This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Dissanayake VH. Capacity building and innovation in eHealth in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J Med. 2018;27:47.DissanayakeVH.Capacity building and innovation in eHealth in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J Med. 2018;27:47.Search in Google Scholar
Mathews SC, McShea MJ, Hanley CL, Ravitz A, Labrique AB, Cohen AB. Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:38.MathewsSCMcSheaMJHanleyCLRavitzALabriqueABCohenAB.Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ Digit Med. 2019;2:38.Search in Google Scholar
Mohanasundaram RK, Krishnan K. Value dimensions of digital health that are changing healthcare in Sweden. J Palliative Med. 2019;24:1867–1871.MohanasundaramRKKrishnanK.Value dimensions of digital health that are changing healthcare in Sweden. J Palliative Med. 2019;24:1867–1871.Search in Google Scholar
Guo C, Ashrafian H, Ghafur S, Fontana G, Gardner C, Prime M. Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—a call for innovative evidence generation approaches. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:110.GuoCAshrafianHGhafurSFontanaGGardnerCPrimeM.Challenges for the evaluation of digital health solutions—a call for innovative evidence generation approaches. NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3:110.Search in Google Scholar
Siribaddana P, Hewapathirana R, Jayatilleke AU, Sahay S, Dissanayake VH. Strengthening health systems through informatics capacity development among doctors in low-resource contexts: the Sri Lankan experience. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2019;8:87–94.SiribaddanaPHewapathiranaRJayatillekeAUSahaySDissanayakeVH.Strengthening health systems through informatics capacity development among doctors in low-resource contexts: the Sri Lankan experience. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2019;8:87–94.Search in Google Scholar
Johansson P, Oléni M, Fridlund B. Patient satisfaction with nursing care in the context of health care: a literature study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16:337–344.JohanssonPOléniMFridlundB.Patient satisfaction with nursing care in the context of health care: a literature study. Scand J Caring Sci. 2002;16:337–344.Search in Google Scholar
Krick T, Huter K, Domhoff D, Schmidt A, Rothgang H, Wolf-Ostermann K. Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:400.KrickTHuterKDomhoffDSchmidtARothgangHWolf-OstermannK.Digital technology and nursing care: a scoping review on acceptance, effectiveness and efficiency studies of informal and formal care technologies. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:400.Search in Google Scholar
Marwaha JS, Landman AB, Brat GA, Dunn T, Gordon WJ. Deploying digital health tools within large, complex health systems: key considerations for adoption and implementation. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:13.MarwahaJSLandmanABBratGADunnTGordonWJ.Deploying digital health tools within large, complex health systems: key considerations for adoption and implementation. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5:13.Search in Google Scholar
Kleib M, Nagle L. Development of the Canadian nurse informatics competency assessment scale and evaluation of Alberta’s registered Nurses’ self-perceived informatics competencies. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018;36:350–358.KleibMNagleL.Development of the Canadian nurse informatics competency assessment scale and evaluation of Alberta’s registered Nurses’ self-perceived informatics competencies. Comput Inform Nurs. 2018;36:350–358.Search in Google Scholar
Pole D. Computerization of clinical records in out-patient departments of Sri Lankan hospitals. Sri Lanka J BioMed Inform. 2010;1:200–204.PoleD.Computerization of clinical records in out-patient departments of Sri Lankan hospitals. Sri Lanka J BioMed Inform. 2010;1:200–204.Search in Google Scholar
Taherdoost H. Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. IJARM. 2016;5:28–36.TaherdoostH.Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. IJARM. 2016;5:28–36.Search in Google Scholar
Ikart EM. Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: an evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian J Soc Sci Stud. 2019;4:1.IkartEM.Survey questionnaire survey pretesting method: an evaluation of survey questionnaire via expert reviews technique. Asian J Soc Sci Stud. 2019;4:1.Search in Google Scholar
Heale R, Twycross A. Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18:66–67.HealeRTwycrossA.Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evid Based Nurs. 2015;18:66–67.Search in Google Scholar
Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36:421–458.BagozziRPYiYPhillipsLW.Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q. 1991;36:421–458.Search in Google Scholar
Surucu L, Maslakçi A. Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Bus Manage Stud Int J. 2020;8:2694–2726.SurucuLMaslakçiA.Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Bus Manage Stud Int J. 2020;8:2694–2726.Search in Google Scholar
Chen ST, Soo KL, Ab Rahman A, Van Rostenberghe H, Harith S. Development and pilot testing of nutrition knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire in persons with disabilities (KAP-nOKU) among trainers in rehabilitation centres, Malaysia. Pak J Nutr. 2013;12:708.ChenSTSooKLAb RahmanAVan RostenbergheHHarithS.Development and pilot testing of nutrition knowledge, attitude and practice questionnaire in persons with disabilities (KAP-nOKU) among trainers in rehabilitation centres, Malaysia. Pak J Nutr. 2013;12:708.Search in Google Scholar
Considine J, Botti M, Thomas S. Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education. Collegian. 2005;12:19–24.ConsidineJBottiMThomasS.Design, format, validity and reliability of multiple choice questions for use in nursing research and education. Collegian. 2005;12:19–24.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong TS, Cohen MZ, Eriksen L, Cleeland C. Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:669–676.ArmstrongTSCohenMZEriksenLCleelandC.Content validity of self-report measurement instruments: an illustration from the development of the Brain Tumor Module of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32:669–676.Search in Google Scholar
George D, Mallery P. Reliability analysis. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. New York: Routledge; 2018:249–260.GeorgeDMalleryP.Reliability analysis. IBM SPSS Statistics 25 Step by Step. New York: Routledge; 2018:249–260.Search in Google Scholar
Xiang Z, Bao Y, Tang Z, Li H. Deep reinforcement learning-based sampling method for structural reliability assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2020;199:106901.XiangZBaoYTangZLiH.Deep reinforcement learning-based sampling method for structural reliability assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 2020;199:106901.Search in Google Scholar
Noble S, Scheinost D, Constable RT. A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2019;203:116157.NobleSScheinostDConstableRT.A decade of test-retest reliability of functional connectivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2019;203:116157.Search in Google Scholar
Wong FMF. First data in the process of validating a tool to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare providers in oral care of institutionalized elderly residents: content validity, reliability and pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4145.WongFMF.First data in the process of validating a tool to evaluate knowledge, attitude, and practice of healthcare providers in oral care of institutionalized elderly residents: content validity, reliability and pilot study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4145.Search in Google Scholar
Yamada J, Stevens B, Sidani S, Watt-Watson J, De Silva N. Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010;7:158–164.YamadaJStevensBSidaniSWatt-WatsonJDe SilvaN.Content validity of a process evaluation checklist to measure intervention implementation fidelity of the EPIC intervention. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2010;7:158–164.Search in Google Scholar
Reethesh SR, Ranjan P, Arora C, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitude, and practices about obesity among obese individuals. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;23:102–110.ReetheshSRRanjanPAroraCDevelopment and validation of a questionnaire assessing knowledge, attitude, and practices about obesity among obese individuals. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2019;23:102–110.Search in Google Scholar
Zamanzadeh V, Ghahramanian A, Rassouli M, Abbaszadeh A, Alavi-Majd H, Nikanfar AR. Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4:165–178.ZamanzadehVGhahramanianARassouliMAbbaszadehAAlavi-MajdHNikanfarAR.Design and implementation content validity study: development of an instrument for measuring patient-centered communication. J Caring Sci. 2015;4:165–178.Search in Google Scholar
Jain S, Dubey S, Jain S. Designing and validation of questionnaire. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2016;2: 1–3.JainSDubeySJainS.Designing and validation of questionnaire. Int Dent Med J Adv Res. 2016;2: 1–3.Search in Google Scholar
Yusoff MS. ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019;11:49–54.YusoffMS.ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Educ Med J. 2019;11:49–54.Search in Google Scholar
Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.PolitDFBeckCT.Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. London: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.Search in Google Scholar
Ng CM, Koo HC, Mukhtar F, Yap RW, Chong PN, Kaur S. Development, validity and reliability of a questionnaire to measure children’s psychosocial factors related to healthy meal preparation. J Public Health. 2020;28:155–161.NgCMKooHCMukhtarFYapRWChongPNKaurS.Development, validity and reliability of a questionnaire to measure children’s psychosocial factors related to healthy meal preparation. J Public Health. 2020;28:155–161.Search in Google Scholar
Ariyaratne MH, Gunasekara TD, Weerasekara MM, Kottahachchi J, Kudavidanage BP, Fernando SS. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of hand hygiene among final year medical and nursing students at the University of Sri Jayewardenepura. SLJID. 2015;3:15–25.AriyaratneMHGunasekaraTDWeerasekaraMMKottahachchiJKudavidanageBPFernandoSS.Knowledge, attitudes and practices of hand hygiene among final year medical and nursing students at the University of Sri Jayewardenepura. SLJID. 2015;3:15–25.Search in Google Scholar
Kaushal G, Doke P, Shah A, Verma V. An analysis of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding standard precautions of infection control and impact of knowledge and attitude of ICU nurses on self-reported practices of infection control. Int J Res Found Hosp Healthcare Adm. 2015;3:79–85.KaushalGDokePShahAVermaV.An analysis of knowledge, attitude and practices regarding standard precautions of infection control and impact of knowledge and attitude of ICU nurses on self-reported practices of infection control. Int J Res Found Hosp Healthcare Adm. 2015;3:79–85.Search in Google Scholar