[Adamowicz, K. 2010. Price elasticity of demand for timber on primary local wood market in Poland. Sylwan, 154 (2), 130−138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adamowicz, K. 2018. Assessment of the average rate of changes in atmospheric CO emissions in OECD countries. Archives of Environmental Protection, 44 (1), 97–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adamowicz, K., Noga, T. 2014. Multivariate analysis of bankruptcy in companies in the wood sector. Sylwan, 158 (9), 643−650.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adamowicz, K., Szramka, H., Starosta−Grala, M., Szczypa, P. 2016. Export and import of timber in selected member states of the European Union. Sylwan, 160 (3), 179−186.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alam, A., Kellomeaki, S., Kilpeleainen, A., Strandman, H. 2012. Effects of stump extraction on the carbon sequestration in Norway spruce forest ecosystems under varying thinning regimes with implications for fossil fuel substitution. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 445–458.10.1111/gcbb.12010]Search in Google Scholar
[Alexander, L.V. et al. 2006. Global observed changes in daily climate extremes of temperature and precipitation. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 111 (D5), D05109.]Search in Google Scholar
[Church, J.A., White, N.J. 2006. A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (1), L01602.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baldocchi, D. 2008. Breathing of the terrestrial biosphere: lessons learned from a global network of carbon dioxide flux measurement systems. Australien Journal of Botany, 56, 1–26.10.1071/BT07151]Search in Google Scholar
[Baritz, R., Seufert, G., Montanarella, L., Van Ranst, E. 2010. Carbon concentrations and stocks in forest soils of Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 262–277.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.025]Search in Google Scholar
[Batjes, N.H. 1996. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 47, 151–163.10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Batjes, N.H. 2014. Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world. European Journal of Soil Science, 65, 10–21.10.1111/ejss.12114_2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bekele, A., Kellman, L., Beltrami, H. 2007. Soil profile CO2 concentrations in forested and clear cut sites in Nova Scotia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 242, 587–597.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.088]Search in Google Scholar
[Bird, D.N., Pena, N., Zanchi, G. 2011. Zero, one, or in between: evaluation of alternative national and entity-level accounting for bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 576–587. DOI:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01137.x10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01137.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Boyland, M. 2006. The economics of using forests to increase carbon storage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36, 2223–2234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x06-09410.1139/x06-094]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Bubier, J.L., Crill, P.M., Moore, T.R., Savage, K., Varner, R.K. 1998. Seasonal patterns and controls on net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a boreal peatland complex. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12, 703–714.10.1029/98GB02426]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cherubini, F., Peters, G.P., Berntsen, T., Strømman, A.H., Hertwich, E. 2011a. CO2 emissions from biomass combustion for bioenergy: atmospheric decay and contribution to global warming. GCB Bioenergy, 3, 413–426.10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01102.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H., Hertwich, E. 2011b. Effects of boreal forest management practices on the climate impact of CO2 emissions from bioenergy.Ecological Modelling, 223, 59–66.10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.06.021]Search in Google Scholar
[Chum, H. et al. 2012. IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Church, J.A., White, N.J. 2006. A 20th century acceleration in global sea-level rise. Geophysical Research Letters, 33 (1), L01602.10.1029/2005GL024826]Search in Google Scholar
[Clark, F.B., Watt, R.F. 1971. Silvicultural methods for regenerating oaks. In: Proceedings of the Oak Symposium USDA Forest Service. Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania.]Search in Google Scholar
[Cooper, C.F. 1983. Carbon storage in managed forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 155–166.10.1139/x83-022]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dedinec, A. et al. 2016. Towards post-2020 climate change regime: Analyses of various mitigation scenarios and contributions for Macedonia. Energy, 94, 124–137. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.08510.1016/j.energy.2015.10.085]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Degórski, M. 2005. Influence of forest management into the carbon storage in soil. Monitoring Środowiska Przyrodniczego, 6, 75–83.]Search in Google Scholar
[Díaz-Yáñez, O., Mola-Yudego, B., Anttila, P., Röser, D., Asikainen, A. 2013. Forest chips for energy in Europe: current procurement methods and potentials. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 21, 562–571.10.1016/j.rser.2012.12.016]Search in Google Scholar
[Ding, W., Yu, H., Cai, Z., Han, F., Xu, Z. 2010. Responses of soil respiration to N fertilization in a loamy soil under maize cultivation. Geoderma, 155 (3/4), 381–389.10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.12.023]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, R. K., Winjum, J. K., Schroeder, P. E. 1993. Conservation and sequestration of carbon: the potential of forest and agroforest management practices. Global Environmental Change, 3 (2), 159–173.10.1016/0959-3780(93)90004-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Dixon, R.K., Brown, S., Houghton, R.A., Solomon, A.M., Trexler, M.C., Wisniewski, J. 1994. Carbon pools and fluxes of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263, 185–190.10.1126/science.263.5144.185]Search in Google Scholar
[Drever, C.R., Peterson, G., Messier C., Bergeron, Y., Flannigan, M. 2006. Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36 (9), 2285−2299.10.1139/x06-132]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[EC. 2009. Directive 2009/28/ECc of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the Promotion of the Use of Energy from Renewable Sources and Amending and Subsequently Repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. 2009/28. European union, Brussels. 2009/28.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Hawthorne, P. 2008. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319, 1235–1238.10.1126/science.1152747]Search in Google Scholar
[Forest Europe. 2015. State of Europe’s Forests 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaj, K. 2012. Carbon dioxide sequestration by Polish forest ecosystems. Leśne Prace Badawcze, 73 (1), 17–21.10.2478/v10111-012-0002-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Gaumont-Guay, D., Black, T.A., Griffis, T.J., Barr, A.G., Jassal, R.S., Nesic, Z. 2006. Interpreting the dependence of soil respiration on soil temperature and water contentin a boreal aspen stand. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 140 (1/4), 220–235.10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Goodrich, J.P., Campbell, D.I., Schipper, L.A. 2017. Southern Hemisphere bog persists as a strong carbon sink during droughts. Biogeosciences Discuss, 14, 1–26.10.5194/bg-2017-97]Search in Google Scholar
[Goud, E.M., Moore, T.R., Roulet, N.T. 2017. Predicting peatland carbon fluxes from non-destructive plant traits. Functional Ecology, 31, 1824–1833.10.1111/1365-2435.12891]Search in Google Scholar
[Guest, G., Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H. 2012. The role of forest residues in the accounting for the global warming potential of bioenergy. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 459–466.10.1111/gcbb.12014]Search in Google Scholar
[GUS. 2017. Forestry 2017. Central Statistical Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haberl, H. et al. 2011. Global bioenergy potentials from agricultural land in 2050: sensitivity to climate change, diets and yields. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 4753–4769.10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.04.035]Search in Google Scholar
[Haberl, H. et al. 2012. Correcting a fundamental error in greenhouse gas accounting related to bioenergy. Energy Policy, 45, 18–23.10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.051]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Halpin, P.N. 1997. Global climate change and natural− area protection: Management responses and research directions. Ecological Applications, 7 (3), 828−843.10.1890/1051-0761(1997)007[0828:GCCANA]2.0.CO;2]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hanson, P.J., Edwards, N.T., Garten, C.T., Andrews, J.A. 2000. Separating root and soil microbial contributions to soil respiration: a review of methods and observations. Biogeochemistry, 48 (1), 115–146.10.1023/A:1006244819642]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Harmon, M.E., Ferrell, W.K., Franklin, J.F. 1990. Effects of carbon storage on conversion of old-growth forests to young forests. Science, 247, 699–702.10.1126/science.247.4943.699]Search in Google Scholar
[Holtsmark, B. 2012a. Harvesting in boreal forests and the biofuel carbon debt. Climatic Change, 112, 415–428.10.1007/s10584-011-0222-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Holtsmark, B. 2012b. The outcome is in the assumptions: analyzing the effects on atmospheric CO2 levels of increased use of bioenergy from forest biomass. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 467–473.10.1111/gcbb.12015]Search in Google Scholar
[Houghton, J.T, Jenkins, G.J., Ephraums, J.J. 1990. IPCC Climate Change. Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Houghton, J.T., Callander, B.A., Varney, S.K. 1992. The 1992 Supplementary Report to the IPCC Assessment. University Press, Cambridge, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hudiburg, T.W., Law, B.E., Wirth, C., Luyssaert, S. 2011. Regional carbon dioxide implications of forest bioenergy production. Nature Climate Change, 1, 419–423.10.1038/nclimate1264]Search in Google Scholar
[IEA. 2008. Energy Technology Perspectives 2008. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.]Search in Google Scholar
[IPCC. 2005. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Prepared by Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[IPCC. 2014. Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, D.W. 1992. Effects of forest management on soil carbon storage. Water, Air, and Soil Pollutution, 64, 83–120.10.1007/BF00477097]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnson, E. 2009. Goodbye to carbon neutral: getting biomass footprints right. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29, 165–168.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.11.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaipainen, T., Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Karjalainen, T. 2004. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science and Policy, 7, 205–219.10.1016/j.envsci.2004.03.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kim, Y.J., He, W., Ko, D., Chung, H., Yoo, G. 2017. Increased N2O emission by inhibited plant growth in the CO2 leaked soil environment: Simulation of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) site. Science of The Total Environment, 607–608, 1278–1285.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.030]Search in Google Scholar
[Kinsman, J., Kaster, G., Kuhn, E., McIntyre, R. 1997. Utility forest carbon management program/ Utilities Carbon Company. Energy Conversion and Management, 38, 563–568.10.1016/S0196-8904(96)00328-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Koncz, P. et al. 2015. Higher soil respiration under mowing than under grazing explained by biomass differences. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 103 (2), 201–215.10.1007/s10705-015-9732-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Krausmann, F., Erb, K. H., Gingrich, S., Lauk, C., Haberl, H. 2008. Global patterns of socioeconomic biomass flows in the year 2000: a comprehensive assessment of supply, consumption and constraints. Ecological Economics, 65, 471–487.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kuemmerle, T. et al. 2011. Post-Soviet farmland abandonment, forest recovery, and carbon sequestration in western Ukraine. Global Change Biology, 17, 1335–1349.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02333.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lambin, E.F., Meyfroidt, P. 2011. Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 3465–3472.10.1073/pnas.1100480108]Search in Google Scholar
[Lamers, P., Junginger, M. 2013. The ‘debt’ is in the detail: a synthesis of recent temporal forest carbon analyses on woody biomass for energy. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7, 373–385.10.1002/bbb.1407]Search in Google Scholar
[Latta, G.S., Baker, J.S., Ohrel, S. 2018. A Land Use and Resource Allocation (LURA) modeling system for projecting localized forest CO2 effects of alternative macroeconomic futures. Forest Policy and Economics, 87, 35–48.10.1016/j.forpol.2017.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Le Quere, C. et al. 2009. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience, 2, 831–836.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindahl, K.B. et al. 2017. The Swedish forestry model: More of everything? Forest Policy and Economics, 77, 186–199.10.1016/j.forpol.2015.10.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Liski, J., Pussinen, A., Pingoud, K., Makipaa, R., Karjalainen, T. 2001. Which rotation length is favorable to carbon sequestrations? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31, 2004–2013.10.1139/x01-140]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Mäkipää, R., Linkosalo, T., Komarov, A., Mäkelä, A., 2014. Mitigation of climate change with biomass harvesting in Norway spruce stands: are harvesting practices carbon neutral? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45, 217–225.10.1139/cjfr-2014-0120]Search in Google Scholar
[Mantau, U. et al. 2010. Real potential for changes in growth and use of EU forests. Methodology report. University of Hamburg, UNECE/FAO, EFI, Probos and Metla, Hamburg, June 2010]Search in Google Scholar
[Markewitz, D. 2006. Fossil fuel carbon emissions from silviculture: Impacts on net carbon sequestration in forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 236 (2/3), 153–161.10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.343]Search in Google Scholar
[Markovska, N. et al. 2016. Addressing the main challenges of energy security in the twenty-first century – Contributions of the conferences on Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems. Energy, 115 (3), 1504–1512. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.10.08610.1016/j.energy.2016.10.086]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Marland, G., Schlamadinger, B. 1997. Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis. Biomass and Bioenergy, 13, 389–397.10.1016/S0961-9534(97)00027-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Matovic, D. 2011. Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: Global and Canadian perspective. Energy, 36, 2011–2016.10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[McKechnie, J., Colombo, S., Chen, J., Mabee, W., MacLean, H.L. 2011. Forest bioenergy or forest carbon? Assessing trade-offs in greenhouse gas mitigation with wood-based fuels. Environmental science and Technology, 45 (2), 789–795.10.1021/es1024004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Meinshausen, M. et al. 2009. Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 °C. Nature, 458, 1158–1163.10.1038/nature08017]Search in Google Scholar
[Melillo, J.M. et al.2009. Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science, 326, 1397–1399.10.1126/science.1180251]Search in Google Scholar
[Melin, Y., Petersson, H., Egnell, G. 2010. Assessing carbon balance trade-offs between bioenergy and carbon sequestration of stumps at varying time scales and harvest intensities. Forest Ecology and Management, 260, 536–542.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.05.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Mika, A.M., Keeton, W.S. 2015. Net carbon fluxes at stand and landscape scales from wood bioenergy harvests in the US Northeast. GCB Bioenergy, 7, 438–454.10.1111/gcbb.12143]Search in Google Scholar
[Millar, C.I., Stephenson, N.L., Stephens, S.L. 2007. Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications, 17 (8), 2145−2151.10.1890/06-1715.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Minasny, B. et al. 2017. Soil carbon 4 per mille. Geoderma, 292, 59–86.10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Niinimäki, S., Tahvonen, O., Mäkelä, A., Linkosalo, T. 2013. On the economics of Norway spruce stands and carbon storage. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 43, 637–648.10.1139/cjfr-2012-0516]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Noss, R.F. 2001. Beyond Kyoto: Forest management in a time of rapid climate change. Conservation Biology, 15 (3), 578−590.10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.015003578.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Orellano, H.A.T., Isla, F.I. 2004. Developing sinks for CO2 through forestation of temperate coastal barriers: an environmental business. Regional Environmental Change, 4, 70–76.10.1007/s10113-003-0065-4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pearson, P.N., Palmer, M.R. 2000. Atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations over the past 60 million years. Nature, 406, 695–699.10.1038/35021000]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, R.L. 1990. Effects of global warming on forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 35 (1/2), 13−33.10.1016/0378-1127(90)90229-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pihlainen, S., Tahvonen, O., Niinimäki, S. 2014. The economics of timber and bioenergy production and carbon storage in Scots pine stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44 (9), 1091–1102.10.1139/cjfr-2013-0475]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Pires, J.C.M. 2017. COP21: The algae opportunity? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 79 (C), 867–877. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.19710.1016/j.rser.2017.05.197]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Post, W.M., Emanuel, W.R., Zinke, P.J., Stangenberger, A.G. 1982. Soil carbon pool and world life zones. Nature, 298, 156–159.10.1038/298156a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Raupach, M.R. et al. 2009. Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Nature Geoscience, 2, 831–836.10.1038/ngeo689]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayner, N.A. et al. 2003. Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 108 (D14), 4407–4443.10.1029/2002JD002670]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on a mechanism for monitoring and reporting greenhouse gas emissions and for reporting other information at national and Union level relevant to climate change and repealing Decision No 280/2004/EC.]Search in Google Scholar
[Regulation of the Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development of May 23, 2019 amending the ordinance on detailed conditions and mode of granting financial aid under the sub-measure Support for afforestation and creation of forested areas covered by the Rural Development Program for 2014–2020 (Journal of Laws item 995). http://dziennikustaw.gov.pl/du/2019/995/1]Search in Google Scholar
[Repo, A., Ahtikoski, A., Liski, J. 2015. Cost of turning forest residue bioenergy to carbon neutral. Forest Policy and Economics, 57, 12–21.10.1016/j.forpol.2015.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Repo, A., Känkänen, R., Tuovinen, J.P., Antikainen, R., Tuomi, M., Vanhala, P., Liski, J. 2012. Forest bioenergy climate impact can be improved by allocating forest residue removal. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 202–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01124.x10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01124.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Repo, A., Tuomi, M., Liski, J. 2011. Indirect carbon dioxide emissions from producing bioenergy from forest harvest residues. GCB Bioenergy, 3, 107–115.10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01065.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Repo, A., Tuovinen, J.P., Liski, J. 2015. Can we produce carbon and climate neutral forest bioenergy? GCB Bioenergy, 7 (2), 253–262.10.1111/gcbb.12134]Search in Google Scholar
[Richardson, J.L., Edmonds, W.J. 1987. Linear regression estimations of Jenny’s relative effectiveness of state factor equations. Soil Science, 144, 203–208.10.1097/00010694-198709000-00006]Search in Google Scholar
[Richter, D.D, Houghton, R.A. 2011. Gross CO2 fluxes from land-use change: implications for reducing global emissions and increasing sinks. Carbon Management, 2, 41–47.10.4155/cmt.10.43]Search in Google Scholar
[Richter, D.D., Markewitz, D., Trumbore, S.E., Wells, C.G. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature, 400, 56–58.10.1038/21867]Search in Google Scholar
[Rignot, E., Kanagaratnam, P. 2006. Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland ice sheet. Science, 311, 986–990.10.1126/science.1121381]Search in Google Scholar
[Rivers, J.S., Siegel, D.I., Chasar, L.S., Chanton, J.P., Glaser, P.H., Roulet, N.T., McKenzie, J.M. 1998. A stochastic appraisal of the annual carbon budget of a large circumboreal peatland, Rapid River Watershed, northern Minnesota. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 12, 715–727.10.1029/98GB02636]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rockstrom, J. et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475.10.1038/461472a]Search in Google Scholar
[Rogelj, J. et al. 2016. Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C. Nature, 534, 631.10.1038/nature18307]Search in Google Scholar
[Routa, J., Kellomaki, S., Peltola, H. 2012. Impacts of intensive management and land-scape structure on timber and energy wood production and net CO2 emissions from energy wood use of Norway spruce. BioEnergy Research, 5, 106–123.10.1007/s12155-011-9115-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Sala K. 2017. Industrial Use of biomass in Poland. Conditions and barriers. Studies of the Industrial Geography Commission of the Polish Geographical Society, 31 (4), 148–156.10.24917/20801653.314.10]Search in Google Scholar
[Sathre, R., Gustavsson, L. 2012. Time-dependent radiative forcing effects of forest fertilization and biomass substitution. Biogeochemistry, 109, 203–218.10.1007/s10533-011-9620-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.F., Banja, M. 2013. Possible impact of 2020 bioenergy targets on European Union land use. A scenario-based assessment from national renewable energy action plans proposals. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews,18, 595–606.10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.040]Search in Google Scholar
[Schelhaas, M.J. et al. 2004. CO2FIX V 3.1 - a modelling framework for quantifying carbon sequestration in forest ecosystems. Alterra Report, 1068, 1–122.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schimel, D.S. et al. 1994. Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 8 (3), 279–293.10.1029/94GB00993]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Schimel, D.S. 1995. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology, 1, 77–91.10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00008.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlamadinger, B., Spitzer, J., Kohlmaier, G.H., Lüdeke, M. 1995. Carbon balance of bioenergy from logging residues. Biomass Bioenergy, 8, 221–234.10.1016/0961-9534(95)00020-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Schlesinger, W.H. 1982. Carbon storage in the caliche of the arid world: a case study from Arizona. Soil Science, 133, 247–255.10.1097/00010694-198204000-00008]Search in Google Scholar
[Schulze, E.D., Körner, C., Law, B.E., Haberl, H., Luyssaert, S. 2012. Large-scale bioenergy from additional harvest of forest biomass is neither sustainable nor greenhouse gas neutral. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 611–616.10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01169.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, S.E. 2008. Uncertainty in climate sensitivity: causes, consequences, challenges. Energy and Environmental Science,1, 430–453.10.1039/b810350j]Search in Google Scholar
[Searchinger, T. et al. 2008. Use of US croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319, 1238–1240.10.1126/science.1151861]Search in Google Scholar
[Searchinger, T.D. et al. 2009. Fixing a critical climate accounting error. Science, 326, 527–528.10.1126/science.1178797]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, P. et al. 2010. Competition for land. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 2941–2957.10.1098/rstb.2010.0127]Search in Google Scholar
[Solomon, S., Plattner, G.K., Knutti, R., Friedlingstein, P. 2009. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106 (6), 1704–1709.10.1073/pnas.0812721106]Search in Google Scholar
[Spittlehouse, D.L., Stewart, R.B. 2003. Adaptation to climate change in forest management. BC Journal of Ecosystems and Management, 4 (1), 1−11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stupak, I. et al. 2007. Sustainable utilisation of forest biomassfor energy-possibilities and problems: policy, legislation, certification, and recommendations and guidelines in the Nordic, Baltic, and other European countries. Biomass and Bioenergy, 31, 666–684.10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Szulczewski, M.L., MacMinn, C.W., Herzog, H.J., Juanes, R. 2012. Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (14), 5185–5189.10.1073/pnas.1115347109]Search in Google Scholar
[Taseska-Gjorgievska, V., Markovska, N., Callaway, J. 2012. Evaluation of climate change impacts on energy demand. Energy, 48 (1), 88–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.06.05310.1016/j.energy.2012.06.053]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Theng, B.K.G., Tate, K.R., Sollins, P. 1989. Constituents of organic matter in temperate and tropical soils. In: Dynamics of soil organic matter in tropical ecosystems (eds.: D.C. Coleman, J.M. Oades, G. Uehara). University of Hawaii, Hawaii, 5–32.]Search in Google Scholar
[Timmons, D.S., Buchholz, T., Veeneman, C.H. 2016. Forest biomass energy: assessing atmospheric carbon impacts by discounting future carbon flows. GCB Bioenergy, 8 (3), 631–643.10.1111/gcbb.12276]Search in Google Scholar
[Trabalka, J.R., Reichle, D.E. 1986. The Changing Carbon Cycle; a Global Analysis. Springer - Verlag, New York.10.1007/978-1-4757-1915-4]Search in Google Scholar
[UNFCC Secretariat. 2008. Challenges and opportunities for mitigation in the agricultural sector, Technical Paper. UNFCC FCCC/TP/2008/8, Geneva.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, B., Steffen, W. 1997. An overview of the implications of global change for natural and managed terrestrial ecosystems. Conservation Ecology, 1 (2), 2–17.10.5751/ES-00028-010202]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, T. et al. 2010. Biomass Sustainability and Carbon Policy Study. June 2010 NCI-2010-03. Manomet Center for Conservation Sciences, Massachusetts.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, T., Cardellichio, P., Gunn, J.S., Saah, D.S., Hagan, J.M. 2013. Carbon accounting for woody biomass from Massachusetts (USA) managed forests: a framework for determining the temporal impacts of wood biomass energy on atmospheric greenhouse gas levels. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 32, 130–158.10.1080/10549811.2011.652019]Search in Google Scholar
[Wear, D., Coulston, J.W. 2015. From sink to source: regional variation in U.S. forest carbon futures. Scientific Reports, 5, 16518.10.1038/srep16518]Search in Google Scholar
[Wennersten, R., Sun, Q., Li, H. 2015. The future potential for Carbon Capture and Storage in climate change mitigation–an overview from perspectives of technology, economy and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 103, 724–736.10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.023]Search in Google Scholar
[White, R.E., Davidson, B., Lam, S.K., Chen, D. 2018. A critique of the paper “Soil carbon 4 per mille” by Minasny et al. (2017). Geoderma, 309, 115–117. DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.02510.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.025]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Winjum, J.K., Meganck, R.A, Dixon, R.K. 1993. Expanding global forest management - an easy 1st proposal. Journal of Forestry, 91, 38–42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wójcik, J. 2013. Możliwości zwiększania sekwestracji węgla w ekosystemach leśnych w warunkach zmian klimatycznych. Gromadzenie węgla w glebie, ochrona materii organicznej. Materials from the panel of experts of the National Forest Program ‘Climate’ 18th June 2013, Sękocin Stary.]Search in Google Scholar
[Woolf, D., Amonette, J.E., Street-Perrott, F.A., Lehmann, J., Joseph, S. 2010. Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change. Nature Communications, 1, 56.10.1038/ncomms1053]Search in Google Scholar
[Yanai, R.D., Currie, W.S., Goodale, C.L. 2003. Soil carbon dynamics after forest harvest: an ecosystem paradigm reconsidered. Ecosystems, 56, 197–212.10.1007/s10021-002-0206-5]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Young, D.M., Baird, A.J., Morris, P.J., Holden, J. 2017. Simulating the long-term impacts of drainage and restoration on the ecohydrology of peatlands. Water Resources Research, 53, 6510–6522.10.1002/2016WR019898]Search in Google Scholar
[Zachos, J.C., Dickens, G.R., Zeebe, R.E. 2008. An early Cenozoic perspective on greenhouse warming and carbon-cycle dynamics. Nature, 451 (7176), 279–283.10.1038/nature06588]Search in Google Scholar
[Zanchi, G., Pena, N., Bird, N. 2011. Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 761–772.10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01149.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Zarządzenie nr 2 Dyrektora Generalnego Lasów Państwowych z dnia 17 stycznia 2017 r. w sprawie realizacji w formie wspólnego przedsięwzięcia jednostek organizacyjnych Lasów Państwowych projektu rozwojowego o charakterze pilotażowym pod nazwą „Leśne Gospodarstwa Węglowe”. http://www.lasy.gov.pl/pl/pro/publikacje/biuletyn-informacyjny-lasow-panstwowych/2017/bilp-2-2017]Search in Google Scholar
[Zetterberg, L., Uppenberg, S., Åhman, M. 2004. Climate impact from peat utilization in Sweden. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 9, 37–76.10.1023/B:MITI.0000009894.59772.af]Search in Google Scholar
[Zummo, L.M., Friedland, A.J. 2011. Soil carbon release along a gradient of physical disturbance in a harvested northern hardwood forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 261, 1016–1026.10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.022]Search in Google Scholar