănași EM, Russu E, Mureșan AV, Arbănași EM. Late Rupture of a Thrombosed Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm – a Case Report. Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2021;7:84–87. doi: 10.2478/jce-2021-0012.Search in Google Scholar
Mărginean L, Mureșan AV, Arbănași EM, et al. Transarterial Embolization of Ruptured Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Related to Chronic Pancreatitis. Diagnostics. 2023;13:1090. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061090.Search in Google Scholar
Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–110. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3.Search in Google Scholar
Rinkel GJE. Intracranial aneurysm screening: indications and advice for practice. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:122–128. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)00993-2.Search in Google Scholar
Arbănași EM, Mureșan AV, Coșarcă CM, et al. Computed Tomography Angiography Markers and Intraluminal Thrombus Morphology as Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19:15961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315961.Search in Google Scholar
Filep RC, Constantin C, Arbănași EM, Mureșan AV, Russu E, Mărginean L. Endovascular treatment of an aneurysm associated with fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery: Case report and review of the literature. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13:966642. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.966642.Search in Google Scholar
Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–1737. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839.Search in Google Scholar
Kadirvel R, Ding YH, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014;270:394–399. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130796.Search in Google Scholar
10.Chen J, Zhang Y, Tian Z, et al. Relationship between haemodynamic changes and outcomes of intracranial aneurysms after implantation of the pipeline embolisation device: a single centre study. Interv Neuroradiol. 2019;25:671–680. doi: 10.1177/1591019919849673.Search in Google Scholar
11.Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, et al. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review. Neuroradiol J. 2015;28:365–375. doi: 10.1177/1971400915602803.Search in Google Scholar
12.Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858–868. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099.Search in Google Scholar
13.Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Nguyen V, et al. The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01543-z.Search in Google Scholar
14.Mantilla D, Ferreira-Prada CA, Galvis M, et al. Clinical impact of Sim & Size® simulation software in the treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysms with flow-diverter Pipeline stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2023;29:47–55. doi: 10.1177/15910199211068668.Search in Google Scholar
15.Chiu AH, Nadarajah M, Wenderoth JD. Cost analysis of intracranial aneurysmal repair by endovascular coiling versus flow diversion: at what size should we use which method? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57:423–426. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12040.Search in Google Scholar
16.Shapiro M, Raz E, Becske T, Nelson PK. Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:727–733. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3742.Search in Google Scholar
17.Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1159–1164. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1543.Search in Google Scholar
18.Ionita CN, Mokin M, Varble N, et al. Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014;9038:90380M. doi: 10.1117/12.2042266.Search in Google Scholar
19.Sarrami-Foroushani A, Lassila T, Gooya A, Geers AJ, Frangi AF. Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability. J Biomech. 2016;49:3815–3823. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.005.Search in Google Scholar
