[Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1999). 2.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 116–157.10.1006/cogp.1999.0717]Search in Google Scholar
[Baillargeon, R. (2004). Infants’ physical world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 89–94.10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00281.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Baiocchi, V., & Chiandetti, C. (2016). Chicks run harder toward a consonant over a dissonant clucking hen: Biological roots for the appreciation of consonant sounds. In Trieste Symposium on Perception and Cognition, Trieste, Italy, November 4, P03.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateson, P. P. G. (1964a). Effect of similarity between rearing and testing conditions on chicks’ following and avoidance responses. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 57(1), 100–103.10.1037/h0043000]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateson, P. P. G. (1964b). Changes in chicks’ responses to novel moving objects over the sensitive period for imprinting. Animal Behaviour, 7(4), 479–489.10.1016/0003-3472(64)90068-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateson, P. P. G. (1990). Is imprinting such a special case? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, 329, 125–131.10.1098/rstb.1990.0157]Search in Google Scholar
[Bateson, P. P. G., Horn, G., & Rose, S. P. R. (1973). Imprinting: Lasting effects on Uracil incorporation into chick brain. Science, 181, 576–578.10.1126/science.181.4099.5764721056]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird, C. D., & Emery, N. J. (2010). Rooks perceive support relations similar to six-month-old babies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 277, 147–151.10.1098/rspb.2009.1456284262719812083]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolhuis, J. J. (1991). Mechanisms of avian imprinting: A review. Biological Reviews, 66(4), 303–345.10.1111/j.1469-185X.1991.tb01145.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolhuis, J. J., de Vos, G. J., & Kruijt, J. P. (1990). Filial imprinting and associative learning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(3), 313–329.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowling, D. L., & Purves, D. (2015). A biological rationale for musical consonance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(36), 11155–11160.10.1073/pnas.1505768112456868026209651]Search in Google Scholar
[Bozzi, P. (1990). Fisica ingenua. Oscillazioni, piani inclinati e altre storie: studi di psicologia della percezione. Milano, Italy: Garzanti.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cacchione, T., & Krist, H. (2004). Recognizing impossible object relations: Intuitions about support in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 118, 140–148.10.1037/0735-7036.118.2.14015250801]Search in Google Scholar
[Call, J. (2007). Apes know that hidden objects can affect the orientation of other objects. Cognition, 105, 1–25.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.08.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Caramazza, A., McCloskey, M., & Green, B. (1981). Naïve beliefs in “sophisticated” subjects: Misconceptions about trajectories of objects. Cognition, 9, 117–123.10.1016/0010-0277(81)90007-X]Search in Google Scholar
[Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195367638.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat’s spatial representation. Cognition, 23(2), 149–178.10.1016/0010-0277(86)90041-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(1), 1–23.10.3758/BF0319634615945200]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C. (2016). A commentary on “Cats prefer species-appropriate music. Snowdon, C. T., Teie, D., Savage, M. (2015). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 166, 106-111”. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 594.10.1016/j.applanim.2015.02.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., & Turatto, M. (2017). Context-specific habituation of the freezing response in newborn chicks. Behavioral Neuroscience, 131(5), 437–446.10.1037/bne000021228805430]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2008). Is there an innate geometric module? Effects of experience with angular geometric cues on spatial re-orientation based on the shape of the environment. Animal Cognition, 11(1), 139–146.10.1007/s10071-007-0099-y17629754]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Experience and geometry: Controlled-rearing studies with chicks. Animal Cognition, 13(3), 463–470.10.1007/s10071-009-0297-x19960217]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2011a). Chicks like consonant music. Psychological Science, 22, 1270–1273.10.1177/095679761141824421934134]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., & Vallortigara, G. (2011b). Intuitive physical reasoning about occluded objects by inexperienced chicks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 278(1718), 2621–2627.10.1098/rspb.2010.2381]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., Spelke, E. S., & Vallortigara, G. (2015). Inexperienced newborn chicks use geometry to spontaneously reorient to an artificial social partner. Developmental Science, 18(6), 972–978.10.1111/desc.1227725530027]Search in Google Scholar
[Chiandetti, C., Dissegna, A., & Turatto, M. (2018). Rapid plasticity attenuation soon after birth revealed by habituation in newborn chicks. Developmental Psychobiology,. [in press].10.1002/dev.2162829574691]Search in Google Scholar
[Collias, N., & Joos, M. (1952). The spectrographic analysis of sound signals of the domestic fowl. Behaviour, 5, 175–188.10.1163/156853953X00104]Search in Google Scholar
[Daisley, J. N., Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2010). Logic in an asymmetrical (social) brain: Transitive inference in the young domestic chick. Social Neuroscience, 5, 309–319.10.1080/17470910903529795]Search in Google Scholar
[DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of human bonding: Newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science, 208, 1174–1176.10.1126/science.7375928]Search in Google Scholar
[Di Giorgio, E., Frasnelli, E., Rosa Salva, O., Scattoni, M. L., Puopolo, M., Tosoni, D., … Vallortigara, G. (2016). Difference in visual social predispositions between newborns at low- and high-risk for autism. Scientific Reports, 6, 26395.10.1038/srep26395]Search in Google Scholar
[Gori, S., Molteni, M., & Facoetti, A. (2016). Visual illusions: An interesting tool to investigate developmental dyslexia and autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 175.10.3389/fnhum.2016.00175]Search in Google Scholar
[Gottlieb, G. (1979). Development of species identification in ducklings: V. Perceptual differentiation in the embryo. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 93, 831–854.10.1037/h0077614]Search in Google Scholar
[Heaton, M. B. (1972). Prenatal auditory discrimination in the wood duck (Aix sponsa). Animal Behavior, 20, 421–424.10.1016/S0003-3472(72)80002-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Hetch, H., & Proffitt, D. R. (1995). The price of expertise: Effects of experience on the water level task. Psychological Science, 6, 90–95.10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00312.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, G. (2004). Pathways of the past: The imprint of memory. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5, 108–120.10.1038/nrn132414735114]Search in Google Scholar
[Horn, G., Bradley, P., & McCabe, B. J. (1985). Changes in the structure of synapses associated with learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 5, 3161–3168.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.05-12-03161.1985]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, M. H. (1992). Imprinting and the development of face recognition: From chick to man. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 52–55.10.1111/1467-8721.ep11509740]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, M. H. (2005). Subcortical face processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 6, 766–774.10.1038/nrn1766]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, M. H., & Horn, G. (1988). The development of filial preferences in the dark-reared chick. Animal Behaviour, 36, 675–683.10.1016/S0003-3472(88)80150-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, M. H., Bolhuis, J. J., & Horn, G. (1992). Predispositions and learning: Behavioural dissociations in the chick. Animal Behavior, 44(5), 943–948.10.1016/S0003-3472(05)80589-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Kent, J. P. (1993). The chick’s preference for certain features of the maternal cluck vocalization in the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus). Behaviour, 125, 177–187.10.1163/156853993X00227]Search in Google Scholar
[Köhler, W. (1921). The mentality of Apes. London, England: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 1927.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorenz, K. (1935). Der Kumpan in der Umwelt des Vogels. Journal fur Ornithologie, 83, 137–213.; 289-413.10.1007/BF01905355]Search in Google Scholar
[Lorenz, K. (1988). Hier bin ich - wo bist du? Ethologie der graugans gebundene ausgabe. Verlag: München, Piper.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mascalzoni, E., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Innate sensitivity for self-propelled causal agency in newly hatched chicks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 4483–4485.10.1073/pnas.0908792107284011920160095]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, U., Pecchia, T., Bingman, V. P., Flore, M., & Vallortigara, G. (2016). Hippocampus and medial striatum dissociation during goal navigation by geometry or features in the domestic chick: An immediate early gene study. Hippocampus, 26(1), 27–40.10.1002/hipo.2248626135386]Search in Google Scholar
[Mayer, U., Bhushan, R., Vallortigara, G., & Lee, S. A. (2017). Representation of environmental shape in the hippocampus of domestic chicks (Gallus gallus). Brain Structure and Function, 2017, 1–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCabe, B. J. (2013). Imprinting. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(4), 375–390.10.1002/wcs.123126304225]Search in Google Scholar
[Partanen, E., Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Huotilainen, M. (2013). Prenatal music exposure induces long-term neural effects. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e78946.10.1371/journal.pone.0078946381361924205353]Search in Google Scholar
[Pattison, K. F., Miller, H. C., Rayburn-Reeves, R., & Zentall, T. (2011). The case of the disappearing bone: Dogs’ understanding of the physical properties of objects. Behavioural Processes, 85(3), 278–282.10.1016/j.beproc.2010.06.01620600694]Search in Google Scholar
[Piazza, M., Facoetti, A., Trussardi, A. N., Berteletti, I., Conte, S., Lucangeli, D., … Zorzi, M. (2010). Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia. Cognition, 116, 33–41.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.01220381023]Search in Google Scholar
[Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (1995). Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Perception and Psychophysics, 57, 971–976.10.3758/BF03205456]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosa-Salva, O. R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2010). Faces are special for chicks: Evidence for inborn domain-specific mechanisms underlying spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli. Developmental Science, 13(4), 565–577.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00914.x20590721]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosa-Salva, O. R., Farroni, T., Regolin, L., Vallortigara, G., & Johnson, M. H. (2011). The evolution of social orienting: Evidence from chicks (Gallus gallus) and human newborns. PLoS ONE, 6(4), e18802.10.1371/journal.pone.0018802308038521533093]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosa-Salva, O. R., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2012). Inversion of contrast polarity abolishes spontaneous preferences for face-like stimuli in newborn chicks. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 133–143.10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.02522155610]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosa-Salva, O. R., Grassi, M., Lorenzi, E., Regolin, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2016). Spontaneous preference for visual cues of animacy in naïve domestic chicks: The case of speed changes. Cognition, 157, 49–60.10.1016/j.cognition.2016.08.01427592411]Search in Google Scholar
[Santolin, C., Rosa-Salva, O., Vallortigara, G., & Regolin, L. (2016). Unsupervised statistical learning in newly-hatched chicks. Current Biology, 26, 1218–1220.10.1016/j.cub.2016.10.01127923125]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, D. A., Howe, C. Q., & Purves, D. (2003). The statistical structure of human speech sounds predicts musical universals. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(18), 7160–7168.10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-18-07160.2003]Search in Google Scholar
[Spalding, D. A. (1873). Instinct, with original observations on young animals. Macmilan’s Magazine, 27, 282–293.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spelke, E. S., & Kinzler, K. D. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00569.x17181705]Search in Google Scholar
[Spelke, E., Lee, S. A., & Izard, V. (2010). Beyond core knowledge: Natural geometry. Cognitive Science, 34(5), 863–884.10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01110.x289717820625445]Search in Google Scholar
[Stahl, A. E., & Feigenson, L. (2015). Observing the unexpected enhances infants’ learning and exploration. Science, 348(6230), 91–94.10.1126/science.aaa3799]Search in Google Scholar
[Stensola, T., & Moser, E. I. (2016). Grid cells and spatial maps in entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. In G. Buzsáki & Y. Christen (Eds.), Micro-, meso- and macro-dynamics of the brain (pp. 59–80). Berlin, Germany: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-28802-4_5]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallortigara, G. (2012). Core knowledge of object, number, and geometry: A comparative and neural approach. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29(1–2), 37–41.10.1080/02643294.2012.654772]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallortigara, G. (2017). An animal’s sense of number. In J. W. Adams, P. Barmby, & A. Mesoudi (Eds.), The nature and development of mathematics. Cross disciplinary perspective on cognition, learning and culture (pp. 43–65). New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallortigara, G., & Andrew, R. J. (1994). Differential involvement of right and left hemisphere in individual recognition in the domestic chick. Behavioural Processes, 33, 41–58.10.1016/0376-6357(94)90059-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallortigara, G., & Chiandetti, C. (2017). Objects and space in an avian brain. In C. Carel ten Cate & S. D. Healy (Eds.), Avian cognition (pp. 141–162). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316135976.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Vallortigara, G., Regolin, L., & Marconato, F. (2005). Visually inexperienced chicks exhibit a spontaneous preference for biological motion patterns. PLOS Biology, 3(7), 1312–1316. (e208).10.1371/journal.pbio.0030208115029015934787]Search in Google Scholar
[Wagner, A. (1978). Expectancies and the priming of STM. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & R. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behaviour (pp. 177–209). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.10.4324/9780203710029-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Yamaguchi, S., Aoki, N., Kitajima, T., Iikubo, E., Katagiri, S., Matsushima, T., & Homma, K. J. (2012). Thyroid hormone determines the start of the sensitive period of imprinting and primes later learning. Nature Communications, 3, 1081.10.1038/ncomms2088365800023011135]Search in Google Scholar
[Zanforlin, M. (1981). Visual perception of complex forms (anomalous surfaces) in chicks. Italian Journal of Psychology, 8, 1–16.]Search in Google Scholar