Microgravity (μ
Since the Skylab missions, space agencies are aware of nutritional concerns seen with μ
Relationships between exercise in μ
Successful in-flight exercise requires they impose little increase to metabolic rates above those that naturally occur in μ
Insufficient energy intakes in μ
The adverse changes humans experience in μ
μ
Cardiovascular system responses to μ
The numerous cardiovascular changes humans experience in μ
There are also concerns of elevated oxidative damage from hypercortisolemia that tends to rise with the rigor and duration of missions (Crucian et al., 2000; Ronca et al., 2014; Stowe et al., 2001; Stowe et al., 2003), and heightened free radical formation seen with longer (Smith et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2005), but not shorter (17-day) (Stein and Leskiw, 2000), spaceflights. Furthermore, similar to VO2 max changes, the return to Earth increase the likelihood of increased oxidative damage, as multiple systems compete to repair after exposure to μ
Among the greater losses from μ
Spaceflight/unloading elicits numerous changes, which include shifts to more glycolytic myofibers (Trappe et al., 2009). Such changes lead to greater fatigue that jeopardize in-flight tasks and the ability to perform emergency egress. The magnitude of strength losses from spaceflight/unloading exceeds those for muscle atrophy. The lower body weight-bearing muscles incur the greatest losses (Belavý et al., 2009; Fitts et al., 2000; Riley et al., 2002; Rittweger et al., 2006). Spaceflights of 5–11 days saw knee extensor force decline 15% versus pre-flight values (Edgerton et al., 1995). Vastus lateralis biopsies 5–11 days post-flight showed cross-sectional area losses to slow (−15%) and fast muscle (−22%) fibers as well as higher expression of fast myosin heavy chains (Edgerton et al., 1995). Seven-day bed rests evoked significant (−3%) thigh muscle volume and knee extensor strength losses (Ferrando et al., 1995; Friman and Hamrin, 1976; Hayes et al., 1992). Unilateral limb suspension for 20 days led to a 7% loss to unloaded knee extensor cross-sectional area (Schultze et al., 2002). A 30-day bed rest evoked higher (−8%) thigh cross-sectional area losses; muscle biopsies showed significant losses by fiber (slow twitch −11%, fast twitch −18%) type (Hikida et al., 1989). Unilateral limb suspension for 28 days evoked unloaded thigh cross-sectional area losses (~ −7%) similar to a 30-day bed rest (Berg et al., 2007; Tesch et al., 2004). Longer unilateral limb suspension studies increased knee extensor (~ −9–16%) atrophy (Alkner and Tesch, 2004a; Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Berg et al., 2007; Caruso et al., 2004b; 1992; Le Blanc et al., 1992). Unloading-induced strength losses exceed those for atrophy due to the role neural factors play in force output (Fitts et al., 2000; Riley et al., 2002). A 14-day bed rest led to a 9% knee extensor torque loss (Bamman et al., 1998). The level of knee extensor losses (−20%) from a 30-day bed rest was like that from a 28-day space flight (Convertino et al., 1989). Unilateral limb suspension for 20–25 days evoked unloaded knee extensor torque deficits of −17%–21% less than pre-unloading values (Berg et al., 1991; Berg et al., 2007; Schultze et al., 2002). Forty days of unilateral limb suspension (−17–22%) and a 90-day bed rest (−31–60%) led to greater knee extensor force deficits (Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Caruso et al., 2004b).
Unlike muscle, bone mass and density decrements occur at slower rates; yet such losses are more difficult to recover from and may persist long after astroanuts return to Earth (Carpenter et al., 2010). Thus bone losses represent a vital risk factor to be mitigated. Both μ
In-flight countermeasures to reduce the adverse physiological changes seen with μ
Research on in-flight exercise noted stationary cycling against mechanical loads of 80–100 watt · min−1 · kg lean body mass−1 · day−1 preserved knee and ankle extensor muscle mass (Whittle, 1979). Yet when compared to unilateral leg press data obtained from flywheel-based hardware (Caruso et al., 2004a), it appears bilateral activity for that exercise can achieve similar mechanical loading values at a far smaller training volume and net energy cost. Ground-based research showed flywheel-based hardware imposes high levels of resistance that users overcome as repetitions proceed at slow rates of movement, yet its net energy costs are rather modest and far less than for aerobic exercise (Caruso et al., 2003; Caruso and Hernandez, 2002; Dudley et al., 1991; Moore et al., 2010). A 3-set 8-repetition leg press protocol on flywheel-based hardware yielded a mean net energy cost of ~90 kilocalories, or 1.24 kilocalories · kg−1 · day−1 (Caruso and Hernandez, 2002). Two seated 3-set 8-repetition leg press workouts, whereby subjects (n = 34) exerted either concentric-only or concentric and eccentric forces, showed muscle lengthening did not raise net energy costs (concentric-only 87.2 ± 4.6 kilocalories, concentric and eccentric 86.1 ± 4.8 kilocalories) despite eliciting an extra ~3600 joules of work (Caruso et al., 2003). Muscle lengthening likely entailed greater knee extensor series elastic element activity to yield such outcomes (Caruso et al., 2003). This is an important issue, as the ability to exert sufficeint eccentric forces were deemed crucial to emergency egress and the perfomance of in-flight operational tasks (Dudley et al., 1991: Stauber, 1989). Flywheel-based hardware also addresses many of the hardware concerns for exercise done within a spacecraft environment (Fitts et al., 2000; Matsumoto et al., 2011; Nicogossian et al., 1994). Yet prior flywheel-based research has focused on musculoskeletal/metabolic outcomes; future trials may wish to examine its utility to limit other types of physiological losses seen with spaceflight.
Due to their promise in ground-based research, flywheel-based devices are used on manned spaceflights. In addition there are several flywheel-based resistive exercise devices now in development at NASA's Glenn and Johnson Space Ceners, with the intent of their use as in-flight hardware (International Countermeasures Working Group, 2010). Now aboard the ISS are two resistive exercise devices equipped with flywheels. A flywheel exercise device (FWED), put there by The European Space Agency, is housed within the ISS's European Columbus Module (International Countermeasures Working Group, 2010). It is the in-flight version of a prototype from which much ground-based data was obtained (Alkner and Tesch, 2004a; Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Caruso et al. 2005b; Tesch et al., 2004). Figure 1 shows the FWED in use on the ISS.
The second piece of flywheel-based hardware is NASA's Advanced Resistive Exercise Device. Pneumatic cylinders are its primary source of resistance, while its flywheels simulate the inertial characteristics of lifting weights on Earth (Bentley et al., 2006). Due to the high degree of inertial resistance flywheel-based hardware imparts during repetitions, much of the prior research with this exercise modality examined musculoskeletal changes. Thus in terms of physiological losses, the remainder of this paper will focus on musculoskeletal changes produced by flywheel-based hardware in spaceflight/unloading models.
The prototype of the European Space Agency's in-flight device uses two flywheels to impart resistance during seated leg and calf press repetitions. Bed rest studies, 29–90 days in length, assessed the merits of the prototype flywheel ergometer to abate knee extensor mass and strength losses (Alkner and Tesch, 2004a; Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Tesch et al., 2004). Results showed concurrent workouts on the prototype ergometer preserved knee extensor mass and elicited strength gains up to 7.7% higher than pre-unloading values, while bed rest control subjects who did not exercise had significant mass (−9–18%) and strength (−30–45%) deficits (Alkner and Tesch, 2004a; Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Tesch et al., 2004). Yet other studies that used to the same prototype flywheel ergometer produced different results (Caruso et al. 2004b; Caruso et al. 2005b). Three groups of subjects underwent 40 days of unilateral limb suspension (Caruso et al., 2004b; Caruso et al., 2005b). Two groups exercised on the ergometer three days per week, while a third served as unloaded controls. The two flywheel ergometer groups also received a capsule dosing assignment; subjects either consumed a placebo (lactose) or 16 mg · day−1 of albuterol with no crossover. Results showed the combined flywheel ergometer-placebo treatment group preserved knee extensor mass, yet over time that group incurred significant (−10%) concentric strength losses over the 40-day unloading period that were less than those for the unloaded controls (Caruso et al., 2004b). Yet subjects who received the combined flywheel ergometer-albuterol treatment acquired significant increases in concentric (+18%) and eccentric (+10%) total work over pre-unloading values (Caruso et al., 2004b). Ankle extensor data from the same three groups showed the combined flywheel ergometer-placebo treatment led to significant intra-group (~−13–15%) eccentric strength losses over 40 days (Caruso et al., 2005b). Yet subjects who received the flywheel ergometer-albuterol treatment had significant eccentric strength (+23–26%) increases over the 40-day unloading period (Caruso et al., 2005b). More than one reason may account for differences in the flywheel-only outcomes for the 40-day trial and bed rest studies. Motivation levels, which in part resulted from differences in the study designs, may account for much of this discrepancy. For the unilateral limb suspension study, subjects were double-blinded to the capsule assignment and may have led some to erroneously believe they could rely on albuterol's ergogenic effect to abate strength losses. Other studies (Alkner and Tesch, 2004a; Alkner and Tesch, 2004b; Tesch et al., 2004), where only one treatment was administered, subjects knew they must rely solely upon the ergometer to maintain muscle mass and strength, and thus may have been more motivated for workouts.
Prior research questioned if in-flight hardware offered a mechanical loading stimulus of sufficient intensity to abate bone losses (Cavanaugh et al., 2005; Schneider et al., 2003; Shackelford et al., 2005). Due to its ability to abate muscle mass and strength losses in ground-based trials, research assessed the merits of the prototype flywheel ergometer to mitigate bone deficits. A 90-day bed rest study examined subjects concurrently assigned to: 1) prototype flywheel ergometer workouts done every 2–3 days, 2): pamidronate therapy to block bone resorption, or 3): a control (no exercise or drug) condition with no crossover (Rittweger et al., 2005). Results showed ergometer workouts concurrent to bed rest abated calf cross-sectional area losses, while tibial diaphyseal and epiphyseal bone mineral content deficits were abated when pamidronate was used as a countermeasure. Each treatment was only partially mitigated bed rest-induced lower leg losses, and the mechanical loading from the prototype ergometer was thought essential to bone health (Rittweger et al., 2005). Due to the merits of combined prototype ergometer-albuterol administrations on muscle strength, this same treatment was also assessed for its ability to abate unloading-induced bone losses (Caruso et al., 2004a). Subjects performed 40 days of unilateral limb suspension with their left legs, which otherwise refrained from traditional weight-bearing activity. As subjects performed concurrent workouts on the prototype flywheel ergometer three days · week−1 with their left legs, they either consumed placebo capsules or a 16 mg · day−1 dose of albuterol with no crossover. Before and after the 40-day period bone densitometry quantified left leg changes. Mechanical loading values from the ergometer workouts were also analyzed. A significant time effect (pre > post) occurred for pelvic bone mineral density (−1.95%); this was the first study to see significant skeletal losses from unilateral limb suspension (Caruso et al., 2004a). Those in the combined flywheel ergometer-albuterol group incurred significant bone mineral content gains to their unloaded leg and a trend (+2.9%) for higher muscle mass, while the flywheel ergometer-placebo group produced no change to those variables. For the latter stages of the 40-day period, mechanical loads for prototype ergometer-placebo subjects declined significantly (−14%) as compared to intra-group values from the start of unloading period. It was suggested albuterol augmented ergometer workouts to maintain mechanical loads that led to bone mineral content gains to the unloaded leg (Caruso et al., 2004a).
Some unloaded leg variables were maintained throughout the 40-day period in the flywheel ergometer-placebo group (Caruso et al., 2004a). Yet a comparative study showed the ergometer as a sole treatment does not promote bone accretion (Caruso et al., 2005a). With a matched-pairs design, ambulatory subjects were assigned to ten weeks of leg press workouts on the prototype ergometer or a standard leg press device with no crossover (Caruso et al., 2005a). Each group performed identical workout protocols and refrained from all other exercise. The progressive overload incurred by the groups was similar over ten weeks. Significant time (pre < post) effects for concentric knee extensor strength, leg muscle mass, body fat percentage and total fat mass occurred for both groups. Yet bone mineral density data produced group-by-time interactions, as standard resistive exercise evoked significant (+1.2%) gains for both leg and total-body bone mineral density while the prototype ergometer group incurred no change. Bone resorption assays showed insignificant changes. It was concluded, that unlike standard resistive exercise, the mechanical stimuli provided by the ergometer does not impart strains upon bone of a sufficient magnitude and rate to evoke osteogenesis (Caruso et al., 2005a). Study results, whereby it was concluded strain rates impeded bone improvements from workouts done on flywheel-based hardware, illustrate a potential paradox for this exercise modality. While larger flywheels impart greater inertial resistance for a more intense mechanical loading stimulus to muscles, it occurs at the expense of reduced strain rates to bones. Even early papers that extolled the potential of flywheel-based hardware to abate muscle atrophy and strength losses, yet were more reserved in regards to its ability to abate in-flight bone deficits (Berg and Tesch, 1994). Subsequent research results, presented in this paper, appear to support this concern. Less resistance, provided by smaller flywheels, may permit the type of bone strains seen with impulse loading. Best achieved with repetitions done at higher speeds, and defined as the force per unit time, impulse loading may elicit bone mineral density increases over time (Dériaz et al., 2010; Heikkinen et al., 2007).
Unlike the European Space Agency's flywheel-based hardware, NASA produced no prototype of the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device from which bone data were obtained. Yet limited in-flight data was obtained on that device's impact on bone mineral changes during extended (4–6 month) stays aboard The ISS (Smith et al., 2012a). Crewmembers exercised with either the Advanced (n = 5) or Interim (n = 8) Resistive Exercise Devices, the latter's hardware did not have flywheels and imparted comparatively lighter peak loads (Smith et al., 2012a). Data, obtained before and 5–45 days after spaceflights, showed bone mineral content and densities were best preserved in crewmembers who used the Advanced Resistive Exercise Device. For some bone-based dependent variables the inter-group differences were significant despite the modest sample sizes (Smith et al., 2012a). It was reported all crewmembers had nominal vitamin D status before and during spaceflight. It was concluded that with improved nutrition and exercise hardware, spaceflight-induced bone losses could be mitigated (Smith et al., 2012a).
Evidence from spaceflight/unloading models shows flywheel-based resistive exercise hardware is efficacious as a countermeasure to muscle mass and strength losses. Exercise done on flywheel-based hardware produced minimal increases in net energy costs (Caruso et al., 2003; Caruso and Hernandez, 2002). Yet it has generally not been as successful in addressing concenrs related to bone. Since flywheel-based hardware imparts a large amount of resistance, repetitions proceed at slow rates that in turn impede the rate of strain imparted to the bone segments engaged in exercise. Thus more success as a bone loss countermeasure may be achieved with exercise hardware that imparts the type of bone strains seen with impulse loading. Due to its ability to reduce muscle atrophy and strength losses with little increase in net energy costs, in-flight flywheel-based hardware should perhaps be redesigned so it imparts greater strain rates to bone for exercise done in μ