[
ARMINJON, Pierre, E NOL‘DE, Boris, WOLFF, Martin. Traité de Droit comparé. Paris : Pichon & Durand-Auzias, 1950.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOLLINGER, Joan Heifetz, et al. Adoption Law and Practice. New York, Lexis Publishing, 2008, §§
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MCDOUGAL, Luther L. et al. American Conflicts Law. Fifth Edition. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Nijhoff, 2001, pp. 1–1040.10.1163/9789004480520
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ZWEIGERT KONRAD, Kötz, An Introduction to Comparative Law, translation from the German original: Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts. Third Edition. OXFORD: Tony Weir, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
APPLETON, Susan Frelich. Presuming Women: Revisiting the Presumption of Legitimacy in the Same-Sex Couples Era. Boston University Law Review, 2006, vol. 86, pp. 227–294.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BARRETT, Ronald A. The Continuing Evolution of US judgements Recognition law. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 2017, vol. 55, pp. 277–342
]Search in Google Scholar
[
BORCHERS, Patrick J., The Essential Irrelevance of the Full Faith and Credit Clause to the Same-Sex Marriage Debate. Chreighton Law Review, 2005, vol. 38, pp. 353–363.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARBONE, June, CAHN, Naomi. Which Ties Blind? Redefining the Parent-Child Relationship in an Age of Genetic Certainty. William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal, 2003, vol. 11, pp. 1011–1070.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CARRUTHERS, Janeen M. Substance and Procedure in the Conflict of Laws: A Continuing Debate in Relation to Damages. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2004, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 691–711.10.1093/iclq/53.3.691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
COX, Stanley E. Nine Questions About Same-Sex Marriage Conflicts. New England Law Review, 2006 vol. 40, no.2, pp. 361–408.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ENGDAHL, David. The Classic Rule of Faith and Credit. Yale Law Journal, 2009, vol. 118, pp. 1584–1659.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
FINEMAN, Martha Albertson. Our Sacred Institution: The Ideal of the Family in American Law and Society. Utah Law Review, 1993, vol. 1993, no. 2, pp. 387–405.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GROSSMAN, Joanna L. Resurrecting Comity: Revisiting the Problem of Neo-Uniform Marriage Laws. Oregon Law Review, 2005, Vol. 84, pp. 433–488.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HAMILTON, Vivian. Principles of U.S. Family Law. Fortham Law Review, 2006, vol. 75, pp. 31–73.10.2139/ssrn.896322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOGUE, L. Lynn. State Common-Law Choice-of-Law Doctrine and Same-Sex “Marriage”: How Will States Enforce the Public Policy Exception? Creighton Law Review, 1998, vol. 32, pp. 29–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HOLLINGER, Joan Heifetz. The Uniform Adoption Act: Reporter’s Ruminations. Family Law Quarterly, 1996, vol. 30, pp. 345–378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
JORAANSTAD, Thomas M. The Fifth Circuit Upholds Louisiana’s Refusal to Issue a Revised Birth Certificate. William & Mary Journal of Women and the Law, 2013, vol. 19, pp. 432–444.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KIRGIS, Frederic L. Jr. Roles of Due Process and Full Faith and Credit in Choice of Law. Cornell Law Review, 1976, vol. 62, pp. 94–150.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KRAMER, Larry. Same-Sex Marriage, Conflict of Laws, and the Unconstitutional Public Policy Exception. Yale Law Journal, 1997, pp. 1965–2008.10.2307/797159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
KOPPELMAN, Andrew. Against Blanket Interstate Nonrecognition of Same-Sex Marriage. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 2005, vol. 17, pp. 205–219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MALMSTROM, Ake. The System of Legal Systems: Notes on a Problem of Classification in Comparative Law. Scandinavian Studies in Law, 1969, vol. 13, p. 127–149.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SACHS, Stephen E. Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress. Virginia Law Review, 2009, vol. 95, pp. 1201–1279.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SACK, Emily J. The Retreat From DOMA: The Public Policy of Same-Sex Marriage and a Theory of Congressional Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause. Creighton Law Review, 2005, vol. 38, pp. 101–125.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SANDERS, Steve. Is the full faith and Credit Clause Still “Irrelevant” to Same-Sex Marriage? Toward a Reconsideration of the Conventional Wisdom. Indiana Law Journal, 2014, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 95–113.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SANDERS, Steve. The Constitutional Right to (Keep Your) Same-sex Marriage. Michigan Law Review, 2012, vol. 110, pp. 1421–1482.10.2139/ssrn.1903386
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SHREVE, Gene R. Choice of Law and the Forgiving Constitution. Indiana Law Journal, 1996, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 271–296.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SILBERMAN, Linda. Same – Sex Marriage: Refining the Conflict of Laws Analysis. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2005, vol. 153, pp. 2195–2214.10.2307/4150660
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SYMEONIDES, Symon C. Choice of Law in the American Courts in 2014. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 2015, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 299–386.10.5131/AJCL.2015.0009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
TERRY, Pamela K. E Pluribus Unum? The Full Faith and Credit Clause and Meaningful Recognition of Out-of-State Adoptions. Fordham Law Review, 2012, vol. 80, pp. 3093–3135.10.2139/ssrn.2017812
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WARDLE, Lynn D. A Critical Analysis of Interstate Recognition of Lesbigay Adoptions. AVE MARIA Law Review, 2005, vol. 3, pp. 561–617.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WARDLE, Lynn D. From Slavery to Same-Sex Marriage: Comity Versus Public Policy in Inter-jurisdictional Recognition of Controversial Domestic Relations. Brigham Young University Law Review, 2018, vol. 2008, pp. 1855–1926.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WASSERMAN, Rhonda. Are You Still My Mother? Interstate Recognition of Adoptions by Gays and Lesbians. American University Law Review, 2008, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 1–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
WHITTEN, Ralph U. Choice of Law, Jurisdiction and Judgement Issues in Interstate Adoption Cases. Capital University Law Review, 2003, vol. 31, pp, 803–851.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EISENGRAEBER, Julia. Lis Alibi Pendens Under The Brussels I Regulation-How To Minimise-Torpedo Litigaiton – And Other Unwanted Effects Of The -Fisrt-Come First-Served Rule. Exeter Papers in European Law, 2004, no. 16, p. 5.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RICHTER, Jeremy W. A Race Odyssey: Alabama’s Anti Miscegenation Statute is Repealed. [online]. Available at: <https://www.jeremywrichter.com/2017/06/14/alabama-anti-miscegenation-statute/>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Constitution Centre. On this day Supreme Court rejects anti inter racial marriage laws. [online]. Available at: <https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/today-in-supreme-court-history-loving-v-virginia>.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SACHS, Stephen E., SANDERS, Steve. Article IV, Section 1: Full Faith and Credit Clause. [online]. Available at: <https://constitutioncenter.org/interactive-constitution/interpretation/article-iv/clauses/44>
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Adar v. Smith, 639 F 3d. 146, 2011.10.1007/978-1-60761-145-5_79
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matsushita Elec. Industrial Co. v. Epstein, 516 U. S. 367, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estin v. Estin 334 U. S. 541, 1948.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loving v. Virginia 388 U.S. 1, 1967.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S., 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baehr v. Lewin 852 P.2d 44, 74 Haw, 1993.10.2307/591230
]Search in Google Scholar
[
United States v. Windsor 133 S Ct. 2675, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Obergefell v. Hodges 576 US, 2015.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker v. Gen. Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222, 1998.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Davenport v Little and Bowser 611 S.E.2d.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Finstuen v. Crutcher 496 F.3d 1139, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Finstuen v. Edmondson, 497 F. Supp. 2d 1295, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RAB v MIB [2008] CSIH 52.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
RH v RH SAC (Civ) 31 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
