Interventional Treatment of Cardiac Emergencies in Children with Congenital Heart Diseases

1. Feltes TF, Bacha E, Beekman RH 3rd, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011;123:2607-2652. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31821b1f10.10.1161/CIR.0b013e31821b1f1021536996Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Cinteza E, Balgradean M, Filip C, et al. Iodinated Contrast Media in Pediatric Cardiac Angiography Nephrotoxic Risk Evaluation. REVISTA DE CHIMIE. 2018;69:511-514.10.37358/RC.18.2.6137Search in Google Scholar

3. Balgradean M, Cinteza E, Filipoiu F, et al. Gentamicin, infections, and acute tubular necrosis in children. FARMACIA. 2013;61:772-780.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chessa M, Carminati M, Cinteza E, et al. Partial anomalous drainage of superior and inferior caval veins into the left atrium and other cardiac associated anomalies: two case reports. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;2:559-562.Search in Google Scholar

5. Cinteza E, Carminati M. Balloon atrial septostomy – almost half a century after. Maedica. 2013;8:280-284.Search in Google Scholar

6. Kitano M, Tsukada M, Fujino M. Wire Atrial Septostomy. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2017:2150135116686929. doi: 10.1177/2150135116686929.10.1177/215013511668692928415904Search in Google Scholar

7. Celiker A, Bilgiç A, Alehan D, Ozkutlu S, Ozer S. Blade atrial septostomy: experience with 18 patients. Turk J Pediatr. 1996;38:459-466.Search in Google Scholar

8. Kumar N, Shaikh AS, Kumari V, Patel N. Echocardiography guided bed side balloon atrial septostomy in dextro transposed great arteries (dTGA) with intact ventricular septum (IVS): A resource limited country experience. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34:1347-1352. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.15792.10.12669/pjms.346.15792629020330559783Search in Google Scholar

9. O'Byrne ML, Glatz AC, Song L, et al. Association Between Variation in Preoperative Care Before Arterial Switch Operation and Outcomes in Patients With Transposition of the Great Arteries. Circulation. 2018;138:2119-2129. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036145.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036145626131530474422Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Polito A, Ricci Z, Fragasso T, Cogo PE. Balloon atrial septostomy and pre-operative brain injury in neonates with transposition of the great arteries: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Cardiol Young. 2012;22:1-7. doi: 10.1017/S1047951111001909.10.1017/S104795111100190922067409Search in Google Scholar

11. Anderson BR, Ciarleglio AJ, Hayes DA, Quaegebeur JM, Vincent JA, Bacha EA. Earlier arterial switch operation improves outcomes and reduces costs for neonates with transposition of the great arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.1645.10.1016/j.jacc.2013.08.164524184243Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Melekoglu AN, Baspinar O. Transcatheter cardiac interventions in neonates with congenital heart disease: A single centre experience. J Int Med Res. 2018:300060518806111. doi: 10.1177/0300060518806111.10.1177/0300060518806111638145930373426Search in Google Scholar

13. Yan C, Niu G, Niu H, Li L, Wan L, Li H. Stable Interatrial Communication Combining Balloon Atrial Septostomy and Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1873-1875. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.058.10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.05830286932Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

14. Savorgnan F, Zaban NB, Elhoff JJ, Ross MM, Breinholt JP. No difference found in safety or efficacy of balloon atrial septostomy performed at the bedside versus the catheterisation laboratory. Cardiol Young. 2018;28:1421-1425. doi: 10.1017/S1047951118001439.10.1017/S104795111800143930152306Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Holzer RJ. Pulmonary valvuloplasty. In Complications during percutaneous interventions for congenital and structural heart disease. Eds: Hijazi Z, Feldman T, Cheatham JP, Sievert H. Informa Healthcare; 2009, p. 62-67.Search in Google Scholar

16. Loureiro P, Cardoso B, Gomes IB, Martins JF, Pinto FF. Long-term results of percutaneous balloon valvuloplasty in neonatal critical pulmonary valve stenosis: a 20-year, single-centre experience. Cardiol Young. 2017;27:1314-1322. doi: 10.1017/S1047951117000178.10.1017/S1047951117000178Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Yucel IK, Bulut MO, Kucuk M, Balli S, Celebi A. Intervention in Patients with Critical Pulmonary Stenosis in the Ductal Stenting Era. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016:37:1037-1045. doi: 10.1007/s00246-016-1386-7.10.1007/s00246-016-1386-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Ronai C, Ghelani SJ, Marshall AC, et al. Characterization of Left Ventricular Dysfunction by Myocardial Strain in Critical Pulmonary Stenosis and Pulmonary Atresia After Neonatal Pulmonary Valve Balloon Dilation. Am J Cardiol. 2018;pii:S0002-9149(18)32040-X. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.025.10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.10.025Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

19. Fedderly RT, Lloyd TR, Mendelsohn AM, Beekman RH. Determinants of successful balloon valvotomy in infants with critical pulmonary stenosis or membranous pulmonary atresia with intact ventricular septum. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:460-465.10.1016/0735-1097(94)00405-FSearch in Google Scholar

20. Santoro G, Formigari R, Carlo DD, Pasquini L, Ballerini L. Midterm outcome after pulmonary balloon valvuloplasty in patients younger than one year of age. Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:637-639.10.1016/S0002-9149(99)80638-9Search in Google Scholar

21. Tynan M, Jones O, Joseph MC, Deverall PB, Yates AK. Relief of pulmonary valve stenosis in first week of life by percutaneous ballon valvuloplasty. Lancet. 1984;1:273.10.1016/S0140-6736(84)90140-5Search in Google Scholar

22. Holzer RJ, Gauvreau K, Kreutzer J, et al. Safety and efficacy of balloon pulmonary valvuloplasty: a multicenter experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80:663-672. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23473.10.1002/ccd.23473Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

23. Garty Y, Veldtman G, Lee K, Benson L. Late outcomes after pulmonary valve balloon dilatation in neonates, infants and children. The Journal of Invasive Cardiology. 2005;17:318-322.Search in Google Scholar

24. McCrindle BW. Independent predictors of immediate results of percutaneous balloon aortic valvotomy in children. Valvuloplasty and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies (VACA) Registry Investigators. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77:286-293.10.1016/S0002-9149(97)89395-2Search in Google Scholar

25. Javois AJ. Aortic Valvuloplasty Complications. In Complications during percutaneous interventions for congenital and structural heart disease. Eds: Hijazi Z, Feldman T, Cheatham JP, Sievert H. Informa Healthcare; 2009, p. 9-86.Search in Google Scholar

26. Prijic SM, Vukomanovic VA, Stajevic MS, et al. Balloon dilation and surgical valvotomy comparison in non-critical congenital aortic valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol. 2015;36:616-624. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-1056-6.10.1007/s00246-014-1056-625388630Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

27. Balmer C, Beghetti M, Fasnacht M, Friedli B, Arbenz U. Balloon aortic valvoplasty in paediatric patients: progressive aortic regurgitation is common. Heart. 2004;90:77-81.10.1136/heart.90.1.77176803814676250Search in Google Scholar

28. Borghi A, Agnoletti G, Valsecchi O, Carminati M. Aortic balloon dilatation for congenital aortic stenosis: report of 90 cases (1986-98). Heart. 1999:82:e10.10.1136/hrt.82.6.e10172922410573506Search in Google Scholar

29. Brown DW, Dipilato AE, Chong EC, Lock JE, McElhinney DB. Aortic valve reinterventions after balloon aortic valvuloplasty for congenital aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010:56:1740-1749. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.040.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.04021070926Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

30. Brown JW, Rodefeld MD, Ruzmetov M, Eltayeb O, Yurdakok O, Turrentine MW. Surgical valvuloplasty versus balloon aortic dilation for congenital aortic stenosis: are evidence-based outcomes relevant? Ann Thorac Surg. 2012:94:146-155. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.054.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.02.05422537535Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

31. Ewert P, Bertram H, Breuer J, et al. Balloon valvuloplasty in the treatment of congenital aortic valve stenosis – A retrospective multicenter survey of more than 1000 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2011:149:182-185. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.01.005.10.1016/j.ijcard.2010.01.00520153064Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

32. Pedra CA, Sidhu R, McCrindle BW, et al. Outcomes after balloon dilation of congenital aortic stenosis in children and adolescents. Cardiol Young. 2004:14:315-321. doi: 10.1017/S1047951104003105.10.1017/S104795110400310515680026Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

33. Filho RIR, Manica JLL. Aortic Coarctation. In Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease. From Fetal Life to Adulthood. Springer-Verlag Italia. Eds: Butera G, Chessa M, Eicken A, Thomson J; 2015, p. 335-353.10.1007/978-88-470-5681-7_22Search in Google Scholar

34. Cinteza EE, Filip Cristina, Bogdan Andrada, Nicolescu A, Mahmoud Hyam. Atretic aortic coarctation – transradial approach. Case series and review of the literature. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2017;58:1029-1033.Search in Google Scholar

35. Salcher M, Naci H, Law TJ, Kuehne T, Schubert S, Kelm M. Cardioproof Consortium. Balloon Dilatation and Stenting for Aortic Coarctation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;pii:e003153. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003153.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.00315327296199Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

36. Fernandes JF, Goubergrits L, Brüning J, et al. Beyond Pressure Gradients: The Effects of Intervention on Heart Power in Aortic Coarctation. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0168487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168487.10.1371/journal.pone.0168487523137028081162Search in Google Scholar

37. Nguyen L, Cook SC. Coarctation of the Aorta: Strategies for Improving Outcomes. Cardiol Clin. 2015;33:521-530. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2015.07.011.10.1016/j.ccl.2015.07.01126471817Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

38. Chen SS, Dimopoulos K, Alonso-Gonzalez R, et al. Prevalence and prognostic implication of restenosis or dilatation at the aortic coarctation repair site assessed by cardiovascular MRI in adult patients late after coarctation repair. Int J Cardiol. 2014;173:209-215. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.02.012.10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.02.01224631116Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

39. Luijendijk P, Bouma BJ, Groenink M, et al. Surgical versus percutaneous treatment of aortic coarctation: new standards in an era of transcatheter repair. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2012;10:1517-1531. doi: 10.1586/erc.12.158.10.1586/erc.12.158Search in Google Scholar

40. Rao PS, Galal O, Smith PA, Wilson AD. Five- to nine-year follow-up results of balloon angioplasty of native aortic coarctation in infants and children. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:462-470.10.1016/0735-1097(95)00479-3Search in Google Scholar

41. Rao PS, Jureidini SB, Balfour IC, Singh GK, Chen SC. Severe aortic coarctation in infants less than 3 months: successful palliation by balloon angioplasty. J Invasive Cardiol. 2003;15:202-208.Search in Google Scholar

42. Qureshi SA, Rosenthal E, Tynan M. Should balloon angioplasty be used instead of surgery for native aortic coarctation? Heart. 1997;77:86-87.Search in Google Scholar

43. Sivakumar K. PDA stenting in Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation. In Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease. From Fetal Life to Adulthood. Springer-Verlag Italia. Eds: Butera G, Chessa M, Eicken A, Thomson J; 2015, p. 375-399.10.1007/978-88-470-5681-7_24Search in Google Scholar

44. Quandt D, Ramchandani B, Penford G, et al. Right ventricular outflow tract stent versus BT shunt palliation in Tetralogy of Fallot. Heart. 2017;103:1985-1991. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310620.10.1136/heartjnl-2016-31062028814489Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

45. Quandt D, Ramchandani B, Stickley J, et al. Stenting of the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Promotes Better Pulmonary Arterial Growth Compared With Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt Palliation in Tetralogy of Fallot-Type Lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1774-1784.10.1016/j.jcin.2017.06.02328882285Search in Google Scholar

46. Bigdelian H, Ghaderian M, Sedighi M. Surgical repair of Tetralogy of Fallot following primary palliation: Right ventricular outflow track stenting versus modified Blalock-Taussig shunt. Indian Heart J. 2018;70Suppl3:S394-S398. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2018.06.020.10.1016/j.ihj.2018.06.020630972430595296Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

47. Cools B, Boshoff D, Heying R, Rega F, Meyns B, Gewillig M. Transventricular balloon dilation and stenting of the RVOT in small infants with tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:260-265. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24548.10.1002/ccd.2454822753282Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

48. Kang SL, Benson L. Recent advances in cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease. F1000Res. 2018;7:370. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.13021.1.10.12688/f1000research.13021.1587196929636905Search in Google Scholar

49. Sandoval JP, Chaturvedi RR, Benson L, et al. Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Stenting in Tetralogy of Fallot Infants With Risk Factors for Early Primary Repair. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9pii:e003979. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.003979.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.00397927965298Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

50. Stumper O, Ramchandani B, Noonan P, et al. Stenting of the right ventricular outflow tract. Heart. 2013;99:1603-1608. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304155.10.1136/heartjnl-2013-30415523846613Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

51. Kanter KR, Kogon BE, Kirshbom PM, et al. Symptomatic neonatal tetralogy of Fallot: repair or shunt? Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;89:858-863. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.060.10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.06020172143Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

52. Zampi JD, Armstrong AK, Hirsch-Romano JC. Hybrid perventricular pulmonary valve perforation and right ventricular outflow stent placement: a case report of a premature, 1.3-kg neonate with tetralogy of Fallot and pulmonary atresia. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2014;5:338-341. doi: 10.1177/2150135113512136.10.1177/215013511351213624668989Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

53. Barron DJ, Ramchandani B, Murala J, et al. Surgery following primary right ventricular outflow tract stenting for Fallot's tetralogy and variants: rehabilitation of small pulmonary arteries. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:656-662. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt188.10.1093/ejcts/ezt18823650024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

54. Ahmad Z, Alwi M. Pulmonary Atresia and Intact Ventricular Septum. In Cardiac Catheterization for Congenital Heart Disease. From Fetal Life to Adulthood. Springer-Verlag Italia. Eds: Butera G, Chessa M, Eicken A, Thomson J; 2015, p. 279-297.10.1007/978-88-470-5681-7_19Search in Google Scholar

55. Holzer RJ, Cheatham JP. Radiofrequency perforation of the pulmonary valve in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. In Complications during percutaneous interventions for congenital and structural heart disease. Eds: Hijazi Z, Feldman T, Cheatham JP, Sievert H. Informa Healthcare; 2009, p. 68-72.Search in Google Scholar

56. Santoro G, Capozzi G, Capogrosso C, et al. Pulmonary artery growth after arterial duct stenting in completely duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. Heart. 2016;102:459-464. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308493.10.1136/heartjnl-2015-30849326830664Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

57. Bentham JR, Zava NK, Harrison WJ, et al. Duct Stenting Versus Modified Blalock-Taussig Shunt in Neonates With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Blood Flow: Associations With Clinical Outcomes in a Multicenter National Study. Circulation. 2018;137:581-588. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.028972.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.02897229084734Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

58. McMullan DM, Permut LC, Jones TK, et al. Modified Blalock-Taussig shunt versus ductal stenting for palliation of cardiac lesions with inadequate pulmonary blood flow. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:397-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.052.10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.05224071469Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

59. Mallula K, Vaughn G, El-Said H, et al. Comparison of ductal stenting versus surgical shunts for palliation of patients with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:1196-1202. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25870.10.1002/ccd.2587025639613Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

60. Santoro G, Gaio G, Capozzi G, et al. Fate of Hypoplastic Pulmonary Arteries After Arterial Duct Stenting in Congenital Heart Disease With Duct-Dependent Pulmonary Circulation. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1626-1632. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.027.10.1016/j.jcin.2015.05.02726386761Search in Google Scholar

61. Sivakumar K, Bhagyavathy A, Coelho R, et al. Longevity of neonatal ductal stenting for congenital heart diseases with duct-dependent pulmonary circulation. Congenit Heart Dis. 2012;7:526-533. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00657.x.10.1111/j.1747-0803.2012.00657.x22548982Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

62. Amoozgar H, Cheriki S, Borzoee M, et al. Short-term result of ductus arteriosus stent implantation compared with surgically created shunts. Pediatr Cardiol. 2012;33:1288-1294.10.1007/s00246-012-0304-x22447384Search in Google Scholar

63. Lee K, Seto W, Benson L, et al. Pharmacokinetics of sirolimus-eluting stents implanted in the neonatal arterial duct. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;pii:e002233.10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.00223325940522Search in Google Scholar

64. Cinteza E, Ungureanu A, Balgradean M, et al. Beneficial Effects of Acetaminophen on the Chemical Mediators Involved in the Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus. REVISTA DE CHIMIE. 2018;69:1537-1540.10.37358/RC.18.6.6363Search in Google Scholar

65. Holzer RJ, Cheatham JP. Occlusion of the patent arterial duct. In Complications during percutaneous interventions for congenital and structural heart disease. Eds: Hijazi Z, Feldman T, Cheatham JP, Sievert H. Informa Healthcare; 2009, p. 185-191.Search in Google Scholar

66. Backes CH, Rivera BK, Bridge JA, et al. Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) Closure During Infancy: A Meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2017;pii:e20162927. doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2927.10.1542/peds.2016-292728087683Search in Google Scholar

67. Backes CH, Cheatham SL, Deyo GM, et al. Percutaneous Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA) Closure in Very Preterm Infants: Feasibility and Complications. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;pii:e002923. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002923.10.1161/JAHA.115.002923480248426873689Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

68. Abadir S, Boudjemline Y, Rey C, et al. Significant persistent ductus arteriosus in infants less or equal to 6 kg: percutaneous closure or surgery? Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;102:533-540. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.04.004.10.1016/j.acvd.2009.04.00419664573Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

69. Baspinar O, Sahin DA, Sulu A, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus in under 6 kg and premature infants. J Interv Cardiol. 2015;28:180-189. doi: 10.1111/joic.12196.10.1111/joic.1219625832591Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

70. Dimas VV, Takao C, Ing FF, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus in infants weighing ≤ 6 kg. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:1295-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.022.10.1016/j.jcin.2010.08.02221232725Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

71. Backes CH, Kennedy KF, Locke M, et al. Transcatheter Occlusion of the Patent Ductus Arteriosus in 747 Infants <6 kg: Insights From the NCDR IMPACT Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1729-1737. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.018.10.1016/j.jcin.2017.05.01828823780Search in Google Scholar

72. Zahn EM, Nevin P, Simmons C, et al. A novel technique for transcatheter patent ductus arteriosus closure in extremely preterm infants using commercially available technology. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;85:240-248. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25534.10.1002/ccd.2553424782400Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

73. Bentham J, Meur S, Hudsmith L, et al. Echocardiographically guided catheter closure of arterial ducts in small preterm infants on the neonatal intensive care unit. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:409-15. doi: 10.1002/ccd.22637.10.1002/ccd.22637Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

74. Zahn EM, Peck D, Phillips A, et al. Transcatheter Closure of Patent Ductus Arteriosus in Extremely Premature Newborns: Early Results and Midterm Follow-Up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9:2429-2437. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.019.10.1016/j.jcin.2016.09.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

75. Baruteau AE, Hascoët S, Baruteau J, et al. Transcatheter closure of patent ductus arteriosus: past, present and future. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;107:122-132. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.01.008.10.1016/j.acvd.2014.01.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

76. Cinteza EE, Butera G. Complex ventricular septal defects. Update on percutaneous closure. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2016;57:1195-1205.Search in Google Scholar

77. Amin Z, Gu X, Berry JM, Titus JL, Gidding SS, Rocchini AP. Perventricular closure of ventricular septal defects without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:149-154.10.1016/S0003-4975(99)00519-6Search in Google Scholar

78. Michel-Behnke I, Ewert P, Koch A, et al. Device closure of VSD by hybrid procedures. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77:242-51.10.1002/ccd.2266620517999Search in Google Scholar

79. Velasco-Sanchez D, Tzikas A, Ibrahim R, Miró J. Transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects: initial human experience with the Amplatzer® membranous VSD occluder 2. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:474-479. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25004.10.1002/ccd.2500423703890Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

80. Mallula K, Patel N, Amin Z. New design of the Amplatzer membranous VSD occluder: a step forward? Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34:2068-2072. doi: 10.1007/s00246-013-0636-1.10.1007/s00246-013-0636-123377383Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

81. Walsh MA, Bialwoski J, Szkutnik M, et al. Atrioventricular block after transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects. Heart. 2006;92:1295-1297. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.084988.10.1136/hrt.2005.084988186119516449504Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

82. Yang J, Yang L, Yu S, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects in children: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:1159-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.008.10.1016/j.jacc.2014.01.00824509270Open DOISearch in Google Scholar