[
Zienkiewicz, O.C., R.L. Taylor. 1998. The Finite Element Method. Butterworth-Heinemann.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wardlaw, RL., GF. Moss, 1970. A standard tall building model for the comparison of simulated natural winds in wind tunnels. CAARC, C.C.662m Tech; 25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melbourne, WH., 1980. Comparison of measurements on the CAARC standard tall building model in simulated model wind flows. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics; 6(1–2), pp. 73–88.10.1016/0167-6105(80)90023-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hirt, CW., JD. Ramshaw, LR. Stein, 1978. Numerical simulation of three-dimensional flow past bluff bodies. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 14(1), pp. 93–124.10.1016/0045-7825(78)90014-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Braun, A.L., A.M. Awruch, 2009. Aerodynamic and aeroelastic analyses on the CAARC standard tall building model using numerical simulation. Comput. Struct., 87, pp. 564–581.10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.02.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, S., QS. Li, S. Xu, 2007. Numerical evaluation of wind effects on a tall steel building by CFD. J Construct Steel Res, 63:, pp. 612–27.10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.06.033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stathopoulos, T., BA. Baskaran, 1990. Boundary treatment for the computation of three-dimensional wind flow conditions around a building. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodynamics, 35, pp. 177–200.10.1016/0167-6105(90)90215-X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harte, M., B. Basu, S. Nielsen, 2012. Dynamic analysis of wind turbines including soil-structure interaction. Eng Struct, 45, pp. 509–18.10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.041
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kausel, E., 2010. Early history of soil–structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng., 30, pp. 822–32.10.1016/j.soildyn.2009.11.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halabian, AM., MH. El Naggar, 2002. Effect of non-linear soil–structure interaction on seismic response of tall slender structures. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng., 22, pp. 639–58.10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00061-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeremic, B., G. Jie, M. Preisig, N. Tafazzoli, 2009. Time domain simulation of soil–foundation–structure interaction in non-uniform soils. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn; 38(5), pp. 699–718.10.1002/eqe.896
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ABAQUS, 2012. ABAQUS Analysis User’s Manual, Minneapolis, Minnesota, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., USA.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Felippa, CA., KC. Park, C. Farhat, 2001. Partitioned analysis of coupled mechanical systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng., 190, pp. 3247–70.10.1016/S0045-7825(00)00391-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Q., T. Hisada, 2004. Studies of the strong coupling and weak coupling methods in FSI analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng., 60, pp. 2013–29.10.1002/nme.1034
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Borja, R.I., W.H. Wu, A.P. Amies and H.A. Smith, 1994. Nonlinear lateral, rocking and torsional vibration of rigid foundations, J. Geotech. Eng., 120(3), pp. 491-513.10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:3(491)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matinmanesh, H. and M.S. Asheghabadi, 2011. Seismic analysis on soil-structure interaction of buildings over sandy soil, Procedia Eng., 14, pp. 1713-1743.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.218
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chu, D. and K.Z. Truman, 2004. Effects of pile foundation configurations in seismic soil-pile-structure interaction, 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
]Search in Google Scholar
