Empathy or Empathies? Uncertainties in the Interdisciplinary Discussion

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251.10.1111/1469-7610.00715Search in Google Scholar

Baron-Cohen, S. (2011). The science of evil. On empathy and the origins of cruelty. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Batson, C. D. (2011). These things called empathy. In J. Decety & W. J. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bekoff, M. (2007). The emotional lives of animals: A leading scientist explores animal joy, sorrow, and empathy, and why they matter. Novato, CA: New World Library.Search in Google Scholar

Berthoz, A., & Thirioux, B. (2010). A spatial and perspective change theory of the difference between sympathy and empathy. Paragrana, 19(1), 1–32. doi:10.1524/para.2010.000310.1524/para.2010.0003Search in Google Scholar

Bischof-Köhler, D. (1989). Spiegelbild und Empathie: Die Anfänge der sozialen Kognition. Bern: Huber.Search in Google Scholar

Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy. The case for rational compassion. New York, NY: Ecco.Search in Google Scholar

Calvo-Merino, B., Glaser, D., Grèzes, J., Passingham, R., & Haggard, P. (2004). Action observation and acquired motor skills: An fMRI study with expert dancers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1243–1249. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi00710.1093/cercor/bhi00715616133Search in Google Scholar

Darwall, S. (1998). Empathy, sympathy, care. Philosophical Studies, 89(2–3), 261–282.10.1023/A:1004289113917Search in Google Scholar

Cameron, D., Inzlicht, M., & Cunningham, W.A. (2015). Empathy is actually a choice. NYTimes, 10 July 2015, 12.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4(3), 245–264.10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01Search in Google Scholar

Coplan, A. (2004). Empathic engagement with narrative fictions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 62, 141–152.10.1111/j.1540-594X.2004.00147.xSearch in Google Scholar

Coplan, A. (2011a). Understanding empathy. Its features and effects. In Amy Coplan & Peter Goldie (Eds.), Empathy: Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 3–18). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coplan, A. (2011b). Will the real empathy please stand up? A case for a narrow conceptualization. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 49(s1), 40–65.10.1111/j.2041-6962.2011.00056.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cuff, B. M., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2014). Empathy: A review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2(April 2016)), 144–153.10.1177/1754073914558466Search in Google Scholar

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113–126.10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113Search in Google Scholar

de Vignemont, F., & Singer, T. (2006). The empathic brain: How, when and why? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 435–441.10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.00816949331Search in Google Scholar

Dick, Philip K. (1968). Do androids dream of electric sheep?, Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Djikic, M., Oatley, K., & Moldoveanu, M. (2013). Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47.10.1075/ssol.3.1.06djiSearch in Google Scholar

Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). The Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(3), 464–473.10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x17990089Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberg, N. (2000). Empathy and sympathy. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.), Handbook of emotions New York, NY: Guilford, pp. 677–691.Search in Google Scholar

Fagiano, M. (2016). Pluralistic conceptualizations of empathy. Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 30(1), 27–44.10.5325/jspecphil.30.1.0027Search in Google Scholar

Feshbach, N., & Roe, K. (1968). Empathy in six- and seven-years-old. Child Development, 39, 133–145.10.2307/1127365Search in Google Scholar

Freedberg, D., & Gallese, V. (2007). Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(5), 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.00310.1016/j.tics.2007.02.00317347026Search in Google Scholar

Gallese, V., & Guerra, M. (2012). Embodying movies: Embodied simulation and film studies. Cinema, 3, 183–210.Search in Google Scholar

Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency. An anthropological theory. Oxford, England: Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, K. (1934). A device for demonstrating empathy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(6), 892–893. doi:10.1037/h007147510.1037/h0071475Search in Google Scholar

Grandin, T., & Johnson, C. (2009). Animals make us human: Creating the best life for animals. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. Guilford Press, pp. 677–691.Search in Google Scholar

Happ, C., Melzer, A., & Steffgen, G. (2015). Like the good or bad guy-empathy in antisocial and prosocial games. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 4, 80–96.10.1037/ppm0000021Search in Google Scholar

Harvey, G. (2015). The handbook of contemporary animism. London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9781315728964Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (1982). The measurement of empathy. In C. E. Izard (Ed.), Measuring emotions in infants and children (pp. 279–296). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hoffman, M. L. (1991). Is empathy altruistic? Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 131–133.10.1207/s15327965pli0202_6Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, D. R. (2012). Transportation into a story increases empathy, prosocial behavior, and perceptual bias toward fearful expressions. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 150–155.10.1016/j.paid.2011.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, D. R. (2013). Transportation into literary fiction reduces prejudice against and increases empathy for Arab-Muslims. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 77–92.10.1075/ssol.3.1.08johSearch in Google Scholar

Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29(4), 589–611.10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.01016198409Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19.10.1037/a002752522448888Search in Google Scholar

Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Kidd, D. C., & Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342, 377–380. doi:10.1126/science.123991810.1126/science.123991824091705Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, A., & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9.1, 79–112.10.1515/jlt-2015-0005Search in Google Scholar

van Lissa, C. J., Caracciolo, M., Duuren, T. V., & van Leuveren, B. (2016). Difficult empathy. The effect of narrative perspective on readers’ engagement with a first-person narrator. DIEGESIS. Interdisciplinary E-Journal for Narrative Research/Interdisziplinäres E-Journal für Erzählforschung, 5.1, 43–63.Search in Google Scholar

Mallgrave, H. F. (2012). The architect’s brain: Neuroscience, creativity, and architecture. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Mallgrave, H. F. (2013). Architecture and embodiment: The implications of the new sciences and humanities for design. London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9780203071144Search in Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., & Oatley, K. (2008). The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 173–192.10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x26158934Search in Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., & Peterson, J. B. (2009). Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications: The European Journal of Communication, 34, 407–428.10.1515/COMM.2009.025Search in Google Scholar

Mar, R. A., Oatley, K., Hirsh, J., dela Paz, J., & Peterson, J. B. (2006). Bookworms versus Nerds: The social abilities of fiction and non-fiction readers. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 694–712.10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Misselhorn, C. (2009). Empathy with inanimate objects and the Uncanny valley. Minds and Machines, 19(3), 345–359.10.1007/s11023-009-9158-2Search in Google Scholar

Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, 19(2), 98–100.10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811Search in Google Scholar

Molnar-Szakacs, I., & Overy, K. (2006). Music and mirror neurons: From motion to ‘e’motion. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 1(3), 235–241. doi:10.1093/scan/nsl02910.1093/scan/nsl029255542018985111Search in Google Scholar

Nelems, R. J. (2018). What is this thing called empathy. In R. J. Nelems & L. J. Theo (Eds.), Exploring empathy: Its propagations, perimeters and potentialities (pp. 17–38). Leiden, Netherlands: Brill-Rodopi.10.1163/9789004360846_004Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Poetic justice: The literary imagination and public life. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (1997). Cultivating humanity: A classical defense of reform in liberal education. Cambridge, England: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctvjghth8Search in Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. (2003). Upheavals of thought. The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: MA: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Oatley, K. (2016). Fiction. Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20.8, 618.10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.00227449184Search in Google Scholar

Prinz, J. J. (2011). Is empathy necessary for morality. In A. Coplan & P. Goldie (Eds.), Empathy. Philosophical and psychological perspectives (pp. 211–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199539956.003.0014Search in Google Scholar

Pinotti, A. (2016). L’empathie: Histoire d’une idée de Platon au posthumain. Paris, France: Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Pinotti, A. (2017). A question of character. Analogy and the empathic life of things. In V. Lux & S. Weigel (Eds.), Empathy: Epistemic problems and cultural–historical perspectives of a cross-disciplinary concept (pp. 245–269). London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Rifkin, J. (2009). The empathic civilization: The race to global consciousness in a world in crisis. Cambridge, MA: Polity.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C. (2008). Mirrors in the brain: How our minds share actions and emotions. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Rooksby, E. (2007). Email and ethics: Style and ethical relations in computer-mediated communication. New York, NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars: Seven paradoxical tales. London, England: Picador.Search in Google Scholar

Sakamoto, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2009). Geminoid: Remote-controlled android system for studying human presence. Kansei Engineering International, 8(1), 3–9.10.5057/ER081218-1Search in Google Scholar

Salgaro, M., & Van Tourhout, B. (2018). Why does frank underwood look at us? Contemporary heroes suggest the need of a turn in the conceptualization of fictional empathy. Journal of Literary Theory, 12(2), 345–368.10.1515/jlt-2018-0019Search in Google Scholar

Sbriscia-Fioretti, B., Berchio, C., Freedberg, D., Gallese, V., & Umiltà, M. A. (2013). ERP modulation during observation of abstract paintings by Franz Kline. Plos One, 8(10), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.007524110.1371/journal.pone.0075241379398224130693Search in Google Scholar

Schramme, T. (2017). Empathy and altruism. In H. L. Maibom (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of philosophy of empathy (pp. 203–214). London, England: Routledge.10.4324/9781315282015-19Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder, R. (2002). The social life of avatars: Presence and interaction in shared virtual environments. London, England: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4471-0277-9Search in Google Scholar

Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 433, 466–469.10.1038/nature04271263686816421576Search in Google Scholar

Slote, M. (2010). Moral sentimentalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195391442.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Sopčák, P., Salgaro, M., & Herrmann, B. J. (Eds.). (2016). Transdisciplinary approaches to literature and empathy (special issue). Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 174.10.1075/ssol.6.1.02sopSearch in Google Scholar

Stansfield, J., & Bunce, L. (2014). The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: Separate roles for cognitive and affective components. EFPSA, Journal of European Psychology Students, doi:10.5334/jeps.ca10.5334/jeps.caSearch in Google Scholar

Titchener, E. B. (1909). Experimental psychology of the thought processes. New York, NY: The Macmillan.10.1037/10877-000Search in Google Scholar

Wallmark, Z., Deblieck, C., & Iacoboni, M. (2018). Neurophysiological effects of trait empathy in music listening. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 66. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.0006610.3389/fnbeh.2018.00066589743629681804Search in Google Scholar

Wang, Y., Davidson, M. M., Yakushko, O. F., Savoy, H. B., Tan, J. A., & Bleier, J. K. (2003). The scale of ethno-cultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(2), 221–234. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.50.2.22110.1037/0022-0167.50.2.221Search in Google Scholar

Wispé, L. (1986). The distinction between sympathy and empathy: To call forth a concept, a word is needed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 314–321. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.31410.1037/0022-3514.50.2.314Search in Google Scholar