Accesso libero

Stability of Sensor Network based on Non-linear Data Analysis for in situ Leaching of Ionic Rare Earth Ore Bodies under Similar Simulation Experiments

, , ,  e   
20 nov 2023
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita
Scarica la copertina

Figure 1:

Sketch map of mountain stope surveying layout.
Sketch map of mountain stope surveying layout.

Figure 2:

Flow chart of the ISL process.
Flow chart of the ISL process.

Figure 3:

Comparative analysis of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value.
Comparative analysis of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value.

Figure 4:

Mass of RE precipitated in the leaching solution of the sample at each moment during the leaching process.
Mass of RE precipitated in the leaching solution of the sample at each moment during the leaching process.

Test sample water content test_

Numbering 1 1.39 3
Aluminum box weight (g) 17.05 2 17.56
Box + wet soil mass (g) 30.54 17.22 39.10
Box + drying soil mass (g) 30.34 30.54 38.82
Mass of water (g) 0.20 30.36 0.28
Dry soil mass (g) 13.29 0.18 21.26
Moisture content (%) 1.5 13.14 1.32
Average moisture content (%) 1.36

Comparison of the error between the actual water pressure value and the measured water pressure value_

Sensor number Measured water pressure (kPa) Measured value of pore water pressure (kPa) Measured accuracy (%)
1# 1.39 1.35 −0.20
2# 1.39 1.42 +0.15
3# 1.39 1.43 +0.20
4# 2.23 2.2 −0.15
5# 2.23 2.25 +0.10
6# 2.23 2.28 +0.25
9# 1.14 1.12 −0.10
10# 1.14 1.1 −0.20
11# 1.14 1.18 +0.20

Comparison of several short-range wireless technologies_

Technical standard Bluetooth Wi-Fi Mobile communications ZigBee
Working frequency 2.4 GHz 2.4 GHz 0.8/0.9 GHz 1.8/1.9 GHz 868 MHz/915 MHz/2.4 GHz
Coverage 10 m 100–200 m Depends on network 50–300 m
Transmission rate 1 M/s 11–54 M/s 50k–2M 10–250k
Power consumption Big Big Small Minimum
Cost High Low Highest Low
Delay Short Long Shorter Shorter
Confidentiality Good Better Good Good
Scalability Difference Good Good Good
Network capacity Small Big Big Big
Technical complexity More complicated Easy Easy Easy

Content of RE ions in the leaching solution of magnesium sulfate leaching in each time period_

Leaching liquid Leaching time/h RE weight collected in leaching solution (mg)

A1 B1 C1
Magnesium sulfate 1 0 0 0
2 1.51 2.24 1.15
3 8.54 10.76 7.56
4 38.25 42.47 38.69
5 10.58 12.01 15.28
6 5.47 3.76 6.89
7 0.78 0.66 0.45
8 0.12 0.1 0.1

Content of RE ions in the leaching solution of clear water leaching in each time period_

Leaching liquid Leaching time/h RE weight collected in leaching solution (mg)

A2 B2 C2
Shimizu 1 0 0 0
2 0 0 0
3 0 0 0
4 0 0 0
5 0 0 0
6 0 0 0
7 0 0 0
8 0 0 0
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
1 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Ingegneria, Introduzioni e rassegna, Ingegneria, altro