Performance Evaluation of Mike Nam Rainfall-Runoff (R-R) Model in Daily Flow Simulation (Case Study: Gonbad Catchment in Hamedan)

Amir, M. S. I. I., Khan, M. M. K., Rasul, M.G., Sharma, R. H., & Akram, F. (2013), Automatic multi-objective calibration of a rainfall runoff model for the Fitzroy Catchment, Queensland, Australia International Journal of Environmental Science and Developmen, 4(3): 10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.361.Search in Google Scholar

Bergström, S. (1995). The HBV model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.).Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp. 443-476.Search in Google Scholar

Danish Hydraulic Institute. MIKE 11: A Modeling System for Rivers and Channels reference manual, 2009, 278-325.Search in Google Scholar

DHI S. (2004), MIKE 11 User & Reference Manual, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark.Search in Google Scholar

Doulgeris, C., Georgiou, P., Papadimos, D., & Papamichail, D. (2011), Evaluating three different model setups in the MIKE 11 NAM model. InAdvances in the Research of Aquatic Environment, pp. 241-249.10.1007/978-3-642-19902-8_28Search in Google Scholar

Golmohammadi, G., Prasher, S., Madani, A. and Rudra, R. (2014). Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Journal of Hydrology. 1: 20-39. doi:10.3390/hydrology1010020.10.3390/hydrology1010020Search in Google Scholar

Graham, D.N. and Butts, M. B. (2005). Flexible, integrated watershed modelling with MIKE SHE. In Watershed Models, Eds. V.P. Singh & D.K.Frevert.1: 245-272.Search in Google Scholar

Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. (1999). Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(2): 135–143.Search in Google Scholar

Hafezparast, M., Araghinejad, S., Fatemi, S. E., Bressers, H. A. (2013), conceptual rainfall-runoff model using the auto calibrated NAM Models in the Sarisoo River, Hydrology, 4(1), 1-6.10.4172/2157-7587.1000148Search in Google Scholar

Havnø, K., Madsen, M. N. and Dørge, J. (1995). “MIKE 11 - A generalized river modelling package,” in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, V. P. Singh, Ed. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, 1995, pp.733-782.Search in Google Scholar

Kumar, P., Lohani, A.K., and Nemai, A.K. (2019) Rainfall Runoff Modeling using Mike 11 Nam Model. Current World Environment, Vol. 14, No. (1) 2019, Pg. 27-36 ISSN: 0973-4929, https://www.cwejournal.org/pdf/vol14no1/Vol14_No1_p_27-36.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Madsen, H. (2000). Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology 235 (2000) 276–288 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216940000279110.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1Search in Google Scholar

Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., Veith T. L. (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers ISSN 0001−2351. Vol. 50(3): 885−900. Https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43261199_Model_Evaluation_Guidelines_for_Systematic_Quantification_of_Accuracy_in_Watershed_Simulations.Search in Google Scholar

Nash JE, Sutcliffe J. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3 282–290).10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6Search in Google Scholar

Odiyo, J. O., Phangisa, J. I., & Makungo, R. (2012), Rainfall– runoff modelling for estimating Latonyanda River flow contributions to Luvuvhu River downstream of Alcatchmenti Dam. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 50, 5-13.10.1016/j.pce.2012.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Refsgaard J. C. and Knudsen J. (1996). Operational validation and inter comparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research [online]. 32(7). pp. 2189-2202. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/96WR00896/pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Sharma, K. D., Sorooshian, S. and Wheater, H., (2008). Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas. New York: Cambridge University Press. 223 p. ISBN-13 978-0-511-37710-5.Search in Google Scholar

Sugawara, M. (1995). Tank model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp. 165–214.Search in Google Scholar

Tokar, A.S. and P.A. Johnson, (1999), Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(1): 232-239.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232)Search in Google Scholar

Zhaohua, D., Amatya, D., Sun. G., Tretctin, C., LI. CH. and LI, H. (2010). A comparison of MIKE SHE and DRAINMOD for modeling forested wetland hydrology in Costal South Calorina, USA. XVIIth World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural Engineering (CIGR) Hosted by the Canadian Society for Bioengineering (CSBE/SCGAB) Québec City, Canada June, pp. 13-17.Search in Google Scholar