[
1. World Health Organization (WHO). Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Libby P, Buring JE, Badimon L et al. Atherosclerosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019;5:56. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z.10.1038/s41572-019-0106-z31420554
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Shi X, Gao J, Lv Q, et al. Calcification in Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability: Friend or Foe? Front Physiol. 2020;11:56. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00056.10.3389/fphys.2020.00056701303932116766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Choi SY, Mintz GS. What have we learned about plaque rupture in acute coronary syndromes? Curr Cardiol Rep. 2010;12:338-343. doi: 10.1007/s11886-010-0113-x.10.1007/s11886-010-0113-x20425160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Partida RA, Libby P, Crea F, Jang IK. Plaque erosion: a new in vivo diagnosis and a potential major shift in the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:2070-2076. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx786.10.1093/eurheartj/ehx786599121529329384
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Stefanadis C, Antoniou CK, Tsiachris D, Pietri P. Coronary Atherosclerotic Vulnerable Plaque: Current Perspectives. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:e005543. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005543.10.1161/JAHA.117.005543552404428314799
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108:1664-1672. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97.10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.9714530185
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Bentzon JF, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Falk E. Mechanisms of plaque formation and rupture. Circ Res. 2014;114:1852–1866. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.302721.10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.114.30272124902970
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Hafiane A. Vulnerable Plaque, Characteristics, Detection, and Potential Therapies. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6:26. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6030026.10.3390/jcdd6030026678760931357630
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Costopoulos C, Brown AJ, Teng Z, Hoole SP, West NE, Samady H, Bennett MR. Intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography imaging of coronary atherosclerosis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;32:189-200. doi: 10.1007/s10554-015-0701-3.10.1007/s10554-015-0701-326153522
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Rathod KS, Hamshere SM, Jones DA, Mathur A. Intravascular Ultrasound Versus Optical Coherence Tomography for Coronary Artery Imaging - Apples and Oranges?. Interv Cardiol. 2015;10:8-15. doi: 10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8.10.15420/icr.2015.10.1.8580846329588667
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407-477. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz425.10.1093/eurheartj/ehz42531504439
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque quantification by coronary CT and intravascular ultrasound identifies a low CT density core as a marker of plaque instability in acute coronary syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-28. doi: 10.1536/ihj.13-213.10.1536/ihj.13-21324463925
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Bittner DO, Mayrhofer T, Puchner SB, et al. Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Specific Definitions of High-Risk Plaque Features Improve Detection of Acute Coronary Syndrome. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:e007657. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007657.10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.007657620522030354493
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Murgia A, Balestrieri A, Crivelli P, et al. Cardiac computed tomography radiomics: an emerging tool for the non-invasive assessment of coronary atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10:2005-2017. doi: 10.21037/cdt-20-156.10.21037/cdt-20-156775876733381440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Liu W, Zhang Y, Yu CM, et al. Current understanding of coronary artery calcification. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2015;12:668-675. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2015.06.012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. van Rosendael AR, Narula J, Lin FY, et al. Association of High-Density Calcified 1K Plaque With Risk of Acute Coronary Syndrome. JAMA Cardiol. 2020;5:282-290. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5315.10.1001/jamacardio.2019.5315699094631968065
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Shmilovich H, Cheng VY, Tamarappoo BK, et al. Vulnerable plaque features on coronary CT angiography as markers of inducible regional myocardial hypoperfusion from severe coronary artery stenoses. Atherosclerosis. 2011;219:588-595. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.128.10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.07.128322684621862017
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Brutkiewicz A, Kruk M, Demkow M, et al. The natural history of napkin-ring sign by coronary computed tomography angiography. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2019;15:314-320. doi: 10.5114/aic.2019.87886.10.5114/aic.2019.87886677719231592255
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Opincariu D, Benedek T, Chițu M, Raț N, Benedek I. From CT to artificial intelligence for complex assessment of plaque-associated risk. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;36:2403-2427. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01926-1.10.1007/s10554-020-01926-132617720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Katranas SA, Kelekis AL, Antoniadis AP, Ziakas AG, Giannoglou GD. Differences in Stress Forces and Geometry between Left and Right Coronary Artery: A Pathophysiological Aspect of Atherosclerosis Heterogeneity. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2015;56:217-223.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Giannoglou GD, Antoniadis AP, Chatzizisis YS, Louridas GE. Difference in the topography of atherosclerosis in the left versus right coronary artery in patients referred for coronary angiography. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2010;10:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2261-10-26.10.1186/1471-2261-10-26289777120534166
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Asakura T, Karino T. Flow patterns and spatial distribution of atherosclerotic lesions in human coronary arteries. Circ Res. 1990;66:1045-1066. doi: 10.1161/01.res.66.4.1045.10.1161/01.RES.66.4.1045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Malek AM, Alper SL, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1999;282:2035-2042. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.21.2035.10.1001/jama.282.21.203510591386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Tutar E, et al. High prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic teenagers and young adults: evidence from intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2001;103:2705-2710. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.22.2705.10.1161/01.CIR.103.22.2705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Stehli J, et al. Coronary dominance and prognosis in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter) registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16:853-862. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeu314.10.1093/ehjci/jeu314450579125744341
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Veltman CE, de Graaf FR, Schuijf JD, et al. Prognostic value of coronary vessel dominance in relation to significant coronary artery disease determined with non-invasive computed tomography coronary angiography. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1367-1377. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs034.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs03422390913
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Tuzcu EM, Kapadia SR, Tutar E, et al. High prevalence of coronary atherosclerosis in asymptomatic teenagers and young adults: evidence from intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2001;103:2705-2710. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.103.22.2705.10.1161/01.CIR.103.22.2705
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H, et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.068.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.02.06819555840
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Thomsen C, Abdulla J. Characteristics of high-risk coronary plaques identified by computed tomographic angiography and associated prognosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17:120-129. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev325.10.1093/ehjci/jev325488289626690951
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Elsman P, van ‘t Hof AW, Hoorntje JC, et al. Effect of coronary occlusion site on angiographic and clinical outcome in acute myocardial infarction patients treated with early coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1137-1141. doi: 10.1016/j. amjcard.2005.11.027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Tang B, Yang H. Post percutaneous coronary interventional outcomes on proximal vs non-proximal lesions of the left and right coronary arteries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98:e16905. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016905.10.1097/MD.0000000000016905683142931415437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Goldberg A, Southern DA, Galbraith PD, Traboulsi M, Knudtson ML, Ghali WA; Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) Investigators. Coronary dominance and prognosis of patients with acute coronary syndrome. Am Heart J. 2007;154:1116-1122. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.041.10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.04118035084
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Parikh NI, Honeycutt EF, Roe MT, et al. Left and codominant coronary artery circulations are associated with higher inhospital mortality among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes: report From the National Cardiovascular Database Cath Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CathPCI) Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:775-782. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.964593.10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.96459323110791
]Search in Google Scholar
