Accesso libero

The Determination of Main Obstacles for the Developing of Highquality Documentation during EIA Process on Natura 2000 Sites

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Jalava K, Pasanen S, Saalasti M, Kuitunen M (2010) Quality of environmental impact assessment: Finish EISs and the opinions of EIA professionals. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisals 28: 1527.10.3152/146155110X488826Search in Google Scholar

Morgan RK, Hart A, Freeman C, Coutts B, Colwill D, Hughes A (2012) Practitioners, professional cultures, and perceptions of impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 32: 1124.10.1016/j.eiar.2011.02.002Search in Google Scholar

Morrison-Saunders A., Annandale D., Cappelluti J. (2001): Practitioner perspective on what influences EIA quality. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 19(4): 321-325.10.3152/147154601781766934Search in Google Scholar

Morrison-Saunders A., Bailey J. (2003): Practitioner perspectives on the role of science in environmental impact assessment. Environmental Management 31: 683-695.10.1007/s00267-003-2709-z14565690Search in Google Scholar

Ortolano L., Sheperd A. (1995): Environmental impact assessment: challenges and opportunities. Impact Assessment 13: 3-30.10.1080/07349165.1995.9726076Search in Google Scholar

Pavličková K, Kozová M, Chrenščová V, Petríková D, Pauditšová E, Moravčíková Z (2009a) Environmentálne plánovanie a manažment, Univerzita Komenského v Bratislave, Prírodovedecká fakulta, Učebnica, Bratislava.Search in Google Scholar

Pavličková K, Kozová M, Miklošovičová A, Žarnovičan H, Barančok P, Luciak M (2009b) Posudzovanie vplyvov na životné prostredie: Vysokoškolský učebný text [CD/ROM]. Univerzita Komenského, Bratislava.Search in Google Scholar

Pinho P, Maia R, Monterroso A (2007) The quality of Portuguese Environmental Impact Studies: The Case of Small Hydro Power Projects. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25: 189-205.10.1016/j.eiar.2006.10.005Search in Google Scholar

Pölönen I, Hokkanen P, Jalava K (2011) The effectiveness of the Finish EIA system -- What Works, what doesn´t, and what could be improved? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 31: 120-128.10.1016/j.eiar.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Samarakoon M, Rowan JS (2008) A critical review of environmental impact statements in Sri Lanka with particular reference to Ecological Impact Assessment. Journal of Environmental management 41: 441-460.Search in Google Scholar

Snell T, Cowell R (2006) Scoping in environmental impact assessment: balancing precaution and efficiency? Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26: 359-376.10.1016/j.eiar.2005.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Toro J, Requena I, Zamorano M (2010) Environmental impact assessment in Colombia: Critical analysis and proposals for improvement. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30: 247-260.10.1016/j.eiar.2009.09.001Search in Google Scholar

Wegner A, Moore SA, Bailey J (2005) Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environmental Impact Assessment 25: 143-162.10.1016/j.eiar.2004.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Wood C (2003) Environmental Impact Assessment -- A Comparative Review, second edition. Pearson Education Ltd. Edinburgh Gate.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1802-1115
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
2 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Geosciences, other