Research on Driving Conditions Based on Principal Component and K-means Clustering Optimization
, , , e
16 giu 2025
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Pubblicato online: 16 giu 2025
Pagine: 53 - 61
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ijanmc-2025-0016
Parole chiave
© 2025 Huifeng Wang et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

COMPARISON OF THE METHOD IN THIS PAPER AND TRADITIONAL K-MEANS RESULTS
Method | Eigenvalue mean relative error/% | Cluster average accuracy/% | Average time/s | SAFD |
---|---|---|---|---|
Traditional K-means clustering | 8.1 | 93 | 215 | 2.12 |
Clustering of this article | 4.6 | 98 | 127 | 1.17 |
PRINCIPAL COMPONENT LOAD MATRIX
Characteristic parameters | |||
---|---|---|---|
Deceleration time ratio |
0.323 | 0.351 | -0.223 |
Driving Clustering |
0.893 | 0.234 | 0.065 |
Run time |
0.782 | 0.251 | -0.342 |
Acceleration time ratio |
0.396 | -0.186 | 0.061 |
Cruise time ratio |
0.641 | 0.335 | -0.075 |
Average speed |
0.499 | 0.763 | 0.125 |
Deceleration time ratio |
0.778 | 0.415 | 0.132 |
Speed standard deviation |
0.498 | 0.333 | 0.054 |
Acceleration standard deviation |
0.125 | 0.267 | -0.077 |
Average acceleration |
0.024 | 0.523 | 0.053 |
Average deceleration |
0.266 | -0.433 | -0.059 |
Idle time ratio |
0.165 | -0.351 | 0.853 |