Accesso libero

Multiple Interpretation and Fragmented Texts Within a Historical Corpus: The Case of Old East Slavic Vernacular Writing

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Elliott, T., Bodard, G., Mylonas, E., Stoyanova, S., Tupman, Ch., Vanderbilt, S. et al. (2007–2020). EpiDoc Guidelines: Ancient documents in TEI XML (Version 9). Accessible at: https://epidoc.stoa.org/gl/latest/. Search in Google Scholar

Franklin, S. (2002). Writing, Society and Culture in Early Rus, c. 950–1300. Cambridge: Cambridge University press, XVI + 325 p. Search in Google Scholar

Lyashevskaya, O. (in print). Syntactic annotation of the Old Russian Birchbark Letters Corpus (submitted). Search in Google Scholar

Medynceva, A. A. (2000). Gramotnost’ v Drevnej Rusi [Literacy in Old Rus’]. Moskva: Nauka, 293 p. Search in Google Scholar

Molina, M., and Molin, A. (2016). Syntactic Annotation for a Hittite Corpus: Problems and Principles. In Computational Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies: Proceedings of the International Conference “Dialogue 2016” Moscow, June 1–4, 2016 (no pagination). Search in Google Scholar

Sitchinava, D., and Dyshkant, A. (2021). Integration of the Old East Slavic Epigraphical Databases, Corpora and Indices. In Scripta & E-Scripta 21, pages 95–108. Search in Google Scholar

Zalizniak, A. (2004). Drevnenovgorodskij dialekt [Old Novgorod dialect]. Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskoj kul’tury, 879 p. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1338-4287
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
2 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Linguistics and Semiotics, Theoretical Frameworks and Disciplines, Linguistics, other