Amylolytic and Cellulolytic Activities, the Digestibility of Dry Matter of Broiler Chickens After Feed Intake of Humic Substances

1. Arif, M., Rehman, A., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Saeed, M., Khan, F., Akhtar, M., et al., 2018: Growth, carcass traits, cecal microbial counts, and blood chemistry of meat-type quail fed diets supplemented with humic acid and black cumin seeds. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 31, 12, 1930‒1938. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.18.0148.10.5713/ajas.18.0148621273229879835 Search in Google Scholar

2. Arpášová, H., Pistová, V., Hrnčár, C., Fík, M., Haščík, P., 2018: The impact of the humic acid and phytobiotics on performance and carcass parameters of broiler chickens. Acta Fytotechn. Zootechn., 21, 4, 173‒178. DOI: 10.15414/afz. 2018.21.04.173–1 78.10.15414/afz.2018.21.04.173-178 Search in Google Scholar

3. Algawany, M., Abd El-Hack, M. E., Farag, M. R., Sachan, S., Karthik, K., Dhama, K., 2018: The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 11, 10611‒10618. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-018–1 687-x.10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x Search in Google Scholar

4. Avci, M., Denek, N., Kaplan, O., 2007: Effects of humic acid at different levels on growth performance, carcass yields and some biochemical parameters of quails. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 6, 1, 1‒4. Available at https://medwelljournals.com/abstract/?doi=javaa.2007.1.4. Accessed August 16, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

5. Bahadori, Z., Esmaielzadeh, L., Karimi-Torshizi, M. A., Seidavi, A., Olivares, J., Rojas, S., et al., 2017: The effect of earthworm (Eisenia foetida) meal with vermi-humus on growth performance, haematology, immunity, intestinal microbiota, carcass characteristics, and meat quality of broiler chickens. Livest. Sci., 202, 74–81. DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci. 2017.05.010.10.1016/j.livsci.2017.05.010 Search in Google Scholar

6. Bailey, C. A., White, K. E., Domke, S. L., 1996: Evaluation of Menefee HumateTM on the performance of broilers. Poult. Sci., 75, Suppl. 1, 84. Search in Google Scholar

7. Carvalho, L. H. M., De Koe, T., Tavares, P. B., 1998: An improved molybdenum blue method for simultaneous determination of inorganic phosphate and arsenate. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Restoration, 1, 1, 13–19. Search in Google Scholar

8. Cunniff, P., 1995: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC. 16th edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, USA. Search in Google Scholar

9. Daněk, P., Paseka, A., Smola, J., Ondráček, J., Bečková, R., Rozkot, M., 2005: Influence of lecithin emulsifier on the utilisation of nutrients and growth of piglets after weaning. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50, 10, 459–465.10.17221/4245-CJAS Search in Google Scholar

10. Demeterová, M., Mariščáková, R., Pistl, J., Naď, P., Šamudovská, A., 2009: The effect of the probiotic strain Enterococcus faecium DSM 7134 in combination with natural humic substances on performance and health of broiler chickens. Berl. Munch. Ttierarztl. Wochenschr., 122, 9‒10, 370‒377. Search in Google Scholar

11. Dominguez-Negrete, A., Gómez-Rosales, S., de Lourdes Angeles, M., López-Hernández, L. H., Reis-de Souza, T. C., López-García, Y., et al., 2019: Effect of the addition of humic substances as growth promoter in broiler chickens under two feeding regimens. Animals, 9, 12, 1101. DOI: 10. 3390/ani9121101.10.3390/ani9121101 Search in Google Scholar

12. El-Ghany, W. A., Abdel-Latif, M. A., Hosny, F., Alatfeehy, N. M., Noreldin, A. E., Quesnell. R. R., et al., 2022: Comparative efficacy of postbiotic, probiotic, and antibiotic against necrotic enteritis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 101, 8, 101988. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988.10.1016/j.psj.2022.101988927237535809347 Search in Google Scholar

13. European Commission, 2009: Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009 of 27 January 2009 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of feed. OJEU, 54. 1‒130. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2009/152/oj. Accessed July 5, 2022.10.1016/S1351-4210(09)70289-6 Search in Google Scholar

14. Gómez-Rosales, S., de Angeles, M., 2015: Addition of a worm leachate as source of humic substances in the drinking water of broiler chickens. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 28, 2, 215‒222. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0321.10.5713/ajas.14.0321428316625557817 Search in Google Scholar

15. Gómez-Rosales, S., Angeles, M. L., López-Hernández, L. H., López-Garcia, Y. R., Domínguez-Negrete, A., 2022: Responses of broiler chickens fed low or high non-starch polysaccharide diets and the addition of humic substances from a worm compost. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 24, 4, 11, 1087. DOI: 10.1590/1806-9061-2021–1 510.10.1590/1806-9061-2021-1510 Search in Google Scholar

16. Gugliemo, C. G., Karasov, W. H., 1993: Endogenous mass and energy losses in ruffed grouse. The Auk, 110, 2, 386‒390. Search in Google Scholar

17. Hassan, S. M., 2014: Effect of adding dietary humate on productive performance of broiler chicks. Asian J. Poult. Sci., 8, 2, 23‒31. DOI: 10.3923/ajpsaj.204.23.31.10.3923/ajpsaj.2014.23.31 Search in Google Scholar

18. Hudák, M., Semjon, B., Marcinčáková, D., Bujňák, L., Naď, P., Koréneková, B., et al., 2021: Effect of broilers chicken diet supplementation with natural and acidified humic substances on quality of produced breast meat. Animals, 11, 1087. DOI: 10.3390/ani11041087.10.3390/ani11041087806914133920276 Search in Google Scholar

19. International Humic Substances Society (IHSS), 2007: What are humic substances ? Newsletter, IHSS, Number 38, 2. http://humic-substances.org/wp-content/uploads/NL_38_2007.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

20. Jaďuttová, I., Marcinčáková, D., Bartkovský, M., Semjon, B., Harčárová, M., Nagyová, A., et al., 2019: The effect of dietary humic substances on the fattening performance, carcass yield, blood biochemistry parameters and bone mineral profile of broiler chickens. Acta Vet. Brno, 88, 307–313. DOI: 10.2754/avb201988030307.10.2754/avb201988030307 Search in Google Scholar

21. Johnson, L. A., Deep, A., Classen, H., 2014: Digestibility and performance responses of broiler chickens fed a pea-based diet with different levels of dietary microbial phytase. USURJ, 1, 1, 39‒44. DOI: 10.32396/usurj.vlil.53.10.32396/usurj.v1i1.53 Search in Google Scholar

22. Kocabagli, N., Alp, M., Acar, N., Kahraman, R., 2002: The effects of dietary humate supplementation on broiler growth and carcass yield. Poult. Sci., 81, 227–230. DOI: 10.1093/ps/81.2.227.10.1093/ps/81.2.22711873831 Search in Google Scholar

23. Konieczka, P., Józefiak, D., Kinsner, M., Smulikowska, S., 2021: Effects of high-moisture corn preserved with organic acids combined with rapeseed meal and peas on performance and gut microbiota activity of broiler chickens. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 280, 115063. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci. 2021.115063.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2021.115063 Search in Google Scholar

24. Kralik, G. Kralik, Z., Grčević, M., Hanžek, D., 2018: Quality of chicken meat. In Yücel, B., Taşkin, T.: Animal Husbandry and Nutrition. 1st edn., Intechopen, 63‒94. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72865.10.5772/intechopen.72865 Search in Google Scholar

25. Kühnert, M., Bartels, K. P., Kröll, S., Lange, N., 1991: Veterinary pharmaceuticals containing humic acid for therapy and prophylaxis for gastro-intestinal diseases of dog and cat. Mon. Vet., 46, 1, 4‒8. Search in Google Scholar

26. Lever, M., 1977: Carbohydrate determination with 4-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PAHBAH): Effect of bismuth on the reaction. Anal. Biochem., 81, 1, 21–27. DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(77)90594-2.10.1016/0003-2697(77)90594-2900479 Search in Google Scholar

27. Levkut, M., Marcin, A., Lenhardt, Ľ., Porvaz, P., Revajová, V., Šoltysová, B., et al., 2010: Effect of sage extract on alkaline phosphatase, enterocyte proliferative activity and growth performance in chickens. Acta Vet. Brno, 79, 2, 177‒183. DOI: 10.2754/avb201079020177.10.2754/avb201079020177 Search in Google Scholar

28. Levkut, M., Marcin, A., Revajová, V., Lenhardt, Ľ., Danielovič, I., Hecl, J., et al., 2011: Influence of oregano extract on the intestine, some plasma parameters and growth performance in chickens. Acta Vet., 61, 2‒3, 215‒225. DOI: 10. 2298/AVB1103215L.10.2298/AVB1103215L Search in Google Scholar

29. Marcin, A., Levkut, M., Revajová, V., Šoltysová, B., Naď, P., 2016: Influence of Salvia officinalis essential oil on digestion parameters and intestinal microflora of broiler chickens. Folia Vet., 60, 1, 5‒14. DOI: 10.1515/fv-2016-0001.10.1515/fv-2016-0001 Search in Google Scholar

30. Marcin, A., Bujňák, L., Mihok, T., Naď, P., 2020: Effects of humic substances with urea on protozoal population and fermentation in the rumen of sheep. Bulg. J. Vet. Med., 23, 1, 60‒69. DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2199.10.15547/bjvm.2199 Search in Google Scholar

31. McCarthy, M. D., Bronk, D. A., 2008: Analytical methods for the study of nitrogen. In Capone, D. G., Bronk, D. A., Mulholland, M. R., Carpenter, E. J.: Nitrogen in the Marine Environment. 2nd edn., Academic Press, Elsevier, 1219‒ 1275. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0–1 2-372522-6.00028–1.10.1016/B978-0-12-372522-6.00028-1 Search in Google Scholar

32. Mudroňová, D., Karaffová, V., Pešulová, T., Koščová, J., Cingeľová Maruščáková, I., Bartkovský, M., et al., 2020: The effect of humic substances on gut microbiota and immune response of broilers. Food Agric. Immunol., 31, 1, 137‒149. DOI: 10.1080/09540105.2019.1707780.10.1080/09540105.2019.1707780 Search in Google Scholar

33. Piccolo, A., 2002: The supramolecular structure of humic substances. A novel understanding of humus chemistry and implications in soil science. Adv. Agron., 75, 57–134. DOI: 10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7.10.1016/S0065-2113(02)75003-7 Search in Google Scholar

34. Písařiková, B., Zralý, Z, Herzig, I., 2010: The effect of dietary sodium humate supplementation on nutrient digestibility in growing pigs. Acta. Vet. Brno, 79, 349‒353. DOI: 10.2754/avb201079030349.10.2754/avb201079030349 Search in Google Scholar

35. Slominski, P., 2011: Recent advances in research on enzymes for poultry diets. Poult. Sci., 90, 9, 2013‒2023. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2011-01372.10.3382/ps.2011-0137221844268 Search in Google Scholar

36. Schuhmacher, A., Gropp, J. M., 2000: Effect of humic acids on health state and performance of weaners. Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol., 9, 77. Search in Google Scholar

37. Taklimi Seyed Mozafar, S. M., Ghahri, H., Isakan, M. A., 2012: Influence of different levels of humic acid and esterified glucomannan on growth performance and intestinal morphology of broiler chickens. Agric. Sci., 3, 5, 663‒668. DOI: 10.4236/as.2012.3508.10.4236/as.2012.35080 Search in Google Scholar

38. Van Loon, J. C., 1980: Analytical Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy, Selected Methods. Academic Press, New York, 348 pp. Search in Google Scholar

39. Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., Lewis, B. A., 1991: Methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74, 10, 3583–3597. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-21660498 Search in Google Scholar

40. Váradyová, Z., Kišidayová, S., Jalč., D., 2009: Effect of humic acid on fermentation and ciliate protoyoan population in rumen fluid of sheep in vitro. J. Sci. Food Agric., 89, 1936‒1940. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.3675.10.1002/jsfa.3675 Search in Google Scholar

41. Yasar, S., Gokcimen, A., Aluntas, I., Yonden, Z., Petekkaya, E., 2002: Performance and ileal histomorphology of rats treated with humic acid preparations. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl.), 86, 7‒8, 257‒264. DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00383.x.10.1046/j.1439-0396.2002.00383.x15379912 Search in Google Scholar

42. Yüca, S., Gul, M., 2021: Effect of adding humate to the ration of dairy cows on yield performance. Ankara Univ. Vet. Fak. Derg., 68, 7–14. DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.626066.10.33988/auvfd.626066 Search in Google Scholar