Factors associated with medical devicerelated pressure ulcers occurrence in hospital setting: a systematic review protocol

1. Edsberg LE, Black JM, Goldberg M, McNichol L, Moore L, Sieggreen M. Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016;43:585–597. Edsberg LE Black JM Goldberg M McNichol L Moore L Sieggreen M. Revised national pressure ulcer advisory panel pressure injury staging system . J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs . 2016 ; 43 : 585 – 597 . Search in Google Scholar

2. VanDenKerkhof EG, Friedberg E, Harrison MB. Prevalence and risk of pressure ulcers in acute care following implementation of practice guidelines: annual pressure ulcer prevalence census 1994-2008. J Healthc Qual. 2011;33:58–67. VanDenKerkhof EG Friedberg E Harrison MB. Prevalence and risk of pressure ulcers in acute care following implementation of practice guidelines: annual pressure ulcer prevalence census 1994-2008 . J Healthc Qual . 2011 ; 33 : 58 – 67 . Search in Google Scholar

3. Reddy M, Gill SS, Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:974–984. Reddy M Gill SS Rochon PA. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review . JAMA . 2006 ; 296 : 974 – 984 . Search in Google Scholar

4. Bambi S. Hospital-acquired injuries: Device-related pressure ulcers, falls, and restraints. In: Comisso I, Lucchini A, Bambi S, Giusti GD, Manici M, eds. Nursing in Critical Care Setting. Cham: Springer; 2018;335–373. Bambi S. Hospital-acquired injuries: Device-related pressure ulcers, falls, and restraints . In: Comisso I Lucchini A Bambi S Giusti GD Manici M , eds. Nursing in Critical Care Setting . Cham : Springer ; 2018 ; 335 – 373 . Search in Google Scholar

5. Moore Z. US Medicare data show incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers is 4.5%, and they are associated with longer hospital stay and higher risk of death. Evid Based Nurs. 2013;16:118–119. Moore Z. US Medicare data show incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers is 4.5%, and they are associated with longer hospital stay and higher risk of death . Evid Based Nurs . 2013 ; 16 : 118 – 119 . Search in Google Scholar

6. Schuurman JP, Schoonhoven L, Keller BP, van Ramshorst B. Do pressure ulcers influence length of hospital stay in surgical cardiothoracic patients? A prospective evaluation. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18:2456–2463. Schuurman JP Schoonhoven L Keller BP van Ramshorst B. Do pressure ulcers influence length of hospital stay in surgical cardiothoracic patients? A prospective evaluation . J Clin Nurs . 2009 ; 18 : 2456 – 2463 . Search in Google Scholar

7. Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1175–1183. Gorecki C Brown JM Nelson EA Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review . J Am Geriatr Soc . 2009 ; 57 : 1175 – 1183 . Search in Google Scholar

8. Are We Ready for This Change? Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; April 2011. http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/long-term-care/resources/pressure-ulcers/pressureulcertoolkit/utool1.html. Accessed January 10, 2023. Are We Ready for This Change? Preventing Pressure Ulcers in Hospitals: a Toolkit for Improving Quality of Care . Rockville, MD : Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ; April 2011 . http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/systems/long-term-care/resources/pressure-ulcers/pressureulcertoolkit/utool1.html . Accessed January 10, 2023 . Search in Google Scholar

9. Posnett J, Gottrup F, Lundgren H, Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe. J Wound Care. 2009;18:154–161. Posnett J Gottrup F Lundgren H Saal G. The resource impact of wounds on health-care providers in Europe . J Wound Care . 2009 ; 18 : 154 – 161 . Search in Google Scholar

10. Gou L, Zhang Z, Yongde A. Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18:e0287326. Gou L Zhang Z Yongde A. Risk factors for medical device-related pressure injury in ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis . PLoS One . 2023 ; 18 : e0287326 . Search in Google Scholar

11. Black JM, Cuddigan JE, Walko MA, Didier LA, Lander MJ, Kelpe MR. Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients. Int Wound J. 2010;7:358–365. Black JM Cuddigan JE Walko MA Didier LA Lander MJ Kelpe MR. Medical device related pressure ulcers in hospitalized patients . Int Wound J . 2010 ; 7 : 358 – 365 . Search in Google Scholar

12. Jaul E. Cohort study of atypical pressure ulcers development. Int Wound J. 2014;11:696–700. Jaul E. Cohort study of atypical pressure ulcers development . Int Wound J . 2014 ; 11 : 696 – 700 . Search in Google Scholar

13. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Mucosal Pressure Ulcers: An NPUAP Position Statement. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2008. https://cdn.ymaws.com/npuap.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/position_statements/muco-sal_pressure_ulcer_posit.pdf. Accessed February 9, 2023. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel . Mucosal Pressure Ulcers: An NPUAP Position Statement . Washington DC : National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel ; 2008 . https://cdn.ymaws.com/npuap.site-ym.com/resource/resmgr/position_statements/muco-sal_pressure_ulcer_posit.pdf . Accessed February 9, 2023 . Search in Google Scholar

14. Jackson D, Sarki AM, Betteridge R, Brooke J. Medical device-related pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019;92:109–120. Jackson D Sarki AM Betteridge R Brooke J. Medical device-related pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis . Int J Nurs Stud . 2019 ; 92 : 109 – 120 . Search in Google Scholar

15. Apold J, Rydrych D. Preventing device-related pressure ulcers: Using data to guide statewide change. J Nurs Care Qual. 2012;27:28–34. Apold J Rydrych D. Preventing device-related pressure ulcers: Using data to guide statewide change . J Nurs Care Qual . 2012 ; 27 : 28 – 34 . Search in Google Scholar

16. Kim JY, Lee YJ, Korean Association of Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses. Medical devicerelated pressure ulcer (MDRPU) in acute care hospitals and its perceived importance and prevention performance by clinical nurses. Int Wound J. 2019;16(suppl 1):51–61. Kim JY Lee YJ Korean Association of Wound Ostomy Continence Nurses . Medical devicerelated pressure ulcer (MDRPU) in acute care hospitals and its perceived importance and prevention performance by clinical nurses . Int Wound J . 2019 ; 16 ( suppl 1 ): 51 – 61 . Search in Google Scholar

17. National Pressure Ulcer Injuries Panel. Best Practices for Prevention of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries: posters. https://npiap.com/page/MDRPI-Posters. Accessed January 10, 2023. National Pressure Ulcer Injuries Panel . Best Practices for Prevention of Medical Device-Related Pressure Injuries: posters . https://npiap.com/page/MDRPI-Posters . Accessed January 10, 2023 . Search in Google Scholar

18. Barakat-Johnson M, Lai M, Wand T, Li M, White K, Coyer F. The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care: a systematic review. J Wound Care. 2019;28:512–521. Barakat-Johnson M Lai M Wand T Li M White K Coyer F. The incidence and prevalence of medical device-related pressure ulcers in intensive care: a systematic review . J Wound Care . 2019 ; 28 : 512 – 521 . Search in Google Scholar

19. Hu J. Incidence and prevalence of medical devicerelated pressure ulcers in children and adults. Evid Based Nurs. 2020;23:62. Hu J. Incidence and prevalence of medical devicerelated pressure ulcers in children and adults . Evid Based Nurs . 2020 ; 23 : 62 . Search in Google Scholar

20. Morgan RL, Whaley P, Thayer KA, Schünemann HJ. Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):1027–1031. Morgan RL Whaley P Thayer KA Schünemann HJ. Identifying the PECO: a framework for formulating good questions to explore the association of environmental and other exposures with health outcomes . Environ Int . 2018 ;121(Pt 1): 1027 – 1031 . Search in Google Scholar

21. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;349:g7647. Shamseer L Moher D Clarke M Preferred reporting items for systematic review and metaanalysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation . BMJ . 2015 ; 349 : g7647 . Search in Google Scholar

22. Warren MJ. Five ways to look at Cohen’s kappa. J Psychol Psychother. 2015;1:4. Warren MJ. Five ways to look at Cohen’s kappa . J Psychol Psychother . 2015 ; 1 : 4 . Search in Google Scholar

23. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. Page MJ McKenzie JE Bossuyt PM The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews . BMJ . 2021 ; 372 : n71 . Search in Google Scholar

24. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020;219–269. https://reviewersmanual. joannabriggs.org/. Accessed November 27, 2022. Moola S Munn Z Tufanaru C Systematic reviews of etiology and risk . In: Aromataris E Munn Z , eds. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual . Adelaide, Australia : The Joanna Briggs Institute ; 2020 ; 219 – 269 . https://reviewersmanual.joannabriggs.org/ . Accessed November 27, 2022 . Search in Google Scholar

25. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al, editors Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 2nd ed. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2019. Higgins JPT Thomas J Chandler J > editors Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions . 2 nd ed. Chichester, UK : John Wiley & Sons ; 2019 . Search in Google Scholar

26. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. Egger M Davey Smith G Schneider M Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test . BMJ . 1997 ; 315 : 629 – 634 . Search in Google Scholar

27. Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A (eds.). The GRADE Working Group. GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations. Updated October 2013. https://gdt.gradepro. org/app/handbook/handbook.html. Accessed November 27, 2022. Brożek J Guyatt G Oxman A (eds.). The GRADE Working Group . GRADE Handbook for Grading Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations . Updated October 2013. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html . Accessed November 27, 2022 . Search in Google Scholar