INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Categoria dell'articolo: Research Note
Pubblicato online: 26 feb 2021
Pagine: 50 - 61
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gsr-2021-0004
Parole chiave
© 2021 Kevin M. Crosby et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Figure 7

Figure 8

Summary of MPG tests and results_
MPG-I-III | Subscale Pill-shaped COPV and transparent polycarbonate tanks | Lab | Settled static | 1-g | <1% | 0.25% |
Parabolic | Sloshing | 0-g | 3–5% | - | ||
KSC Cold-Tank test | Shuttle OMS tank | Lab | Settled slow drain and fill | 1-g | – | <0.5% |
Airbus Orion ESM tank qualification | Orion ESM qualification tank | Lab | Settled slow drain and fill | 1-g | <1% | 0.24% |
Morpheus hot-fire | 48-in diameter spherical propellant tanks | Morpheus Prototype Lander | 30-s vacuum hot-fire at the NASA Plumbrook Station B-1 Chamber | 1-g | – | 0.12% |
P9 Mission | Subscale polycarbonate cylindrical tanks | NS | P9 Suborbital Flight | 0-g | <1% | < 1% |
Cross-correlation-predicted fill fraction and NS P9 known fill fractions_% Error is calculated from 100 x [Predicted Fill Volume – Known Fill Volume|/Total Tank Volume_ The total tank volume is 4356 ml_
Tank 1 | 1000 | 0.230 | 1025 | 0.57% |
Tank 2 | 500 | 0.115 | 540 | 0.92% |
Tank 3 | 1500 | 0.344 | 1485 | 0.34% |