[
Abas A, Arifin K, Ali MAM, Khairil M, (2023), A systematic literature review on public participation in decision-making for local authority planning: A decade of progress and challenges. Environmental Development, 46:100853. ISSN 2211-4645. doi: 10.1016/j.envdev.2023.100853.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albaladejo-García JA, Zabala JA, Alcon F, Dallimer M, Martínez-Paz JM, (2023), Integrating socio-spatial preference heterogeneity into the assessment of the aesthetic quality of a Mediterranean agricultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning, 239:104846. ISSN 0169-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104846.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Albert C, Schröter B, Haase D, Brillinger M, Henze J, Herrmann S, Gottwald S, Guerrero P, Nicolas C, Matzdorf B, (2019), Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: How can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landscape and Urban Planning, 182:12–21. ISSN 0169-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson CC, Renaud FG, Hanscomb S, Munro KE, Gonzalez-Ollauri A, Thomson CS, Pouta E, Soini K, Loupis M, Panga D, Stefanopoulou M, (2021), Public Acceptance of Nature-Based Solutions for Natural Hazard Risk Reduction: Survey Findings From Three Study Sites in Europe. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. ISSN 2296-665X. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2021. 678938.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anderson CC, Renaud FG, Hanscomb S, Gonzalez-Ollauri A, (2022), Green, hybrid, or grey disaster risk reduction measures: What shapes public preferences for nature-based solutions? Journal of Environmental Management, 310:114727. ISSN 0301-4797. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114727.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezak N, Raška P, Macháč J, Louda J, Zupanc V, Slavíková L, (2024), Investigating the public perception of green, hybrid and grey flood risk management measures in Europe. Progress in Disaster Science, 23:100360. ISSN 2590-0617. doi: 10.1016/j.pdisas.2024.100360.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bogunović I, Filipović V, (2023), Mulch as a nature-based solution to halt and reverse land degradation in agricultural areas. Current Opinion in Environmental Science amp; Health, 34: 100488. ISSN 2468-5844. doi: 10.1016/j.coesh.2023.100488.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calliari E, Castellari S, Davis M, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Martin J, Mysiak J, Pastor T, Ramieri E, Scolobig A, Sterk M, Veerkamp C, Wendling L, Zandersen M, (2022), Building climate resilience through nature-based solutions in Europe: A review of enabling knowledge, finance and governance frameworks. Climate Risk Management, 37:100450. ISSN 2212-0963. doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2022.100450.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chelli A, Brander L, Geneletti D, (2025), Cost-Benefit analysis of urban nature-based solutions: A systematic review of approaches and scales with a focus on benefit valuation. Ecosystem Services, 71:101684. ISSN 2212-0416. doi: 10.1016/j. ecoser.2024.101684.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen S, Wang Y, Ni Z, Zhang X, Xia B, (2020), Benefits of the ecosystem services provided by urban green infrastructures: Differences between perception and measurements. Urban Forestry amp; Urban Greening, 54:126774. ISSN 1618-8667. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126774.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CTU, (2019), Catalog of nature-based flood protection measures (Katalog přírodě blízkých protipovodňových opatření).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CTU, (2020), Studie erozně-odtokových poměrů v povodí “Oleška”. (Study of erosion-runoff conditions in the Oleška river basin). Available at: https://storm.fsv.cvut.cz/data/files/STRIMAII/Oleska_studie.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dang HL, Li E, Nuberg I, Bruwer J, (2019), Factors influencing the adaptation of farmers in response to climate change: a review. Climate and Development, 11, (9):765–774. ISSN 1756-5537. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2018.1562866.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Derkzen ML, van Teeffelen AJ, Verburg PH, (2017), Green infrastructure for urban climate adaptation: How do residents’ views on climate impacts and green infrastructure shape adaptation preferences? Landscape and Urban Planning, 157: 106–130. ISSN 0169-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016. 05.027.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Commission, (2015), Towards an EU research and innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions re-naturing cities – Final report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on “Nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities”.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faivre N, Fritz M, Freitas T, de Boissezon B, Vandewoestijne S, (2017), Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environmental Research, 159:509–518. ISSN 0013-9351. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferreira V, Barreira AP, Loures L, Antunes D, Panagopoulos T, (2021), Stakeholders’ perceptions of appropriate naturebased solutions in the urban context. Journal of Environmental Management, 298:113502. ISSN 0301-4797. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113502.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Furtak K, Wolińska A, (2023), The impact of extreme weather events as a consequence of climate change on the soil moisture and on the quality of the soil environment and agriculture – A review. CATENA, 231:107378. ISSN 0341-8162. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grothmann T, Patt A, (2005), Adaptive capacity and human cognition: The process of individual adaptation to climate change. Global Environmental Change, 15, (3):199–213. ISSN 0959-3780. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2005.01.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gullino P, Battisti L, Novelli S, Frontuto V, Corsi A, Devecchi M, Larcher F, (2023), The landscape impact of agricultural sheds in rural UNESCO site: Public preferences and mitigation solutions. Environmental Science amp; Policy, 140:232–241. ISSN 1462-9011. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2022.12.009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haines-Young R, (2023), Common Interna3onal Classifica3on of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.2 and Guidance on the Application of the Revised Structure. Available from www.cices.eu].
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Han S, Kuhlicke C, (2019), Reducing Hydro-Meteorological Risk by Nature-Based Solutions: What Do We Know about Peoples Perceptions? Water, 11, (12):2599. ISSN 2073-4441. doi: 10.3390/w11122599.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Häfner K, Zasada I, van Zanten BT, Ungaro F, Koetse M, Piorr A, (2017), Assessing landscape preferences: a visual choice experiment in the agricultural region of Märkische Schweiz, Germany. Landscape Research, 43, (6):846–861. ISSN 1469-9710. doi: 10.1080/01426397.2017.1386289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Junker B, Buchecker M, (2008), Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, (3–4):141–154. ISSN 0169-2046. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karki S, Burton P, Mackey B, (2019), The experiences and perceptions of farmers about the impacts of climate change and variability on crop production: a review. Climate and Development, 12, (1):80–95. ISSN 1756-5537. doi: 10.1080/17565529.2019.1603096.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koutová A, (2022), Územní plán Košťálov (Zoning plan of Košťálov).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krčmářová J, Kala L, Brendzová A, Chabada T, (2021), Building Agroforestry Policy Bottom-Up: Knowledge of Czech Farmers on Trees in Farmland. Land, 10, (3):278. ISSN 2073-445X. doi: 10.3390/land10030278.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macháč J, Trantinová M, Zaňková L, (2020), Externalities in agriculture: How to include their monetary value in decisionmaking? International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 18, (1):3–20. ISSN 1735-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02752-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macháč J, Brabec J, Hekrle M, Vacková A, (2021). In: What Nature-Based Flood Protection Solutions Are Best Perceived by People? Lessons from Field Research in Czechia. Springer International Publishing, pp. 425–446. ISBN 9783030775056. doi: 10.1007/698_2021_763.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Macháč J, Brabec J, Arnberger A, (2022), Exploring public preferences and preference heterogeneity for green and blue infrastructure in urban green spaces. Urban Forestry amp; Urban Greening, 75:127695. ISSN 1618-8667. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug. 2022.127695.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mancuso G, Bencresciuto GF, Lavrnić S, Toscano A, (2021), Diffuse Water Pollution from Agriculture: A Review of Nature-Based Solutions for Nitrogen Removal and Recovery. Water, 13, (14):1893. ISSN 2073-4441. doi: 10.3390/w13141893.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meierová T, (2020), Conflicts Between Farmers and Conservationists: The Role of Communication in the Management of Natural Resources. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 13, (2): 129–149. ISSN 1805-4196. doi: 10.2478/jlecol-2020-0013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meierová T, Chvátalová V, (2022), Frustrated or fulfilled? Motivation of Czech farmers to implement climate change adaptation measures on the landscape level. Journal of Rural Studies, 92: 354–370. ISSN 0743-0167. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.04. 013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miralles-Wilhelm F, (2021), Nature-based solutions in agriculture: Sustainable management and conservation of land, water and biodiversity. Available at: https://www.fao.org/documents/card/fr/c/cb3140en/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mumtaz M, Puppim de Oliveira JA, (2023), A framework for analyzing the implementation of climate adaptation policies in the agriculture sector at the subnational level. Environmental Science amp; Policy, 147:126–137. ISSN 1462-9011. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.06.002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nesshöver C, Assmuth T, Irvine KN, Rusch GM, Waylen KA, Delbaere B, Haase D, Jones-Walters L, Keune H, Kovacs E, Krauze K, Külvik M, Rey F, van Dijk J, Vistad OI, Wilkinson ME, Wittmer H, (2017), The science, policy and practice of naturebased solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of The Total Environment, 579:1215–1227. ISSN 0048-9697. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Newig J, Jager NW, Challies E, Kochskämper E, (2023), Does stakeholder participation improve environmental governance? Evidence from a meta-analysis of 305 case studies. Global Environmental Change, 82:102705. ISSN 0959-3780. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102705.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oppio A, Caprioli C, Dell’Ovo M, Bottero M, (2024), Assessing Ecosystem Services through a multimethodological approach based on multicriteria analysis and cost-benefits analysis: A case study in Turin (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 472:143472. ISSN 0959-6526. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024. 143472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Orduño Torres MA, Kallas Z, Ornelas Herrera SI, (2020), Farmers’ environmental perceptions and preferences regarding climate change adaptation and mitigation actions; towards a sustainable agricultural system in México. Land Use Policy, 99: 105031. ISSN 0264-8377. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020. 105031.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Partelow S, Schlüter A, Armitage D, Bavinck M, Carlisle K, Gruby RL, Hornidge AK, Le Tissier M, Pittman JB, Song AM, Sousa LP, Văidianu N, Van Assche K, (2020), Environmental governance theories: a review and application to coastal systems. Ecology and Society, 25, (4). ISSN 1708-3087. doi: 10.5751/es-12067-250419.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Phillips A, da Schio N, Canters F, Khan AZ, (2023), “A living street and not just green”: Exploring public preferences and concerns regarding nature-based solution implementation in urban streetscapes. Urban Forestry amp; Urban Greening, 86: 128034. ISSN 1618-8667. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.128034.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Povodňový portál Libereckého kraje, (2020), Charakteristiky vodních toků - Geoportál Libereckého kraje. Available at: https://povodnovyportal.kraj-lbc.cz/charakteristikyvodnich-toku.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pulido-Velazquez D, Baena-Ruiz L, Mayor B, Zorrilla-Miras P, López-Gunn E, de Dios Gómez-Gómez J, de la Hera Portillo A, Collados-Lara AJ, Moreno MM, Aróstegui JLG, Alcalá FJ, (2023), Integrating stakeholders’ inputs to co-design climate resilience adaptation measures in Mediterranean areas with conflicts between wetland conservation and intensive agriculture. Science of The Total Environment, 870:161905. ISSN 0048-9697. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161905.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raška P, Bezak N, Ferreira CS, Kalantari Z, Banasik K, Bertola M, Bourke M, Cerdà A, Davids P, Madruga de Brito M, Evans R, Finger DC, Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir R, Housh M, Hysa A, Jakubínský J, Solomun MK, Kaufmann M, Keesstra S, Keles E, Kohnová S, Pezzagno M, Potočki K, Rufat S, Seifollahi-Aghmiuni S, Schindelegger A, Šraj M, Stankunavicius G, Stolte J, Stričević R, Szolgay J, Zupanc V, Slavíková L, Hartmann T, (2022), Identifying barriers for nature-based solutions in flood risk management: An interdisciplinary overview using expert community approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 310:114725. ISSN 0301-4797. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114725.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Remme RP, Meacham M, Pellowe KE, Andersson E, Guerry AD, Janke B, Liu L, Lonsdorf E, Li M, Mao Y, Nootenboom C, Wu T, van Oudenhoven AP, (2024), Aligning nature-based solutions with ecosystem services in the urban century. Ecosystem Services, 66:101610. ISSN 2212-0416. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser. 2024.101610.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzo A, Sarti C, Nardini A, Conte G, Masi F, Pistocchi A, (2023), Nature-based solutions for nutrient pollution control in European agricultural regions: A literature review. Ecological Engineering, 186:106772. ISSN 0925-8574. doi: 10.1016/j. ecoleng.2022.106772.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saarikoski H, Aapala K, Artell J, Grammatikopoulou I, Hjerppe T, Lehtoranta V, Mustajoki J, Pouta E, Primmer E, Vatn A, (2022), Multimethod valuation of peatland ecosystem services: Combining choice experiment, multicriteria decision analysis and deliberative valuation. Ecosystem Services, 57:101471. ISSN 2212-0416. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101471.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sklenička P, Molnarova KJ, Salek M, Simova P, Vlasak J, Sekac P, Janovska V, (September 2015), Owner or tenant: Who adopts better soil conservation practices? Land Use Policy, 47: 253–261. ISSN 0264-8377. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015. 04.017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slavíková L, Milman A, (2023), Mitigation of Concurrent Flood and Drought Risks Through Land Modifications: Potential and Perspectives of Land Users. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 48, (1):319–346. ISSN 1545-2050. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-110922-031849.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sowińska-Świerkosz B, García J, (2022), What are Nature-based solutions (NBS)? Setting core ideas for concept clarification. Nature-Based Solutions, 2:100009. ISSN 2772-4115. doi: 10.1016/j.nbsj.2022.100009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Suppakittpaisarn P, Larsen L, Sullivan WC, (2019), Preferences for green infrastructure and green stormwater infrastructure in urban landscapes: Differences between designers and laypeople. Urban Forestry amp; Urban Greening, 43:126378. ISSN 1618-8667. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2019.126378.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tarolli P, Luo J, Park E, Barcaccia G, Masin R, (2024), Soil salinization in agriculture: Mitigation and adaptation strategies combining nature-based solutions and bioengineering. iScience, 27, (2):108830. ISSN 2589-0042. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024. 108830.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Teff-Seker Y, Segre H, Eizenberg E, Orenstein DE, Shwartz A, (2022), Factors influencing farmer and resident willingness to adopt an agri-environmental scheme in Israel. Journal of Environmental Management, 302:114066. ISSN 0301-4797. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114066.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinio PPL, Leder H, Strasser M, (2011), Image quality and the aesthetic judgment of photographs: Contrast, sharpness, and grain teased apart and put together. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, (2):165–176. ISSN 1931-3896. doi: 10.1037/a0019542.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Třebický V, Klápště P, Kubín M, Lupač M, (2020), Akční plán adaptace na změnu klimatu v podmínkách Libereckého kraje.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Valencia Cotera R, Guillaumot L, Sahu RK, Nam C, Lierhammer L, Máñez Costa M, (2023), An assessment of water management measures for climate change adaptation of agriculture in Seewinkel. Science of The Total Environment, 885:163906. ISSN 0048-9697. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163906.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Berkel DB, Verburg PH, (2014), Spatial quantification and valuation of cultural ecosystem services in an agricultural landscape. Ecological Indicators, 37:163–174. ISSN 1470-160X. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.06.025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Tilburg AJ, Hudson PF, (2022), Extreme weather events and farmer adaptation in Zeeland, the Netherlands: A European climate change case study from the Rhine delta. Science of The Total Environment, 844:157212. ISSN 0048-9697. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157212.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viti M, Löwe R, Sørup HJ, Ladenburg J, Gebhardt O, Iversen S, McKnight US, Arnbjerg-Nielsen K, (2023), Holistic valuation of Nature-Based Solutions accounting for human perceptions and nature benefits. Journal of Environmental Management, 334:117498. ISSN 0301-4797. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023. 117498.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vojtěch M, (2015), Územní plán Stará Paka (Zoning plan of Stará Paka).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vrabcová J, (2017), Protipovodňový plán města Semily (Flood protection plan of the town of Semily).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vávra J, Duží B, Lapka M, Cudlínová E, Rikoon JS, (2019), Socioeconomic context of soil erosion: A comparative local stakeholders’ case study from traditional agricultural region in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 84:127–137. ISSN 0264-8377. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.03.005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zandersen M, Oddershede JS, Pedersen AB, Nielsen HØ, Termansen M, (2021), Nature Based Solutions for Climate Adaptation - Paying Farmers for Flood Control. Ecological Economics, 179:106705. ISSN 0921-8009. doi: 10.1016/j. ecolecon.2020.106705.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zobeidi T, Yaghoubi J, Yazdanpanah M, (2022), Farmers incremental adaptation to water scarcity: An application of the model of private proactive adaptation to climate change (MPPACC). Agricultural Water Management, 264:107528. ISSN 0378-3774. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107528.
]Search in Google Scholar
