[Ahokas, E., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J. 2004. A quality assessment of repeated airborne laser scanner observations. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35, 237-242.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alharthy, A., Bethel, J., Mikhail, E. M. 2004. Analysis and accuracy assessment of airborne laserscanning system. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 35, 144-149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Antonarakis, A.S., Richards, K.S., Brasington, J. 2008. Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment, 112 (6), 2988-2998. DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.00410.1016/j.rse.2008.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Baltsavias, E.P. 1999. Airborne laser scanning: basic relations and formulas. ISPRS Journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing, 54 (2), 199-214. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2716(99)00015-510.1016/S0924-2716(99)00015-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Behan, A. 2000. On the matching accuracy of rasterised scanning laser altimeter data. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33 (B2), 75-80.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bowen, Z.H., Waltermire, R.G. 2002. Evaluation of light detection and ranging (LIDAR) for measuring river corridor topography. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 38 (1), 33-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chase, A.F. et al. 2011. Airborne LiDAR, archaeology, and the ancient Maya landscape at Caracol, Belize. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38 (2), 387-398. DOI: 10.1016/j.jas.2010.09.01810.1016/j.jas.2010.09.018]Search in Google Scholar
[Congalton, R.G. 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37 (1), 35-46. DOI: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-b10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B]Search in Google Scholar
[Congalton, R.G., Green, K. 2008. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data: principles and practices. CRC press.10.1201/9781420055139]Search in Google Scholar
[County, K. 2003. LiDAR digital ground model point density, KGIS Center, Seattle, WA. Available at http://www5.kingcounty.gov/sdc/raster/elevation/LiDAR_Digital_Ground_Model_Point_Density.html/]Search in Google Scholar
[Dewberry, 2014. LiDAR Quality Assurance for Oahu LiDAR Produced for National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Available at https://coast.noaa.gov/htdata/lidar1_z/geoid12a/data/3655/supplemental/hi2013_noaa_oahu_lidarreport_m3655.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Filin, S. 2003. Analysis and implementation of a laser strip adjustment model. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65–70.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fischler, M.A., Bolles R.C. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with application to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24 (6), 381-395.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groundpoint Technologies. 2010. Accuracy assessment and quality control report for the Milwaukee, WI Project Area. Available at http://www.county.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/User/bshaw/LiDARQAQC_MilwaukeeWI_final_01.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Glennie, C. 2007. Rigorous 3D error analysis of kinematic scanning LIDAR systems. Journal of Applied Geodesy, 1 (3), 147-157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gruen, A. 1985. Adaptive least squares correlation: a powerful image matching technique. South African Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Cartography, 14 (3), 175-187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guo, B., Huang, X., Zhang, F., Sohn, G., 2015. Classification of airborne laser scanning data using JointBoost. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 100, 71-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.00410.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.03.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Haala, N., Kada, M. 2010. An update on automatic 3D building reconstruction. ISPRS Journal of Photo-grammetry and Remote Sensing, 65 (6), 570-580. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.09.00610.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Habib, A., Bang, K.I., Kersting, A.P., Chow, J. 2010. Alternative methodologies for LiDAR system calibration. Remote Sensing, 2 (3), 874-907. DOI: 10.3390/rs203087410.3390/rs2030874]Search in Google Scholar
[Habib, A., Bang, K.I., Kersting, A.P., Lee, D.C. 2009. Error budget of LiDAR systems and quality control of the derived data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 75 (9), 1093-1108. DOI: 10.14358/PERS.75.9.109310.14358/PERS.75.9.1093]Search in Google Scholar
[Habib, A.F., Kersting, A.P., Ruifang, Z., Al-Durgham, M., Kim, C., Lee, D.C. 2008. LiDAR strip adjustment using conjugate linear features in overlapping strips. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 37, 385-390.]Search in Google Scholar
[Habib, A.F., Rens, J.V. 2007. Quality assurance and quality control of Lidar systems and derived data. In: Advanced Lidar Workshop, University of Northern Iowa.10.1201/9781420051438.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[Heidemann, H.K. 2014. Lidar base specification version 1.0: US Geological survey techniques and methods. Book, 11, 63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, H.B., Sohn, G. 2010. 3D classification of power-line scene from airborne laser scanning data using random forests. International Archives of Photo-grammetry and Remote Sensing, 38, 126-132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lari, Z., Habib, A. 2012. Alternative methodologies for the estimation of local point density index: Moving towards adaptive LiDAR data processing. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 39, 127-132.]Search in Google Scholar
[Latypov, D. 2002. Estimating relative lidar accuracy information from overlapping flight lines. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 56 (4), 236-245. DOI: 10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00047-310.1016/S0924-2716(02)00047-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, X. 2011. Accuracy assessment of LiDAR elevation data using survey marks. Survey Review, 43 (319), 80-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[Liu, Z.S., Liu, B.Y., Wu, S.H., Li, Z.G., Wang, Z.J. 2008. High spatial and temporal resolution mobile incoherent Doppler lidar for sea surface wind measurements. Optics letters, 33 (13), 1485-1487.]Search in Google Scholar
[Luethy, J., Ingensand, H. 2004. How to evaluate the quality of airborne laser scanning data. Proceedings of NATSCAN-Conference on Laser-Scanners for Forest- and Landscape Assessment, Freiburg, Germany, October 3-6, 2004. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 36 (8/W2), 313-317.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maas, H.G. 2003. Planimetric and height accuracy of airborne laserscanner data: User requirements and system performance. Proceedings of Photogram-metric Week, Vol. 49, 117-125.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maas, H.G. 2002. Methods for measuring height and planimetry discrepancies in airborne laserscanner data. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68 (9), 933–940.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maltamo, M., Næsset, E., Vauhkonen, J. 2014. Forestry applications of airborne laser scanning. Concepts and case studies. Managing for Ecosystems, 27, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matikainen, L., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H. 2009. Comparison between first pulse and last pulse laser scanner data in the automatic detection of buildings. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 75 (2), 133-146.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polish Ministry of the Interior and Administration. 2011. Ordinance of the Minister of Interior and Administration of 3 November 2011 on aerial and satellite imagery databases and orthophotomaps and numerical terrain models.]Search in Google Scholar
[Renslow, M.S. 2012. Manual of Airborne Topographic LiDAR. American Society for Photogrammetry Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rupnik, B., Mongus, D., Žalik, B. 2015. Point Density Evaluation of Airborne LiDAR Datasets. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(4), 587-603. DOI: 10.3217/jucs-021-04-0587]Search in Google Scholar
[Rusu, R.B. 2010. Semantic 3d object maps for everyday manipulation in human living environments. KIKünstlicheIntelligenz, 24(4), 345-348.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stereńczak, K., Ciesielski, M., Bałazy, R., Zawiła-Niedźwiecki, T. 2016. Comparison of various algorithms for DTM interpolation from LIDAR data in dense mountain forests. European Journal of Remote Sensing, 49, 599–621.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tran, G., Nguyen, D., Milenkovic, M., Pfeifer, N. 2015. Potential of Full Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning Data for Urban Area Classification-Transfer of Classification Approaches Between Missions. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40 (7), 1317-1323.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vierling, K.T., Vierling, L.A., Gould, W.A., Martinuzzi, S., Clawges, R.M. 2008. Lidar: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modeling. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 6(2), 90-98. DOI: 10.1890/07000110.1890/070001]Search in Google Scholar
[URS Corporation. 2012. Independent LiDAR Quality Control Report – Calvert Country Area of Interest. Available at http://webmaps.esrgc.org/LiDAR/portal/client/download/Metadata/Calvert/Final%20Calvert%20LiDAR%20QA%20Report.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Wechsler, N., Rockwell, T.K., Ben-Zion, Y. 2009. Application of high resolution DEM data to detect rock damage from geomorphic signals along the central San Jacinto Fault. Geomorphology, 113 (1), 82-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wężyk, P. 2014. Podręcznik dla uczestników szkoleń z wykorzystaniem produktów LiDAR. Głowny Urząd Geodezji i Kartografii, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, J., Yao, W., Chi, W., Zhao, X. 2011. Comprehensive quality evaluation of airborne lidar data. International Symposium on Lidar and Radar Mapping Technologies, 828604-828604. International Society for Optics and Photonics.10.1117/12.912588]Search in Google Scholar
[Xiong, X., Adan, A., Akinci, B., Huber, D. 2013. Automatic creation of semantically rich 3D building models from laser scanner data. Automation in Construction, 31, 325-337. DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.00610.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Yan, W.Y., Shaker, A., Habib, A., Kersting, A.P. 2012. Improving classification accuracy of airborne Li-DAR intensity data by geometric calibration and radiometric correction. ISPRS Journal of Photo-grammetry and Remote Sensing, 67, 35-44. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.10.00510.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, Y.J., Xiong, X.D., Hu, X.Y. 2013. Rigorous Li-DAR Strip Adjustment with Triangulated Aerial Imagery. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, II-5/W2, 361–366. DOI: 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W2-361-201310.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W2-361-2013]Search in Google Scholar