[Aguilar, R., Quesada, M., Ashworth, L., Herrerias-Diego, Y., Lobo, J., 2008: Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Molecular Ecology, 17:5177–5188.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03971.x19120995]Search in Google Scholar
[Aravanopoulos, F. A., 2018: Do silviculture and forest management affect the genetic diversity and structure of long-impacted forest tree populations? Forests, 9:14.10.3390/f9060355]Search in Google Scholar
[Augustynczik, A. L. D., Asbeck, T., Basile, M., Bauhus, J., Storch, I., Mikusiński, G. et al., 2019: Diversification of forest management regimes secures tree micro-habitats and bird abundance under climate change. Science of the Total Environment, 650:2717–2730.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.36630296777]Search in Google Scholar
[Bacles, C. F. E., Jump, A. S., 2011: Taking a tree’s perspective on forest fragmentation genetics. Trends in Plant Science, 16:13–18.10.1016/j.tplants.2010.10.00221050799]Search in Google Scholar
[Baisheva, E., Shirokikh, P., Martynenko, V., 2019: Bryophyte diversity in the forests of the Southern Urals. In: Sabovljević, M. S., Sabovljević, A. D. (eds.): Bryophytes. IntechOpen, p. 2–26.10.5772/intechopen.88301]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertolasi, B., Leonarduzzi, C., Piotti, A., Leonardi, S., Zago, L., Gui, L. et al., 2015: A last stand in the Po valley: Genetic structure and gene flow patterns in Ulmus minor and U. pumila. Annals of Botany, 115:683–692.10.1093/aob/mcu256434329125725008]Search in Google Scholar
[Blanc-Jolivet, C., Degen, B., 2014: Using simulations to optimize genetic diversity in Prunus avium seed harvests. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 10:503–512.10.1007/s11295-014-0699-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradshaw, R. H. W., 2004: Past anthropogenic influence on European forests and some possible consequences. Forest Ecology and Management, 197:203–212.10.1016/j.foreco.2004.05.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Bushbom, J., Yanbaev, Y., Degen, B., 2011: Efficient long-distance gene flow into an isolated relict oak stand. Journal of Heredity, 102:464–472.10.1093/jhered/esr02321525180]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomic-Zegar, E., Nowakowska, J. A., Tereba, A., 2015: Forest decline has not reduced genetic diversity of naturally regenerated Norway spruce from the Beskids, Poland. Silvae Genetica, 64:270–278.10.1515/sg-2015-0025]Search in Google Scholar
[Collin, E., 2003: EUFORGEN. Technical guidelines for genetic conservation and use for European white elm (Ulmus laevis). Rome, Italy, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI).]Search in Google Scholar
[Contreras-Hermosilla, A., 2000: The underlying causes of forest decline. Bogor, Indonesia, CIFOR Occasional Paper No. 30, Centre for International Forestry Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortés, A. J., Restrepo-Montoya, M., Bedoya-Canas, L. E., 2020: Modern strategies to assess and breed forest tree adaptation to changing climate. Frontiers in Plant Science, 11:1606.10.3389/fpls.2020.583323760942733193532]Search in Google Scholar
[Čurn, V., Dědouchová, M., Kubátová, B., Malá, J., Máchová, P., Cvrčková, H., 2014: Assessment of genetic variability in autochthonous elm populations using ISSR markers. Journal of Forest Science, 60:511–518.10.17221/81/2013-JFS]Search in Google Scholar
[Degen, B., Yanbaev, Y., Blanc-Jolivet, C., Ianbaev, R., Bakhtina, S., Mader, M., 2021: Genetic comparison of planted and natural Quercus robur stands in Russia. Silvae Genetica, 70:1–8.10.2478/sg-2021-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Dyderski, M., Dyderska, S., Frelich, L., Jagodziński, A. M., 2018: How much does climate change threaten European forest tree species distributions? Global Change Biology, 24:1150–1163.10.1111/gcb.1392528991410]Search in Google Scholar
[Fageria, M. S., Rajora, O. P., 2014: Effects of silvicultural practices on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce in Saskatchewan. Tree Genetics & Genomes, 10:287–296.10.1007/s11295-013-0682-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Gauli, A., Gailing, O., Stefenon, V. M., Finkeldey, R., 2009: Genetic similarity of natural populations and plantations of Pinus roxburghii Sarg. in Nepal. Annals of Forest Science, 66:1–10.10.1051/forest/2009053]Search in Google Scholar
[Gorchakovsky, P. L., 1988. Vegetation and botanical-geographical division of the Bashkir ASSR. In: Keys to higher plants of the Bashkir ASSR. Moscow, Publishing House Science, p. 3–13.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jolivet, C., Holtken, A. M., Liesebach, H., Steiner, W., Degen, B., 2012: Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in four contrasting wild cherry populations (Prunus avium L.). European Journal of Forest Research, 131:1055–1069.10.1007/s10342-011-0576-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Kramer, A. T., Ison, J. L., Ashley, M. V., Howe, H. F., 2008: The paradox of forest fragmentation genetics. Conservation Biology, 22:878–885.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00944.x18544089]Search in Google Scholar
[Kremer, A., Hipp, A. L., 2020: Oaks: An evolutionary success story. New Phytologist, 226:987–1011.10.1111/nph.16274716613131630400]Search in Google Scholar
[Lowe, A. A., Boshier, D. H., Ward, M., Bacles, C. F. E., Navarro, C., 2005: Genetic resource impacts of habitat loss and degradation: Reconciling empirical evidence and predicted theory for neotropical trees. Heredity, 95:255–273.10.1038/sj.hdy.680072516094300]Search in Google Scholar
[Neyshtadt, M. I., 1957: History of forests and paleogeography of USSR in Holocene. Moscow, Izd-vo AN SSSR.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nielsen, L. R., Kjær, E. D., 2010: Fine-scale gene flow and genetic structure in a relic Ulmus laevis population at its northern range. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 6:643–649.10.1007/s11295-010-0280-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Oleksyn, J., Przybyl, K., 2007: Oak decline in the Soviet Union – scale and hypotheses. European Journal of Forest Pathology, 17:321–336.10.1111/j.1439-0329.1987.tb01325.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Popadyuk, R. V., Smirnova, O. V., Evstigneev, O. I., Yanitskaya, T. O., Chumatchenko, S. I., Zaugolnova, L. B. et al., 1995: Current state of broad-leaved forests in Russia, Belorussia, Ukraine: Historical development, biodiversity, structure and dynamic. Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino Research Centre.]Search in Google Scholar
[Popov, G. V., 1984: Forests of Bashkiria. Ufa, Bashkirskoe knijnoe izdatelstvo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Poudel, R. C., Möller, M., Liu, J., Gao, L. M., Baral, S. R., Li, D. Z., 2014: Low genetic diversity and high inbreeding of the endangered yews in Central Himalaya: implications for conservation of their highly fragmented populations. Diversity and Distributions, 20:1270–284.10.1111/ddi.12237]Search in Google Scholar
[Prunier, J., Verta, J. P., MacKay, J. J., 2016: Conifer genomics and adaptation: At the crossroads of genetic diversity and genome function. New Phytolo-gist, 209:44–62.10.1111/nph.1356526206592]Search in Google Scholar
[Ratnam, W., Rajora, O. P., Finkeldey, R., Aravanopoulos, F., Bouvet, J. M., Vaillancourt, R. E. et al., 2014: Genetic effects of forest management practices: Global synthesis and perspectives. Forest Ecology and Management, 333:52–65.10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogers, S. O., Bendich, A. J., 1985: Extraction of DNA from milligram amounts of fresh, herbarium, and mummified plant tissues. Plant Molecular Biology, 5:69–76.10.1007/BF0002008824306565]Search in Google Scholar
[Su, J., Yan, Y., Song, J., Li, J., Mao, J., Wang, N. et al., 2018: Recent fragmentation may not alter genetic patterns in endangered long-lived species: evidence from Taxus cuspidata. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9:1571.10.3389/fpls.2018.01571622003830429863]Search in Google Scholar
[Vakkari, P., Rusanen, M., Heikkinen, J., Huotari, T., Kärkkäinen, K., 2020: Patterns of genetic variation in leading-edge populations of Quercus robur: Genetic patchiness due to family clusters. Tree Genetics and Genomes, 16:1–12.10.1007/s11295-020-01465-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Venturas, M. D., Lopez Rodriguez, R. A., Perea García-Calvo, R., Fernandez, V., Guzman Delgado, P., Rodriguez-Calcerrada, J. et al., 2015: Ulmus laevis in the Iberian Peninsula: A review of its ecology and conservation. iForest, 8:1–8.10.3832/ifor1201-008]Search in Google Scholar
[Vijayan, K., 2005: Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in Mulberry genome analysis. International Journal of Industrial Entomology, 10:79–86.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vranckx, G. U. Y., Jacquemyn, H., Muys, B., Honnay, O., 2012: Meta-analysis of susceptibility of woody plants to loss of genetic diversity through habitat fragmentation. Conservation Biollogy, 26:228–237.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01778.x22044646]Search in Google Scholar
[Wehenkel, C., Corral-Rivas, J J., Castel-Lanos-Bocaz, H. A., Pinedo-Alvarez, A., 2009: Is there a positive relationship between naturalness and genetic diversity in forest tree communities? Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 18:20–27.10.5424/fs/2009181-01047]Search in Google Scholar
[Zietkiewicz, E., Rafalski, J., Labuda, D., 1994: Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics, 20:176–183.10.1006/geno.1994.11518020964]Search in Google Scholar