[[1] Ashworth, R., Boyne, G., 2000. Promises and Performance, (edt. by T. Clark and K. Hoggart). People, Parties and Policies, Westview, Boulder.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Audit Commission, 2002. Stewardship and Governance: A Review of the work of the Audit Commission's Appointed Auditors in 2002.]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Auguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., Joo, H., 2013. Avoiding a “me” versus “we” dilemma: Using Performance Management to Turn Teams into a Source of Competitive Advantage. Business Horizons, 56, pp.503-512.10.1016/j.bushor.2013.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Auguinis, H., Gottfredson, R.K., Joo, H., 2012a. Using Performance Management to Win the Talent War. Business Horizons, 55, pp.609-616.10.1016/j.bushor.2012.05.007]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Auguinis, H., Joo, H., Gottfredson, R.K., 2012b. Performance Management Universals: Think Globally and Act Locally. Business Horizons, 55, 385-392.10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Boyne, G., 2001. The Impact of Best Value on Local Authority Performance: Evidence from the Welsh Pilots. Local Government, 27 (2), pp.44-68.10.1080/714004097]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] Boyne, G.A.,. Gould-Williams, J., Law, J. and Walker, J., 2002. Plans, Performance Information and Accountability: the Case of Best Value. Public Administration, 80 (4), pp.691-710.10.1111/1467-9299.00324]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Bovaird, T., 2008. Emergent Strategic Management and Planning Mechanisms in Complex Adaptative Systems: The Case of UK Best Value Initiative. Public Management Review, 10(3), pp.319-340.10.1080/14719030802002741]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] CRC for Construction Innovation (2002). Best Value Second Interim Report. CRC for Construction Innovation, Brisbane.]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] Cuganesan, S., Guthrie J., Vranic, V., 2014. The Riskiness of Public Sector Performance Measurement: A Review and Research Agenda. Financial Accountability & Management, 30 (3), pp.279-302.10.1111/faam.12037]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] DETR, 1999. Best Value: New Roles for Members, London: DETR.]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] Fryer, K., Antony J., Ogden S., 2009. Performance Management in the Public Sector. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 22 (6), pp.478-498.10.1108/09513550910982850]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Harris, L., 2005. UK Public Sector Reform and Performance Agenda in UK Local Government: HRM Challenges and Dilemmas. Personnel Review, 34 (6), pp.681-696.10.1108/00483480510623466]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Lin Shin-Jie and Po-Yu Lee, 2011. Performance Management in Public Organizations: A Complexity Perspective. International Public Management Review, 12 (2), pp.81-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Martin, S., Downe, J., Grace, C., Nutley S., 2013. All Change? Performance Assessment Regimes in UK Local Government. Public Money & Management, 33 (4), pp.277-280.10.1080/09540962.2013.799816]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Martin, S., 2002a. Best Value: New Public Management or New Direction (edt. by Kate McLaughlin, et al.). New Public Management: Current Trends and Future Prospects. London: Routledge, pp.129-141.]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Martin, S., 2002b. The Modernization of UK Local Government: Markets, Managers, Monitors and Mixed Fortunes. Public Management Review, 4 (3), pp.291-307.10.1080/14616670210151595]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Martin, S. 2000. Implementing Best Value: Local Public Services in Transition. Public Administration, 78 (1), pp.209-227.10.1111/1467-9299.00200]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Midwinter, A., 2008. Performance Management and Best Value Audit in Scotland: A Research Note on Theory and Practise. Financial Accountability & Management, 24 (4), pp.439-453.10.1111/j.1468-0408.2008.00461.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Mueller-Hanson, R., Pulakos E.D., 2015. Putting the Performance Back in Performance Management. Shrm-SIOP Science of HR White Paper Series, pp.1-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Navarro-Galera, A., Orti-Rodriguez, D., and López-Hernández, A.M., 2008. Identifying Barriers to the Application of Standardized Performance Indicators in Local Government. Public Management Review, 10 (2), pp.241-262.10.1080/14719030801928706]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Nielsen, P.A., 2013. Performance Management, Managerial Authority and Public Service Performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24, pp.431-458.10.1093/jopart/mut025]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R.A., O’Leary, R.S., Meyrowitz M.M., 2012. Building a High-Performance Culture: A Fresh Look At Performance Management. Alexandria, VA: Society for Human Resource Management.]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] Pulakos, E.D., Mueller-Hanson, R.A., Arad, S., Moye, N., 2015. Performance Management Can Be Fixed: An On-the-Job Experiential Learning Approach for Complex Behaviour Change. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8 (1), pp.51-76.10.1017/iop.2014.2]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Sanderson, I., 2001. Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in Modern Local Government. Public Administration, 79 (2), pp.297-313.10.1111/1467-9299.00257]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Schachter, H.L., 2010. Objective and Subjective Performance Measures: A Note on Terminology. Administration & Society, 42 (5), pp.550-567.10.1177/0095399710378080]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Stevens, P., Stokes, L., O'Mahony, M., 2006. Metrics, Targets and Performance. National Institute Economic Review, Vol. 197, July, pp.80-92.10.1177/0027950106070037]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Vakkuri, J., Meklin P., 2006. Ambiguity in Performance Measurement: A Theoretical Approach to Organizational Uses of Performance Measurement. Financial Accountability & Management, 22 (3), pp.235-250.10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00401.x]Search in Google Scholar
[[29] Wollman, H., 2004. Local Government Reforms in Great Britain, Sweden, Germany, and France: Between Multi-Function and Single- Purpose Organizations. Local Government Studies, 30 (4), pp.639-665.10.1080/0300393042000318030]Search in Google Scholar
