[ABRAHAM, Elizabeth. Comment: The Sins of the Savior: Hold the United Nations Accountable to International Human Rights Standards for Executive Order Detentions in its Mission in Kosovo. American University Law Review, 2003, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1291–1337]Search in Google Scholar
[BARON, Wiebe. Command Responsibility in a Multinational Setting: How to Deal with Different Interpretations of International (Humanitarian) Law. Some Experiences from Practice. Military Law and Law of War Review, 2005, vol. 44, p. 14210.4337/mllwr.2005.3-4.15]Search in Google Scholar
[BLOKKER, Niels. Member State Responsibility for Wrongdoings of International Organizations – Beacon of Hope or Delusion? International Organizations Law Review, 2015, vol. 12, pp. 319–33210.1163/15723747-01202003]Search in Google Scholar
[CASEY-MASLEN, Stuart. Commentaries on Arms Control Treaties Volume I: The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and their Destruction. 2nd Edition, 2005, Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO. Consensus Decision-Making at NATO [online]. 14 March 2016, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_49178.htm (last accessed on 24 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[D’ASPREMONT, Jean. Abuse of the Legal Personality of International Organizations and the Responsibility of Member States. International Organizations Law Review, 2007, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 91–119.10.1163/157237307X223648]Search in Google Scholar
[D’ASPREMONT, Jean. The limits to the exclusive responsibility of International Organizations. Human Rights and International Legal Discourse, 2007, pp. 215–228]Search in Google Scholar
[DÖRMANN, Knut et al. Commentary on the First Geneva Convention. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 201610.1017/9781316755709]Search in Google Scholar
[ECOWAS Community Standing Mediation Committee. Decision A/Dec.1/8/90 On the Ceasefire and Establishment of an ECOWAS Ceasefire Monitoring Group for Liberia. Official Journal of the Economic Community of West African States, vol. 21, November 1991, pp. 6–8, available at: https://www.peaceagreements.org/masterdocument/1305 (last accessed on 24 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[ECtHR, Bosphorus v Ireland, Application No 45036/98 (2006) 42 EHRR 1]Search in Google Scholar
[ECtHR, Decision as to the Admissibility of 2 May 2007, Application No 71412/01 (Agim Behrami and Bekir Behrami against France) and Application No 78166/01 (Ruzhdi Saramati against France, Germany and Norway)]Search in Google Scholar
[ECtHR, Gasparini v. Italy and Belgium, Application No. 10750/03, Admissibility Decision of 12 May 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[ECtHR, Kokkelvisserij v the Netherlands, Application No 13645/05, Judgment of 20 January 2009]Search in Google Scholar
[EGNELL, Robert. The Swedish Experience: Overcoming the Non-NATO-Member Conundrum. In MUELLER, Karl P. (ed.) Precision and Purpose: Airpower in the Libyan Civil War. 2015, Rand Corporation, pp. 466 (p. 320), available online at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR600/RR676/RAND_RR676.pdf (last accessed on 24 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[FRANCIS, David. ECOMOG: A New Security Agenda in World Politics. In BAKUT, Bakut Tswah, DUTT, Sagarika (eds.) Africa at the Millennium: An Agenda for Mature Development. Palgrave, 2000, pp. 177–20210.1007/978-1-137-05113-4_10]Search in Google Scholar
[Hague District Court, Mothers of Srebrenica vs The Netherlands, C/09/295247 / HA ZA 07-2973]Search in Google Scholar
[International Law Commission. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations and the accompanying Commentaries, 2011 ILC 63rd session, UN Doc. A/RES/66/10]Search in Google Scholar
[MÖLDNER, Mirka. Responsibility of International Organizations – Introducing the ILC’s DARIO. Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law Online, 2012, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 282–327, available online at: https://www.mpil.de/files/pdf4/mpunyb_06_Moeldner_161.pdf (last accessed 24 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[MURRAY, Odette. Piercing the Corporate Veil: The Responsibility of Member states of an International Organisation. International Organizations Law Review, 2011, vol. 8, issue 2, pp. 291–34710.1163/157237411X633881]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO. International Military Staff [online]. 15 June 2017, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_64557.htm (last accessed on 24 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[NATO. North Atlantic Council [online]. 10 October 2017, available at: https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_49763.htm (last accessed 24 May 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[NYSTUEN, Gro, CASEY-MASLEN, Stuart. The Convention on Cluster Munitions: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2010.]Search in Google Scholar
[PAASIVIRTA, Esa. Responsibility of a Member State of an International Organization: Where Will it End? Comments on Article 60 of the ILC Draft on the Responsibility of International Organizations. International Organizations Law Review, 2010, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 49–6110.1163/157237310X523830]Search in Google Scholar
[REINISCH, August. Securing the Accountability of International Organizations. Global Governance, 2001, vol. 7, pp. 131–14910.1163/19426720-00702004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[RYNGAERT, Cedric. The Responsibility of Member States of International Organizations – Concluding Observations. International Organizations Law Review, 2015, vol. 12, pp. 502–51710.1163/15723747-01202012]Search in Google Scholar
[RYNGAERT, Cedric. The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 2011, vol. 60, no. 4, pp. 997–101710.1017/S0020589311000467]Search in Google Scholar
[SADURSKA, Romana, CHINKIN, C.M. The Collapse of International Tin Council: A Case for Responsibility? Virginia Journal of International Law, 1990, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 845–890]Search in Google Scholar
[SCHERMERS, Henry G, BLOKKER, Niels M. International Institutional Law. 2011, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 5th edition.10.1163/ej.9789004187962.i-1273]Search in Google Scholar
[ŠTURMA, Pavel. Drawing a Line Between the Responsibility of an International Organization and Its Member States under International Law. Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, 2011, vol. 2, pp. 3–20]Search in Google Scholar
[TONDINI, Matteo. Coalitions of the Willing. In NOLLKAEMPER, Andre, PLAKOKEFALOS, Ilias (eds.) The Practice of Shared Responsibility in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 701–73210.1017/9781316227480.028]Search in Google Scholar
[UNGA. Fourth Report on Responsibility of International Organizations by Giorgio Gaja, Special Rapporteur. 20 April 2006, A/CN.4/564/Add.2]Search in Google Scholar
[WALRAVEN, Klaas van. Containing Conflict in the Economic Community of West African States: Lessons from the Intervention in Libya 1990–1997. Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael, January 1999, available online at: https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/19990100_cru_paper_walraven.pdf (last accessed on 25 July 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[YEE, Sienho. ‘Member Responsibility’ and the ILC Articles on the Responsibility of International Organizations: Some Observations. In RAGAZZI, Maurizio (ed.) Responsibility of International Organizations: Essays in Memory of Sir Ian Brownlie. Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013, pp. 325–336.10.1163/9789004256088_028]Search in Google Scholar
[ZIMMERMANN, Andreas. The Security Council and the Obligation to Prevent Genocide and War Crimes. Polish Yearbook of International Law, 2012, vol. 32, pp. 307–314, available online at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2407597 (last accessed on 24 July 2019).]Search in Google Scholar