Perceptual Simplicity: The True Role of Prägnanz and Occam

Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183–193.10.1037/h0054663Search in Google Scholar

Bahnsen, P. (1928). Eine Untersuchung über Symmetrie und Asymmetrie bei visuellen Wahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 108, 129–154.Search in Google Scholar

Balasubramanian, V. (2005). MDL, Bayesian inference, and the geometry of the space of probability distributions. In P. D. Grünwald, I. J. Myung, & M. A. Pitt (Eds.), Advances in minimum description length: Theory and applications (pp. 81–99). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Baudry, L. (1926). La lettre de Guillaume d’Occam aux chapitre d’Assise (Epistola ad fratres minores in capitulo apud Assisium congragatos). Revue d’Histoire Franciscaine, 3, 185–215.Search in Google Scholar

Baudry, L. (1949). Guillaume d’Occam. Paris, France: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Ehrenstein, W. (1925). Versuche über die Beziehungen zwischen Bewegungs- und Gestaltwahrnehmung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 96, 305–352.Search in Google Scholar

Feldman, J. (2016). The simplicity principle in perception and cognition. WIREs Cognitive Science, 7, 330–340. doi:10.1002/wcs.140610.1002/wcs.1406Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Froyen, V., Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2015). Bayesian hierarchical grouping: Perceptual grouping as mixture estimation. Psychological Review, 127, 575–597. doi:0033-295X/15/$12.0010.1037/a0039540Search in Google Scholar

Goldmeier, E. (1936). Über Ähnlichkeit bei gesehenen Figuren. Psychologische Forschung, 15, 146–208 [eng. tr. Similarity in Visually Perceived Forms. Psychological Issues, 8, n. 1, 1972, Non. N. 29].10.1007/BF02441206Search in Google Scholar

Goldmeier, E. (1982). The memory trace: Its transformation and its fate. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Hochberg, J., & MacAlister, E. (1953). A quantitative approach to figural goodness. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 361–364.10.1037/h0055809Search in Google Scholar

Johnsen, B. C. (2014). Reclaiming Quine’s epistemology. Synthese, 191, 961–988.10.1007/s11229-013-0302-4Search in Google Scholar

Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: Seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.), Organization and representation in perception. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.Search in Google Scholar

Kanizsa, G., & Luccio, R. (1986). Die Doppeldeutigkeiten der Prägnanz. Gestalt Theory, 8, 99–135.Search in Google Scholar

Kanizsa, G., & Luccio, R. (1996). Multistability as a Research Tool in Experimental Phenomenology. in: P. Kruse & M. Stadler (eds), Ambiguity in mInd and Nature. Berlin: Springer, 47-68.10.1007/978-3-642-78411-8_4Search in Google Scholar

Koenderink, J., van Doorn, A., & Pinna, B. (2018). Measures of Prägnanz. Gestalt Theory, 40, 7–28. doi:10.2478/gth-2018-0002.10.2478/gth-2018-0002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London, England: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1920). Die physischen Gestalten in Ruhe und im stationären Zustand: Eine naturphilosophische Untersuchung. Braunschweig, Germany: Friedr. Vieweg and Sohn.10.1007/978-3-663-02204-6Search in Google Scholar

Köhler, W. (1922). Gestaltprobleme und Anfänge einer Gestalttheorie. Jahresberichte über die gesamte Physiologie und experimentelle Pharmakologie, 3, 512–539.Search in Google Scholar

Luccio, R., & Vardabasso, F. (1986). La percezione di figure interrotte. Ricerche di Psicologia, 14(1), 119–137.Search in Google Scholar

Ma, W. J. (2012). Organizing probabilistic models of perception, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 511–518.10.1016/j.tics.2012.08.010Search in Google Scholar

MacKay, D. J. C. (2003). Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Piesbergen, C. (1991). Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Parallelogramm-Punkttäuschung. Gestalt Theory, 13(4), 232–242.Search in Google Scholar

Pomerantz, J. R., & Kubovy, M. (1986). Theoretical approaches to perceptual organization: Simplicity and likelihood principles. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1–46). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. (1981). Theories and things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rausch, E. (1952). Struktur und Metrik figural-optischer Wahrnehmung. Frankfurt, Germany: Kramer.Search in Google Scholar

Rausch, E. (1966). Das Eigenschaftsproblem in der Gestalttheorie der Wahrnehmung. In W. Metzger & H. Erke (Eds.), Handbuch der Psychologie. Bd 1/1. Wahrnehmung und Bewußtsein. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Search in Google Scholar

Rissanen, J. (1978). Modelling by the shortest data description. Automatica, 14, 465–471. doi:10.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-510.1016/0005-1098(78)90005-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rissanen, J. (1989). Stochastic complexity in statistical inquiry theory. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing Co.Search in Google Scholar

Segall, M. H., Campbell, D. T., & Herskovitz, J. (1966). The influence of the culture on visual perception. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Search in Google Scholar

Stigler, S. M. (1982). Thomas Bayes’s Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, 145, 250–258.10.2307/2981538Search in Google Scholar

Thorburn, W. M. (1918). The myth of Occam’s razor. Mind, 27, 345–353.10.1093/mind/XXVII.3.345Search in Google Scholar

van der Helm, P. A. (2017). On Bayesian simplicity in human visual perceptual organization. Perception, 46(1), 1269–1282. doi:10.1177/030100661771960410.1177/030100661771960428697640Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

von Helmholtz, H. (1855/1903). Über das Sehen des Menschen. In Vorträge und Reden (pp. 85–117). Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.Search in Google Scholar

von Helmholtz, H. (1867). Handbuch der physiologischen Optik. Leipzig, Germany: Lieferung.Search in Google Scholar

von Helmholtz, H. (1878/1903). Die Tatsachen in der Wahrnehmung, in Vorträge und Reden (213-247). Braunschweig, Germany: Vieweg.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1912). Über das Denken der Naturvölker, Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 60, 321–368.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1914). Diskussion zum Vortrag von Benussi: Kinematohaptische Scheinbewegung und Auffassungsformung. In F. Schumann (Ed.), Bericht über den VI. Kongreß für experimentelle Psychologie. I. Teil. Leipzig, Germany: Barth, 11.Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1922). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I, Psychologische Forschung, 1, 47–58.10.1007/BF00410385Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II, Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350.10.1007/BF00410640Search in Google Scholar

Wertheimer, M. (2012). On perceived motion and figural organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press [L. Spillmann Ed.].10.7551/mitpress/9222.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Westheimer, G. (2008). Was Helmholtz a Bayesian? Perception, 37, 642–650. doi:10.1068/p597310.1068/p597318605140Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wolpert, D. H. (1993). On the Bayesian “Occam factors” argument for Occam’s razor. SFI Working Paper: 1993-10-065.Search in Google Scholar