[
Barbu I, (2013), The factors appearance and development of rural tourism. The Annals of the University of Oradea. Economic Sciences, 22:750–758.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barral MP, Oscar MN, (2012), Land-use planning based on ecosystem service assessment: A case study in the Southeast Pampas of Argentina. Agriculture, Ecosystems Environment, 154:34–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beichler SA, (2015), Exploring the link between supply and demand of cultural ecosystem services – towards an integrated vulnerability assessment. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services Management, 11:250–263.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Belčáková I, (2021), A cultural and Environmentla Assessment of a Landscape Archetype with Dispersed Settlements in Cadca cadastral District, Slovakia. Sustainability, 13, (1200).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Billgren C, Holmén H, (2008), Approaching reality: Comparing stakeholder analysis and cultural theory in the context of natural resource management. Land Use Policy, 25:550–562.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bond A, (2004), Public participation in EIA of nuclear power plant decommissioning projects: a case study analysis. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 24:617–641.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boyd J, Banzhaf S, (2007), What are ecosystem services? The need for standarnized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economy, 63:616–626.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brennan-Horley C, Gibson B, (2009), Where is Creativity in the City? Integrating Qualitative and GIS Methods. Environmental and Planning A, 41:2595–2614.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown G, Montag JM, Lyon K, (2012), Public participation GIS: a method for identifying ecosystem services. Society natural resources, 25:633–651.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bryan BA, Crossman ND, (2008), Systematic regional planning for multiple objective natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 88:1175–1189.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Burkhard B, (2012), Mapping ecosystem services supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21:17–29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Catney C, Frost D, Vaughn L, (2018), Residents’ perspectives on defining neighbourhood: mental mapping as a tool for participatory neighbourhood research. Qualitative Research, 19: 735–752.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chan K, Satterfield T, Goldstein J, (2012), Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecological Economics, 74:8–18.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clemente P, (2019), Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal. Ecological Indicators, 96:59–68.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CLLD Strategy, (2022), Stratégia miestneho rozvoja vedeného komunitou CLLD Verejno - súkromného partnerstva Združenie obcí Bielokarpatsko - trenčianskeho mikroregiónu a Mikroregiónu Bošáčka. Available online: https://www.btmmb.sk/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/FINAL_BTMMB_Strategia-CLLD-verzia-2.1-v-zneni-dodatkuc.1-bez-SZ.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costanza R, (1997), The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387:253–260.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Daniel TC, Muhar A, Arnberger A, Aznar O, Boyd JW, Chan KMA, Costanza R, Elmqvist T, Flint CG, Gobster PH, Grêt- Regamey A, Lave R, Muhar S, Penker M, Ribe RG, Schauppenlehner T, Sikor T, Soloviy I, Spierenburg M, Taczanowska K, Tam J, von der Dunk A, (May 2012), Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, (23):8812–8819. ISSN 1091-6490. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114773109.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Denwood T, Huck JJ, Lindley S, (2022), Participatory Mapping: A Systematic Review and Open Science Framework for Future Research. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 112:2469–4452.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunlap RE, (2000), New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56: 425–442.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Faith DP, Walker PA, (2002), The role of trade-offs in biodiversity conservation planning: Linking local management, regional planning and global conservation efforts. Journal of Biosciences, 27:393–407.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freemapsk, (2024), Freemap.sk. Available at: https://qms.nextgis.com/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gao J, (2019), Suitability of regional development based on ecosystem service benefits and losses: A case study of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China. Ecological Indicators, 107, (105579).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GC D, (1992), Natureʹs services: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grêt-Regamey A, Walz A, Bebi P, (2008), Valuing Ecosystem Services for Sustainable Landscape Planning in Alpine Regions. Mountain Research and Development, 28, (2):156 – 165. doi: 10.1659/mrd.0951.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Groot RS, (2010), Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 7:260–272.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guckian ML, (2018), Cognitive Mapping as Participatory Engagement in Social Science Research on Sustainability. Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research, Springer International Publishing, Cham.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haase D, Schwarz N, Strohbach M, Kroll F, Seppelt R, (2012), Synergies, Trade-offs, and Losses of Ecosystem Services in Urban Regions: an Integrated Multiscale Framework Applied to the Leipzig-Halle Region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17, (3). ISSN 17083087.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haines-Young R, Potschin M, (2011), Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES. Available online: https://seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/1_116.pdf.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IPBES, (2017), Update on the classification of nature’s contributions to people by the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Available online: https://seea.un.org/content/update-classification-nature
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaiser FG, (2005), Contrasting the Theory of Planned Behavior With the Value-Belief-Norm Model in Explaining Conservation Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35:2150–2170.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandziora M, (2013), Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators—A theoretical matrix exercise. Ecological Indicators, 28:54–78.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kellstedt PM, (2008), Personal Efficacy, the Information Environment, and Attitudes Toward Global Warming and Climate Change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28:113–126.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kenderessy P, (2018), Status and outlook of hiking trails in the central part of the Low Tatra Mountains in Slovakia between 1980–1981 and 2013–2014. Journal of Mountain Science, 15: 1615–1632.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar P, (2010), TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity Ecological and Economic Foundations. Available online: teebweb.org/publications/teeb-for/research-andacademia/ (2023-11-29.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kurz T, (2005), Utilizing a Social-Ecological Framework to Promote Water and Energy Conservation: A Field Experiment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35:1281–1300.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lehnert M, (2021), Comparison between mental mapping and land surface temperature in two Czech cities: A new perspective on indication of locations prone to heat stress. Building and Environment, 203, (108090).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lidskog R, Soneryd L, (2000), Transport Infrastructure Investment and Environmental Impact Assessment in Sweden: Public Involvement or Exclusion? Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32:1465–1479.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maes J, (2012), Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosystem Services, 1:31–39.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mapycz, (2024), Mapy.cz. Available online: https://mapserver.mapy.cz/turist-m/.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MEA, (2005), Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mederly P, (2020), National ecosystem services assessment in slovakia – meeting old liabilities and introducing new methods. One Ecosystem, 5:1–31,. e53677.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mederly P, Černecký J, (2020), A Catalogue of Ecosystem Services in Slovakia. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Milligan J, (2009), Nature conservation for future sustainable shorelines: Lessons from seeking to involve the public. Land Use Policy, 26:203–213.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mostafa MM, (2007), Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behaviour: the effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31:220–229.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson NA, (2008), Validation of A brief sense of community scale: Confirmation of the principal theory of sense of community. Journal Community Psycholgy, 36:61–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Petrovič F, Petrikovičová L, (2021), Landscape transformation of small rural settlements with dispersed type of settlement in Slovakia. European Countryside, 13, 2:455–478.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pfeiffer C, (2008), Facilitating participatory multilevel decisionmaking by using interactive mental maps. Geospatial Health, 3:103–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Plieninger T, (2013), Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy, 33:118–129.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polizzi C, (2015), Is ecosystem restoration worth the effort? The rehabilitation of a Finnish river affects recreational ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 14:158–169.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pánek J, (2014), GeoParticipace: Jak používat prostorové nástroje v rozhodování o lokalitách, ve kterých žijeme?. Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pánek J, (2016), From Mental Maps to GeoParticipation. The Cartographic Journal, 53:300–307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruff LC, Olson MA, (2009), The attitudes of interior design students towards sustainability. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19:67–77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schröter M, (2014), Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: A conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecological Indicators, 36:539–551.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schultz PW, Zelezny LC, (1998), Values and Proenvironmental Behaviour: A Five-Country Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29:540–558.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schägner JP, (2013), Mapping ecosystem services’ values: Current practice and future prospects. Ecosystem Services, 4: 33–46.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seppelt R, (2012), Form follows function? Proposing a blueprint for ecosystem service assessments based on reviews and case studies. Ecological Indicators, 21:145–154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sevenant M, Antrop M, (2010), Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium. Land Use Policy, 27: 373–386.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Small N, Munday M, Durance I, (2017), The challenge of valuing ecosystem services that have no material benefits. Global Environmental Change, 44:57–67.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ståhle A, (2013), Sociotope mapping-exploring public open space and its multiple use values in urban and landscape planning practice. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 19:59–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tammi I, Mustajärvi K, Rasinmäki J, (2017), Integrating spatial valuation of ecosystem services into regional planning and development. Ecosystem Services, 26:329–344.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thompson M, (2020), Mental mapping and multinational migrations: A geographical imaginations approach. Geographical Research, 58:388–402.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
van Oudenhoven APE, (2012), Framework for systematic indicator selection to assess effects of land management on ecosystem services. Ecological Indicators, 21:110–122.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villamagna A, Angermeier P, Bennett E, (2013), Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: A conceptual framework for analysing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecological Complexity, 15:114–121.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Špulerová J, (2013), Developing a strategy for the protection of traditional agricultural landscapes based an a complex landscape-ecological evaluation (the case of a mountain landscape in Slovakia. Moravian Geographical Report, 21, 4: 15–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Špulerová J, (2018), Contribution of traditional farming to ecosystem services provision: Case studies from Slovakia. Land, 7, (2):74.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Švoňavová K, (2024), A detailed assessment of the land cover development in a territory with dispersed settlement area (case study Hrinova - Snohy, Slovakia. Nature Conservation – Bulgaria, 55:41–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
