[1. Comhaire, F. H., Schoonjans, F. A., 2011: Canine hip dysplasia: The significance of the Norberg angle for healthy breeding. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 52, 536—542.10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01105.x21967100]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Coopman, F., Verhooeven, G., Paepe, D., Van Bree, H., Du-chateau, L., Saunders, J. H., 2007: Inter-observer agreement on the radiograhic assessment of canine hip dysplasia. Vlams Diergeneeskundig Tijddschrift, 76, 418—422.10.21825/vdt.87595]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Culp, W. N., Kapatkin, A. S., Gregor, T. P., 2006: Evaluation of the Norberg angle threshold: a comparison of Norberg angle and distraction index as measures of coxofemoral degenerative point susceptibility in seven breeds of dogs. Veterinary Surgery, 35, 453—459.10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00174.x16842290]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fluckiger, M., 2007: Scoring radiographs for canine hip dysplasia: the three big organizations in the world. European Journal of Companion Animal Practice, 17, 135—140.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Gray, M. J., Kirberger, R. M., Spotswood, T. C., 2003: Cervical spondylomyelopathy (wobbler syndrome) in the Boerboel. Journal of South African Veterinary Association, 74, 104—110.10.4102/jsava.v74i4.52015038422]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Guilliard, M., 2014: The PennHIP method of predicting canine hip dysplasia. In practice, 36, 66—71.10.1136/inp.f7486]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Hedhammar, Å. A., Indrebø, A., 2011: Rules, regulations, strategies and activities within the Federation Cynologique Internationale (FCI) to promote canine genetic health. Vet. J., 189, 141—146.10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.01121757380]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Janssens, L., Ridder, M. D., Verhoeven, G., Gielen, I., Bree, H. V., 2014: Comparing Norberg angle, linear femoral overlap and surface femoral overlap in radiographic assessment of the canine hip joint. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 55, 135—138.10.1111/jsap.1217124372260]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Lee, C. B., Kim, Y. J., 2012: Imaging hip dysplasia in the skeletally mature. Orthopaedic Clinic North America, 43, 329—342.10.1016/j.ocl.2012.05.00722819161]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Meomartino, L., Fatone, G., Potenn, A., Brunetti, A., 2002: Morphometric assessment of the canine hip joint using the dorsal acetabular rim view and the centre-edge angle. Journal of Small Animal Practice, 43, 3—6.10.1111/j.1748-5827.2002.tb00001.x11833819]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Noordin, S., Umer, M., Hafeez, K., Nawaz, H., 2010: Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthopaedic Review, 2, 19.10.4081/or.2010.e19314397621808709]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Olsson, S. E., 1961: Roentgen examination of the hip joints of German Shepherd Dogs. Advances in Small Animal Practice, 3, 117—118.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Orthopedic Foundation for Animals (OFA), 2017: Hip dysplasia statistics. HTTP://www.offa.org/stats. Accessed on 29th April, 2017, 2 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Rocha, B. D, Tôrres, R. C. S., 2007: Ultrasonic and radiograhic study of laxity in hip joints of young dogs. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinaria e Zootecnia, 59, 90—96.10.1590/S0102-09352007000100016]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Simeonova, G., 2007: Hormonal and radiographic studies in German shepherd dogs with hip dysplasia. Trakia Journal of Sciences, 5, 59—64.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Smith, G. K, Biery, D. N., Gregor, T. P., 1990: New concepts of coxofemoral joint stability and the development of a clinical stress-radiographic method for quantitating hip joint laxity in the dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 196, 59—70.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Stanin, D., Pavlak, M., Vrbanac, Z., Potocnjak, D., 2011: Prevalence of hip dysplasia in dogs according to official radio-graphic screening in Croatia. Veterinarski Arhiv, 81, 235—248.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Stock, K. F., Distl, O., 2010: Simulation study on the effects of excluding offspring information for genetic evaluation versus using genomic markers for selection in dog breeding. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 127, 42—45.10.1111/j.1439-0388.2009.00809.x20074186]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Tomlinson, J. L., Cook, J. L., 2002: Effects of degree of acetabular rotation after triple pelvic osteotomy on the position of the femoral head in relationship to the acetabulum. Veterinary Surgery, 31, 398—403.10.1053/jvet.2002.3359812094355]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Trumpatori, B. J., Mathews, K. G., Simon, R. R., Robertson, I. D., 2003: Radiographic anatomy of the canine coxofemoral joint using the dorsal acetabular rim (DAR) view. Vet. Radiol. Ultrasound, 44, 526—532.10.1111/j.1740-8261.2003.tb00501.x14599163]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Verhooeven, G. E. C, Coopman, F., Duchateau, L., Bosmans, T., Van Ryssen, B., Van Bree, H., 2009: Interobserver agreement on the assessability of standard ventrodorsal hip-extended radiographs and its effect on agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia and on routine FCI scoring. Veterinary Radiology, 50, 259—263.10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01530.x19507387]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Voss, H., Iversen, J. K., Charampilidis, G., Lund, B., 2015: Acetabular coverage in the Hip Joint. In Proceedings International Society of Hip Arthroscopy, Cambridge, UK, 32 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Wylie, J. D, Kapron, A. L, Peters, C. L, Aoki, S. K, Maak, T. G., 2017: Relationship between the lateral Center-Edge Angle and 3-Dimensional Acetabular Coverage. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 5, 1—6.10.1177/2325967117700589540022428451616]Search in Google Scholar