[
Aarts, Bas and Sean Wallis. 2006. The Diachronic Corpus of Present-Day Spoken English (DCPSE). Survey of English Usage, UCL, London. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/english-usage/projects/dcpse (28 February 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad and Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Harlow, Essex: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins and William Pagliuca. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect, and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Coates, Jennifer. 1983. The semantics of the modal auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Croft, William D. and Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dancygier, Barbara. 1998. Conditionals and prediction: Time, knowledge and causation in conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486463
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dancygier, Barbara and Eve Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elder, Chi-Hé and Kasia M. Jaszczolt. 2016. Towards a pragmatic category of conditionals. Journal of Pragmatics 98: 36–53.10.1016/j.pragma.2016.04.013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Charles J. 1990. Epistemic stance and grammatical form in English conditional sentences. Papers from the twenty-sixth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Volume 1, The Main Session, 137–162.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fillmore, Charles J., Paul Kay and Mary Catherine O’Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64(3): 501–538.10.2307/414531
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fried, Mirjam and Jan-Ola Östman. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried and J-O. Östman (eds.). Construction Grammar in a cross-language perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/cal.2.02fri
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2007. If-conditionals as modal colligations: A corpus-based investigation. In M. Davies, P. Rayson, S. Hunston and P. Danielsson (eds.). Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference: Corpus Linguistics 2007, 1–20. University of Birmingham.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2010. A corpus-based examination of English if-conditionals through the lens of modality: Nature and types. PhD thesis, Lancaster University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2011. If-conditionals and modality: A corpus-based investigation. Corpus Linguistics 2011, University of Birmingham, UK, 20–22 July 2011. Available at If-conditionals and modality A corpus-based investigation (lancs.ac.uk)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2013. Using corpus analysis to compare the explanatory power of linguistic theories: A case study of the modal load in if-conditionals. Corpus Linguistics 2013, Lancaster University, 23–26 July 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2018. Keyness analysis: Nature, metrics and techniques. In C. Taylor and A. Marchi (eds.). Corpus approaches to discourse: A critical review, 225–258. Oxford: Routledge.10.4324/9781315179346-11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2019. If-conditionals and modality: Frequency patterns and theoretical explanations. Journal of English Linguistics 47(4): 301–334.10.1177/0075424219875994
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gabrielatos, Costas. 2020. Conditionals, modality, and Schrödinger’s cat: Conditionals as a family of linguistic qubits. In P. l. Hohaus and R. Schulze (eds.). Re-assessing modalising expressions: Categories, co-text, and context, 141–172. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/slcs.216.06gab
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199268511.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldberg, Adele and Ray Jackendoff. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3): 532–568.10.1353/lan.2004.0129
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.10.1163/9789004368811_003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halliday, Michael A. K. 2004. An introduction to Functional Grammar. 3rd edn. London: Arnold.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmann, Sebastian, Stefan Evert, Nick Smith, David Lee and Ylva Berglund-Prytz. 2008. Corpus linguistics with BNCweb – a practical guide. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and modality in English. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huddleston, Rodney and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2002. The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316423530
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lastres-López, Cristina. 2019. Conditionals in spoken courtroom and parliamentary discourse in English, French and Spanish: A contrastive analysis. In T. Fanego and P. Rodríguez-Puente (eds.). Corpus-based research on variation in English legal discourse, 51–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.91.03las
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lastres-López, Cristina. 2020. Beyond conditionality: On the pragmaticalization of interpersonal if-constructions in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 157: 68–83.10.1016/j.pragma.2019.12.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, Geoffrey. 1992. Corpora and theories of linguistic performance. In J. Svartvik (ed.). Directions in corpus linguistics: Proceedings of the Nobel symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991, 105–122. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leech, Geoffrey. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. 3rd edn. London: Long-man.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levinson, Stephen C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López-Couso, María José and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2014. The use of if as a declarative complementizer in English: Some theoretical and empirical considerations. In A. Alcaraz-Sintes and S. Valera-Hernández (eds.). Diachrony and synchrony in English Corpus Linguistics, 85–107. Bern: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
López-Couso, María José and Belén Méndez-Naya. 2015. Secondary grammaticalization in clause combining: From adverbial subordination to complementation in English. Language Sciences 47: 188–198.10.1016/j.langsci.2014.07.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mato-Míguez, Beatriz. 2016. The expression of directive meaning: A corpus-based study on the variation between imperatives, conditionals, and insubordinate if-clauses in spoken British English. PhD Thesis, University of Santiago de Compostela.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language, and conceptualisation: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/hcp.5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, Frank R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, Frank R. 1987. The English verb. 2nd edn. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Palmer, Frank R. 1990. Modality and the English modals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Perkins, Michael R. 1983. Modal expressions in English. London: Frances Pinter.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperberg-McQueen, C. Michael and Lou Burnard. 2019. TEI P5: Guidelines for electronic text encoding and interchange. The Text Encoding Initiative Consortium. https://www.tei-c.org/release/doc/tei-p5-doc/en/html/index.html (17 February, 2019).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sweetser, Eve E. 1990. From etymology to pragmatics: Metaphorical and cultural aspects of semantic structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511620904
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilson, Andrew. 2013. Embracing Bayes factors for key item analysis in corpus linguistics. In M. Bieswanger and A. Koll-Stobbe (eds.). New approaches to the study of linguistic variability, 3–11. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
]Search in Google Scholar
